Telecare – Providing Dignity, Security and Efficiency

1) To view it via internet you will need to provide your contact details to this commercial company, GBTV’s LocalGov TV (not to be confused with the LGA’s Local Government Channel on www.localgovtv.com) . The quid pro for viewing the video is that you will receive marketing material. It is available to buy on DVD, but the price isn’t revealed on the site.

2) The programme is split into segements. The viewing lengths are:

  • Expert Panel – Telecare Opportunities: 7 min
  • Case Study- Notts Care Services – Award Winning Telecare: 6 min
  • Case Study- Cheshire County Mainstreams Telecare: 8 min
  • Case Study- Safety Confirmation – A New Approach to Telecare: 5 min
  • Policy Drivers and Initiatives: 3 min
  • Clarifying the Terminology: 4 min
  • Service and Technology Options: 4 min
  • Procurement through PASA: 3 min
  • PTG Preventative Technology Grant: 2 min
  • Key Challenges: 7 min
  • Local Authority Progress to Date: 7 min
  • The Future for Telecare: 6 min

Westminster – Cisco’s Wireless City

6 minutes 30 seconds.

Title: Westminster – The Wireless City: Improving Business and Services with WIFI.
This addition to the video library should give ammunition to all who are looking for substantial investment in telecare. The video itself shows how Westminster invested many millions in wireless CCT systems to help keep its citizens and visitors safe on the streets. How about a similar spend to keep them safe in their homes? View the video on the Cisco site via the above link.

Mobile Teledicine Vehicle

Preparation for the Great Californian Disaster maybe? The Loma Linda University Medical Center which produced this vehicle, and the video, is a Seventh-Day Adventists’ healthcare institution.

{google}8335735774831241047{/google}

no video? update flash player

Telecare Soapbox: Council runs liability risk with inappropriate telecare provision

James Batchelor, MD of Alertacall, raises a serious issue for councils and other telecare suppliers: what risk is a council running when its employee substitutes a ‘standard’ but inappropriate equipment package for a privately-funded one that was more suitable for the client? Would the person’s consent to the course of action be a defence if the consent were based on inappropriate advice? (more…)