BlackCat is back, claims theft of 6TB of Change Healthcare data

February 29, 2024 | by

What’s known as of Thursday 29 February (Leap Day) about the Change Healthcare cyberattack:

  • Change and Optum have attributed it to BlackCat/ALPHV as of today. From Becker’s HealthIT:  “Change Healthcare can confirm we are experiencing a cybersecurity issue perpetrated by a cybercrime threat actor who has represented itself to us as ALPHV/Blackcat,” an Optum spokesperson emailed Becker’s on Feb. 29. “We are actively working to understand the impact to members, patients and customers.”
  • BlackCat is claiming it stole 6 terabytes (TB) of data in the breach. From Bleeping Computer 28 Feb:

BlackCat said that they allegedly stole 6TB of data from Change Healthcare’s network belonging to “thousands of healthcare providers, insurance providers, pharmacies, etc.”

The ransomware gang claims that they stole source code for Change Healthcare solutions and sensitive information belonging to many partners, including the U.S. military’s Tricare healthcare program, the Medicare federal health insurance program, CVS Caremark, MetLife, Health Net, and tens of other healthcare insurance providers.

Per BlackCat’s claims, the sensitive data stolen from Change Healthcare contains a wide range of information on millions of people, including their:

  • medical records
  • insurance records
  • dental records
  • payments information
  • claims information
  • patients’ PII data (i.e., phone numbers, addresses, social security numbers, email addresses, and more)
  • active U.S. military/navy personnel PII data

Tyler Mason, UnitedHealth Group VP, had earlier stated to Bleeping Computer that 90% of the 70,000+ affected pharmacies switched to new electronic claims procedures to avoid the Change Healthcare issues. 

While this cybertheft appears breathtaking in its scope and perfect revenge as a “dish best eaten cold” for the December takedown of their websites, the amount and type of data in the exploit may be exaggerated for purposes of negotiating a rich settlement. As of today, BlackCat has not offered a number for ransom. This theft may be worth far more in selling the data to other cybercriminals in Russia, Eastern Europe, and China than demanding a ransom from UHG/Optum, which may decide to rebuild systems rather than pay up [TTA 27 Feb].

Change Healthcare cyberattack persists–is the BlackCat gang back and using LockBit malware? BlackCat taking credit. (update 28 Feb #2)

February 27, 2024 | by

On Day 7, reports, like recollections, may differ. Today’s Reuters report (26 Feb) attributes the attack on Change Healthcare, which has snarled pharmacies and hospitals since Wednesday [TTA 23 Feb], to a revived BlackCat (a/k/a ALPHV) ransomware operation. Readers will recall that the FBI busted BlackCat right before Christmas last year, seizing their operational darknet websites and putting up a most showy home screen. They worked their way into the BlackCat operation via their affiliate operation. However, BlackCat rebooted a few days later, made an appearance, and went back underground. As Bleeping Computer predicted then, BlackCat is apparently back and, adding insult, not even under a new name. 

Bleeping Computer today reported that BlackCat’s hack went through a critical ConnectWise ScreenConnect auth bypass flaw (CVE-2024-1708 and 1709) which was actively exploited in attacks to deploy ransomware on unpatched servers. This was confirmed by Reuters and Health-ISAC, a healthcare-focused organization engaged in cyber best practices and threat intelligence, via the American Hospital Association’s AHA Cybersecurity Advisory today (26 Feb). AHA is advising healthcare organizations to actively reevaluate their connection or disconnection status of Change Healthcare systems which have been deemed safe by Optum.

As of today, BlackCat did not claim credit for taking down Change’s systems nor is there any report of a ransom demand. It is perhaps too early to determine if there has been any data theft. Nor are there reports of other healthcare or other organizations being attacked through the ScreenConnect flaw.

Optum has a page detailing the status of Change Healthcare’s individual systems here. Optum has a statement that has remained nearly the same on issues with connectivity since last Wednesday.* This Editor’s experience of the page is that it needs refreshing to view the full version. Regarding the systems, they are a long list to scroll through and your Editor lost count after 100. Most have red Xs by them. Some systems are checked green. Change is also holding Zoom calls to update partners. Reuters reported that Alphabet’s cybersecurity unit Mandiant is in charge of investigating the attack.

Change Healthcare processes 15 billion healthcare claims annually. This attack seems to have hit their pharmacy software the hardest. These software tools are used to verify patient eligibility for specific medication and also their insurance coverage. The outage not only covers the big chains like CVS and Walgreens, but also Tricare and the Military Health System (MHS) globally. TTA 22 Feb, updated 23 Feb.

A Friday report in SC Magazine indicated that the malware used by BlackCat was a strain of LockBit malware going through the ConnectWise ScreenConnect bypass flaw. Their source, Toby Goucker, chief security officer at First Health Advisory, stated that their firm found the ScreenConnect flaws and sent out a notification on 19 February. Goucker noted that bad actors prey on the gap between when these vulnerabilities are uncovered and announced, but before when patches are applied. However, Goucker was not able to confirm that Change uses ScreenConnect.

Ironically, the LockBit ransomwareistes were busted only last week by a combined UK NCA and US DOJ/FBI effort. Like weeds, they never go away entirely.

Oddly, Change Healthcare’s website home page does not have a notice about their problem or direct to a page on their or UHG’s site about it for assistance. We know you’re busy, guys, but from this Editor’s marketing perspective not having an information banner and redirect to the Optum page is a basic communication failure.

**This is a developing story and will be updated.**

*Update 27 Feb 9am Eastern Time.

A repeat of Optum’s boilerplate statement on their page today indicates this cyberattack is still unresolved for most of Change Healthcare–and will remain unresolved at least through today:

Update – Change Healthcare is experiencing a cyber security issue, and our experts are working to address the matter. Once we became aware of the outside threat, and in the interest of protecting our partners and patients, we took immediate action to disconnect Change Healthcare’s systems to prevent further impact. This action was taken so our customers and partners do not need to. We have a high-level of confidence that Optum, UnitedHealthcare and UnitedHealth Group systems have not been affected by this issue.

We are working on multiple approaches to restore the impacted environment and will not take any shortcuts or take any additional risk as we bring our systems back online. We will continue to be proactive and aggressive with all our systems and if we suspect any issue with the system, we will immediately take action and disconnect. The disruption is expected to last at least through the day. We will provide updates as more information becomes available.
Feb 27, 2024 – 09:03 EST

Identical message 28 Feb 10:48am ET indicating that the effects of this attack are now one week old.

Updated 28 Feb: DataBreaches.net (“The Office of Inadequate Security”) reports that BlackCat is taking credit for it.

“BlackCat informed DataBreaches that yes, they are responsible for the attack. DataBreaches has asked them if they are willing to share any additional details and will update this post if any are received.”

This Editor is also following coverage in the usually reliable The Register which added a reply they obtained from Optum: “Since identifying the cyber incident, we have worked closely with customers and clients to ensure people have access to the medications and the care they need. We also continue to work closely with law enforcement and a number of third parties, including Mandiant and Palo Alto Networks, on this attack against Change Healthcare’s systems.” They are not confirming the perpetrators. 

#2 update from DataBreaches may point to Change Healthcare as well as healthcare in general. Here is part of a Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) that is an ongoing #StopRansomware effort by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). CISA was joined by the FBI and interestingly, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). They “are releasing this joint CSA to disseminate known IOCs and TTPs associated with the ALPHV Blackcat ransomware as a service (RaaS) identified through FBI investigations as recently as February 2024.” The addition of HHS as well as February 2024 should be noted. “FBI, CISA, and HHS encourage critical infrastructure organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this CSA to reduce the likelihood and impact of ALPHV Blackcat ransomware and data extortion incidents.” Could this be behind what is going on at Change Healthcare–a BlackCat full-court press versus US healthcare?

And at least one major hospital CEO wants answers now. Tampa General Hospital CEO John Couris went up to Optum’s CEO Amar Desai in the speaker room at the ViVE conference in Los Angeles on Monday, and the answer was far less than satisfactory. “And his answer to me was, ‘We’ll have an update in two days.’ So I don’t think he knows.” Mr. Couris’ speculates that Change Healthcare will 1) not pay ransom and 2) will rebuild its systems in maybe four weeks–and how that puts hospitals like his that use Change as a clearing house for claims in, to put it mildly, a pickle. MedCityNews

Breaking: Walgreens’ VillageMD shutting in Florida; Change Healthcare system websites cyberattacked (updated 23 Feb)

February 22, 2024 | by

The New Reality Strikes Again. Walgreens is closing all VillageMD locations in Florida. In addition to the 14 already closed, an additional 38 will be shuttered on 15 March for a total of 52. These are all co-located and attached to Walgreens locations (left).

Florida was a major expansion market for co-located clinics and its third largest market following Texas and Arizona) according to a report by investment analyst Jefferies.  In October, Walgreens announced the closure of 60 Village Medical locations in ‘non-strategic locations’. In January, CEO Tim Wentworth confirmed that about half of those locations were already closed. Doing the math, the rest of those locations will be in Florida.  Updated–see 29 February

Evidently, Walgreens’ US Healthcare unit views Florida as non-supportable to warrant a drastic move like this in a growing population market. Business Insider, which appears to have an inside track on this from the Jefferies report, “theorized” that many of these Village Medical locations were actually inside pharmacies–too small to attract patients and to recruit primary care doctors. If this is true, for a company that prides itself on retail know-how, as in the old real estate saw ‘location-location-location’, it has made a major and costly misstep.

Walgreens has sunk close to $9 billion into VillageMD: $5.2 billion for the majority stake and another $3.5 billion to aid with the Summit Health/CityMD buy. This does not include the earlier minority investment in VillageMD, so the total is likely well north of $10 billion. It all looked very different in 2020 when it was ‘go big or go home’. One wonders if VillageMD / Village Medical or its parts are on the selling block along with Shields Health if Walgreens has decided on a major strategic change.  Healthcare Dive

And another Reality is Cyberattack. Revenue cycle management and leading patient payment processor Change Healthcare is the latest victim. It notified users that it was disconnecting systems hours after Wednesday morning Eastern Time when it noticed disruptions to some applications that grew into “enterprise-wide connectivity issues.” The disruption is continuing into today (Thursday 22 Feb). There are few public specifics other than the timing and confirmation of the attack as of now, but it appears to have reached down to the local pharmacy level, into providers of all sizes, and shut down nearly every Change Healthcare system. This Editor visited the main website, which appears altered (shrunken); attempts to go to connecting links go to blank screens. Optum is not disclosing further information and perhaps shouldn’t at this point. Change Healthcare is part of UnitedHealth Group’s Optum and processes 15 billion transactions a year filled with PHI and PII, which adds to the scariness factor. TechCrunch, Becker’s, HealthITSecurity   This is a developing story and will be updated

Update 22 Feb: HISTalk reports that athenahealth customers are also affected, as their electronic data interchange is supported by Change Healthcare technology.

UnitedHealth Group said in an SEC filing that a “suspected nation-state associated cybersecurity threat actor” gained access to Change Healthcare’s information technology systems. It “cannot estimate the duration or extent of the disruption at this time.” UnitedHealth has retained security experts and was working with law enforcement. As of Thursday evening, the disruption continues and affects pharmacies nationwide in an inability to process insurance claims for prescriptions. Healthcare services are also being disrupted, said an unnamed director at a regional hospital system in Pennsylvania. Reuters

Update 23 Feb: Further corroboration in Fox Business on the above and continuing effects on pharmacies. Tricare, which covers active and retired military, stated on its website in a news release that this is impacting all military pharmacies worldwide. “Military clinics and hospitals will provide outpatient prescriptions through a manual procedure” until the ongoing cyberattack against Change Healthcare “is resolved.”

In more unwelcome news that this cyberattack is ongoing, the American Hospital Association (AHA) is formally advising healthcare facilities to not only disconnect from Change/Optum, but also check their own IT for vulnerabilities. AHA notice.  Also WSJ (not paywalled)

DOJ drops appeal to block UHG-Change; more hints that FTC will be hunting big game with Amazon

March 23, 2023 | by

DOJ has walked away from trying to stop the already-closed UHG-Change Healthcare merger. The US Department of Justice, which had appealed in November the District Court of DC approval in late September of UnitedHealth Group’s acquisition of Change Healthcare, on antitrust grounds, decided ‘enough egg on face’ and dropped its appeals court filings on 21 March. DOJ did not respond to Reuters’ report. Change is being integrated into OptumInsight and will be kept separate from the health plans. The DC District Court ruling found that DOJ did not conclusively prove its allegations of antitrust and loss of competition in services to hospitals and other providers. Statements from UHG’s competitors such as Cigna, Aetna, and Elevance (Anthem) that the acquisition would not lead them to ‘stifle innovation’ also weakened the DOJ’s case. Had the appeal been successful, it would have forced separation of Change Healthcare’s businesses, which are being quickly integrated into OptumInsight.  Healthcare Dive, Becker’s. Also TTA 4 Oct and 22 Nov 22.

Elsewhere in DC, it’s hunting season for the FTC, and its sights are fixed on Big Game called Amazon. POLITICO confirmed the speculation (or gave advance notice) [TTA 3 Mar], that FTC was building a multi-layered case beyond the Amazon-One Medical buy and warnings about failing to maintain consumer privacy [TTA 3 Mar] to include multiple practices. The POLITICO report indicates that there are at least six ongoing investigations by the FTC’s competition and consumer protection teams, with three apparently near the boiling point of action:

  • Blocking the acquisition of iRobot, famous for its Roomba robot vacuums. Amazon’s $1.7 billion acquisition has stalled with FTC rumoring action and Amazon apparently shutting down any further information. It does not have UK or EU approvals, which gives the FTC some more time to build a case. iRobot is the largest maker of robot vacuums. An acquisition would be expected to shut out competitive manufacturers marketing on Amazon such as Samsung. Their report indicates that FTC’s staff attorneys are leaning toward suing to stop the deal. Court action is expected in the next few months or sooner. 
  • Privacy investigations involving data security from their Ring camera/security system business and the Alexa voice assistant. The Alexa investigation also involves potential violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. iRobot, Ring, and Alexa also tie into another FTC concern that Amazon is cornering the market on connected home devices.
  • Retail operations. These possibly could be around bundling services through the Prime subscription business and how competitor data is used on the Amazon platform to ‘outmuscle’ them. There is also a deceptive advertising probe around the use of the “Amazon Choice” label for certain products, including pay-to-play practices.

There is also scrutiny of how Prime and other Amazon services entice customers in with offers for expensive subscriptions, then make it extremely difficult or opaque to unsubscribe. This deceptive practice is called a “dark pattern”. Stay tuned.

CVS opens the checkbook, does the Oak Street Health deal for a generous $10.6B

February 9, 2023 | by

Staying on strategy, CVS buys provider group Oak Street Health. First rumored in mid-January, CVS Health and Oak Street finalized their deal today. The $10.6 billion purchase price of the NYSE traded company rewards shareholders with a $39 per share purchase price. 45% of the shareholders are composed of Newlight Partners LP and General Atlantic LLC plus certain members of the Oak Street Health Board of Directors. They have agreed to vote the shares they own in favor of the transaction (with a whew! at exiting). It is expected to close this year subject to the usual Department of Justice antitrust, Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state-level review.

The $39 per share price was a tick lower than the January speculation that the price would be over $40 per share. $39 is not bad; at close of last week OSH was trading at $26.80, a far cry from its 2021 share prices in the $50-60 range. Today’s price closed at just above $35.  It has 169 offices and 600 providers across 21 states, making it a manageable size for CVS. OSH is headquartered in Chicago. Their CEO Mike Pykosz will continue to lead OSH, which will become part of CVS’ new Health Care Delivery organization and will be payer agnostic.  Oak Street is notable for serving underserved patient populations–50 percent of Oak Street Health’s patients have a housing, food or isolation risk factor.  

CVS Health’s long term plan, announced at recent earnings calls, is to add services in three categories: primary care, provider enablement, and home health. They are not hurting for profit or financing, closing out 2022 with $4.2 billion profit which certainly is a shining star in the depressed healthcare sky. CVS projects more than $500 million in synergy potential at the 2026 goal which is over 300 centers by 2026. But there will be losses first: 2023 loss about $200 million and not turning the profit corner till 2025 at earliest. An attractive point for CVS is  Canopy, their proprietary technology that determines the appropriate type and level of care for each OSH patient–and care integrates nicely into CVS Health’s community, home and digital offerings, as they say.

Will DOJ allow it without divestment? This administration has already taken a fairly hard tack on antitrust, trying (and failing, though appealing) to block UHG-Change Healthcare. Already the CVS-OSH tie-up has been opposed by an antitrust think tank, the American Economic Liberties Project. Oak Street adds primary care practices to those already under Aetna, many of which are in Federal ACO programs. Signify Health also has Medicare ACO practice groups, including the Caravan ACOs bought late last year. The Signify buy is already under a rolling DOJ and FTC review that has been moving slowly since last October. Signify’s other strength is diversification into home health, CVS’ third target area.

CVS’ investment in Carbon Health ($100 million Series D investment into primary and urgent care clinics in Western states) may be considered as Carbon will be piloting clinics in CVS retail locations. Release, Mobihealthnews, Healthcare Dive, Becker’s (including a breakdown of CVS’ 2022 financials), FierceHealthcare

CVS works their plan in Oak Street Health buy talks, Carbon Health $100M investment + clinic pilot; VillageMD-Summit finalizes (updated)

January 11, 2023 | by

CVS, Walgreens, Amazon, Walmart all chasing the same type of companies to expand their service continuum. During their Q2 2022 earnings call, CVS Health announced that they were determined to enhance their services in three categories: primary care, provider enablement, and home health. And CVS’ CEO Karen Lynch was pretty blunt about it: “We can’t be in the primary care without M&A” (sic). So CVS’ latest moves should come as no surprise.

Oak Street Health: CVS is in talks with this value-based care primary care provider for primarily older adults in Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans. With 100 offices nationally, it’s not too small, not too large to combine with other operations. As a public company traded on the NYSE but puttering along in the $13-$22 per share range since the fall from a high of $30 in August, the news of CVS’ interest has boosted them above $28 and a market cap of just under $7 billion. Although Oak Street has previously maintained that they have no interest in a sale, it has never been profitable and is on track to lose $200 million this year. That is not a good look for CVS but they are working a strategy. Previously, CVS walked away from primary care group Cano Health [TTA 21 Oct 22]. Bloomberg News (paywalled) reported that CVS could pay $10 billion which would be over $40 a share. Healthcare Dive, Reuters

Carbon Health: CVS leads their Series D with a $100 million investment plus piloting Carbon Health operations in primary and urgent care clinics in their retail stores. However, the deal came at a price. Last week, prior to the investment announcement, Carbon announced that it would wind down lines of business in public health, remote patient monitoring, hardware, and chronic care programs, cutting 200 jobs in addition to a June cut of 250, at the time about 8% of their workforce. Carbon will now concentrate on their clinic core business. 100 are presently located across Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, Kansas, Florida, Massachusetts, and California (San Francisco, Bay Area, and San Jose).

In the last two years, Carbon raised $350 million and grew by acquiring four clinic chains. It diversified by buying Steady Health (chronic care management in diabetes) and Alertive Health (remote patient management)–both businesses they are departing. Reportedly last month they bought Inofab Health, an Istanbul-based digital health platform for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and cystic fibrosis. Crunchbase, FierceHealthcare, Mobihealthnews, SF BizJournal,

CVS is still working its Signify Health acquisition past the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It went into a Second Request for information in late October under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR), which adds 30 days to the review timetable after the Second Request has been complied with. There is some competitive overlap between CVS and Signify in home health management and accountable care organization (ACO) operations, and some divestitures may be necessary. A closing in Q1 as planned seems optimistic. Acquiring Oak Street may complicate matters since their clinics operate as a Direct Contracting Entity (DCE, now ACO REACH). This present administration is not friendly towards healthcare consolidation of any type, especially with entities participating in Federal programs. (See UHG’s acquisition of Change Healthcare, with court approval being appealed by DOJ.) Reaching (so to speak) deep into CMS programs could be a red flag.

Walgreens’ VillageMD finalized their Summit Health acquisition for $8.9 billion yesterday (9 Jan) (updated). Now with 680 provider locations in 26 markets and 20,000 employees, the group adds to VillageMD’s primary care practices specialty practices in neurology, chiropractic, cardiology, orthopedics, and dermatology plus 150 City MD urgent care locations. 200 VillageMD locations are already adjacent to Walgreens locations. Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) and Evernorth, the health services business of Cigna, were the two investors. WBA raised full-year sales guidance from $133.5 billion to $137.5 billion. The current chair and former chief executive officer of Summit Health, Jeffrey Le Benger, MD, will be the interim president until VillageMD finds a permanent president reporting to VillageMD CEO Tim Barry. Release, RevCycleIntelligence, Forbes  At this point, Walgreens hasn’t moved forward with the rumored acquisition of ACO management services organization Evolent Health [TTA 1 Oct 22], which would be far more complex. 

Amazon is still awaiting Federal approval for One Medical as well as in multiple states (Oregon only the first; expect scrutiny). It is also closing Amazon Care and opening asynchronous non-face-to-face telehealth service Amazon Clinic.  Walmart continues on an internal strategy of opening Walmart Health clinics in underserved areas. Earlier in 2022, they announced the opening of more health ‘superstores’ in Florida, having established 20 in Arkansas, Illinois, and Georgia starting in 2019. Walmart’s approach to retailing health services and products, since getting serious about it in 2018, has wavered with multiple changes of strategy and executive departures [TTA 22 Nov 22]

News roundup: Babylon Health Q3 revenue up 3.9x; surprise–DOJ to appeal UHG-Change buy approval; Walmart loses senior health exec Pegus to JPM

November 22, 2022 | by

Earlier this month, Babylon Health announced its Q3 financials. Both revenue and value-based care membership grew. Losses also grew but the margins narrowed considerably. Highlights of their release:

Comparing Q3 2022 to Q3 2021

  • Revenue increased by $288.9 million versus $74.5 million, an increase of $214.4 million or 3.9x. This was largely driven by a 285% increase in Medicare membership.
  • Losses were there but margins improved due to aggressive cost reductions. Q3 loss was $89.9 million, or a 31.1% loss for the Period Margin (percent of revenue). Last year’s loss was $66 million, or 88.6% Period Margin. This represented an improvement of 57 points. When looking at EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA totaled $(54.3) million, an (18.8)% Adjusted EBITDA Margin. This compared to last year’s $(47.5) million Adjusted EBITDA, or (63.7)% Adjusted EBITDA Margin, an improvement of 45 points.
  • Value-based care membership grew 2.7x to approximately 271,000
  • They acquired Medicare Advantage members in New Mexico, and commercial members via a digital-first product for Centene’s Ambetter plans in six states
  • In the UK, their Bupa partnership was extended for three years. Bupa has 2.3 million health insurance customers.

For year 2022, Babylon is updating its revenue guidance from $1.0 billion or greater to $1.05 billion to $1.1 billion.

Babylon is selling Meritage Medical Network, an independent physician association (IPA) based in Northern and Central California with 1,800 providers in six counties serving 90,000 patients, advised by  a major investment bank. They will also comply with SEC reporting requirements for a domestic issuer versus previously as a foreign private issue. Babylon will report its Q4 and 2022 yearend results under U.S. GAAP. They are also proceeding with a 25-to-1 reverse stock split to boost share price and prevent a NYSE delisting [TTA 13 Oct]. Mobihealthnews

The Department of Justice (DOJ) wiped egg off its face Friday, appealing the District Court of the District of Columbia approval in late September of UnitedHealth Group’s acquisition of Change Healthcare. The two companies closed on the buy in early October. DOJ was joined in the appeal by New York and Minnesota. The surprising appeal, after six weeks and the closing, is unusual but not unprecedented. At the time, the DOJ statement was written so that industry observers expected an appeal.

While the merger is closed, an appealed decision, if favorable to the DOJ, would force a separation of the businesses. Of course, UHG believes that “the appeal is without merit.” Stay tuned to see if this goes anywhere. Becker’s, Healthcare Dive

Walmart loses another healthcare exec. Cheryl Pegus, MD, will be departing Walmart as EVP of health and wellness and joining Morgan Health as a managing director. At Morgan, she will be focusing on population-based health initiatives and bringing clinical expertise to mental health, diabetes, and other chronic diseases. She is also joining Atria, a physician-owned organization of heart specialists.

During two years at Walmart, Dr. Pegus helmed development of a low-cost private brand analog insulin, expanded Walmart’s retail health center network across major markets, and the company’s pandemic response. Morgan Health was set up in 2021 to improve the quality, affordability, and equity of employer-sponsored healthcare. It has opened advanced primary care centers in Ohio. JPM a few weeks ago opened a Life Sciences Private Capital group [TTA 2 Nov]. Becker’s, Healthcare Dive

Walmart, despite their size, has had a certain wobbliness in their strategy. Aggressively starting out of the gate in 2018 with high-profile exec Sean Slovenski leading and plans to open up 1,000 clinics, he departed in 2020 and that put the brakes on the clinic strategy for awhile. In 2021, they bought privately held telehealth provider MeMD. Earlier this year, they announced the opening of more health ‘superstores’ in Florida, having established 20 in Arkansas, Illinois, and Georgia starting in 2019. Meanwhile, Walgreens is going big with VillageMD and its acquisition of Summit Health, and CVS Health is snapping up Signify Health to expand into value-based care and home health.

Catchup News Roundup: UHG-Change buy final; Theranos’ Holmes sentencing delayed, ‘limited hearing’ agreed to

October 4, 2022 | by

Note: your Editor is on the mend after returning from vacation with a nasty bug that’s laid her low for the better part of a week.

UnitedHealth Group’s Optum unit completed its acquisition of Change Healthcare, after the 10-day agreed waiting period post-decision. As planned, Change will be folded into the OptumInsight unit. The all-cash deal was either $7.8 billion or $13 billion, depending on what source you go with [TTA 20 Sept].

The Department of Justice has a generous quantity of Grade A, Extra Large Egg on its metaphorical face. The District Court decision found that the DOJ did not conclusively prove its allegations of antitrust and loss of competition in services. Statements from UHG’s competitors such as Cigna, Aetna, and Elevance (Anthem) that the acquisition would not lead them to ‘stifle innovation’ also weakened the DOJ’s case. The major conflict, ClaimsXtend, was already in progress of divestiture to TPG.

Challenging acquisitions post-closing is difficult but has happened. Readers may recall the 2019 nine-month long District Court Tunney Act review drama over the final approval of the CVS buy of Aetna, dragging on long after the buy was final and reorganization was underway. If the Tunney Act applies, and this goes to a certain Judge Richard Leon, watch out!  Optum’s release did not disclose reorganization plans or management changes. Healthcare Dive, FierceHealthcare 

Elizabeth Holmes’ sentencing delayed to allow a ‘limited hearing’ on The Mysterious Visit of Adam Rosendorff.  The ‘crafty strategy’ [TTA 16 Sept] scored a win today (3 October). Judge Edward Davila accepted the defense’s request for a limited hearing on whether there was any prosecutorial misconduct in Dr. Rosendorff’s testimony and delayed Holmes’ sentencing originally scheduled for 17 October.

In August, according to Holmes’ partner Billy Evans, in a scene lifted out of TV’s Perry Mason, Dr. Rosendorff arrived at Holmes’ home doorstep disheveled and apologetic, allegedly telling Evans that the prosecution “made things sound worse than they were.” Yet Dr. Rosendorff swore a declaration to the prosecution after the Mysterious Visit that he testified “completely, accurately and truthfully” and stood by his testimony, while expressing “compassion” for her and her family. Rosendorff’s testimony was more about the Theranos labs and how they defrauded patients based on specious PR and inflated claims, not the investor fraud of which she was convicted. 

The limited hearing has been scheduled for 17 October (the original sentencing date). Judge Davila has already stated that the hearing will not last the full day. He also offered to both the prosecution and defense options for new sentencing dates: mid-November, early December, or mid-January. How this will affect Sunny Balwani’s upcoming sentencing on 12 counts is not known. Mercury News 

Breaking: Judge permits UnitedHealth acquisition of Change Healthcare, denies DOJ motion (updated)

September 20, 2022 | by

US District Court judge dismisses Department of Justice motions to prevent UHG acquisition. The decision on Monday by Judge Carl Nichols of the District of Columbia district court denies DOJ’s action to stop the deal. It also orders the planned divestment of Change’s ClaimsXten claims payment and editing software to an affiliate of TPG Capital for $2.2 billion in cash.

The DOJ and entities such as the American Hospital Association had objected to UHG’s folding Change into OptumInsight as anti-competitive. As both Optum and Change offered competing claims processing software that covers 38 of the top 40 health insurers, UHG would then solely have access to nearly all competitive payers’ information. There were other competitive issues that were dismissed in the judge’s brief opinion. (For insight, see our earlier coverage starting here.) The full opinion, originally expected in October after the bench hearing in August, is under seal due to proprietary, sensitive information and will not be released. (US v UnitedHealth Group, 22-cv-481)

DOJ’s top antitrust official, Jonathan Kanter, said they are “reviewing the opinion closely to evaluate next steps”.  DOJ’s short statement surely sounds like the DOJ will appeal. UHG and Change are moving forward “as quickly as possible”. Stay tuned.  Reuters, Healthcare Dive

Update: As reported in HISTalk from Bloomberg the all-cash deal is $7.8 billion, not the earlier reported $13 billion.

News briefs, catchup edition: UnitedHealth/Change decision October?, CVS wins $8B Signify Health auction, Walgreens majority buy of CareCentrix, FTC requests more info on Amazon-One Medical

September 15, 2022 | by

Your Editor is semi-returned from Almost Two Weeks in Another Town, with a few more days to close out September (and summer into autumn) coming up. A lot of big news broke despite the usually slow Labor Day holiday week.

UnitedHealthcare Group/Change Healthcare Federal lawsuit to be decided in October–reports. The bench trial in the US District Court in Washington DC pitted the Department of Justice and state plaintiffs against UHG’s massive $13 billion acquisition of claims and EDI/data processing giant Change. It concluded 16 August with closing arguments presented 8 September. Dealreporter via Seeking Alpha reported that UHG and Change effectively countered DOJ’s antitrust objections to the acquisition. Change Healthcare had previously sold their claims editing business to TPG Capital to ease antitrust concerns.  Whether that will be enough in the current environment with greater sensitivities around healthcare consolidation remains to be seen. If approved, Change will be folded into OptumInsight. For a deeper dive into the issues, see TTA’s earlier reporting 3 August and 23 March.

CVS Health beat out other contenders with an $8 billion cash bid for Signify Health. It was a busy Labor Day for CVS as Signify’s board met and decided that day on CVS’ cash offer of $30.50 per share in their unusual auction. Amazon, UnitedHealth Group, and little-known Option Care Health were the other bidders. Signify is a strategic boost for CVS in becoming a major player in primary care, provider enablement, and home health as we’ve summarized here from CVS’ Q2 earnings call. Signify’s capabilities in in-home health delivery and provider services were cheaper to buy than to develop. Based on the weight given to it in the CVS release, Signify’s Caravan Health and their Medicare ACOs furnishing value-based care management services to 170 providers was a significant factor in the top price paid.

New Mountain Capital and their investors own 60% of Signify and will be exiting. Signify had in July announced their own exit from the costly and problematic Episodes of Care/BPCI business acquired with Remedy Partners back in 2019. This led to most of the over 480 staff layoffs announced last month. The sale is, as usual, pending regulatory approvals and isn’t expected to close until first half 2023. Kyle Armbrester, Signify’s CEO Kyle Armbrester will continue to lead the company as part of CVS Health. Healthcare Finance, FierceHealthcare

Rival Walgreens Boots Alliance completed their acquisition of a majority share of home care coordination platform CareCentrix. Walgreens’ final payment was $330 million for 55% of the company at an $800 million valuation. As noted previously, Walgreens ‘go big or go home’ strategy in primary care kicked off in 2020 with growing investments in VillageMD, culminating in last year’s $5.2 billion for 63% of the company. The plan is to co-locate Village Medical offices with 600 Walgreens locations by 2025 [TTA 14 Oct 2021]. CVS’ recent actions can be seen as a reaction to Walgreens’ aggressive moves. Healthcare Finance

Amazon now under FTC scrutiny for One Medical acquisition. If shutting down the much-publicized Amazon Care wasn’t quite enough last month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will be reviewing Amazon’s $3.9 billion buy of One Medical. This was announced in a 1Life Healthcare (parent of One Medical) 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Both 1Life and Amazon received requests for additional information on 2 September, above and beyond the usual required Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) reports that will be reviewed by the FTC and DOJ. Effectively it extends the HSR waiting period by 30 days after One Medical and Amazon have substantially complied with the additional information ‘second request’.

The FTC isn’t winning popularity contests with Amazon’s legal department, as the agency is reviewing their acquisition of iRobot, maker of robot vacuum cleaners. Mobihealthnews

Mid-week roundup: UnitedHealth-Change trial kicks off; Amazon’s One Medical buy questioned; Cionic’s neural sleeve designed by Yves Behar; Medable-Withings partner; Orion Health’s new CEO; IBM Watson Health’s Simon Hawken passes

August 3, 2022 | by

The Department of Justice lawsuit to block the $13 billion acquisition of Change Healthcare by UnitedHealth Group started on Monday. It is a bench trial in US District Court in the District of Columbia that will last 12 days, concluding on 16 August with a verdict date to be determined. The DOJ and the plaintiffs, including Minnesota and New York State, are presenting their case over seven days. UHG and Change will have five days. It’s expected that UHG CEO Andrew Witty and former chief David Wichmann will be testifying. The American Hospital Association (AHA) was a key player in pushing for a DOJ action (their article here). TTA recapped the main competitive issues in play on 23 March, along with this Editor’s opinion that the merger will be blocked given this current administration’s anti-trust stand. ‘It will be one for the books–the ones marked ‘Nice Try, But No Dice’. FierceHealthcare, HealthcareFinanceNews

Will Amazon’s acquisition of One Medical be reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)? That is what Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) is requesting. He cites that Amazon will have “access to enormous tranches of patient data. While HIPAA and other privacy laws exist to thwart the worst potential abuses, loopholes exist in every legal framework.” He also cites, somewhat broadly, that information of this type could be used to suggest over-the-counter blood pressure medications to a One Medical patient shopping at a Whole Foods Market. (What is meant here is that there are many supplements that claim to benefit blood pressure available OTC, such as Garlique; however, there are many OTC meds that can increase blood pressure such as decongestants.) This Editor agrees with Senator Hawley that the acquisition should be carefully reviewed by FTC and, to go further, HHS as it involves patient data.) Hawley Senate.gov page 

The Cionic Neural Sleeve, designed to aid people with mobility issues, is getting a design upgrade via Yves Behar and his fuseproject. The Neural Sleeve [TTA 30 June] aids the legs through sensors in the sleeve that monitor movement for muscle firing and limb position, then analyzes them through an app to optimize functional electronic stimulation (FES) delivered through the sleeve. The Behar team, according to the release, has delivered a neural sleeve “designed for everyday wear, and importantly, is easy to put on and take off – a critical design element for those with inhibited mobility. The lightweight, breathable fabric feels like an athletic legging, and is available in multiple colors and sizes. Paired with the intuitive CIONIC app, the sleeve enables the user to be in control of their own mobility journey.” Cionic is taking pre-orders for delivery in early 2023. Also The Robot Report.

Medable partners with Withings for clinical trials. Medable, a clinical trials platform, is partnering with Withings Health Solutions to connect Withings devices for monitoring at home. Withings devices will provide medical-grade measurements, including temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, sleep patterns, and weight to connect the data into Medable’s decentralized clinical trial platform. Direct monitoring also assists in attracting and retaining subjects in clinical trials, plus improving accuracy, by eliminating subject manual reporting and checkins. Financial terms and duration were not disclosed. Release, FDA News, FierceBiotech

Short international take: Orion Health, an Auckland, New Zealand-based health IT company headed by Ian McCrae for the past 30 years, announced he is stepping down for health reasons. Replacing him in late August as CEO will be Brad Porter, coming from Fisher & Paykel, a NZ-based medical device company. Mr. Porter is Mr. McCrae’s son in law.  Orion recently won what could be the largest health information exchange system in the world for Saudi Arabia, covering 32 million people. Healthcare IT News 

And a sad passing: Our UK and European Readers likely know Simon Hawken from his long career with IBM, including Watson Health (now Merative) and Merge Healthcare, and earlier with BEA Systems. HISTalk reported that he passed away on 25 July. This Editor has not been able to find other notices, so is asking for Reader help and comments.

Amazon moves to acquire One Medical provider network for $3.9B (updated)

July 27, 2022 | by | 1 Comment

Amazon joining the in-person provider network space for real. Amazon Health Services last week moved beyond experimenting with in-person care via provider agreements (Crossover Health, TTA 17 May) to being in the provider business with an agreement to acquire One Medical. Earlier this month, news leaked that One Medical as 1Life Healthcare was up for sale to the right buyer, having spurned CVS, and after watching their stock on Nasdaq plummet 75%.

  • The cash deal for $3.9 billion including assumption of debt is certainly a good one, representing $18 per share, a premium to their $14 share IPO in January 2020. (The stock closed last Wednesday before the announcement at just above $10 per share then plumped to ~$17 where it remains.)
  • The announcement is oddly not on One Medical’s website but is on Amazon’s here.
  • The buy is subject to shareholder and the usual regulatory approvals. The IPO was managed by JP Morgan Securities and Morgan Stanley. It is primarily backed by Alphabet (Google).
  • One Medical’s CEO Amir Dan Rubin will stay on, but there is no other executive transition mention.
  • Also not mentioned: the Iora Health operation that serves primarily Medicare patients in full-risk value-based care models such as Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare shared savings, quite opposite to One Medical’s membership-based concierge model. However, Iora’s website is largely cut over to One Medical’s identity and their coverage is limited to seven states.

There is a huge amount of opinion on the buy, but for this Editor it is clear that Amazon with One Medical is buying itself into in-person and virtual primary care for the employer market, where it had limited success with its present largely virtual offering, and entree with commercial plans and MA. One Medical has over 700,000 patients, 8,000 company clients and has 125 physical offices in 12 major US markets including NYC, Los Angeles, Boston, and Atlanta. It has never turned a profit. Looking at their website, they welcome primarily commercial plans and MA (but not Medicare supplement plans).

Amazon, with both a virtual plus provider network, now has a huge advantage over Teladoc and Amwell, both of which have previously brushed off Amazon as a threat to their business. There is the potential to run two models: the current Amazon Care pay-as-you-go model and the One Medical corporate/concierge model. This puts Amazon squarely in UHC’s Optum Health territory, which owns or has agreements with over 5% of US primary care practices, is fully in value-based care models such as Medicare shared savings through its ACOs, and is aggressively virtual plus integrating services such as data analytics, pharmacy, and financial. Becker’s

What doesn’t quite fit is Iora Health and the higher cost/higher care needs Medicare market that is less profitable and requires advanced risk management, a skill set that Amazon doesn’t have. This Editor will make a small prediction that Iora will be sold or spun off after the sale.

This Editor continues to believe that the real game for Amazon is monetizing patient data. That has gained traction since we opined that was the real Amazon Game in June and October last year, To restate it: Amazon Care’s structure, offerings, cheap pricing, feeds our opinion that Amazon’s real aim is to accumulate and own national healthcare data on the service’s users. Then they will monetize it by selling it to pharmaceutical companies, payers, developers, and other commercial third parties in and ex-US. Patients may want to think twice. This opinion is now shared by those with bigger voices, such as the American Economic Liberties Project. In their statement, they urged that the government block the buy due to Amazon’s cavalier attitudes towards customer data and far too much internal access, unsecured, to customer information (Revealnews.org from Wired). Adding PHI to this is like putting gasoline on a raging fire, and One Medical customers are apparently concerned. For what it’s worth, Senator Bernie Sanders has already tweeted against it.   MarketWatch

Whether this current administration and the DOJ will actually care about PHI and patient privacy is anyone’s guess, but TTA has noted that Amazon months ago beefed up its DC lobbying presence last year. According to Opensecrets.org, they spent $19.3 million last year. In fairness, Amazon is a leading Federal service provider, via Amazon Web Services. (Did you know that AWS stores the CIA’s information?)  One Medical is also relatively small–not a Village MD/Village Medical, now majority owned by Walgreens Boots. This is why this Editor believes that HHS, DOJ, and FTC will give it a pass, unlike UHG’s acquisition of Change Healthcare, especially if Amazon agrees to divest itself of the Iora Health business.

Treat yourself to the speculation, including that it will be added as an Amazon Prime benefit to the 44% of Americans who actually spend for an Amazon Prime membership. It may very well change part of the delivery model for primary care, and force other traditional providers to provide more integrated care, which is as old as Kaiser and Geisinger. It may demolish telehealth providers like Teladoc and Amwell. But as we’ve also noted, Amazon, like founder Jeff Bezos, deflects and veils its intents very well. FierceHealthcare 7/25, FierceHealthcare 7/21, Motley Fool, Healthcare Dive

Thursday legal news roundup: Oscar Health accused of IPO securities fraud; Venezuelan cardiologist moonlights as cybercriminal, faces slammer; Change Healthcare sues former employee now at Olive AI

May 19, 2022 | by

To use a cliché, what a difference a year makes. In March 2021, insurtech Oscar Health successfully raised $1,4 billion in its IPO with shares at $39. Heady times didn’t last long, with shares tumbling to $5.67 as of this writing. Now the shareholder lawsuits have begun, with the complaint stating that negative effects of COVID-19 on Oscar’s business were not disclosed, specifically the growing cost of the pandemic on testing and treatment costs they would cover, and “Oscar would be negatively impacted by an unfavorable prior year Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) result relating to 2019 and 2020 [and] that Oscar was on track to be negatively impacted by significant SEP membership growth”. The lack of forward-looking disclosure at an IPO is a violation of the Securities Act. The initial lawsuit has been filed in the US District Court for the Southern District Court of New York by shareholder Lorin Carpenter. Multiple law firms have invited shareholders to join in the suit — example from PR Newswire. Also named in the suit are Oscar Health co-founders CEO Mario Schlosser and Vice Chairman Joshua Kushner, plus several investment banks.

Oscar started the year with a Q1 loss of $0.36 per share versus an estimate of a loss of $0.40, but this is less than half of last year’s loss of $0.98 per share. They are also exiting the Arkansas and Colorado markets in 2023. Healthcare Dive

Cardiologist, master cybercriminal, a new Dr. Mabuse? Accused of the creation, use, and sale of ransomware is one Venezuelan doctor and practicing cardiologist, Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez, a dual citizen of Venezuela and France. The charges by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in the Eastern District of New York also detail his “extensive support of, and profit sharing arrangements with, the cybercriminals who used his ransomware programs.” SaaS can’t hold a candle to the RaaS–ransomware-as-a-service–operation he created to sell what he dubbed ‘Thanos,’ allegedly named after a fictional cartoon villain responsible for destroying half of all life in the universe. Turns out that Iranian state-sponsored hackers and fellow ransomware designers really liked it too. If convicted, he faces 10 years in Club Fed–five years for attempted computer intrusion, and five years for conspiracy to commit computer intrusions. Designing criminal software really does test the limits of moonlighting. DOJ release, TechCrunch

Change Healthcare sues former employee at competitor Olive AI. While their merger with UnitedHealthcare is tied up in the US District Court in DC [TTA 23 Mar], Change Healthcare is not letting any courtroom grass grow under their feet. They are suing a former employee, Michael Feeney, with violating the non-compete clauses of his employment contract. The suit was filed in Tennessee Chancery Court, its HQ state. Mr. Feeney has countersued in his state of residence, stating that the non-compete violates Massachusetts law. He was VP, strategy and operations at Change handling physician revenue cycle management. At Olive AI, he is currently SVP, provider market operations. Information is a bit scarce on this and the free article this Editor has found reads machine-translated. If you have access to the Nashville Post or Modern Healthcare it’s probably more decipherable.

As to the lawsuit affecting non-competes due to the tight labor market–don’t count on it. It’s a conflict between the state the company is in enforcing non-competes, versus a state which restricts (or negates) them that is the former employee’s state of residence and work. What wins out will be the interesting part and affect many of us in the US.

Thursday roundup: UHG/Optum, Change extend merger deadline to 31 Dec, buys Kelsey-Seybold; $2B Tivity Health sale; General Dynamics enters derm AI diagnostics; MobileHelp PERS sold to Advocate Aurora

April 7, 2022 | by

UnitedHealth Group’s Optum unit and Change Healthcare, to no one’s surprise, have cast the die and extended their merger deadline to 31 December. Originally, the acquisition was to be completed at end of 2021 and later pushed to 5 April.

In a joint release, they touted their shared vision for a “simpler, more intelligent and adaptive health system for patients, payers and providers”. Backing this up is a break fee of $650 million from Optum to Change Healthcare in the event the court scuppers the deal.

On 25 February, the US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Washington, DC to stop the acquisition on anti-competitive grounds [TTA 25 Feb]. UHG/Optum and Change, despite divestitures, could not evade DOJ’s reasoning that Optum was buying its only major competitor in areas such as hospital claims data, claims processing, claims editing, and EDI clearinghouse, which facilitates the transfer of electronic transactions between payers and physicians, health care professionals, or facilities. Less than a month later, Optum and Change responded, contesting the charges in that same District Court, and contending that it would be ‘economic suicide’ for Optum to be anti-competitive, since Optum’s business model is dependent on payers other than UnitedHealth. Fighting rather than switching off the deal, it’ll be heard on 1 August [TTA 23 March]. FierceHealthPayer, 

As noted last week, Optum is writing big checks for LHC Group home care/management services and Refresh Mental Health. This week’s jumbo buy is the Kelsey-Seybold Clinic of Houston. This is a multi-faceted operation with multiple multi-specialty care centers, a cancer center, a women’s health center, two ambulatory surgery center locations, and a 30-location specialized sleep center. It also has a highly regarded ACO and KelseyCare Advantage, a 5 Star Medicare Advantage plan, in addition to partnering with insurers on commercial value-based health plans. If it closes, Optum will be more than likely well over its goal of owning or controlling over 5% of US providers. Terms were not disclosed, but TPG’s private equity arm made a minority investment in Kelsey-Seybold two years ago. At the time, the valuation was rumored to be $1.3 billion.

Tivity Health is being acquired by funds managed by Stone Point Capital for $2 billion. The $32.50 per share is a 20% premium to the 90-day price average, which reflects its 40% financial share growth in the past year. Having sold its original name of Healthways and a sizable chunk of its original business to the digital health conglomerate Sharecare, it rebranded in 2017 as Tivity and concentrated on fitness businesses: senior-targeted SilverSneakers, gym chain Prime Fitness, and alternative/complementary medicine WholeHealth Living. Closing is anticipated to be Q3. CEO Richard Ashworth will remain with the company, and headquarters stay in Franklin, TN. Release, Becker’s

A palate cleanser: a division of defense/aerospace giant General Dynamics, General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) has developed an AI diagnostic for remote dermatologic use for the active service/veteran market. It classifies images of skin lesions, determines if they are indicative of skin disease, and will recommend follow-up care. According to the GDIT release, “the GDIT skin lesion classifier tool won third place in the VA National AI Tech Sprint 2020-2021, a competition organized by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Artificial Intelligence Institute (NAII) to match private sector talent with veterans, VA clinicians and other experts to brainstorm AI-based solutions that can improve veteran health and well-being.” Also Healthcare IT News

MobileHelp, one of the earliest mobile PERS, and sister company Clear Arch Health, a remote patient monitoring provider, have been purchased by Advocate Aurora Enterprises. Terms were not disclosed, but management will remain in place in Boca Raton. MobileHelp was private, so estimates of valuation are difficult, but their private equity backing included ABRY Partners and Topmark Partners (Crunchbase). Their PERS market claimed 300,000 households. Clear Arch had a separate clinical base with provider care management of chronic condition patients connected to EHRs. For AAE, a division of Advocate Aurora Health systems in Illinois and Wisconsin, MobileHelp’s acquisition will complement their recently acquired home health provider Senior Helpers and Xhealth clinical digital solution ordering. The traditional PERS and call center business continues to be of interest, but blending into other businesses. Release, Healthcare IT News

DOJ lawsuit to block UnitedHealth-Change Healthcare’s acquisition now set for 1 August trial

March 23, 2022 | by

UnitedHealth Group isn’t giving up. Last Thursday (17 March) UHG filed with the US District Court in Washington, DC, responding to the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) suit to stop their acquisition of Change Healthcare and folding into its Optum unit. Essentially, their argument in their public statement is that the acquisition would have multiple consumer benefits and big savings as the ‘healthcare system of the future’, including:

  • We can increase efficiency and reduce friction in health care, producing a better experience and lower costs
  • Helping health care providers and payers better serve patients by more effectively connecting and simplifying key clinical, administrative and payment processes
  • Improve the quality of health care delivery, automate claims transactions, and accelerate payment between provider and payer
  • Patients get a simplified consumer experience, lower costs, and get better point-of-care delivery due to improved adherence to best clinical evidence

In their view, it would be ‘economic suicide’ for Optum to be anti-competitive. UHG states that Optum’s business model is dependent upon their external customers, and if their competitively sensitive information is misused, they would stop using Optum’s services and turn to competitors.

The DOJ does not agree, of course. As to competition, they contend that Change is the only significant competitor to Optum in claims processing. The merger would be anti-competitive in other ways as well:

  • Change is “United’s only major rival for first-pass claims editing technology — a critical product used to efficiently process health insurance claims and save health insurers billions of dollars each year — and give United a monopoly share in the market.” It would also give UHG the ability to raise competitors’ costs for that technology.
  • Hospital data accounts for about half of all insurance claims. UHG with Change would have effective control of that ‘highway’.
  • Change is also a major EDI clearinghouse, which facilitates the transfer of electronic transactions between payers and physicians, health care professionals, or facilities. UHG would have control of the EDI clearinghouse market.
[More–TTA 25 Feb] 

It moves to the District Court and Judge Carl J. Nichols on 1 August. The trial will be 12 days–seven for DOJ, five for UHG/Change. With the delay, analyst Jailendra Singh of Credit Suisse expects Change to press UHG to sweeten the deal, such as a termination fee, versus an increase in purchase price. It’ll be an interesting summer for a bevy of lawyers! Forbes, Credit Suisse note

This Editor holds to her previous opinion that this merger is ‘one for the books–the ones marked ‘Nice Try, But No Dice’.  No matter what, Change will have to change.

The shoe dropped: DOJ sues to block UnitedHealth Group-Change Healthcare merger. What’s next?

February 25, 2022 | by

To nearly no one’s surprise, the US Department of Justice did what was reported back on 17 Jan: block UnitedHealth Group’s (UHG) bid to acquire Change Healthcare on anticompetitive grounds. Earlier today, the DOJ issued their statement in a release on the joint civil lawsuit with the attorneys general of New York and Minnesota. (This Editor finds the New York AG participation interesting, as Change is HQ’d in Nashville, Tennessee with UnitedHealth in Minnesota. The usual grounds are state interest and commerce.)

The reasons cited will also not come as any surprise to our Readers, as these objections were raised from the start in that the acquisition would give UHG an unfair advantage against their payer competition and squelch innovation. These are from the DOJ release and the complaint filed today (24 February) in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.

  • UHG is the US’ largest insurer and also a major controller of health data. Change is a major competitor to UHG/OptumInsight in health care claims technology systems, which was the basis of the American Hospital Association’s (AHA) objections.
  • The acquisition would eliminate a major competitor to UHG in claims processing. Moreover, Change is “United’s only major rival for first-pass claims editing technology — a critical product used to efficiently process health insurance claims and save health insurers billions of dollars each year — and give United a monopoly share in the market.” It would also give UHG the ability to raise competitors’ costs for that technology.
  • Hospital data accounts for about half of all insurance claims. UHG with Change would have effective control of that ‘highway’.
  • Change is also a major EDI clearinghouse, which facilitates the transfer of electronic transactions between payers and physicians, health care professionals, or facilities. UHG would have control of the EDI clearinghouse market.
  • UHG would be able to view competitors’ claims data and other competitively sensitive information through Change. “United would be able to use its rivals’ information to gain an unfair advantage and harm competition in health insurance markets.”

The plaintiffs–DOJ, New York, and Minnesota–conclude with a request of the court to 1) enjoin (stop) the acquisition and 2) award restitution by UHG and Change for costs incurred in bringing this action.

Consider this acquisition one for the books–the one embossed ‘Nice Try, But No Dice’. 

So what’s next? Here’s your Editor’s speculation.

Change is one of the ‘shaggiest’ independent companies in healthcare, in so many businesses (many acquired) that it’s hard to understand exactly what they stand for. It has extensive businesses not only in the areas above that will nix the UHG buy, but also in imaging, data analytics, clinical decision making, revenue cycle management, provider network optimization and related solutions, pharmacy benefits, patient experience in billing and call centers, funding healthcare….and that’s just the surface of a giant list. From the outside, it’s hard to see how all these parts coalesce.

In the industry, Change was long rumored to be for sale. Recently, it’s become unprofitable. It closed its FY 2021 (ending 31 Mar 2021) with a $13.1 million loss and through Q3 FY 2022 with a $24.5 million loss.

At the end of this, Change may be better advised to sell off some of its businesses, retrench, and refocus on its most cohesive and profitable areas.