News roundup: Withings Medical Group service launches, MPs urge cancellation of NHS/Palantir FDP contract, IKS closes TruBridge buy for $557M, ATA comments on prelim CMS PFS for telehealth, Philips’ AI-powered…toothbrush

Withings USA expands monitoring into clinical care services. Withings’ reach from devices into clinical care is definitely something unusual, as it’s rare that a device developer gets into the messy care space, much less with a ten-year commitment. Here Withings, with the Withings Medical Group, is entering care for Original Medicare beneficiaries via CMS’s new ACCESS Model (Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions). ACCESS is a ten-year CMS Innovation Center model that pays providers on chronic disease management outcomes. It launched on 5 July.

Withings Medical Group will concentrate on cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic health (CKM), beginning with hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. The medical group’s care team will work with the beneficiary’s primary care providers to build an individualized care plan for each member. The Withings Medical Group teams can also prescribe and adjust medications and support the beneficiary on lifestyle changes.

From the release: “This focused scope reflects a deliberate, clinically rigorous approach to entering care, and it marks only the beginning of a broader ambition for how Withings supports health over the long term. It also aligns with the ACCESS Model’s ten-year, phased approach to testing whether outcome-aligned, technology-supported care can improve outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries nationwide.”

In the UK, two Commons committees have urged the Health Innovation Minister to cancel the contract for the NHS Federated Data Platform (FDP).  The developer, Palantir, has come under fire in both the UK and US on its ties to defense and security agencies in those countries and with Israel. Palantir contracted with NHS England starting in 2023. The Commons committees objecting to Palantir to Health Innovation Minister Preet Kaur Gill are the Health and Social Care Committee and the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee. They are urging using a contractual break in February 2027 to term the contract, seek another contractor, or develop one in the UK. The concerned Members cross parties and are joined by the trade unions and 100 NHS data and technology specialists, who have separately objected to the FDP in a letter to Health Secretary James Murray.

The FDP is a key part of NHS digital transformation to facilitate storage and analysis of health datasets to improve planning, patient care and hospital operations. But the concerns apparently are more political, targeting Palantir and alleging that its defense and security contracts will discourage patients from allowing their medical information to be used. If we in the US shared similar concerns, Microsoft, Meta, AWS, and Oracle wouldn’t have a single healthcare contract. Computing UK

IKS Health wrapped up its TruBridge buy last Thursday for $557 million. The acquisition, announced last April, closed a quarter earlier than expected. IKS is a healthcare software company for administration and documentation, with TruBridge an EHR and revenue cycle management (RCM) provider to primarily rural hospitals. The combined company now has a US customer base of 150,000 clinicians and 2,000 healthcare organizations. IKS Health is traded in India with US operations in Dallas. The TruBridge acquisition is their third this year, financed with $600 million over five years in debt sourced from Citibank, JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank. TruBridge shareholders received $26.25 in cash per share as offered in April. The release is singularly unrevealing on whether TruBridge will continue as a separate product line, nor on any operational/management continuity. It is another example of consolidation and ‘line extension’ between similar companies. MedCityNews

If it’s midyear, it’s time for a preliminary CMS Physician Fee Schedule draft. ATA ACTION has an early review of its telehealth and technology changes proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that affect physicians serving Medicare beneficiaries. From the release (PDF):

  • Telehealth: In addition to changes to extend existing telehealth flexibilities, CMS proposes adding five codes to the Medicare Telehealth List, clarifying critical care consultation code descriptors, creating two new telehealth modifiers, and allowing physicians to bill for telehealth services involving residents when either the teaching physician or resident is in the room with the beneficiary.
  • Remote Patient Monitoring: CMS proposes tightening guardrails and recalculating payment for remote patient monitoring (RPM) and remote treatment monitoring (RTM) services. Key changes include restricting RTM billing to patients with an established relationship with the billing practitioner, requiring a separately reportable initiating visit tied to the start of monitoring services, prohibiting use of third-party remote monitoring companies, lowering monitoring valuations, and potentially consolidating current CPT codes into four new G-codes (two RPM, two RTM) covering initial setup and monthly monitoring/management.
  • Technology-Enabled Care: CMS is seeking broad feedback on modernizing Medicare reimbursement for technology-enabled care, with particular interest in primary care, care management, capitated payment models, and AI.
  • New–Software as a Medical Service (SaMS): Aligning with the OPPS proposed rule, CMS introduces a new category – Software as a Medical Service – defined as algorithm-based clinical decision-support software with clinical or diagnostic functionality (excluding remote monitoring and prescription digital therapeutics). SaMS providing secondary analysis of lab data would shift from the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule to the Physician Fee Schedule.
  • Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Improvement Activities: CMS proposes two new technology-focused improvement activities: clinician use of AI to improve patient care, and use of interoperable clinical decision support.

Whether these survive to the Final PFS is dependent on comments, Congress, and budgets.

And now we have AI for our electronic toothbrush. Philips goes AI in its latest model, the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9900 Prestige. It uses built-in, on-device AI and spatially aware guidance to track brushing. There’s a 12-segment “Mouth Map” on the handle, with a light ring that gives real-time visual feedback on your coverage, pressure, and scrubbing habits. For those of us who like to press down, the SenseIQ sensor automatically adjusts intensity so we aren’t so bad. It has eight modes and three intensities, a bit more than their top-of-the-line existing Sonicares. And it comes in five premium colors! Well, well…as a faithful user of my Philips Sonicare toothbrush since a rather extensive dental  ‘remodeling’ a few years ago, and guilty of sometimes being a bit sketchy about my completeness, I am somewhat dismayed that to be au courant, I will need to acquire this new model…but it won’t be available till this fall in the US and Europe. Release, Mobihealthnews

Rock Health’s sunnier 2025: up 35% due to AI, but a tale of ‘have and have nots’

Rock Health’s 2025 digital health roundup, published in January, was upbeat–as usual, and in no way Hemingwayan. Their calculation of US digital health fundings was up 35% versus 2024, rising to $14.2 billion from 2024’s $10.5 billion. This was a higher number and a stark contrast to Silicon Valley Bank’s (SVB) tracking of US and EU healthtech investments as a 1) lower number and 2) flat 5%, growing from 2024’s $13.2 billion to $13.9 billion [TTA 14 Jan].

Let’s do some unpacking:

  • The number of digital health deals went down from 509 to 482, a decline of 5.3%.
  • In terms of current dollars, 2025’s funding of $14.2 billion was, as projected, a snap back to 2020’s $14.4 billion, as 2024 was to 2019. In constant/inflation-adjusted dollars, applying a cumulative inflation of 25%, 2025 is well under 2020 but better than 2019; 2020’s $14.4 billion then is equivalent to $18.3 billion today.
  • Where Rock Health and SVB agree is the ‘barbell’ profile of what gets funded.  
    • Mega funds like General Catalyst and Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) do mega deals: 26 mega deals and 15 newly-minted unicorns (up from six last year), for a funding average by these two in D+ of $266 million, versus Series A of $24.1 million. 
    • The funding also skews towards “AI-enabled” companies and secondarily, wellness
    • Something that made this Editor go ‘hmmm…’:Rock Health’s usual analysis of letter deals across all funders is, unusually, missing in their 2025 report. The only comparison made is from GC and a16z, two mega funders. Inadvertently, Rock Health has drawn a bright line on the contraction of venture and private equity funders not only in available funds, but in sheer numbers. Discussed here intermittently, especially in the context of SVB’s failure and rescue, but at more length here in this 2023 commentary.
  • What they have picked up that SVB didn’t was the continuing significant number of unlabeled, non-letter financings–35% of deals, but down from 44% in 2023. Before 2021, unlabeled financings were fairly rare and in single digits.
  • The other significant pickup was that over 600 companies they track have not raised anything since 2021-2022. That could be a sign of health–that they are profitable and operating successfully on their cash flow–or barely staggering through and cannot get financing. 
  • M&A revived in 2025 with 195 deals in 2025, up 61% from 2024’s crater. Digital health companies were the majority acquirers (66%) with private equity at 10%. Rock Health attributes this to ‘tapestry weaving’ (creating more continuous solutions to flesh out platforms), legacy acquisitions by AI companies (a/k/a smush togethers, something New Mountain Capital excels at), and ‘acqui-hires’ to get top talent and tech.
    • They note of NMC: “Now, they’re weaving the largest “M&A tapestry” in digital health thus far: Matt Holt, NMC’s former managing director and president of private equity, is reportedly leaving to combine five NMC portfolio companies into a $30B holding company called Thoreau.”, a $30 billion deal broken out in a graphic. The five companies are Datavant, Swoop, Machinify, Smarter Technologies (itself a combine of SmarterDx, Thoughtful.ai, and Access Healthcare in RCM), and OfficeAlly. Whether this pending move (December) will actually work or turn into a petite version of Change Healthcare, we can only surmise.
  • IPOs haven’t really revived in digital health. Rock Health counts five IPOs in 2025, but only two are really digital health, Hinge Health and Omada Health, same as 2024. Both were at relatively flat valuations. The other three are more legitimately classified as biotech–Heartflow, Carlsmed, and Profusa. IPOs may improve in 2026, with Doc.com’s filing for a Nasdaq listing earlier this month and Devoted Health now at a post-F financing.
  • There is zero here about bankruptcies and reorganizations. No reference to the utter implosion of 23andMe and its shocking sale back to founder/CEO Anne Wojcicki.

The impact of ACCESS and ELEVATE. There is also a good graphic analysis of two CMS models that may support digital health more comprehensively than previous value-based care models such as ACO shared savings. The first CMMI model, ACCESS, will be debuting in July and is a 10 year voluntary payment model for Original Medicare outcomes in chronic care management. It reduces barriers for digital health to profitably work with CMS because it offers direct patient enrollment and waiving copays. The other from CMS is ELEVATE, launching in September, which funds up to 30 proposals with $100 million over three years to raise health and prevention for Original Medicare beneficiaries.

Rock Health’s 2025 wrapup

2026 remains Anyone’s Guess. It feels better…but….

Editor’s Note: Our Readers know that this Editor considers Rock Health a bit of a cheerleader for Sand Road. They play both sides of the fence as a venture fund/accelerator. There’s nothing wrong in that. SVB, like other financial institutions, funds a broad swath of healthcare and makes no bones about it. That is why their analysis, which also included EU and a bit of Asia, made its broader and tarter take on 2025 even more interesting.

What’s missing is year-to-year consistency in Rock Health’s analyses, notably what digital health sectors were funded and the Series letter breakdown across all funders.

Anyone doubting the benefits of clinical mobile access, read on…

Yes of course it is a survey produced by a supplier, so possibly a trifle biased, however EU News’s  item on the benefits of mobile access by community health people makes a very strong case for good access to clinical information when visiting patients that makes sense.

Notable quotes include:

Lack of access to patient information in real-time is affecting the ability of 88% of community health workers to perform their roles…

70% of participants said mobile working technology had resulted in greater patient involvement in care and the management of conditions, and had also improved the quality of visits, with more time focused on treatment.

Almost a fifth of respondents said they spent more than ten hours a week, the equivalent of more than two hours per day, on a combination of travelling back to base to file reports, and other administrative tasks – time that could be spent providing enhanced patient care or home visits.