Theranos’ Holmes and Balwani appeal fraud convictions, $450M investor restitution

June 12, 2024 | by

An interesting Tuesday at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Jose, California. A three-judge Federal appeals court held hearings yesterday (11 June) on separate appeals on the convictions found and restitution imposed on both Elizabeth Holmes and Ramesh ‘Sunny’ Balwani, the former CEO and president of Theranos. The Holmes hearing was 50 minutes before Judges Jacqueline Nguyen, Ryan Nelson, and Mary Schroeder.

Holmes is seeking a complete overturn of the trial and jury verdict primarily on the basis of Judge Edward Davila including evidence favorable to the prosecution and not including defense-favorable evidence. She was not there as serving her time to mid-August 2032 in Bryan, Texas. Representing her for the defense was Amy Saharia of Williams & Connolly LLP, considered to be one of the US’ top appellant litigators.

  • Favorable to the prosecution was Theranos’ chief scientist Kingshuk Das, MD’s testimony. Dr. Das was the final Theranos lab director who worked there March 2016 to June 2018–and voided two years of Edison Lab tests. Saharia is claiming that the prosecution was improper in putting him on the stand since he was not qualified by the court as an ‘expert witness’ and was allowed to express his opinion, specifically in statements allowed by Judge Davila including “I found these instruments to be unsuitable for clinical use.”

Going back to TTA’s original coverage of 11 Nov 2021 (which the coverage below largely has not), Dr. Das was hired to respond to CMS’ deficiency report that went to the prior lab director two months before. The subject line: “CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES – IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY.” The report went on to say that “it was determined that your facility is not in compliance with all of the Conditions required for certification in the CLIA program.” and concluded that “the deficient practices of the laboratory pose immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety.” After speaking with Holmes and dealing with her position that it wasn’t an instrument failure, but rather a quality control and quality assurance issue, he voided every Edison lab test made in 2014 and 2015–between 50,000 and 60,000. Holmes was told, but she didn’t believe Das or previous lab directors about the Edison problems. Also testifying was a contract offsite co-lab director in 2014-15 who expressed her reservations to one of Dr. Das’ predecessors –who also happened to be Sunny Balwani’s dermatologist. 

Judge Nelson said during the hearing that “There’s a pretty good story here for Ms. Holmes” and “They do have a pretty good basis for some unfairness here.” in how Judge Edward Davila allowed this testimony.  Judge Nguyen also seemed to agree with the defense position that Judge Davila went too far in allowing opinions from Dr. Das that under the rules would require his being vetted as an expert. Judge Nelson added that the conviction was supported by “pretty overwhelming evidence.” For Dr. Das, the conundrum was that he was called in as the former lab director to testify on Holmes’ knowledge of the problems the Edison lab had but he also had a level of expertise involving the labs. The Federal prosecutor on the appeal, Kelly Volkar, countered with how Judge Davila “carefully parsed” the Das testimony and sustained defense objections during the trial. While having concerns that Das strayed into opinions and Judge Davila allowed it, Judges Nguyen and Schroeder stated that much of Das’ testimony concerned what he observed at the company.

Reportedly, much of the hearing time focused on this one point. Saharia again insisted that “She [Holmes] in good faith believed in the accuracy of this technology” and did not knowingly misrepresent it.

  • Not including defense-favorable testimony was another alleged Davila mistake. In the defense presentation, Judge Davila allowed testimony from former laboratory director Adam Rosendorff without including more evidence of government investigations of his work after quitting Theranos in 2014. These were direct attacks on his competence in running a lab facility. However, in our 6 October 2021 coverage, the defense grilled Rosendorff on his work at uBiome and PerkinElmer; both came under Federal investigation during his tenure.

A final Holmes defense point was made on how these ‘errors’ made by Judge Davila unfairly shaped the jury decision, where she was found guilty by a jury on only four counts of the prosecution’s 11.

The panel did not provide any timeline for issuing a ruling, other than in ‘due course’. This can be anywhere from a few weeks to over a year. The track record for Federal Court appeals tends to be dismal for the defense. 

Far less coverage was given to the separate Sunny Balwani hearing. This centered on the fact that the restitution of $450 million to investors ordered by Judge Davila’s order was incorrect and part of the “nature of investing in a private company.”  His defense counsel, Patrick Looby, also representing Holmes, made a most interesting spin on how fraud did not rob Theranos of ‘residual value’. “The fact that the investors may have had difficulty selling their shares is not owing to the fraud.” Volkar for the prosecution stated that the investors had no opportunity to do any recouping of their losses. Looby also contended that the prosecution presented distorted evidence against Balwani in a different narrative than against Holmes. Balwani was convicted on all 12 charges and is serving 12.9 years at the Federal Terminal Island facility. No timeline for a ruling was reported.

Mercury News, AP, Yahoo Finance  The Ninth Circuit also has an unusual web page on the Holmes appeal with case information plus notifications of public proceedings.

Theranos, The Trial of Elizabeth Holmes, ch. 7: Edison labs consistent–in deficiency and strange results

November 11, 2021 | by

And Elizabeth Holmes knew. The last two years of Theranos’ existence, were, to put it mildly, fraught, for anyone honest. Job 1 for the very last in a parade of lab directors, Kingshuk Das, MD, was to respond to CMS on substantial deficiencies found in a November 2015 on-site inspection. The CMS deficiency report, sent to the prior lab director in January 2016, two months before Dr. Das’ start, had a subject line that would grab anyone’s immediate attention: “CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES – IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY.”

The report went on to say that it was determined that your facility is not in compliance with all of the Conditions required for certification in the CLIA program.” and concluded that “the deficient practices of the laboratory pose immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety.”

Dr. Das found some interesting things in his early days on the job, such as the Edison labs producing results detecting abnormal levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–in female patients. When he brought this to Holmes’ attention, she quoted a few journal articles stating that certain rare breast cancers in women might present that result. This didn’t seem quite plausible to Dr. Das. Holmes then told him that it wasn’t an instrument failure, but rather a quality control and quality assurance issue. Nevertheless, Dr. Das went back and voided every Edison lab test made in 2014 and 2015, stating to Holmes that the Edison labs were not performing from the start. Most Theranos results sent to patients were produced on third-party machines made by Siemens and others, often on inadequately sized blood samples. 

As Dr. Das testified to the defense, many skilled people at Theranos earnestly tried to fix the problems with the Edison lab machines, but, as The Verge put it in part, if Holmes didn’t believe Dr. Das, other employees, or multiple preceding lab directors that the machines were really, truly broken, did it matter?

The defense is maintaining that Holmes didn’t really understand the lab details and was heavily influenced (ahem!) by president Sunny Balwani. However, the Babe in the Medical Startup Woods defense falls apart when there’s no Sunny to blame–he departed shortly after Dr. Das’ arrival. 

The actual theme–a long-term pattern of deception aimed at those who wanted to believe, and ponied up Big Bucks--was reinforced by a witness before Dr. Das. Lynette Sawyer was a temporary co-lab director for six months during 2014 and 2015, but never came to the Theranos site. It seems that her main duties were signing off remotely on documents using Docusign and backing up then-lab director Dr. Sunil Dhawan, Balwani’s dermatologist who came to the lab a handful of times. Even more amazingly, she was unaware of Theranos’ signature ‘nanotainers’ and the backup use of third-party devices. After her six-month contract was up, she departed, uncomfortable with Theranos’ procedures.

Kicking off the day was Judge Davila’s regular admonition to those in the public section of the courtroom to type vewy, vewy quietly. Then the video display for exhibits broke down. This led to a two-hour delay while the court found an antique projector to show the images to the jury and the public on a blank wall.

One wonders if the tapping plus the tech breakdown topping off the Parade of Fraud is leaving the jurors numb–or wanting to jump into the well above, even if there is no bottom. CNBC, Wall Street Journal (15 Oct), 5KPIX

TTA’s earlier coverage: Chapter 6, Chapter 5, Chapter 4 (w/comment from Malcolm Fisk), Chapter 3, Chapter 2, Chapter 1

To be continued….

 

 

The Theranos Story, ch. 70: the lab director turns Federal evidence

February 18, 2021 | by

A Tasty Appetizer of what awaits in July in Federal District Court, San Jose, showed up in the Wall Street Journal today (paywalled, link to full article below). Theranos‘ lab director Kingshuk Das, MD will testify in Elizabeth Holmes’ trial that the Theranos lab and technology did not work accurately enough to use–and that the company’s leaders ‘pushed back’ against his assessment.

Dr. Das’ comments, revealed in new court filings, represent his most extensive (and only revealed, in this Editor’s estimation) remarks on Theranos. His one-hour interview with Federal agents took place on 1 February. They indicate that Federal prosecutors continue to dig for damning evidence prior to the July trial.

Dr. Das held the lab director, later medical director, position at the Newark, California lab facility in Theranos’ final years (December 2015 in the article, the LinkedIn profile states March 2016, to June 2018). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had already put Theranos on notice for“deficient practices” in November 2015. The WSJ, around that time, revealed Theranos’ dodgy practices.

Dr. Das’ fully credible and extensive pathology training is listed in his LinkedIn profile. It includes his MD at Case Western Reserve, internship at UCLA, residencies in clinical pathology at Washington University (St. Louis) and USC, and return to UCLA for a fellowship in molecular genetics, then rising to Associate Medical Director, UCLA Clinical Laboratories. As for many others, Theranos was challenging,  could not have been good for his career, but perhaps gave him a taste of how to do entrepreneurship right. He has worked in several positions and is currently listed with consumer genetics tester Invitae as a molecular pathologist and founder of AnimanDX from 2018.

This Editor would bet that Dr. Das had far more to say than what was cited in the WSJ article. At least this is more like Joe Friday’s ‘just the facts’ (Dragnet) and not mired in the swamp of ‘motivations’ represented by the filings around Silicon Valley’s Lifestyles of the Rich, Famous, and Busted.

Full article at StockXpo. Hat tip to reader William T. Oravecz. For those interested in the full sturm und drang by chapter, it is here.