TTA’s autumn leaves: Amazon Rx kiosks for One Medical, VillageMD shrinks in TX, Rock Health’s odd take on Q3 investment, Trilliant Health’s dizzying what-ails-healthcare analysis

 

Friday 10 October 2025

Several quick looks at Amazon’s test of pharmacy dispensing kiosks in One Medical clinics, VillageMD’s Texas selloff, and Rock Health’s strangely ambivalent report on Q3 digital health investment. Today’s deeper dive is a Must Read–Trilliant Health’s diagnosis on what ails US healthcare and why a “return to first principles” is badly needed, detailed in a 100+ page free report.

Editor Donna will be taking a short additional hiatus; back w/o 27 October.

Editor Donna’s selective roundup: One Medical’s Amazon Rx kiosks, VillageMD sells off Texas, digital health investment’s Q3 boost

Will “expensive, complex and inefficient” US healthcare respond to six major demographic, cost, supply trends–and recuperate? Or further sicken?

From our last Alert: Editor Donna is back. Here’s the catchup.

Congratulations to James Batchelor MBE (Well Deserved!)

And a read with even more relevance now: Should free-falling UnitedHealth Group be broken up? Or break itself up to survive, before it becomes another GE? (updated) (Not a rant, more a ‘get going’ to avoid disaster!)

* * *
Advertise on Telehealth and Telecare Aware
Support not only a publication but also a well-informed international community.

Contact Editor Donna for more information.

Help Spread the News

Please tell your colleagues about this free news service and, if you have relevant information to share with the rest of the world, please let me know!

Donna Cusano, Editor In Chief
donna.cusano@telecareaware.com

Telehealth & Telecare Aware – covering news on latest developments in telecare, telehealth and eHealth, worldwide.

Editor Donna’s selective roundup: One Medical’s Amazon Rx kiosks, VillageMD sells off Texas, digital health investment’s Q3 boost

Amazon keeps trying to integrate healthcare and make One Medical work, using Pharmacy as leverage. Like CVS, Walmart, and Walgreens, Amazon succumbed in 2022 to the Gold Rush of buying up a health clinic network and attempting to integrate primary care delivery into its retail model–after stumbling badly and failing with Amazon Care (2019). While the former have either ditched (Walmart), pivoted (CVS–Oak Street), or spun off their primary care providers (Walgreens–VillageMD/Summit Health), Amazon is testing yet another integration with One Medical, their first being with Amazon Prime.

In its latest tweak, Amazon is delivering limited onsite pharmacy services via a dispensing kiosk to a group of five One Medical offices in the Los Angeles metro. Now Amazon never calls it a test–one has to get about halfway down their release to discover those kiosks won’t be installed till December–but it’s obviously one, with a rollout to other undetermined One Medical offices promised in the sweet bye-and-bye of 2026. The kiosks will dispense common prescription meds in a four-step process: prescription written, sent to Amazon Pharmacy, patient opts for in-office kiosk pickup and payment using their mobile phone to check it out in the Amazon Pharmacy app, and checks it out using a QR code at the kiosk.

Using these five locations (Beverly Hills! West LA!) is an adequate feasibility test, but doesn’t address the piously phrased rationale of 25% of neighborhoods as “pharmacy deserts” and where even in non-desert areas, 51% of patients report delays in filling prescriptions.

The kiosks will be storing basically common Rx meds such as antibiotics, blood pressure medications, and inhalers. 

Where this picture isn’t as revolutionary as my friend Sergei Polevikov maintains in his latest Substack essay (subscription required–and you should; also partially on LinkedIn), it’s another kick in the head for the traditional pharmacy retailers and the PBMs. They are already getting boot impressions by the Hims & Hers virtuals and Big Pharma on GLP-1 and ‘favored nation’ DTC deals. On one side, it reduces friction by making it onsite and easy. But suppose the kiosk doesn’t have my med or it’s out of stock. What do I do once the script is sent and I need to change it? This is also appealing to a younger and/or tech-savvy segment who live on their phone and Amazon apps. Suppose I’m an older patient and apps/QR codes do nothing but confuse me? For Amazon, what about the cost of kiosk installation, cleaning, stocking, monitoring, just like those telehealth kiosks from Forward (CarePods), Higi, and way back HealthSpot Station. They were the future–for five minutes. Apparently there’s also a little regulatory issue of self-dealing referral (hat tip to LinkedIn commenter Ajay Kumar Gupta).  Also Healthcare Dive

VillageMD continues to shrink. The formerly free-standing and co-located Walgreens clinic unit, spun off into a standalone company by Sycamore Partners while I was on medical leave (FierceHealthcare 28 Aug), has sold 32 Texas primary care clinics to Harbor Health, a primary care group and payvider in the Austin area. This adds San Antonio, El Paso, and Dallas as well as more Austin locations. Forbes From a significant almost-national primary and specialty care group, VillageMD is devolving into pieces for sale. One wonders about the extensive Summit Health/CityMD operation, very much tied in with Hackensack Meridian Health that dominates northern New Jersey, and disruption. (Disclosure: my family and I are Summit Health patients)  In other news, Tim Wentworth was replaced as CEO by Mike Motz, from another Sycamore portfolio company. Wentworth remains as director for the time being, undoubtedly working out his retention and various payouts. 

Rock Health breaks the cheerful news that Q3 digital health is an improvement over a dismal 2024 a/k/a 2019. YTD is $9.9 billion, exceeding the $8.4 billion raised through 2024 Q3. Deal size is also trending up: $28.1 million, increasing from $20.4 million in 2024. Where it’s still wobbly is middle-stage investment and anything with a Series letter. Rounds of $100 million plus thrived, with 19 of them accounting for 40% and $3.8 billion of 2025 YTD total funding. I won’t be doing my usual dive into their numbers due to time constraints, but Healthcare Dive summary will do. Rock Health’s Q3 report, usually putting the best foot forward, is weirdly downbeat, calling it ‘signals out of sync’. 

Way out of sync is the continuation of the partial Federal government shutdown, with no mercy on telehealth services and the donkeys doing what donkeys do…refuse to move. 

I’ll be on a short hiatus with no new articles until the week of 27 October.

News roundup: OnMed to debut CareStation at January CES, former HealthTap employees sue investor MDV, maternal monitoring spotlight with PeriGen/Texas Children’s in Malawi, Ouma Health-Marani Health partner

The ‘doc-in-box’ an idea that won’t die–but maybe it’ll work this time?? OnMed, which pioneered a telemedicine kiosk that TTA last reported on in October 2019 with placements at Tampa General Hospital, will be debuting it five years later (!) at CES this January in Las Vegas. The “Clinic-in-a-Box” offers a telemedicine live virtual consult with a virtual clinician working with the patient to assess vital signs such as weight, blood pressure, temperature, oxygen levels (SpO2), and thermal imaging. Unlike the Tampa Hospital kiosks, these will not dispense medications but the clinician can e-prescribe to a pharmacy of the patient’s choice. The one – or two booth self-cleaning kiosk has been placed in Tampa, Auburn, Tuskegee, Milam County, Connecticut, and Georgia in multiple settings including a homeless shelter, sheriff’s office, universities, public buildings, and supermarkets. Their website has demonstration videos here. Their target has also changed from five years ago to concentrate on underserved areas, citing the 80% of U.S. counties lacking sufficient primary care and 83 million Americans living in healthcare deserts.

Our Readers will be reminded of Forward’s recent implosion [TTA 14 Nov, 15 Nov] after two CarePods installed, and in the Wayback Machine, HealthSpot Station which managed to get to 50 placements before fading to black in mid-2016 [TTA 17 Nov 2023]. Like HealthSpot, OnMed’s kiosk is dependent on a synchronous virtual consult, but is more compact and self-cleaning. It also does not have the claustrophobia concerns that plagued Forward and HealthSpot–the clear windows ‘fog’ only when the consult starts. OnMed release, HIStalk Monday Morning 9 Dec

Moving smartly to the courts, a group of former HealthTap employees and shareholders have sued the company. Four plaintiffs have filed in Delaware Chancery Court (as the California company is incorporated there) against controlling VC Mohr Davidow Ventures (MDV) and five board members and executives. The suit charges that going back to 2018, MDV took over the company, replaced the CEO with Bill Gossman, a MDV partner, and switched the telehealth provider from an enterprise-focused to a direct-to-consumer model. At the time, they had a contract with UK’s Bupa. Walking away from corporate contracts drastically reduced the value of the company, driving it from what the plaintiffs claim was a billion-dollar valuation to the brink of insolvency, in a strategy to drive out other investors and repel outside funding, leaving MDV as the only other source of funding. MDV purchased notes in what is depicted as repeated self-interested financing and is now issuing millions of shares in this private company which further dilute the value of existing shares. The company is now controlled by MDV and allied entities. 

In May 2018, when CEO Ron Gutman was fired by the board, accused of “acts of intimidation, abuse, and mistrust, and that [he] repeatedly mistreated, threatened, harassed and verbally abused employees”, the plaintiffs claim that HealthTap “had tens of millions of dollars in cash and accounts receivable and was nearing profitability.” They seek an order declaring that the plaintiffs breached their fiduciary duties and award damages. The lawsuit was dated 24 October 2024. Mobihealthnews

In this time of year that celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ, let us celebrate two partnerships that promise safer pregnancies and births.

  • In Malawi, PeriGen‘s perinatal software and Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) are partnering with the Area 25 maternal health centre in their capital, Lilongwe, for diagnosing high-risk pregnancies and developing fetal conditions. Area 25 is the only clinic equipped with PeriGen in the joint program with TCH. In three years of the program, the number of stillbirths and neonatal deaths at the centre have fallen by 82%. PeriGen’s AI-based ‘early warning system’ requires less time, equipment and fewer skilled staff, which is critical for areas without sufficient health workers and high rates of fetal abnormalities. The Guardian,  HIStalk Monday Morning 9 Dec
  • Back in the US, Austin’s Ouma Health and Minnesota’s Marani Health are partnering with their respective maternal health technologies to create an integrated solution. Ouma offers 24/7 maternity telehealth and Marani has devices and an AI-powered platform for remote patient management. They are targeting areas that are underserved or without access to maternity care. Ouma currently works with over a dozen Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) nationwide. Release

Previously, the two companies jointly submitted a proposal to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Prevention Research Center. In October, they were awarded a $5 million grant to fund community-engaged research to address maternal and child health disparities in Wisconsin. Release  In March 2023, Ouma also partnered with in-home care provider MedArrive an in-home care provider, is partnering with Ouma Health, for maternal-fetal care of women on Medicaid coverage. 

Bad News Roundup updates: UHG/Optum defends Amedisys buy fast via a website, digging deeper into Forward’s fast demise, former Masimo CEO Kiani booted–and sued (updated)

The other shoe drops, as UnitedHealth Group/Optum take their defense public a day later. This unorthodox approach to defending an acquisition against a Department of Justice lawsuit [TTA 13 Nov] is visible on a specially set up Optum page. ImprovingHomeCare.com predictably highlights the benefits of an Amedisys merger along with the divestitures to VitalCaring Group. The gauntlet thrown is unadorned: “The Amedisys combination with Optum would be pro-competitive and further innovation, leading to improved patient outcomes and greater access to quality care. We will vigorously defend against the Department of Justice’s overreaching interpretation of the antitrust laws.”

  • Setup is around present and future demand–and that providers have to be capable of investing and scaling to meet it. “70% of adults 65 or older will likely need some form of long-term care during their lives.” and 3 million Americans received home health services in 2020 (Editor’s note–in a pandemic year when visits were certainly curtailed).
  • Home health is highly fragmented both nationally and locally, thus the acquisition isn’t anti-competitive. “In metropolitan areas with approximately 500,000 residents, there are an average of 26 agencies serving the metro area. The combination of Optum and Amedisys would be a fraction of both home health and hospice–and there would be strong competition in both metro and rural areas.
  • The divestiture to VitalCaring would further preserve competition, and that VitalCaring is a quality competitor. The DOJ release made much of VitalCaring’s inadequacies, such as their lower quality scores, financial difficulties, and leadership. VitalCaring, headquartered in Austin, Texas, currently operates in six states with 58 locations with plans to expand. Their CEO April Anthony is cited as building multiple home health companies ‘from scratch’ such as Encompass Care.
  • Additional proof points stress streamlining of care across Optum’s areas of expertise, integrating technology, and improving value-based care coordination.

FierceHealthcare

Forward’s shut down continues to reverberate in a classic tale of overreach and misdirection. Their bet on kiosks, plus a ‘forward-tech’ approach to a concierge-on-the-cheap, no- insurance-accepted model of primary care over eight years, apparently led to what pilots call a death spiral–it begins wide and imperceptible until it tightens and accelerates fatally in a final dive. Business Insider, true to its name, spoke with 11 anonymous and now former employees who attributed the failure to putting all their chips on 3,200 CarePods installed in one year. Their CEO, Adrian Aoun, was obsessed with technology to the point where he wanted to replace his offices and doctors with CarePods and started to strip the clinics of services, despite only two CarePods installed. 

Most advanced, yet unacceptable*. Patients didn’t try out or use the CarePods, finding them less than inviting. Logistical challenges delayed placements in large markets like New York and Chicago. Then technical problems mounted: automated blood draws failed, lab tests were withdrawn. The coup de grace–patients kept getting trapped in the CarePods. They were insanely expensive–the first two CarePods cost over $1 million each. Then the huge units were unattractive to landlords who didn’t want to fight local building codes nor saw a profit in them. By the end of the summer, there were only two CarePods in place at a mall in Sacramento and in Chandler, Arizona, both gathering dust. (*Shout out to Raymond Loewy, Never Leave Well Enough Alone)

In the increasingly empty Forward clinic offices, the futuristic tech and breadth of services touted in social media adverts weren’t quite as advertised. The whole-body scanner glitched requiring manual checks. Their lab tests became limited to those that could be done in-house, eliminating genetic testing via 23andMe along with services such as simple dermatology removals.

Christina Farr in Second Opinion has a set of takeaways worth noting, with this Editor’s comments (in parentheses):

  • Subscription-based, out-of-pocket healthcare is possible–but hard. (WAY hard when basics are up 25%+! And insurance is almost a given, even if taken in part.)
  • Brick-and-mortar clinics make only limited sense–and space must be used economically, not easy to do in health tech. (Retail and in-person are perhaps anathema in the concepts of those in health tech.)
  • We’re not focusing on those who really need care (But they’re not sexy, wealthy, or relatable to the creators of said tech. Many of them are also on Medicare and Medicaid–truly not sexy.)
  • Primary care is a tough starting point for subscription care (Except the very highest, most exclusive end as she notes!) Specialties may be more amenable to this model. (But volume?) And different age groups want different relationships within this type of care.
  • Timing is everything. Perhaps if Forward had started its clinics today it would have had a far better chance of success? (Then look at bullets 1-4 and see how truly daunting a tech-first clinic setup can be for the tech mindset untempered by research and UX-minded marketing.)

Forward is yet another sad and expensive example of 1) a founder hyperfocusing on whiz-bang technology, 2) losing touch with the customers using it, 3) not improving delivery based on customer needs, and 4) forgetting where he ostensibly started–the mission of improving healthcare. This Editor is sure that his 30-odd investors, especially Vinod Khosla, will have something to say to him about running through $100 million in one year–and over $300 million over eight years.

Masimo’s now-former CEO booted from his company and sued–to boot! (updated) The new management formally terminated founder Joe Kiani on 24 October, as noted in an October SEC filing. In a classic ‘you’re fired..no, I quit!’ situation, after he lost the proxy fight for control of the company, he resigned on 19 September. Kiani immediately filed a lawsuit against Masimo in California state court to obtain a $400 million payout per his employment contract. It is reported to be a declaratory relief suit that hinges on a ‘resignation for good reason’. This is usually specified in the contract. An example is that the executive ceases to be part of senior management, along with others.

The new board of directors has now turned the tables. Masimo is now suing Kiani and RTW Investments in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges collusion to violate Federal securities laws by secretly manipulating the shareholder vote through an ’empty voting’ scheme. Empty voting is done through put options or by selling the shares after the record date but before the shareholder meeting. It’s a way for an investor to build up share control and sway the outcome of a shareholder vote at little cost. The suit proposes that Kiani and RTW did precisely that, rigging the vote by acquiring control of over 19% of shares. Evidently, the BOD has proof. The lawsuit and more details are in Strata-gee.

(Editor’s opinion: this is a bare-knucks attempt to claw back Kiani’s contract payout by the new controlling company, Politan Capital Management. And both lawsuits could be true. Pass the popcorn.)

Insult upon injury for Joe Kiani is that shareholders now have some hope that management can save the company by concentrating on healthcare tech. Shares are up. Masimo’s Q3 results reported on 5 November were strong though net income declined. Sound United, the main anchor dragging down the company, is now termed ‘a discontinued operation’. Exhaustive detail on their results is in Strata-gee here.

Bad News roundup: DOJ drops the hammer on UHG-Amedisys, 23andMe lays off 40% and closes therapeutics, Lyra Health lays off 2% in restructuring, Forward primary care + kiosks shuts down abruptly

Shoe drop! The long-anticipated Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit against UnitedHealth Group and Optum to prevent the acquisition of  home health and hospice operator Amedisys was filed yesterday (12 November) in the District of Maryland. UHG’s offer to acquire Amedisys was made in June 2023 for $3.3 billion in an all-cash deal, but approval was held up in DOJ review ever since. Even with location divestitures proposed in July to VitalCaring Group to reduce anti-trust concerns with Optum’s home health operations (acquired with LHC Group), UHG remained a DOJ target. The civil lawsuit was filed by DOJ together with the Attorneys General of Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, and New York. No timeline is provided in the release.

The rationale cited is of course anti-trust and elimination of competition between Amedisys and UHG’s Optum. “We are challenging this merger because home health and hospice patients and their families experiencing some of the most difficult moments of their lives deserve affordable, high quality care options,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. The fact that the US Attorney General was quoted first in their release indicates the importance of the case to the DOJ. It’s also a race to the finish as come 20 January 2025, there will be a new president appointing a new AG immediately.

The DOJ states that both companies are “fierce competitors” and that the divestiture is insufficient. “The proposed divestiture does not alleviate harm in over 100 home health, hospice, and labor markets, which generate at least a billion dollars in revenue annually, serve at least 200,000 patients, and employ at least 4,000 nurses.”  Their case is well-built in this Editor’s view. From the release:

 UnitedHealth’s market share after the transaction would make the merger presumptively illegal in:

    • Hundreds of local home health care markets, with an annual volume of commerce exceeding $1.6 billion annually, in 23 states and the District of Columbia;
    • Dozens of local hospice markets, with an annual volume of commerce exceeding $300 million annually, in 8 states; and
    • Hundreds of local markets for home health and hospice nurse labor, employing at least 8,000 nurses, in 24 states.

The lawsuit also seeks civil penalties against Amedisys for falsely certifying compliance with its obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act) by failing to produce millions of documents or disclosing the deletion of other documents. For each day that Amedisys was in violation of the HSR, DOJ is seeking a fine of up to $51,744 daily. Amedisys was originally set to be acquired by OptionCare, which does not directly compete in home health, but UHG won a bidding war.

As this Editor said at the time of the Change Healthcare acquisition win against DOJ in Federal court (and we know how that turned out long term), “DOJ has a long memory, a Paul Bunyan-sized ax to grind, and doesn’t like losing.” FierceHealthcare

23andMe continues their long jump down to…who knows where? CEO Anne Wojcicki is minusing out 200+ employees or 40% of its remaining workforce, and fully shuttering its therapeutics development unit. The latter is running two clinical trials which will be wound down ‘as quickly as practical.’ These cuts will save $35 million annually but incur $12 million in one-time severance and termination-related costs. The much-touted therapeutics discovery unit was shut in late summer [TTA 14 August].

What’s left? Not much–the Lemonaid remote prescribing unit, with an entree into GLP-1 prescribing, some published studies, a new AI chatbot called “DaNA”, and a longevity service dubbed Total Health. During their Q2 FY2025 earnings call and release, revenue sank to $44 million versus prior year’s $50 million (-12%)–slightly from Q1’s $40 million–operating expenses reduced 17% to $84 million versus prior year’s $101 million, but the company remained firmly in the red with a GAAP loss of $59 million, 21% less than last year’s $75 million and reduced versus Q1’s $69 million loss. The board, as previously noted, now consists of three financial non-healthcare people, replacing the seven who resigned. Meanwhile, customers wonder about the security and use of their genetic and personal information [TTA 8 Nov]. Release, AP, Healthcare Dive

Another telemental health unicorn, Lyra Health, laid off 2% of staff in a restructuring. 77 people on non-clinical operational teams were released. Some may receive severance for 12 weeks with health benefits, according to one of the anonymous released. Noted in the FierceHealthcare article are reported changes at Lyra, including larger provider caseloads demanded and deletion of seven core values that put clients and clinicians first. Lyra’s last raise was a $235 million Series F in January 2022 for a total of over $910 million (Crunchbase). That high valuation of $5.6 billion has been tough to maintain in the current funding environment–and to not take a down round that affects valuation. 

Health kiosk/primary care practice Forward goes backward, shuts immediately. Nearly on the first anniversary of a $100 million Series E raise from Khosla Ventures and four other investors to deploy self-serve kiosks (left) in major cities [TTA 17 Nov 23], tech-driven primary care practice Forward announced its sudden closure today, effective immediately. What remains on their website is a goodbye-and-good-luck note to patients canceling appointments and zeroing out its app. Patients can email clinicians for care support until 19 December. There is no information available on accessing records nor transferring to new providers, leaving patients in the lurch. 200 employees will lose their jobs immediately as well.

Forward had primary care practices in 14 markets such as New York, San Francisco, and others. Last year it claimed 100+ primary clinicians at 19 locations, with patients paying $150/monthly (no insurance accepted) for un­lim­it­ed vis­its to For­ward’s pri­ma­ry clin­ics. (Refunds, anyone?) The CarePods self-serve kiosks were designed to be self-contained units placed in malls, offices, and gyms. Inside, subscribing patients could access AI-powered health apps for disease detection, biometric body scans, blood testing in disease areas, including diabetes, hypertension, weight management, and mental health (depression and anxiety). They were scheduled last year to be deployed in the San Francisco Bay Area, New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia. Nice idea, but like the earlier HealthSpot Station of 2012-2016, they are equally defunct.

In its eight-year life, Forward had raised $325 million (Crunchbase), which also reported last year’s Series E as only $75 million. At the time of their Series D, Forward was valued at over $1 billion and had a roster of flashy investors such as music’s The Weeknd, Salesforce’s founder Marc Benioff, actor Matthew McConaughey, Eric Schmidt, and Softbank. What’s stunning? Reports indicated that it only gen­er­at­ed un­der $100 mil­lion in to­tal rev­enue since its founding. There has to be more to this, like lawsuits….    FierceHealthcare, Endpoints News

Primary care provider Forward introduces CarePod kiosks, raises $100 million for deployment–but will it work this time?

Forward, a primary care provider that works on a membership model and has practices in 14 markets, announced a line extension to their existing practices. CarePods are self-serve closed kiosks designed for placement in malls, offices, and gyms that deploy a variety of AI-powered health apps for disease detection, biometric body scans, blood testing in disease areas, including diabetes, hypertension, weight management, and mental health (depression and anxiety). The CarePods will be deployed in the San Francisco Bay Area, New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia. Access to CarePods and the app starts at $99/month and $1,639/year–the release is not clear on whether that can include in-office visits. It is not covered by insurance, including Medicare or Medicaid.

The technology is an extension of what’s seen in their offices (this NY-based Editor is bombarded with YouTube ads for membership) that uses body scanning, vital signs monitoring, blood testing, heart monitoring, and corresponding apps for preventative care and condition management. While the ads feature human doctors and clinicians, the impression from the ads and website is that the health exams are technology-driven and while there are clinicians, they may not necessarily be there. It is not for getting updated on your vaccinations or diagnosing a rash or fever. Forward claims 100+ primary clinicians at 19 locations. 

Forward raised a $100 million Series E to deploy the CarePods from Khosla Ventures, Founders Fund, Samsung Next, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and Softbank. It consists of equity financing of more than $50 million as well as debt financing. Forward’s total financing is $657 million with its Series D round (Crunchbase). Forward also boasts a blue chip roster of advisers from Eric Schmidt of Google to Robert Wachter, MD.

In viewing this first from their communications representatives, this Editor was immediately reminded of the last time she saw a closed type of health kiosk. I demo’d HealthSpot Station at the CES preview in NYC in late 2012. It officially debuted at CES 2013. Despite decent takeup, HealthSpot was defunct by mid-2016 having placed only 50 or so stations and burned through a substantial $43 million through its entire short but showy life. Its remains went to now-bankrupt Rite Aid which did nothing reportable with it. HealthSpot had key differences with Forward’s CarePods in that HealthSpot was a place to sit down and have a synchronous virtual visit with a doctor (supplied by Teladoc initially), with vital signs monitoring through self-serve tools in the kiosk. Payment was per use and for the doctor visit. Their problems were placement of rather large units, maintenance, and the general reluctance of people to use monitoring tools at that time within a closed area. Based on the available media, the CarePod technology is much more advanced towards a virtual visit with touch screens, AI assists, sophisticated monitors, and an integrated app that generates care plans. It also builds on an established app and in-office technology. Concerns remain in this Editor’s view about maintenance, especially with the CarePod using much more sophisticated technology, cleanliness, and claustrophobia. FierceHealthcare, PYMNTS

This Editor has also taken a dim view of open kiosks placed in retailers such as CVS Health, Walmart, and supermarkets, such as Higi (bought by Babylon Health but evidently not part of the bankruptcy) and Pursuant Health (the former SoloHealth), having seen all too many of them in dusty corners, neglected, and often with Out Of Order signs. The Forward plan to restrict them to malls, offices, and gyms seems to avoid the retail crunch but one wonders what the breakeven is–or if this is a substitute for office expansion.

A commenter with a far dimmer view than this Editor’s is quoted at length in today’s HISTalk. “The target audience seems to be young, worried well people who prefer faceless machines and tons of prevention-focused data or congratulatory test results to interacting with a clinician. That actually is a pretty good business model. Reviews for the company’s in-person clinics are almost all from customers in their 20s and early 30s.” But the commenter–a customer–is dissatisfied with being completely unable to get someone on the phone, everything done through chat, and wait times to see a real doctor upwards of two weeks.