VillageMD’s co-founder/CEO resigns as Walgreens continues the brush-off after billions in losses

Walgreens’ disposition of VillageMD clarifies with CEO/co-founder/board chair Tim Barry’s sudden and unceremonious departure. The news dropped on Wednesday 27 November, directly into the media black hole of the Thanksgiving holiday.

A tell-tale sign is that Walgreens’ board has appointed only an interim, VillageMD’s chief operating officer Jim Murray. It is not clear from company statements made to media if Mr. Murray will replace Mr. Barry on the board.

Mr. Murray was appointed only last April, having nearly all his experience on the insurance side. He retired from Centene in late March, having come aboard after being COO at Magellan Health when Centene acquired it (now mostly sold off) and with 28 years previously at Humana. [TTA 10 Apr and release] This may suit Mr. Murray, given his age at about 70 (from Centene regulatory filings). 

In a statement to the Chicago Tribune, a Walgreens spokesperson said that “We look forward to continuing to partner with Jim Murray as he assumes day-to-day leadership responsibilities.” (Editor Donna–as if a COO does not already have day-to-day leadership responsibilities?) Murray has been “integral in helping lead the company’s turnaround as VillageMD makes meaningful progress and positions itself for profitable growth.” Neither the Walgreens representative nor VillageMD spokesperson Molly Lynch answered media questions about why Mr. Barry left or the circumstances behind the sudden departure without even a fig leaf (or pumpkin pie) of a cover story or the usual ‘thanks for your service’–which leads to more questions and doubts about What Really Happened.

The larger picture of sinking Walgreens financials. They closed FY 2024 with an operating loss of over $14 billion, more than doubling FY 2023’s loss of $6.9 billion versus FY 2022’s profit of $1.4 billion during the pandemic. $12.7 billion of a total $13.4 billion impairment was due to VillageMD’s loss in value due to clinic closures, slow patient panel growth, and downward trends in Medicare reimbursement. The remainder of about $332 million was attributed to loss of value in the CareCentrix home care unit (Form 10-K 10 October 2024, document page 123; impairments page 97; also TTA 28 Mar)

The Big Idea of combining primary care with retail locations in the Roz Brewer/WBA’s Stefano Pessina vision (hallucination?) was a major misstep into a Big Hole.

  • Bad timing was one factor. VillageMD added to a mound of miseries in retail and pharmacy sales caving, competition from direct vendors such as Amazon and Mark Cuban Cost Plus, plus  traditional brick-and-mortar CVS and Walmart. There were also expensive settlements around opioid prescribing. VillageMD also tapped Walgreens for $3.5 billion to acquire Summit Medical and CityMD–and defaulted on a $2.25 billion loan in August.
  • Joining primary care clinics with retail footprints wasn’t based on testing consumer behavior and acceptance–or practice reality. The plan was to have 1,000 joint locations modeled on the picture above left by 2027. As a model, it depended on obtaining both sufficient providers and building loyal patient panels, a slow pull if there ever was one. Physically adding clinic locations to Walgreens’ stores proved to be both expensive and difficult. 
  • These factors and others sank Roz Brewer’s CEO-dom, the share price, and the vision of Mr. Barry’s and VillageMD’s founders and physicians. The last dated back to 2013 and built into a network of hundreds of freestanding primary care clinics in value-based care. Many of the 140+ closures starting early this year were not only of expansions, but also of long-standing VillageMD offices, including in its core market of Chicago metro. Earlier this year, Cigna wrote off most of its $2.5 billion investment, throwing its Q1 into the red [TTA 2 May].

Many of the practices participated successfully in CMS’ advanced ACO shared savings models starting in 2016 such as Next Generation, Direct Contracting, and the current ACO REACH. The practices integrated telehealth as part of their value-based care models to achieve quality metrics. In CY 2023, VillageMD-operated ACO entities in the REACH model achieved $140 million in gross savings for Medicare, with $36 million shared back with the government and the remainder reinvested in the care model. (CMS reports are released 10-12 months after the prior year’s end.) 12 November release

Walgreens went big–and was sent home with the metaphorical tail between the hind legs. Perhaps engraved on VillageMD’s headstone will be what Walgreens CEO Tim Wentworth said of VillageMD during the Q4 earnings call in October, “… We’ve declared it’s not a crucial part of our future.” Mr. Wentworth and the board declared months ago that they wished to sell all or part of the business, at least below their majority holding at 63% [TTA 8 Aug, 2 JulyWho even wants to or is able to buy, with Walmart Health defunct and Oak Street Health and One Medical retrenching for their respective owners? Will VillageMD be part of anyone’s future? Healthcare Finance News, Healthcare Dive

Weekend reading: 23andMe’s up in the air future, including genetic data; Walgreens debates What To Stop and Start; what if healthcare pursued a zero-failure rate?

While 23andMe figures out a future….what happens to the genetic data?  Troubled 23andMe today announced that it will be reporting its FY2025 Q2 numbers next Tuesday 12 November. An interesting part of their release is that shareholders can submit and upvote questions to management via the Say Technologies portal–and they’re blistering. They ask about the plan for recovery (132 votes, 60K shares represented), whether the company will be sold off piecemeal (128 votes, 73.5K shares) and a sale of the company (78 votes, 47.8K shares. Also questioned (38 votes, 3.4K shares): the addition of three new board members, none of whom have biopharmaceutical experience as all former CFOs outside of healthcare. These replace the seven that ankled on 17 September [TTA 17 Sept]. 

To Wojcicki, of course, with her reported 49.99% of voting control, shareholders’ questions aren’t really going to matter. Whether they will be addressed on Tuesday is anyone’s guess.

Many 23andMe customers have questioned how to remove their personal genetic data from their database, which if en masse will reduce the value of the company. This TechCrunch article explains how that data is not covered by HIPAA privacy regulations, but 23andMe’s own retention rules.

If 23andMe sells, the data goes with it. If there is no sale, apparently recent Wojcicki statements indicate that the model going forward for the company is the sale of that data to pharma developers and researchers, ditching its independent drug discovery, and moving into telehealth prescribing of GLP-1 drugs through its Lemonaid subsidiary. 

For those concerned about their privacy, or wary of a change of ownership, accounts can be easily deleted–but not the genetic information. TechCrunch gives how to delete your account–but apparently that won’t delete your genetic information, date of birth, and gender. 23andMe will also retain limited personal information attached to your account for an undefined time. Individuals can also reverse their consent for sharing that information with researchers, but cannot remove it. 12 million people have reportedly given consent–deliberately or not. A real lesson on oversharing for millions–if they care. 

What can Walgreens reasonably stop or reverse in its multiple series of Bad Decisions? A short interview at HLTH with US Healthcare head Mary Langowski indicates that there’s not much that hasn’t been already announced. We know that VillageMD is shuttering locations and is up for sale. 1,200 retail locations will be closed over the next three years. But what else to stop? “A lot of what I’ve fo­cused on in the first six months, is re­al­ly, it’s okay to stop stuff. What are we gonna stop?” While it’s totally fine to fail ‘at some things’, these weren’t small fails. Wentworth is concentrating on the new chief commercial officer selling Wal­greens’ ser­vices to pay­ers, providers, and life sci­ence com­pa­nies, such as clinical trials capabilities, CareCentrix, and Shields Health. There’s also some push towards “build­ing a stand­alone phar­ma­cy busi­ness rather than a ver­ti­cal­ly in­te­grat­ed busi­ness”. Endpoints News

Thinking about if healthcare adopted a ‘zero-failure’ rate. Michael Alkire’s (CEO, Premier Inc., a health system operational improvement provider) daughter was on Alaska Airlines’ Flight 1282 on 5 January 2024. That was the Boeing 737-9 MAX flight that had a blowout of a mid-cabin exit door plug placed there instead of an emergency exit door. The blowout was due to four improperly installed (loose) bolts. It occurred at 16,000 feet and the lower altitude, combined with no one seated in that row, contributed to a 100% survivability rate and a successful landing, though passengers were injured. Anyone with an interest in aircraft knows that one little thing, like a worn jackscrew on a rudder or an untightened bolt, can lead to a non-survivable crash.

Mr. Alkire’s point is that we should be striving, as the airlines and aircraft manufacturers have done (which failed in this case) for zero failure in healthcare.  He cites the well-known statistic that 98,000 people die each year from medical errors. We don’t have a culture of continuous performance improvement. For one, clinical innovations can take nearly two decades to become standard practice. Yet it works. Simple things, such as clinical surveillance in nursing homes, can reduce adverse drug events by 92%.  Much more to ponder in this Influencer contribution to MedCityNews. (And Boeing has a long way to go to restore trust–buying back Spirit AeroSystems, the former Boeing Wichita, is a necessary start they are finally making.)

News roundup 16 Oct: Walgreens shuts 1,200 stores–500 in ’25, CVS exiting core infusion biz, Masimo v. Apple update, DEA recommends 3rd telehealth extension, Change hack costing UHG $705M, Owlet back in NYSE compliance

A roundup of chickens coming home to roost? But some chickens are just happy to come home.

Walgreens’ Mound of Misery just grew a little higher. The headlines today were all about Walgreens’ closing 1,200 stores over the next three years. Their current store location roster is about 9,000, according to their website. 500 of these will be closed during their upcoming FY2025.  Their release stated this would be “immediately accretive to adjusted EPS and free cash flow”. (Were they making any money at all?) This helped to give their share price a nice bump from $9 to above $10 at market close today. Last year, Walgreens’ shares were priced above $22.

Q4 (closing 31 August) closed with a 6% boost in retail sales. However, losses were $3.0 billion versus a net loss of $180 million in the prior year’s Q4. The reasons cited in their release were a higher operating loss, a $2.3 billion non-cash charge for valuation allowance on deferred tax assets primarily related to opioid liabilities recognized in prior periods, and a non-cash impairment charge related to equity investment in China. The operating loss related to a non-cash goodwill impairment charge for CareCentrix. 

The full year was not cheery. Sales were $147.7 billion, an increase of 6.2% from a year ago (in constant currency, 5.7%). But losses in their FY2024 were $14.1 billion, a stunning increase of 104.5% compared to prior year.

VillageMD is being monetized along with other assets. “CEO Tim Wentworth said in the earnings call that the company is focused on “monetizing non-core assets to generate cash,” naming VillageMD as an example, to focus on its core retail pharmacy business.” HIStalk 16 Oct Can Walgreens shrink itself to profitability? Fierce Healthcare

Over at CVS, they’re doing their own shrinking. CVS is closing its core infusion services business, with plans to either close or sell 29 related regional pharmacies. Infusion services were bought from Coram LLC in 2013 for $2.1 billion. This Reuters exclusive was based on an 8 October memo and confirmed by a CVS press representative. Patients relying on antibiotics, drugs supporting muscular health, and intravenous nutrition services will be transferred to other providers. CVS will continue to provide certain services: specialty medications and enteral nutrition, or tube feeding, at pharmacies in Minnesota, Pennsylvania and San Diego, with nationwide nursing services. Hat tip to HIStalk 16 Oct.

Masimo wins one big patent challenge, loses one (or four), to Apple. 

The Win: Apple had sued Masimo in the US District Court of Delaware for patent infringement of Apple’s utility patent 10,942,491 B2 (“the ‘491 patent”). Masimo was charged as violating Apple’s patent on 19 features. Masimo appealed to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for an inter partes review (IPR) of the patent on the grounds of ‘unpatentability’, a very high proof. Masimo succeeded in this, rendering Apple’s ‘491 patent useless. Apple can appeal but the likelihood of success against the PTAB ruling that required three administrative patent judges to review, at this level of proof, is low. In this Editor’s view, this may spur other developers to come up with innovations now that these 19 features have been deemed unpatentable.

The Loss (I think): In review in the Delaware District Court are four complicated lawsuits between the two combatants, with Apple’s premise that Masimo has infringed upon other patents. Masimo alleged “inequitable conduct” by Apple in their patent filings with the PTO, essentially alleging fraudulent filings on multiple patents. Apple has been granted a summary judgment on Masimo’s claims, throwing them out.

Interestingly, Masimo–never shy to announce wins versus their foe Apple under the prior leadership of Joe Kiani–has remained strangely mum. (Perhaps everyone is waiting for the takeover dust to settle?) Will the ‘new’ Masimo be so combative against Apple? A far more detailed analysis for the patent mavens is in Strata-gee. A very large hat tip and bow to their editor, Ted Green, who writes about marketing primarily in the audio/visual business but has been 100% on top of The Masimo Saga–thank you!

To no one’s surprise, DEA kicks the telehealth waiver can down the road–for the third time. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) sent to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a proposed rule to extend telehealth prescribing of Schedule II and higher controlled substances without changes. These waivers which removed the in-person examination requirement under the Ryan-Haight Act were instituted during the Covid pandemic and extended twice [TTA 11 Oct 2311 May 23] with a final expiration of 31 December 2024. In September, reports indicated that DEA not only wanted to restore prior restrictions but also wished to introduce additional ones. However, their timing (September!) given Federal standards of publishing draft rules and lengthy comment periods before a final rule was impossible to be achieved by year’s end. [TTA 13 Sept]

Whether OMB will approve the extension (to a date that cannot be confirmed since the text is unavailable, but reportedly one year) is not certain, as it may be disputed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Since the waiver is due to expire at the end of the year, this may help to assure the multitude of mental health and other telehealth companies dependent on legal remote diagnosis and prescribing controlled substances that their businesses can continue. FierceHealthcare

UHG didn’t have a happy quarter either due to Change. The total hit to UnitedHealth Group of the Change Healthcare hack is now estimated at $705 million, or 75 cents a share. Their 2025 guidance on profit is a lackluster $30 per share–below Wall Street estimates of $31.18. Government plans’ cuts in payments for Medicare Advantage plus and low state payment rates for Medicaid are affecting UHG as well as nearly every other payer. UHG’s share price on the news reacted negatively, falling 9% and dragging down other payers as well. UHG must rue the day they bought Change Healthcare, as it has been largely bad news ever since. CNBC

And winding up on a happy note–Owlet is back in good graces with the NYSE. Last year, they faced a NYSE notification that they were out of compliance with the $50 million minimum valuation of the company over a consecutive 30-day trading day period. They are now in compliance and their Class A shares can trade without the ‘BC’ black mark and no longer be listed as such on the NYSE website. The NYSE will be following its standard procedure of a 12-month follow-up on compliance. Release, Mobihealthnews

The baby sock and baby monitoring company has had a rough couple of years between a cracked SPAC (2021), FDA notifying them at the end of 2021 that they considered the Smart Sock a medical device, forcing the company to pull it from distribution [TTA 4 Dec 21], mounting losses, layoffs, and rebuilding with an FDA-cleared BabySat and enhanced Dream Sock [TTA 21 June 23]. Usually, this concatenation of events means the company either shuts or sells, but Owlet has done neither and bootstrapped itself. Revenue in their Q2 ending 30 June was up 58% year over year with a narrower operating loss of $2.2 million, compared with $6.7 million in prior year. It recently expanded their European distribution of the Dream Sock after CE Mark certification in May to a total of 11 countries [TTA 18 Sep]. 

What’s next for: Steward CEO now in criminal contempt of Congress; Walgreens’ Pessina’s fortune vanishes by 97%; Masimo’s Kiani now a man without a company

Senate unanimously votes to hold Steward Health CEO in contempt. The resolution passed on Wednesday 25 September refers the contempt charges against Dr. Ralph de la Torre, the CEO of Steward Health, to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) voted on 19 September to recommend two contempt charges–criminal and civil–to the full Senate. It is the first time since 1971 that a criminal contempt charge has been passed. The DOJ’s actions can include prosecution by the District of Columbia’s US Attorney which can mean arrest and possible incarceration, with a fine that doesn’t exceed $100,000, or civil contempt which usually involves a fine and another subpoena to appear. FierceHealthcare, Becker’s

The threatening language of the HELP committee members such as Bernie Sanders and Ed Markey surely did not encourage de la Torre or his legal counsel to appear on 12 September, with the anger across the board among all members regardless of party. All that it promised to be was, in street language, the worst kind of beatdown. Formally, the appearance was rejected because of Steward’s bankruptcy in adjudication in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas supervising the sale of Steward assets. There is also a court order that prevents de la Torre from commenting during the sale process. To the press, his legal counsel depicted the HELP committee hearing as “a pseudo-criminal proceeding in which they use the time, not to gather facts, but to convict Dr. de la Torre in the eyes of public opinion.” TTA 14 Sept

Steward Health’s spectacular collapse opens even more Pandora’s Boxes for de la Torre. He possibly faces additional lawsuits attempting to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ to claw back his bank and personal, sizeable maritime and aviation assets–or hold him criminally liable, far more complicated, long-term, and damaging. A cynical view would be that de la Torre would be well advised to get on his $40 million yacht or one of his private aircraft–and depart for a destination that is reluctant to extradite to the US. 

Walgreens Boots Alliance’s troubles drastically shrink executive chairman Stefano Pessina’s personal fortune. Chairman Pessina, who holds 17% of WBA stock and is the single largest shareholder, has seen his holdings shrink in value by 97%, from $12 billion in 2015 to a current $1.3 billion, according to Bloomberg data. The 83-year-old WBA head has seen hard times before. He pulled a rabbit out of the proverbial hat in 2007 by going private with Boots and then merging it with Walgreens in 2015, but time and Mr. Market are not on his side with taking on the debt load necessary.

Is WBA or Walgreens attractive to an acquirer? With stock trading at a record low of around $8 and a market capitalization of about $7.5 billion, it may be a bargain if an investor ignores or doesn’t blanch at the debt load. But those who understand the business cannot buy due to US antitrust regulations, which rules out any retail competitor or PBM. Or the company could be parted out to healthcare providers or a health insurer, but that ignores their miseries, such as reduced Medicare Advantage reimbursements. Their mistakes such as VillageMD and unprofitable locations are in the middle of being worked out and the company is shrinking. Meanwhile, their 15 October full-year earnings report will be dripping with red ink, as their Q1-3 lost $314 million versus prior year earnings of $1.2 billion. Crain’s Chicago Business

Vanishing for Joe Kiani is his day job at Masimo after a dramatic proxy fight. The founder of the audio and health monitor company was voted out of his board seat by shareholders. He followed by resigning as CEO after founding the company 35 years ago. Michelle Brennan, a board member (from Politan) has been appointed as interim CEO. Previously, she was a senior executive at Johnson & Johnson’s companies, including international experience in business development, for over 30 years. She also is on the board of Cardinal Health. Korn Ferry is coordinating the search for a permanent CEO.

The proxy battle wasn’t even close, according a CNBC report reported by Strata-gee. Quoting an inside source, the Politan slate of two directors, Darlene Solomon and William Jellison, received twice as many votes as Joe Kiani and Christopher Chavez on the Masimo slate. 

The company is continuing ‘strategic alternatives’ (read: sale) of its consumer health and audio businesses, the latter mostly acquired in the utterly snakebit 2022 acquisition of Sound United’s consumer audio brands. Masimo is using Centerview Partners and Morgan Stanley as financial advisors and Sullivan & Cromwell as a legal advisor. Presumably, the Kiani-arranged sales to or joint ventures of these units with unnamed investors is off. Masimo will be retaining their professional healthcare and pulse oximetry products. For Q3 2024, Masimo reiterated its financials from early August, with earlier guidance here.

Whether others will depart with Kiani is too soon to tell. During the proxy fight in July, Masimo’s chief operating officer, Bilal Muhsin, promised to resign if Kiani was forced out, specifically citing that he would refuse to work with Quentin Koffey, a Masimo director and chief investment officer of Politan Capital. Other managers signed similar letters around the same time.  However, in the Masimo release on the Kiani resignation, financials, and management changes, CFO Micah Young and Muhsin stated that would provide more details on an earnings call in October.

The Strate-gee view was that shareholders got tired of hearing promises about Sound United and that Kiani was high-handed with them–treating it as his personal company and not theirs. Healthcare Dive

Rounding up follow ups: Walgreens shareholder suit on pharmacy performance, Steward CEO no-shows Senate committee, Masimo-Politan proxy fight has court win for Politan–vote on for 19 September

Another shovelful topping Walgreens’ Mound of Misery. Filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, this shareholder lawsuit points to the poor performance of Walgreens’ pharmacy division. The fault is assigned to Walgreens management, specifically CEO Tim Wentworth and CFO Manmohan Mahajan plus 10 other executives including chairman Stefano Pessina, in overstating the division’s performance between 12 October 2023 to 26 June 2024 . It charges that they “falsely and materially claimed confidence in the brand inflation, volume growth, cost execution, discipline, and overall contributions of [Walgreens’] pharmacy division”, leading to an overvaluation of Walgreens’ share price. In addition, Walgreens “veiled the reality: that (Walgreens’) pharmacy division was not actually equipped to adapt to ongoing hurdles within the industry”.

The shareholder is Mark Tobias, a shareholder since late 2022. Key to the suit is the 12 October 2023 earnings conference call that contained positive comments about the pharmacy operation made by Wentworth, new at that time to Walgreens, and Mahajan. Their tune changed by the 27 June 2024 conference call where they admitted that the pharmacy model was “not sustainable”. Walgreens’ share price on 12 October 2023 was $24.19.  As of 4pm New York time today, 13 September, Walgreens closed at $9.21.

From the Crains Chicago Business article, the lawsuit demands restitution and reforms:

  • Walgreens should be awarded damages and restitution from the individual defendants
  • The company and defendants take steps to reform and improve corporate governance and internal procedures
  • Those reforms may include
    • Strengthening the board’s supervision of operations
    • Permitting Walgreens shareholders to nominate at least five candidates for election to the board
    • Ensure the establishment of effective oversight of compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations

The Crains article also includes a Scribd copy of the filing.  Also Healthcare Dive

Another very large Mound of Misery buried Steward Health…but CEO Ralph de la Torre doesn’t plan to comply with a Senate committee subpoena. His testimony before the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee was scheduled for 12 September but last week on 4 September, his attorneys informed the committee that Dr. de la Torre would not appear. They cited the ongoing US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas sale of Steward assets (Healthcare Dive update) and a court order that silences him from comment during the sale process. The committee, chaired by Senator Bernie Sanders, is also accused by the CEO’s attorneys of using the bankruptcy and de la Torre’s marine possessions (a $40 million yacht and $15 million fishing boat) and private jets as “a pseudo-criminal proceeding in which they use the time, not to gather facts, but to convict Dr. de la Torre in the eyes of public opinion.”

The committee plans to decide on 19 September among two options: whether Dr. de la Torre will be brought up on criminal contempt charges that would be referred to the District of Columbia US Attorney, or civil contempt which usually involves a fine and another subpoena to appear. Several Senators on the committee–Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Edward Markey–have called de la Torre’s no-show “outrageous”. Sanders has issued threats of de la Torre being held accountable for his greed, but exactly how much of this is for the press and what the committee will do is unclear.  More of concern to the CEO would be whether further lawsuits would attempt to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ and claw back his bank and personal assets–or hold him criminally liable. Healthcare Dive, AP

The ugly Masimo-Politan Capital proxy fight continues–with a win for Politan. The attempt by Masimo, a consumer audio company that branched out into professional healthcare and pulse oximetry products–and last year won a big patent infringement decision against Apple on pulse oximetryto further postpone a shareholder vote on giving control to activist shareholder Politan Capital ended in a loss yesterday. The US District Court, Central District of California denied Masimo’s request for a preliminary injunction to block Politan’s nominees for the Masimo board. Unless Masimo’s motion asking the same court to find Politan in contempt due to breaking the court’s sealing order on the decision, and the court grants a further delay, the shareholder vote will be held next Thursday 19 September. The likely outcome, according to Strata-gee which is covering this from the consumer audio perspective, is that shareholders will turn the board over to Politan by electing their representatives to the two open seats, booting CEO Joe Kiani–and total corporate chaos will ensue. Strata-gee has all the gory details. Background in TTA 8 August and prior.

Breaking: Walgreens considering sale of entire stake in VillageMD

The other shoe just dropped. Walgreens Boots Alliance filed today (7 August) Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that confirms that they are considering a VillageMD sale. On page 2, Walgreens is considering the “sale of all or part of the VillageMD businesses, possible restructuring options and other strategic opportunities.”

The broad reason why is that VillageMD has “substantial ongoing and expected future cash requirements”. The specific event is VillageMD’s default as of 2 August on the VillageMD Secured Loan, a senior secured term loan and credit facility amounting to $2.25 billion. Currently (6 August), the loan is in a forbearance agreement while the companies work out terms. The 8-K also reiterates that Walgreens “is actively engaged in discussions with VillageMD’s stakeholders and other third parties with respect to the future of its investment in VillageMD”.

None of this should be surprising given recent statements made by CEO Tim Wentworth on the dismal Q3 earnings call [TTA 2 July], disclosing that Walgreens plans to lower its Village MD ownership below a majority holding (currently 63%). This signaled a partial sale at least–and that Walgreens was giving up on VillageMD as an integral part of the company. Between the direct investment of $5.3 billion and subsidizing Village MD’s purchase of Summit Health/CityMD with an additional $3.5 billion plus development costs, the Village MD Money Pit has disappeared roughly $10 billion of Walgreens’ fisc. Closing 160 locations did not, and could not, unsink this ship. While VillageMD is not the only dark spot for Walgreens’ business (retail is crashing, pharmacy is going soft), the plunging stock price has kicked off multiple shareholder class action lawsuits.[TTA 17 July]

It’s going to be tough to find any buyer at all at even a fraction of what Walgreens invested. An industry analyst estimated VillageMD’s 2023 losses at $800 million last April. WBA took a writedown last quarter, a $12.4 billion non-cash impairment charge related to VillageMD goodwill. Cigna also wrote off $1.8 billion of its 2022 $2.2 billion investment which gave it a ‘in the teens’ share [TTA 2 May]. Even CVS is trying to amortize its $10.6 billion buy of its own Money Pit–much smaller Oak Street Health–by finding a joint venture private equity partner [TTA 29 May].

This filing, coupled by the announcement of a third sale of Cencora stock to generate cash [TTA 7 Aug], points to no end in sight of Walgreens’ troubles. The SEC filing took place after markets closed; investors can expect a very down morning in an unstable market. Crain’s Chicago Business, Forbes 

Midweek wrap: Walgreens sells off $1.1B Cencora shares, R1 RCM goes private for $8.9B, Steward’s unwinding with 2 hospital closures, 1,200+ laid off, $30M state funding, bids due for physician group, CEO Senate hearing

Retrenching is the theme this (crazy) week.

Walgreens sells another 2% of Cencora shares, raising $1.1 billion of much-needed cash. Walgreens reduced its ownership share of the drug distributor formerly known as Amerisource Bergen to 10% by selling the remainder of their unencumbered shares, approximately 2% of the common stock. Known as a Rule 144 sale of restricted or control stock, the proceeds as of 1 August are $818 million followed by a concurrent share repurchase by Cencora of $250 million. This is the third sale this year: in May Walgreens sold 1% for $400 million and in February 2% for $990 million. All these sales were to fund operations and pay down debt. Despite the further reduction, Ornella Barra, COO International of Walgreens Boots Alliance, will continue on Cencora’s board. The partnership agreement remains in place. Release, Healthcare Dive, Reuters

Revenue cycle management company R1 RCM finally found investors to take it private.  TowerBrook Capital Partners and Clayton, Dubilier and Rice are the winners, acquiring R1 for $8.9 billion. They will purchase outstanding shares at $14.30 per share in an all-cash deal expected to close by the end of 2024. Private equity investor TowerBrook already owns 36% of the company. This shuts out rival New Mountain Capital as their 23 February bid was offered at a lower $13.75 per share. At that time, New Mountain owned 32%; that bid valued the company at nearly $6 billion. The purchase will be financed with a combination of committed debt financing and equity from investment funds affiliated with TowerBrook and CD&R. Large shareholders Ascension Health Alliance (also R1’s major customer) and Coliseum Capital Management were not mentioned in the acquisition release.

In March, a special committee was formed by their board to evaluate strategic alternatives, code for ‘we believe it’s undervalued’. The company is currently traded on Nasdaq and closed today at $13.96. R1 closed 2023 profitably with net income of $3.3 million, flipping a $63 million 2022 loss, on a revenue increase of nearly 25% to $2.3 billion. Q1 and Q2 2024 are a more mixed picture. Q1 had revenue of $603.9 million, up 11% year-over-year, but with a net loss of $35.1 million caused in part by $10 million in losses created by the Change Healthcare ransomware attack. Q2 continued the trend, with revenues of $627.9 million up 12% versus prior year, but a widening net loss of $7.6 million versus $1 million in the prior year. Q2 earnings release, Q1 earnings release, FierceHealthcare, Healthcare Dive

Seeking ‘strategic alternatives’ for current investors and going private seems to be the new fashion in the crowded healthcare business process outsourcing (BPO) and RCM sectors. Profitable but problematic companies such as Veradigm [TTA 28 May] and GeBBS [TTA 17 Apr] both up for sale or investment. To date, Veradigm has not gone public with any offers, but GeBBS was scheduled last month to have binding offers submitted by Carlyle Group, Hillhouse Investment, and CVC Capital Partners. ChrysCapital, India’s largest private equity firm, owns 80% of GeBBS. Economic Times (India)

The messy unwinding of Steward Health Care in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas continues.

  • The court approved the closure of two Massachusetts hospitals, Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer, at the end of August. Neither hospital received qualifying bids in the sale process and both hospitals, serving primarily low-income patients, are among the worst performers in Steward’s anemic portfolio.
  • Based on WARN notices filed with the state, over 1,200 people will lose their employment as well as communities losing services. 
  • Yesterday, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts agreed to provide $30 million to keep the six remaining hospitals in the state running in two tranches: $11.3 million on 9 August and $18.7 million on 16 August. 
  • Those hospitals are being handed over to NYC-based Apollo Global Management, a global alternative asset manager, to facilitate their sale from current landlords Medical Properties Trust and partner Macquarie Infrastructure Partners to new operators.
  • Auctions pushed forward include the Arizona hospitals, with a new bid deadline of 12 August with a 19 August sale objection deadline and a 22 August sale hearing. Other hospitals in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, and Louisiana have not been rescheduled after their canceled auctions.
  • The Stewardship Health practice group now has a bid deadline of 6 August, with the sale objection deadline now 9 August and the sale hearing set for 13 August. Optum walked away from its deal back in April with the Chapter 11 filing and there is no word if they are bidding in bankruptcy.

Additional updates: the Senate investigation of Steward is going forward with a subpoena issued to CEO Ralph de la Torre. The public hearing of the HELP Committee and his appearance are scheduled for 12 September. FierceHealthcare No further developments in the US Attorney’s Boston office investigation of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act about Steward’s business dealings in Malta between 2018 and 2023. One wonders whether Dr. de la Torre will sail off on his 190-foot superyacht to one of the few places where extradition is difficult, such as Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela, or Iceland.

Healthcare Dive, Becker’s 31 July, Becker’s 6 August  Most recently in TTA 2 July, 18 July, 25 July

News roundup: Waystar $1B IPO is on (updated); CVS looking for Oak Street PE partner; 23andMe net loss doubles to $667M, may go private; Otsuka dives into digital therapeutics; HoneyNaps’ $12M no snooze

Waystar finally getting around to starring in its IPO. Again. The on-again/off-again public offering for this healthcare payments software platform developer is back on, according to their Form S-1 filed yesterday (28 May) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Their first filing draft was in October 2023 on Nasdaq which would have valued the company at $8 billion. The IPO was again revived in December and postponed. This filing for WAY floats 45 million shares valued between $20 and $23 which would raise $1 billion with a far more reasonable valuation of $3.7 to $3.83 billion (latter updated per Waystar). Lead book-running managers are JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, and Barclays.

Cornerstone investors, who purchase stock before the formal listing, have expressed interest in buying up to $225 million in shares; these investors include funds managed by Neuberger Berman and a wholly-owned subsidiary of sovereign wealth fund Qatar Investment Authority. 

Underwriters have a 30-day option to purchase up to 6.75 million shares at the IPO price less the underwriter discount. Their current investors are EQT AB, Bain Capital, Francisco Partners, and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board. The net proceeds from the offering will repay outstanding indebtedness. No timing is stated for when the IPO will happen. Usually, there are roadshows for institutional investors that showcase the prospectus (in the S-1) and positive points such as their $5 billion in annual transactions. After the listing, the current investors will still have substantial shares: EQT, CPPIB, and Bain will own about 29.2%, 22.3%, and 16.8% stakes respectively. 

Release, Morningstar, FierceHealthcare, Reuters

CVS Health is reaching out for a private equity partner to expand Oak Street Health’s clinics. Bloomberg News reported this unusual move by CVS with a handful of private equity firms to explore what was termed by ‘insiders’ as a joint venture. It’s all very preliminary and a JV may not be the final form. OSH is far smaller than rivals One Medical (Amazon) and VillageMD (Walgreens) but CVS apparently does not want to go it alone to fully take on the development cost. On February investor calls, CVS projected building out to 300 clinics by 2026. Reuters

Even in early 2023 with rivals Amazon (One Medical), Walgreens (VillageMD), and Walmart Health on primary care clinic buying and building binges, CVS’ buy for $10.6 billion for the ‘runt of the litter’ was widely derided as a waste of money [TTA 16 Feb, 2 Mar 2023]. OSH had only 169 offices in 21 states. It was also a money loser, $510 million in the red in 2022 and $200 million projected in 2023, with no breakeven predicted until 2025. A large part was due to OSH’s patient population, heavily skewed towards Medicare Advantage and underserved, high-risk patients. Those factors have gotten worse, not better. CMS has now tightened payments on MA with new rates and on reimbursement for diagnoses, making the growth of this population even riskier. Further dimming prospects for a willing partner: Walmart Health is shutting at end of June and VillageMD has shed or is shedding 140 locations to perhaps 620.  

23andMe’s losses double while revenue shrinks by 31%. Things continue to dim at the beleaguered genetics testing company. Their Q4 ending 31 March 2024 (FY24) closed with a net loss of $209 million on $64 million in revenue, compared to a net loss of $64 million on $94 million in revenue in the prior year Q4. In adjusted EBITDA, Q4 lost $33 million, compared to a loss of $39 million in prior year Q4. Net loss in full year FY24 was $667 million on revenue of $220 million, versus prior year’s loss of $312 million on revenue of $299 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $176 million versus prior year’s $161 million. As previously reported [TTA 20 Apr], CEO and co-founder Anne Wojcicki may offer to buy out the 80% of shares she does not already own. In developments, 23andMe has introduced an ancestry feature called Historical Matches, three new genetic reports for 23andMe+ members covering breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer based on polygenic risk scores, and some clinical trials moving forward. 23andMe also lost revenue in mid-year from GSK’s expiring agreement, had an impairment relating to Lemonaid Health, and of course (but not mentioned here) their massive 6.9 million record data breach. Shares closed today at $0.61, slightly up from April’s lows. Release

Otsuka America bucks the down trend, moves into digital therapeutics with Otsuka Precision Health. The Japanese pharmaceutical company’s US division is moving forward with a new digital health unit, Precision Health (OPH), headed by 14 year veteran Sanket Shah. Their first rollout later this summer will be based on the newly FDA-cleared Rejoyn, the first prescription digital therapeutic authorized for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) symptoms. Rejoyn was developed in conjunction with Click Therapeutics. Mr. Shah and Otsuka are taking the longer view in terms of development, that future developments will be about both partnerships and solo effort, and that the road is long–and littered with the burnt-out shells of failed companies like Pear Therapeutics, Babylon Health, and way back to Happtique. Otsuka has had its own digital health learning experience. They partnered in 2017 with Proteus Digital Health’s smart pill tech for its Abilify MyCite anti-depressant. After abruptly ending the partnership, Otsuka bought the smart pill technology out of bankruptcy [TTA 19 Aug 2020]. Release, Healthcare Dive 

One funding of note this week is HoneyNaps‘ $11.6 million Series B. Hi Investment Partners, QUAD Investment Management, and Industrial Bank of Korea led the South Korean sleep diagnostics company’s funding. HoneyNaps has an FDA-cleared (2023) bio-signal monitoring and AI-assisted sleep diagnosis software, SOMNUM, that will be introduced to the US market. In the release, the company CFO announced plans to “further advance the AI to expand its application to other critical areas such as cardiovascular disease, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease”. Mobihealthnews

Separation or sale? WBA putting Boots out for bids; Walgreens pharmacists end month-long HQ protest.

Boots to be ‘booted’ from WBA? Bloomberg and other sources on Monday reported that WBA is now once again searching for buyers for the UK-based Boots pharmacy chain. Earlier reports from end of 2023 into Q1 [TTA 5 March] that it was up for sale were later denied. WBA is at a preliminary stage in working with advisers to seek out some buyers.

The price will be steep. Boots’ estimated value is £7 billion (about $8.78 billion). One rumored possibility other than a sale is a UK IPO. The news sent WBA shares up by 5% during Monday trading to a close of $18.12. If a sale or spinoff does go through, it will bring to an end an unusual trans-Atlantic alliance for Walgreens, though other than some Boots beauty products in the No. 7 line, there’s little crossover between the two chains, at least here in the US. Reuters, Crain’s Chicago Business

Meanwhile, back in the trenches, Walgreens’ Chicago-area pharmacists wrapped up on Friday a month-long protest at Walgreens’ Deerfield HQ. These actions, which have been rolling since last year, center around increased staff and hour cutbacks plus the rise of telepharmacy. This replaces pharmacists with technicians for filling prescriptions, with patient questions answered by a remote pharmacist via an iPad. Pharmacists represented by the National Pharmacists Association-Laborers’ International Union of North America (NPhA-LIUNA) have been working without a contract since last May. In the past seven years, they have received a 2% wage increase. The local dispute has been mirrored at Walgreens and CVS locations nationwide. Crain’s Chicago Business

News roundup: UHG CEO’s Bad Day at Capitol Hill; Kaiser’s 13.4M data breach; Walgreens’ stock beatup; Cigna writes off VillageMD; Oracle Cerner shrinks 50%; Owlet BabySat gets Wheel; fundings for Midi, Trovo, Alaffia, Klineo

It was a Bad Day at Boot (Capitol) Hill for UnitedHealth Group’s CEO Andrew Witty. On May Day, he was the Man In The Arena facing two Congressional grillings–the first from the Senate Finance Committee in the morning, and the second in the afternoon from the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. The precipitating event was the Optum/Change Healthcare data breach and system hacking by ALPHV/BlackCat, a disruption which is as of today not fully resolved.  Millions of patients may have had data stolen and exposed–a number that has yet to be determined, but an outcome for which UHG, while paying the ransomwaristes, has prepared. Already, the VA has notified 15 million veterans and families of that possibility.

This Editor will be linking below to multiple articles and Mr. Witty’s prepared testimony. Interested Readers can also refer to YouTube for extensive links to video testimony. Highlights:

  • Both houses criticized the slow response and amount of financial assistance given to providers after the shutdown of Change’s systems prevented (and still is preventing) timely claims processing and payment. While ‘near normal’ volumes of medical claims and 86% restoration of payment processing sounds good, that leaves a lot of wiggle room on over two months of totally disrupted processing and payment. The billion or so cited sounds impressive but much of this is in loans. Most practices and groups simply do not have the financial cushion or billing skillset to bridge this disruption, to pay back loans, or to bookkeep this.
  • Also criticized at this late date was UHG being unable to determine how many individuals had PHI exposed in the breach.
  • As to cause, the description of UHG finding that surprise, surprise, Change’s systems were way out of date, stored on physical servers versus the cloud, and used Citrix remote access without multi-factor authentication (MFA) was utterly savaged. According to Mr. Witty, ALPHV after days of knocking around got in on the one server that did not have MFA authentication.

The blunt fact is that UHG had close to two years (January 2021-Oct 2022) before the buy closed. Due diligence consisting of a full audit had to have been done on Change’s IT systems. They processed what UHG wanted to buy. In this Editor’s estimation, Job #1! for UHG should have been ensuring that Change’s systems were hardened, then upgrading to what Mr. Witty called UnitedHealth’s standards. This Editor will go further. A minimum requirement for the sale should have been security hardening. There was time before the closing.

Senator Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, had the best riposte. He brought a copy of “Hacking for Dummies” to the hearing, highlighting MFA. I doubt he was much moved by UHG now bringing in cybersecurity company Mandiant to both investigate and harden their systems, nor by UHG having to pay ransom, without knowing whose data was compromised.

  • Beyond the breach, UHG was called ‘monopolistic’ by both Republican and Democrat Members. There were calls to break up UHG as not ‘too big to fail’. UHG has grown by acquisition and consolidation of services. As this Editor has speculated, this is likely coming to an end with the new, much more stringent Merger Guidelines. This sentiment paints a large, unmissable target on UHG’s back for aiming FTC’s and DOJ’s missiles. (DOJ also has a huge score to settle with UHG dating back to the failure to block the Change sale.)

By the end of the day, Mr. Witty looked quite the worse for wear–tie and collar askew, slightly sweaty, versus the perfect poses of the various Members. Becker’s, FierceHealthcare, Axios, HealthcareDive    Mr. Witty’s Senate testimony statement, House testimony statement

Speaking of data breaches, Kaiser Permanente reported a big one to Health and Human Services (HHS). This relates to ad tracker information shared with third-party advertisers such as Google, Microsoft, and X. Kaiser used it in secured areas of their website and mobile apps. Information disclosed could be name and IP. Kaiser reported it on 12 April but only disclosed on 25 April that 13.4 million records may have been affected. The ad trackers have since been removed. TechCrunch, FierceHealthcare 

Walgreens stock not recovering. April was WBA’s worst month in five years and May is no better, with the stock muddling around $17.50. The month slid around 18%. Their 52-week high was $33. As of now, CEO Tim Wentworth’s actions such as closing locations and writing down VillageMD haven’t convinced Mr. Market of WBA’s worth, but in fairness it’s early in his tenure. In the Insult to Injury Department, it was revealed that the IRS is seeking to claw back $2.7 billion in unpaid 2014-2017 taxes. Crain’s Chicago Business

Cigna is also writing down its interest in VillageMD. Almost forgotten is that in late 2022, Cigna invested $2.5 billion into VillageMD. They have now written down $1.8 billion of that ‘low teens’ ownership. The planned tie was connecting Village Medical into Evernorth, Cigna’s medical services area. It was also supposed to provide Cigna with an annual return on investment, but one assumes it did not. The writeoff threw Cigna’s Q1 into the red with a net loss of almost $300 million versus a prior year profit of $1.3 billion, despite a strong quarter that grew revenue 23% versus prior year to $57.3 billion. Healthcare Dive

Oracle Health has been successful–in shrinking Cerner by close to half. Records of employment at Cerner’s Kansas City-based operation have declined from 11,900 people in 2022 (Kansas City Area Development Council) to a current 6,400 (internal documents). Cerner itself reported 12,778 local full-time-equivalent employees in 2022. Oracle had multiple layoffs of Cerner affecting Kansas City workers and has consolidated multiple office buildings and campuses. Becker’s

In more cheerful news:

Baby monitor Owlet announced a strategic partnership with Wheel for Owlet’s BabySat. BabySat is Owlet’s FDA-cleared prescription vital signs monitor for infants 1-18 months. Wheel clinicians can now prescribe BabySat which enables parents to order BabySat from Owlet and other suppliers. With Wheel, BabySat also integrates with durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers who accept and can bill for the product through many insurance providers for partial or full reimbursement. Wheel is a virtual care platform and physician/nurse-practitioner online network available direct to consumer and to enterprises. Owlet release

And rounding up funding:

MidiHealth closed a $60M Series B funding. This was led by Emerson Collective with participation from Memorial Hermann, SemperVirens, Felicis, Icon Ventures, Black Angel Group, Gingerbread Capital, Able Partners, G9, and Operator Collective for a total of $99 million in funding. Midi provides virtual support for women going through peri- and full menopause. The fresh funding will help them expand national insurance coverage, hire and upskill an additional 150 clinicians by end of year, diversify service lines, and scale to care for 1 million+ women per year by 2029. Release

Trovo Health launched with $15 million in seed funding, led by Oak HC/FT. The NYC-based AI-powered provider task assistance platform will use the funding to build its technology platform, clinical operations, and leadership team. Mobihealthnews 

In the same roundup, NYC-based Alaffia Health scored a $10 million Series A round. This was led by FirstMark Capital with participation from Aperture Venture Capital. Alaffia creates generative AI solutions for payment integrity in health insurance claims operations, with the aim of eliminating insurance fraud, waste, and abuse for health plans, third-party administrators, self-insured employers, stop-loss carriers, and government agencies. Their total raise to date is $17.6 million. Paris-based Klineo also raised €2 million for its oncology clinical trials search platforms, assisted by AI, for the use of doctors and patients. BPIFrance and business angels participated in the round.

Mid-week short takes: UnitedHealth’s $1.2B Q1 loss from Change attack, another Walgreens layoff, Dexcom-MD Revolution partner, Kontakt.io $47.5 raise, GeBBS Healthcare may sell for $1B

UnitedHealth Group rang up Q1 revenue of $99.8 billion, with adjusted earnings from operations $8.5 billion, but had a net loss of $1.22 billion (WSJ). (Ed. note–Becker’s has $1.4 million) The loss was created not only from the cyberattack on Change Healthcare’s systems ($0.74/share) but also a $7 billion charge due to the sale of UHG’s Brazil operations.

  • Q1 revenue was up $7.9 billion versus same quarter 2023.
  • Their year 2024 forecast of the damage done by the ALPHV cyberattack on Change is $1.6 billion ($1.15 to $1.35 per share).
  • Optum’s Q1 revenues of $61 billion grew by $7 billion over prior year, led by Optum Health and Optum Rx due to continued strong expansion in the number of people served

Someone at HIStalk did some counting and noted that the Optum Solution Status dashboard for Change Healthcare shows 109 of 137 applications remain down, not much different than when we eyeballed it on 3 April. CNBC, UHG release, HIStalk, Becker’s, MSN/WSJ

Walgreens continues to cut staff–this go-around, it’s corporate support center employees both in Chicago and working remotely. No total was provided by the Walgreens spokesperson contacted by Crain’s Chicago Business. This adds to 900 corporate staff laid off in several waves earlier this year and last fall, VillageMD staff due to 140 closures, and 646 distribution center staff laid off last month. Walgreens stock is down 33% this year. 

In cheerier news, Dexcom is partnering with remote patient monitoring (RPM) provider MD Revolution to add its continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to MD Revolution’s RPM platform. MDR is a startup company marketing its RPM platform to large practices, health systems, and healthcare organizations. Current raises date back to 2015 totaling under $60 million mostly from venture round funding (Crunchbase). Release

Inpatient data analytics company Kontakt.io raised a Series C investment of $47.5 million, led by Growth Equity at Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Goldman Sachs). This adds to a modest $21.5 million from various investors from 2013 to 2022 (Crunchbase). Kontakt provides patient flow analytics to health systems to optimize patient, staff, and resource flows, improving safety, coordination, and service delivery. It uses a combination of RTLS property tracking, cloud, and AI to provide real-time location data and orchestrate staff, equipment, and clinical spaces around a patient’s care journey. The additional funds will be used for sales expansion and AI development. HIStalk, Release 

GeBBS Healthcare Solutions on the block, may fetch $1 billion. The LA-based business process outsourcing (BPO)/revenue cycle management (RCM) company, currently owned by ChrysCapital of New Delhi, is on the market for a reported $800 million to $1 billion. This would be a tidy payday for ChrysCapital which back in 2018 acquired an 80% stake in GeBBS for $140 million with a valuation then of $175 million. ChrysCapital is India’s largest home-grown PE investor. Economic Times-India Times, HIStalk

Opinion: Further thoughts on Teladoc, Amwell, and the future of telehealth–what happens next?

The end of last week marked an Apocalypse Light in telehealth, but it was coming in this Editor’s opinion. And Pepper the Robot has nothing to do with it, other than representing telehealth’s state, and perhaps this Editor’s.

Two events–the forced exit of 15-year CEO Jason Gorevic from Teladoc and both Teladoc’s and Amwell’s continued market weakness and long roads to breakeven, if ever–have caused many in the field to think hard about our direction and where telehealth is going.

Both Teladoc and Amwell are the pioneers in provider-to-patient telehealth, going back over 20 years. While Amwell is no longer the #2 to Teladoc’s #1, both were in the forefront of how remote consults have transformed healthcare. The ability to remotely diagnose and provide care at distance is now a ‘given’ that has shifted the baseline for providers, patients, and payers. Nearly every entrant has or has acquired a remote in-person or app feature, whether care management, diagnostics, health education, or telemental health.

Because Teladoc’s struggles are writ large in the industry, we might benefit from a closer look at What Happened–and what in this Editor’s opinion might happen next.

What Happened?

The pandemic. Yes, it provided a major boost to any telehealth provider’s business whether corporate or provider-based. It mainstreamed telehealth. Smaller players like MDLive and Included Health snatched market share. But it also introduced ‘silly money’ that led companies to think that all they had to do was hold out the buckets, fill them with cash, and buy business. By late 2020, practices had reopened–and telehealth usage nosedived quickly, stabilizing to around 5% of medical claims, over 60% of which is mental health according to the FAIR Health end of 2023 telehealth tracker. 

The integration of telehealth into multiple platforms is now commonplace. This Editor observed in her work with her then-employer in early 2020 that the population health platform they had introduced already had integrated HIPAA-compliant telehealth platforms as a module–all that was needed to get the practices up and running on it–and coding correctly. Health systems now integrate telehealth into their patient portals. EHRs even for the small practice market now have integrated telehealth. As mentioned, specialized telehealth such as telemental health took off during the pandemic and, after a cleanout period, have largely stayed with us. Asynchronous telehealth has also become acceptable to consumers. (Interestingly, the leading asynchronous diagnoses are for hypertension and respiratory diseases that benefit companies like Amazon Clinic and triage-type systems.)

People use it when needed, but the enterprise payment model is subscriber-based. Teladoc has long claimed its subscriber base is 90 million people–but user data from HHS (ASPE 3/2023) indicates that only one of four use it. For an enterprise, paying for subscribers, this is a big fat line item ready to cut. Payers have also integrated telehealth into their coverage. Teladoc has, to its credit, created payer partnerships such as with Aetna, but so have others.

Bottom line: there’s no more ‘blue water’ market left for a big player like Teladoc with a model dependent on growth and on enterprise sales that are inherently price-driven. It’s a hard and painful change to realize that your technology is no longer the future, and that you have to slug it out in the mud with everyone else. 

A closer look at Teladoc. 

After 20 years, why wasn’t it profitable? A look back on our Teladoc coverage prior to the pandemic indicated growth was created by buying up smaller competitors, domestic and international, at premium prices. InTouch Health was a notable one, acquired January 2020 for $600 million. But Teladoc was way overdue on turning a profit before 2020, at which point it should have firmly moved into the black. And then reality hit by early 2022.

Where was the board in all this? This Editor does not pretend to know the minds of those far more experienced in the financial aspect of business than she. But after 15 years of CEO Jason Gorevic and the 2022 $6.6 billion write-down of Livongo which precipitated the long 90%+ loss in market value slide, why was he given walking papers only last Friday? Boards are supposed to be wise heads, looking out for the business and the shareholders. Did they get caught in the hype or hope that BetterHelp would save the company? Did something else happen? (Fun fact: Mr. Gorevic remains on the board.)

A track record of flawed judgment and recovery. In December 2018, their COO/CFO was dismissed after charges of insider trading and sexual misconduct. There have been two COOs since then, the first, David Sides, moving to CEO of NextGen Healthcare in 2021. In May 2019, Teladoc’s NCQA accreditation, first won in 2013, was placed under an unusual “corrective action” by NCQA which was termed by the CEO ‘much ado about nothing’. Au contraire, it was a black eye at the time and the industry never quite knew what happened. And then there was Livongo….

The Livongo deal killed Teladoc; saying the quiet part out loud. As this Editor stated at the time, the $18.5 billion purchase price of Livongo was dangerous for Teladoc (see ‘Gimlet Eyes’ from August 2020 here and here). It was a too-fast too-much too-soon deal that closed in three months at the summer peak of the pandemic and lockdowns looking like forever. The very notion that Livongo would open doors in hospitals and cross-selling to enterprises was suspect even at the time. The deal that Gorevic and 7WireVentures’ Glen Tullman and Livongo CEO Zane Burke concocted was ‘Grand Theft Auto’–for Livongo and their leadership, especially if they sold their Teladoc shares. It was never a merger of equals nor was it additive in value. Teladoc then made multiple, continuing transitioning and management errors, including not retaining Livongo executives, which have been well documented. And again–where was the board on this?

Where are the analysts? They seem to accept a storyline that ‘all is OK’ for 2024 now that Gorevic is gone. But standing pat on the Q1 and 2024 guidance as nearly all have done is suspect. Unlike Amwell, Teladoc has not forecast when it will achieve breakeven, much less profitability.

What’s Next? Given all the above, when will the aftershocks hit? Sooner or later?

If one looks to Walgreens as an example, where disaster hit quickly and hard last summer, a board member, Ginger Graham, took the acting CEO position. She took front and center on investor calls and executing reorganizations, which for an interim is unusual. Almost immediately, the cleanout began at the CIO and CFO levels and moved downward. Tim Wentworth joined as CEO in mid-October 2023 seven weeks after Roz Brewer was separated. VillageMD was identified quickly as a large part of the problem. He took the writedown even before locations were fully closed and made multiple moves to cut costs starting at the corporate level before moving into the field. This is not to make light of the human damage and the jury remains out on the wisdom of some of the moves. But Wentworth has moved quickly, decisively, and positioned it realistically in saying ‘this is not a 12-month turnaround’ and wisely caveating that board alignment around the strategic review was essential. Timid he is not.

Teladoc needs to move quickly, and intelligently–now, not later. While acting CEO Mala Murthy, backed by the board, makes decisive moves, Teladoc must find and appoint a Tim Wentworth-type at the helm for the turnaround. Quickly. It’s important not only for Teladoc but also for the telehealth industry.  But neither Mr. Market, judging on share price, nor this Editor, based on their track record, are hopeful.

Walgreens’ latest cuts affect 646 at Florida, Connecticut distribution centers

Walgreens closes two distribution centers to ‘streamline capacities to best support our stores’. Two large centers serving Walgreens retail stores, in Orlando, Florida and Dayville (Killingly), Connecticut, are closing permanently in May, with workers discharged on or before 17 May. Affected are 324 workers in Orlando and 322 workers in Dayville who according to Walgreens will receive severance, additional separation pay, on-site career fairs, and/or outplacement services. While workers in Orlando have a better employment situation locally with unemployment at 3%, Dayville, in northeastern Connecticut’s rural Windham County near the Rhode Island border, is up to 5%. WARN notices were filed in both states about 14 March. Crain’s Chicago Business, Becker’s 

Press accounts do not mention corresponding closures of Florida or New England Walgreens stores. The puzzle is that Florida, particularly central Florida, is a growing market with a permanent population as well as seasonal/tourism. Yet all 52 Village Medical co-located offices have closed in that state [TTA 22 Feb]. Reasons why range from too small co-locations unable to support full practices to lack of doctors and medical saturation.

Walgreens, after several quarters of losses, is cutting to the bone expenses, with layoffs, consolidations, and closures everywhere from their Illinois headquarters to VillageMD. Despite the $1 billion in cuts for 2024 announced last October, Mr. Market is not responding–Walgreens’ stock price continues its downward trend and has lost 15% sharply since January. The new CEO Tim Wentworth has already positioned Walgreens’ recovery as ‘not a 12-month turnaround story’. Walgreens, over the past three years, drilled a lot of holes. Some worked out well, such as Shields, but the $10 billion investment in VillageMD may be a dry hole.  In the strategic review he announced earlier this month, Boots may be on the block, not Shields, but there will be more and deeper cuts to come–if WBA’s closely held ownership agrees. Based on the distribution center closures, expect more closures of retail locations served by those centers to be announced. 

Facing Future: Walgreens CEO moves company into strategic review–will he get WBA board alignment?

Walgreens’ CEO Wentworth positions for turnaround. “This is not a 12-month turnaround story” said Mr. Wentworth at the TD Cowen healthcare investor conference. To this Editor, the public honesty and lack of cant (a/k/a “PR Speak”) was refreshing. His unobvious caveat though was aligning the board around what he and the new executive team–very few if any carryovers from the prior regime–see as the direction of the company and asset management.

The WBA board is led by executive chairman Stefano Pessina, who has a vested interest in a turnaround. He is the lead individual shareholder of WBA with apparently 10% of shares with other insiders (including the COO of WBA International, Ornella Barra, spouse of Mr. Pessina) having about 17%. Large institutional investors (Vanguard, State Street, etc.) have over 60% of the company. The share price has fallen about 40% in the past year (from early March 2023) and 55% from this time in 2022. (Derived from WBA and Yahoo Finance)

Example: This Editor has estimated from public information that Walgreens sank north of $10 billion into VillageMD, from initial and then controlling interest, then funding the buy of Summit Health/CityMD. This is a huge and recent investment that is going sideways in a span of less than three years. It does take some nerve to walk it back. TTA 22 Feb

Other key points Mr. Wentworth made, according to the most complete report in Crain’s Chicago Business, was that this was not a prelude to some massive unveiling of a New Walgreens, that it would be a ‘starting gun’ for the work to be done, and that investors would be updated through the process. The review will include:

  • Evaluating its 8,000+ location footprint based on current and projected population and type of usage
  • US Healthcare assets including the already shrinking VillageMD [TTA 29 Feb], home care benefit management services primarily for payers CareCentrix, and specialty pharmacy Shields Health Solutions.
  • Shields is apparently no longer up for sale per earlier reports but Boots now may be
  • Smaller assets around clinical trials and pharmacy fulfillment centers

The next earnings call is 28 March, when undoubtedly more will be revealed.

FierceHealthcare caught up to this as well.

Editor’s POV on ‘musts to avoid’: Walgreens’ chief medical officer, Dr. Sashi Moodley, was interviewed during ViVE24 by Mobihealthnews, It is only remarkable in how he sidestepped direct questions beyond the first two lengthy ones on a virtual care initiative, generating a fog of non-answers around VillageMD closures and corporate strategy that became peasoup thick by the last question. (Kudos to Jessica Haden for not going wobbly.) The dubious wisdom of placing a C-level in front of the press at a ‘hard and tough news’ time, one whose expertise is clinical in nature, most comfortable in speaking to that and not corporate strategy, plus evidently has a hard time editing/limiting responses, should be rethought. 

Breaking: VillageMD exiting Illinois clinics–in its home state–as closures top 80 locations

VillageMD to cut six locations in the Chicago area–five standalone, one attached to a Walgreens store. The clinics will close on 19 April.

The irony is that VillageMD is headquartered in Chicago.

In October, Walgreens announced that 60 Village Medical clinics would close. The Florida closings announced last week were in two phases, 14 and 38, a total of 52. With Illinois, the total would be 58. However, Crain’s Chicago Business stated late on Wednesday in its article that 12 Massachusetts locations closed in February. Last month, three locations in New Hampshire and all 12 Indiana clinics closed, bringing the total to 85.

This story will be updated as it develops.

Roundup: Walgreens’ new chief legal officer; Digital Health Collaborative launched; fundings/M&A defrosting for b.well, R1 RCM, Abridge, Reveleer; Veradigm likely delists, buys ScienceIO–mystery? (updated)

Walgreens’ CEO Wentworth’s final add to Executive Committee named. Lanesha Minnix was announced on Monday as the company’s new global chief legal officer and EVP, effective 15 April. She comes from being general counsel and corporate secretary for Ecolab, a Fortune 500 water, hygiene and infection prevention company. As chief legal officer, she will oversee Walgreens’ global legal, compliance, corporate governance and corporate security functions. Ms. Minnix succeeds Danielle Gray, who left in January to “pursue an external opportunity” (Reuters). Yahoo Finance from PR Newswire

A new organization to ‘advance digital health adoption’ launched last week. The Digital Health Collaborative, a coalition of 14 healthcare and consumer organizations, is committed to “evidence-based, cost-effective, equitable digital health solutions.” Their initial activities are expected to include a national purchaser survey, grantmaking, and convenings. The DHC is supported by the Peterson Health Technology Institute (PHTI) and led by Caroline Pearson, also the Executive Director at the NYC-based Peterson Center on Healthcare.

The 14 organizations backing the DHC are: AARP, AHIP, Alliance for Connected Care, American Medical Association (AMA), American Telemedicine Association (ATA), Consumer Technology Association (CTA), Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), Digital Therapeutics Alliance (DTA), HLTH Foundation, Innovation and Value Initiative (IVI), International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM), National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions, The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and RockHealth.org.

The DHC with support from PHTI has established a Research and Impact Fund for aligned research and programs. The first grant was provided to DiMe for its Integrated Evidence Plans for Digital Health Products. While a fine list, this Editor notes no payers or hospitals (end user groups) or cybersecurity organizations to advocate for digital health security. DHC release

Some funding and M&A action…zounds!

b.well Connected Health’s Series C clocks in at $40 million. Leavitt Equity Partners led the raise which tops up b.well’s funding to $98.8 million. Their last funding round was a $32 million Series B in July 2021 with HLM Venture Partners as the lead. b.well markets its FHIR-enabled Connected Health platform to unify healthcare data, solutions, and services for end users at payers, providers, and employers. Joining the board are three new members: Andrew Clark, Managing Partner at Leavitt Equity Partners, Ryan Howells, Principal at Leavitt Partners and Executive Director of the CARIN Alliance, as an independent director, and Hon Pak, MD, Head of Digital Health at Samsung. Samsung is a key partner of b.well. A key joint project involves giving Galaxy smartphone users control over their longitudinal health records, as well as proactive, personalized health insights via Samsung Health, with easy access to care from providers including Walgreens, Northwell Health, Lee Health, ThedaCare, and others. Is the lettered round an indicator of Better Times ahead? Release, FierceHealthcare

R1 RCM may go private via investor group. An investor group led by New Mountain Capital is offering to take the revenue cycle management (RCM) company private to buy up shares they do not already own at $13.75 per share. New Mountain holds 32.43% of shares and is working with an investment group that includes another major shareholder TCP-ASC (TowerBrook Capital Partners that has a 29.64% stake, plus Ascension Health Alliance–Ascension accounts for nearly half of R1’s income), putting them at over 62% if TowerBrook goes all in. Mr. Market has weighed in and says that the offer price is already obsolete. It  represented a tidy premium to Friday’s close at $11.10, but the current trading on Nasdaq is well above the bid at $14.45. Current shareholders such as Coliseum Capital Management LLC, one of the five largest shareholders, have already stated to the board that the company is undervalued at the offer price. R1 traded in the $18 as recently as last summer, but hit a headwind at end of year with the loss of customer Pediatrix on implementation issues. But based on their 2023 performance despite this, the other investors are making a good case. R1 RCM is the largest publicly traded RCM company for hospitals and healthcare systems. They closed 2023 profitably with net income of $3.3 million, flipping a $63 million 2022 loss, on a revenue increase of nearly 25% to $2.3 billion.  Reuters, Healthcare Dive

Abridge, a clinical documentation and ‘clinical conversation’ company, is enjoying a lush Series C of $150 million led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and Redpoint Ventures leading five other investors. Abridge has a conversational AI technology using LLM and speech recognition to ease the burden of taking notes during the doctor’s appointment and states it is fluent in 14 languages across 55 medical specialties. Its last raise was a $30 million Series B just last October. A good reason why both is that it is fully integrated within Epic. According to HISTalk, Lightspeed advisor Paul Ricci is a former chairman and CEO of Nuance, one of Abridge’s biggest competitors, so one has to assume he knows what’s what inside this technology. Axios

Another NLP and AI powered healthcare data analytics company, Reveleer, is also topping its tanks with a $65 million raise. Hercules Capital led the venture round on a total funding of $208 million. Release

Veradigm nears a delisting on Nasdaq due to reporting–but plans acquisition of ScienceIO, in what has to be a first. The continuing delisting watch on Veradigm (the former Allscripts) is fading to black with the company anticipating its failure to file needed financial statements with Nasdaq. Its stock continues to decline (today at $7.32 as of noon ET).

Since March 2023, Veradigm has had trouble with required reports due to faulty financial software and has begged extension after extension. The required reports due by Tuesday 27 February are for 2023 quarterlies on form 10-Q and its annual 2022 report on form 10-K.

Veradigm is also facing a slew of shareholder lawsuits on the decline in its share price [TTA 3 Jan]. To counter this, Veradigm announced today (27 Feb) that the board of directors is adopting a limited duration stockholder rights plan that issues by means of a dividend one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of Company common stock to stockholders of record on the close of business on 8 March 2024. This becomes exercisable only if a person or group secures beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding shares in the next year. The rights plan is obviously designed to compensate shareholders in the event of a takeover not approved by the board (i.e. a hostile takeover) via accumulation of stock and make a sale to an unapproved buyer less attractive. Release, MarketWatch/WSJ

Apparently Veradigm is healthy and profitable, according to analysts reported in Healthcare Dive. The company estimated unaudited revenue between $608 million and $622 million for its fiscal year 2023. Net income from continuing operations is estimated between $49 million and $58 million, according to the filing. This, coupled with its business as a data company, further adds to the mystery around their reporting to Nasdaq.

Simultaneous to the delisting, Veradigm announced today that it is acquiring yet another company, ScienceIO, that is (surprise!) an AI company. Veradigm will leverage ScienceIQs proprietary large language models on Veradigm’s rich data set and more. Acquisition cost of $140 million in cash (subject to customary adjustments for cash, indebtedness, working capital and transaction expenses) has approximately $44 million deferred, substantially all of which is payable in installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing date. Release

This is not the first acquisition that Veradigm has made with the delisting hanging. In January, Veradigm announced the acquisition of Koha Health, which specializes in orthopedic/musculoskeletal (MSK) revenue cycle management (RCM).

Updated 28 Feb: Nasdaq is delisting Veradigm effective 29 February. It will continue to trade OTC under MDRX until whatever time they become compliant with their reports. Veradigm is not appealing at this time. Healthcare Innovation. Veradigm release