Short takes: fundings for Huma, Truvian, Headway, ThymeCare, Freshpaint; Headspace’s new CEO; UK M&A RLDatix-Carebeans; Elevance earnings news, another Steward shocker; Meta’s Reality Labs AR unit sinking–is Meta?

July 18, 2024 | by

Rounding up the fundings first, as signs of life persist through AI disruptions, hacking, and layoffs:

Huma, the former Medopad, now up to a Series D and over $322 million in total funding. The $80 million funding represents a share issuance. Funders included AstraZeneca, Hat Technology Fund 4 by HAT SGR, HV Fund by Hitachi Ventures and Leaps by Bayer. London/New York-based Huma’s last major round was in May 2021 with a jumbo $130 million Series C, not unusual for that time. That round had a $70 million add-on option; looking at Crunchbase, there was a corporate round of £25 million and a debt financing of $30 million between the Series C and D. In 2020, Huma renamed, relogo’d, and pivoted then from something ill-defined around predictive diagnostics to a platform that supports ‘hospital at home’ plus pharma and research companies in large, decentralized clinical trials.

With the funding, Huma also announced the Huma Cloud Platform, designed to benefit their own projects and those of digital health developers with a library of pre-built modules and device-connectivity capabilities. The platform is FDA Class II, EU MDR Class IIb and Saudi FDA Class C cleared.  Huma release, Mobihealthnews

Truvian Health, developer of an automated digital benchtop blood-testing and diagnostics system, scored a $74 million raise in a venture round. The round was led by Great Point Ventures and Wittington Ventures, with participation from existing investors Medical Excellence Capital, Tao Capital, DNS Capital, 7wireVentures and TYH Capital. The company has raised over $208 million through this round and a 2021 (!) $105 million Series C. Truvian’s analyzer is not FDA cleared as of yet and the raise will be used to obtain that clearance. Truvian is also partnering with Shoppers Drug Mart, Canada’s largest pharmacy, as a commercial partner, having worked with Truvian last year on an onsite evaluation versus standard lab testing. Echoes of Theranos, except that it may work?  Release, Mobihealthnews

Behavioral health platforms are still getting financing, with Headway benefiting from a $100 million unlettered venture round. Spark Capital led the round with previous investors participating including Thrive Capital, Accel, Andreessen Horowitz and Global Founders Capital for a total funding of $325 million and a $2.3 billion valuation. Their last round was a $125 million Series C in October 2023 which was pretty impressive in the middle of a funding drought. Reports are a little scarce including no mention on their website, but Behavioral Health Business has what’s available via Bloomberg News. Headway’s niche is exclusively partnering with health plans to provide members with therapy and psychiatry.

One of Headway’s competitors, Headspace, named a new CEO, Tom Pickett, as their new CEO, effective 12 August. He joins from DoorDash, where he served as chief revenue officer, which is quite a leap. Prior to that, he was in digital media and the US Navy as F/A-18 pilot and “Top Gun” graduate. Pickett replaces Russell Glass, who resigned in March. Headspace has had a rocky time of it versus competition, with layoffs of 15% last July and a $105 million senior debt financing to get by [TTA 27 July 2023]. Release

Value-based cancer care platform Thyme Care announced a capital raise of $95 million. The Series B round of equity funding was led by Concord Health Partners with participation from all existing investors, including CVS Health Ventures, Town Hall Ventures, a16z Bio + Health, AlleyCorp, Echo Health Ventures, Frist Cressey Ventures, and Foresite Capital. Adding to this was a $40 million debt financing from Banc of California. The fresh funding brings their total to $178 million. According to MedCityNews, “Thyme Care manages over half a billion dollars in medical spend through its risk-based contracts and anticipates tripling that amount within the next year. The company has also doubled its oncology partnerships in the last six months and intends to expand nationwide by securing new contracts with health plans, employers and primary care groups that bear financial risk”. Release, Mobihealthnews 

Freshpaint took a slightly different tack with its announcement of a $30 million Series B round. Their CEO/co-founder’s blog for this healthcare-focused performance marketing/data infrastructure security company interestingly asks the question why they decided to obtain additional financing. Well, they want to cover the waterfront (Editor’s term) of healthcare beyond hospitals to payers, other providers, and retail health. The financing was led by Threshold with additional participation from SignalFire, Intel Capital, Zero Prime, and Y Combinator. Their Series A back in November 2022 was a modest $9.5 million, for a total since their start of $42 million. 

On the M&A front, we have the UK’s RLDatix acquiring Carebeans. Transaction cost and staff transitions were not disclosed. The two systems will be integrated with single sign in. RLDatix is a healthcare operations platform that captures data across risk, safety, compliance, provider lifecycle and workforce management. Carebeans also provides care management services software primarily in the domicilary, care planning, supported care, and social care management sectors. Release

Elevance (the former Anthem) had a decent quarter. Their Q2 notched $2.3 billion in profit but the company turned around and lowered their full year guidance due to weakness in the health insurance business that reduced total revenue slightly to $43.2 billion. While beating Mr. Market, the ongoing weaknesses in the payer market have analysts seeing yellow and red flags. Elevance’s Medicaid enrollment declined 5%: 2.2 million to 45.8 million. As UHG stated in their earnings results, they are swimming against a general trend toward elevated utilization rates and higher acuity populations, particularly in Medicaid, which was offset by increased premiums. For Medicare Advantage, they believe their plans will benefit from CMS’ rerun of the Star ratings and balance out reimbursement cuts. Healthcare Dive, FierceHealthcare

As if the Steward Healthcare story couldn’t get any more seamy (not steamy–that was earlier this month), 14 executives paid themselves $1 million + salaries and bonuses in the year prior to the company’s Chapter 11. MedCityNews did the math on the bankruptcy filing addendum (Statement of Financial Affairs Amendment). The CEO earned a $3.7 million salary, the president of Steward Health Care a $1.73 million salary plus a $500,000 bonus, and the EVP for human resources a $842,000 salary with a $300,000 bonus. Extremely high C-level/EVP salaries in healthcare are not unusual even for smaller organizations, but Steward was in trouble plenty for some years, and being sued right and left by vendors for long-delayed payments and bouncing checks. You wonder what the debtors-in-possession will make of all of this

Last but certainly not least are reports of layoffs and major restructuring at Meta (Facebook)’s Reality Labs, which is their unit for augmented reality (AR)/virtual reality (VR) headset and software development unit. It’s now separated into two units, Wearables (headsets, glasses such as smart Ray-Bans) and Metaverse (platform and Quest headsets). Reports that are primarily paywalled have said that multiple leaders have been laid off from the company, with The Information (paywalled) stating the late June layoff affected a dozen VPs and directors. Teams also have to cut spending 20% by 2026, with the bulk of the cuts this year. Meta, despite billions in investment and Metaverse hype by Mark Zuckerberg including a corporate name change, has largely failed against Apple’s Vision Pro and others. ABPLive, EM360Tech

Whither Meta? An Editor’s Opinion: This Editor believes that Meta requires a real housecleaning which may be beyond the abilities or interests of its controlling shareholder. The Reality Labs reorganization resembles rearranging deck chairs on a listing ship as AR/VR users in healthcare invariably use Apple and other headsets. While claiming 175 million users of an X-like platform called Threads, does anyone actually use it? Facebook is suffering from an aging user base and Gen X defection. Ads are down in overall share though still around 10%. Effectiveness in the past few years is also dropping due to fatigue factor. As a Facebook admin for a non-profit organization, their tools feel a decade old–clunky and hard to use. Facebook Marketplace is a modest success as an e-commerce adjunct to Facebook, but resembles CraigsList. Zuckerberg seems to care more for his charities and political influence, so perhaps it’s time for him to leave management to others–and retire.  

Monday roundup: Envision files Ch. 11, who’s to blame for Meta Pixel abuse?, CVS Health to shut clinical trials unit, Amino Health scoops $80M, DocGo flat but optimistic, Owlet way down in revenue

May 16, 2023 | by

What was envisioned last week came to pass for Envision Healthcare on Sunday. The hospital and physician staffing company filed for Chapter 11 reorganization five years after it was taken private by investment company KKR. At the time of that massive buyout, the value of the company was pegged at $10 billion. Things started to go south for Envision after 2020 with the pandemic drying up patient volumes for two years, with the added factors of regulations kicking in on ‘no surprise’ billing, inflation, staffing shortages, and major fights with health plans around out-of-network inflated charges plus a huge claims dispute with UnitedHealthcare [TTA 12 May]. Ironically, Envision won the main dispute with UHG; that $91 million won in arbitration in an insider’s view would have staved off the bankruptcy this year.

KKR will apparently lose its $3.5 billion equity in the company as $8 billion in debt restructuring takes place. What’s before the court is that the Envision staffing operation will be separated from the AmSurg surgical clinics. Senior lenders will have their debt rearranged into equity into one or the other company. Junior lenders, bondholders, and KKR will receive zero, or as we say locally, bupkis. It’s envisioned (sic) that the restructuring will take about three to four months.  Financial Times, Envision release

The hospitals, that’s who! If you believe Meta, it’s the hospitals that abused those poor Pixels, making them do things against their wishes to tattle all sorts of PHI and PII to Big Bad Meta which sends patients all those Nasty Intrusive Ads. Meta is being sued by parties from the ACLU to patients in class action lawsuits on how the Pixel was used on hospital patient portals and scheduling websites. Meta’s argument is that the health systems’ developers could but did not control how the ad trackers were used and that “Meta did not implement or configure” the Pixels used on the health systems’ websites. In fact, Meta claims that they have filtering tools that screen out sensitive data and that would alert the developer. “It’s ultimately the developer, not Meta, that controls the code on its own website and chooses what information to send,” according to the May 5 filing in that busy US District Court of Northern California.

This could influence outcomes in the multitude of lawsuits being filed against health systems like Kaiser Permanente, UCSF Health, and LCMC Health in New Orleans plus Willis-Knighton Health in northwest Louisiana (Healthcare Dive). If the District Court finds that Meta, and possibly other ad trackers such as those from Google, Twitter, or Bing were not inherently liable for personal health data violations that monetized PHI, then the health systems are 100% on the hook for the data breaches (or ‘wiretapping’ in a creative use of terminology). It also makes the potential paydays possibly less lucrative–in the eyes of this Editor, as Meta and Google have far deeper pockets than any ol’ health system. SC Media, Paubox   The Meta Pixel backstory here

CVS Health to shut its clinical trials unit by December 2024. CVS, like Walgreens and Walmart, jumped into the clinical trials business during the Covid-19 pandemic, seeing a need in the market with pharmaceutical companies and a ready-made, 100 million deep diverse base of patients among their pharmacy users. CVS cited to Healthcare Dive that the shutdown was to better concentrate on core business. Current active trials on the website include narcolepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, and kidney health. No disclosure as to profitability but CVS has a lot to digest with new buys Signify Health and Oak Street Health.

Amino Health’s $80 million funding is a bright spot in this sideways spring. With a digital guidance model that works with employers and health plans to help 1.6 million members navigate their care, their new funding will be used for technology scaling. Equity and debt financing were led by Transformation Capital, which will be joining the Amino board, and Oxford Finance LLC. Amino is being boosted by the Federal Transparency in Coverage (TIC) Rule which makes pricing disclosure a key part of plan navigation. Amino originally started with a direct-to-consumer model but shifted to enterprise, including brokers and third-party administrators. Amino’s total raise is now $125 million (Crunchbase). Mobihealthnews, Amino release

DocGo’s two services, mobile health and medical transport, essentially swapped revenue this quarter in a better-than-average picture. Their mobile health services area in Q1 fell 19% to $72.9 million from $90.1 million in Q1 2022, while transportation services grew 44% to $40.1 million from $27.8 million in Q1 2022. This added to total revenue of $113 million with a net loss of $3.9 million. Their 2023 revenue guidance remains at $500-$510 million with adjusted EBITDA guidance of $45-$50 million. 

What’s promising here is that it’s a SPAC that didn’t crack like practically every other. DocGo pointed out in their release that they have a backlog of $205 million in total contract value over approximately three years and they have doubled their RFPs. Their patient target for 2023 is 50,000. Share price today on Nasdaq ticked up to $8.77. Considering their high last year of $11.08, they are not doing badly in this time at all. Mobihealthnews .We last saw DocGo providing mobile clinics in a Tennessee pilot with Dollar General [TTA 24 Jan] which now is tied in with the state of Tennessee, plus a pilot in NY and NJ with Redirect Health. They provide services in 26 states and the UK.  

This Editor is trying to be as cheerful as the baby at left about baby sock/monitor Owlet, which has had a rough ride in the past two years. Their revenue dropped to $10.7 million in Q1 2023 versus $12 million in Q4 2022 and $21.5 million in Q1 2022. Owlet ended 2021 with a nastygram from the FDA that pulled their original Smart Sock off the market [TTA 4 Dec 2021] but rebounded early in 2022 with the Dream Sock and Dream Duo [TTA 16 Feb 2022] that avoided the claims that sent them into 510(k) Marketing Neverland.  Still, they were delisted by the NYSE in December 2022. On the positive side, Owlet wound up 2022 with $69.2 million in revenue and a good-sized private placement of $30 million in February [TTA 18 Mar]. It has submitted to FDA for two products, including the steep de novo climb on an enhancement to the Dream Sock. Now a much smaller company than it was last year, they have reduced operational expenses to $15.1 million from $24.1 million in Q4 2022 to get to breakeven by end of this year and to be relisted on the NYSE in the future. Having followed them since the early ‘telehealth for the bassinet set’ days of 2012-2013, this Editor wishes them bonne chance. Owlet release, Mobihealthnews

Meta Pixel ad tracker collects another 3 million data breaches at Advocate Aurora Health; Zuckerberg getting Senate scrutiny

October 21, 2022 | by

The Pixel ad tracker continues to be a Big Problem for Meta and Facebook. Advocate Aurora Health, a large health system in Illinois and Wisconsin, this week informed 3 million patients of a potential data breach connected to the use of Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel snippets of JavaScript code were used within their Epic MyChart and LiveWell websites and applications, as well as on some of their schedulers.

As we have previously noted (below), ad trackers like the Meta Pixel are used to target website visitors and also to track ads placed on Facebook and Instagram. Developers routinely permit these snippets of code as trackers for better performance and website tracking, but the problem here is that sensitive patient information (PHI) is being sent back to Facebook where it violates patient privacy and can be misused.

Advocate Aurora cited that Meta Pixel may have collected “IP address; dates, times, and/or locations of scheduled appointments; your proximity to an Advocate Aurora Health location; information about your provider; type of appointment or procedure; communications between you and others through MyChart, which may have included your first and last name and your medical record number; information about whether you had insurance; and, if you had a proxy MyChart account, your first name and the first name of your proxy.” It did not collect social security number, financial accounts, credit cards, or debit card information. At this point, there is no reported misuse of information. Bleeping Computer, HealthcareITNews

That this is at all problematic is being vigorously denied by Facebook. But in an unusual move, Senator John Warner (D-VA) sent a letter yesterday to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, containing seven fairly rigorous questions based on The Markup’s articles to be answered by 3 November. This follows on Sen. Jon Ossoff’s request via the Senate Homeland Security Committee (below)  (Editor’s opinion: to be written by Meta’s lawyers, and don’t hold your breath for any rending of garments or mea culpas.) HealthcareITNews, The Markup

Our previous articles on The Markup‘s research and Meta Pixel:

Breaking: Hospitals sending sensitive patient information to Facebook through website ‘Meta Pixel’ ad tracker–study

Facebook Meta Pixel update: Nemours Children’s Health using 25 ad trackers on appointment scheduling site

Let the lawsuits begin: Meta sued by health system patient for Meta Pixel info gathering

Novant Health notification 

Meta facing some Senate scrutiny on Meta Pixel’s health data collection–and how it’s used

Meta facing some Senate scrutiny on Meta Pixel’s health data collection–and how it’s used

September 20, 2022 | by

A member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) has requested that Facebook’s parent, Meta, account for healthcare information that it has collected as a result of the Meta Pixel being used on leading hospitals’ websites as an ad tracker. During a hearing, Meta chief product officer Chris Cox was questioned about Meta’s having and using the data and responded, “Not to my knowledge.” According to this latest report in The Markup, Cox will follow up with a written response to the committee.

The June investigation by The Markup and STAT [TTA 17 June] investigated how these snippets of code, routinely used by developers to track website performance, could be sending to Facebook through online appointment schedulers and patient portals highly sensitive patient information. As we noted then from the article, “None of the hospitals using the Pixel have patient consent forms permitting the transmission of individual patient information, nor business associate agreements (BAAs) that permit this data’s collection.” Facebook’s defense is that it does not use this information in any identifiable way.  

Developments have moved quickly since then. According to The Markup, 28 of the 33 hospitals in the initial report have removed the Meta Pixel from their appointment schedulers or blocked it from sending patient information to Facebook. At least six of the seven health systems had also removed the pixels from their patient portals. In August, Novant Health notified patients of a code misconfiguration of their Meta Pixel tracker that may lead to unauthorized disclosure of their personal health information (PHI) [TTA 19 Aug]. North Carolina’s attorney general may investigate. Five class action lawsuits have been filed by patients, including against Novant and Medstar [TTA 23 June].

It may be that Meta may have a very hard time ‘splainin’ to Sen. Ossoff how the data flow and is used for any given account, based upon their own internal engineers’ assessments in a leaked 2021 privacy memo. But given Meta’s and the founder’s pull in the Federal government, one wonders how far all of this will go. Your Editor is not optimistic. TTA’s articles on Meta Pixel

Let the lawsuits begin: Meta sued by health system patient for Meta Pixel info gathering

June 23, 2022 | by

That was fast. Class action game on! Today’s reports of a class action lawsuit being filed against Meta Friday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco is going to be only the first. The ‘John Doe’ plaintiff, a patient of Baltimore-based Medstar Health System and a Facebook user, claims that he is filing on behalf of “millions of other Americans whose medical privacy has been violated by Facebook’s Pixel tracking tool.” Four law firms are involved in the lawsuit. It follows on last week’s investigative report by The Markup and STAT on the Meta Pixel tracker being used by 33 of the top 100 hospital systems [TTA 17 June].

The study indicates that the information gathered in the appointment booking form included IP address, doctor’s name, patient name, email address, phone number, zip code, and city of residence. When it’s put together with outside information, it can be considered a HIPAA violation.

The lawsuit alleges that the information was collected without consent. Neither Meta nor Facebook have a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) agreement in place covering them for gathering this information in any one of the 664 health systems using the Meta Pixel cited in the suit.

The suit requests compensatory and punitive damages for breach of contract, constitutional invasion of privacy, violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, and other allegations. The filing was captured by ReclaimTheNet.org. If you look at page 18, there are multiple statements from Meta/Facebook stating that advertising based on health is ‘inappropriate’, but then illustrates how Facebook goes ahead and does it anyway (!)

A small wrinkle: In a statement to HIPAA Journal, Medstar Health Systems claimed it does not use the Meta Pixel or any Facebook code on its website. It creates an issue of the plaintiff’s standing and harm.

FierceHealthcare, Becker’s, HealthITSecurity