Breaking–Oracle to lay off thousands due to AI data center cash crunch, possibly as early as next week. What’s next? (Updated)

March 6, 2026 | by

We now know another piece of the puzzle on why so many Oracle Health top executives have departed. Bloomberg’s Brody Ford has followed up his earlier report on five departures  of key executives at Oracle Health [TTA 3 Mar] with the not-unsurprising news that there will be thousands of layoffs at Oracle, starting as early as this month. The reason why is Oracle’s aggressive expansion into data centers and the shortage of free or loaned cash available for that expansion, necessary to remain competitive in cloud computing with Amazon and Microsoft. (That situation, and the speculation around it, is explored in more detail in our article here.)

The pennydrop was as early as last September in a filing, according to Mr. Ford. It was estimated in the filing that $1.6 billion in restructuring costs will hit this FY, which ends in May. Oracle as of last May had 162,000 employees worldwide.

According to Mr. Ford’s sources, the layoffs will not be the ‘usual’ rolling layoffs, but wider reaching. He cites an internal announcement that “it would be reviewing many of the open job listings in its cloud division.” Some of the cuts will be targeting jobs Oracle needs fewer of because of AI. He cites the reception of Microsoft’s AI-related layoffs and Block, Inc, founded by CEO Jack Dorsey, laying off nearly half of its staff due to supposed leaps in AI (but more likely due to ballooning hiring not compatible with cash flow).

The scuttlebutt on Reddit indicate the cuts could be as high as 20% with the US operation hard hit, and strike as early as next week. Since Oracle has not been shy about cutting jobs over the years (see Mr. Ford’s article), this high number is a surprise. Another bit of information gleaned off Reddit is that the OHAI reporting line has changed from TK Anand to “Clay”–possibly co-CEO Clay Magouyrk, versus Mike Sicilia who testified before Congress two years ago when the VA implementation cratered?

Editor’s analysis and opinion: With five major executives leaving OHAI (Oracle Health and AI), she continues to believe that many of the cuts will hit the health area. Yet OHAI is the area that has taken tons of flak from current customers, from Congress on Veterans Health, from the VA, and from health systems. 

  • Oracle has major Federal contracts. The prominence of the VA contract and rollout timing makes cuts in this area problematic. Just because EHR problems have supposedly been fixed and that both the VA and Oracle are set to roll it out, VISN by VISN, does not mean that AI can do it. It is a long and customized implementation due to the sheer number of VA locations and diversity of functions [TTA 8 Feb]. And for that, you need people with deep experience and buckets of patience who know the system and can get along with their Federal counterparts. VistA in over two decades of implementation was so highly customized for both patient care and additional areas such as research that Oracle, in replacing it to VA satisfaction and to be better than VistA, has to accommodate a lot of, shall we say, discovery along the way.
  • In health systems, the discontent with Oracle was about declining vendor partnership and communication. This points to problems with people and continuity. This was highly apparent in the KLAS survey from October 2025 cited here. When half of the interviewees tell KLAS that they would not buy the system again, that is disastrous.

Apparently missing in action is Seema Verma, the general manager of OHAI.

When your current customers providing your business and cash flow are restive, yet what’s coming out of Oracle has been about 1) refocusing on cloud computing and AI datacenter contracts, not health, 2) massive job cuts to pay for them disproportionately affecting Oracle Health, 3) rumors about a sale of Oracle Health to pay for the datacenters, and 4) still paying a $1.4 billion dividend to shareholders that largely benefits Larry Ellison, holder of 40% of stock–what are the next pennies to drop? Stay tuned!

Sources for this article: Bloomberg, Investor.com

Updated 9 March. SimplyWallSt pegged the layoffs at 18%. One of Oracle’s data center contracts is with OpenAI, but they canceled a large planned AI data center expansion in Texas. Other potential tenants, including Meta, reportedly are interested in the site. Their analysis depicts Oracle as “trying to reconcile very large capital commitments to AI data centers, negative cash flow pressure, and debt and equity raises, with the operational reality of supporting customers such as OpenAI, xAI and Meta.” Yet they are aggressively pushing AI through promotion in healthcare, F1 racing, and construction. Their rock-and-hard place is making commitments versus not having the cash to quickly fulfill them. This returns to our 5 February report. Tuesday is the day that Oracle reports results.

Oracle’s Ellison set last quarter the company’s transformation as three steps: From the Fortune article:

  • Oracle making its database available inside its competitors’ clouds, including Amazon’s AWS, Alphabet’s Google, and Microsoft’s Azure.
  • “Vectorizing” the data to make it readable by AI models, which makes the data customers have in Oracle’s systems more valuable.
  • Building an “AI Lakehouse,” which vectorizes all a company’s data and not just what’s in Oracle databases or applications.

But what if you don’t want your data ‘vectorized’ to be read by AI models? Something called proprietary information and data comes to mind, like business and marketing plans. What about PHI and PII? Those could be the danger points to consider in this ‘transformation’. (Forgive me for being oh-so-tired of ‘transformation’–the last time Mr. Ellison trumpeted this was for…Oracle Health, which may be hollowed out to finance this.)

Tunstall secures additional £20 million from Charterhouse: implications?

October 6, 2014 | by

Breaking News  Tunstall Healthcare Group quietly announced on 25 September an additional investment of £20 million from its private equity owner, Charterhouse Capital Partners. Our readers know from our May and July articles the business challenges Tunstall has faced. We have particularly focused on–as have Bloomberg in May, this Editor and our Founder/EIC Emeritus Steve Hards over the years–on the heavy burden of Tunstall’s debt service, multiple management changes on both sides of the Atlantic, and a decided ‘failure to launch’ in the US market.

Readers of the Sunday Times woke up to this headline and lede (what news writers use to introduce the topic and entice you to read on):

Headline: £20m to steady ship at Tunstall

Lede: CHARTERHOUSE Capital Partners, one of the City’s oldest and most secretive private equity firms, has been forced to provide a multimillion-pound lifeline to another of its investments. A fortnight ago, Charterhouse ploughed £20m into Tunstall, a healthcare technology company that makes equipment to monitor the elderly and sick at home.

Insider Media Limited (business news review) had a more measured take in its ‘Yorkshire News’ section:

Headline: BACKERS PUMP £20M INTO HEALTHCARE FIRM (more…)

Tunstall’s unhappy lenders and the consequences of debt service

May 22, 2014 | by | 2 Comments

A ‘slipped under the radar’ story (in this Editor’s judgement, based on the lack of news references) is Bloomberg News’ exclusive on last week’s (12 May) meetings between Tunstall Group Ltd and its creditors over the company’s recent performance. According to Bloomberg’s sources, the meeting was called “after income plunged and management changed following a refinancing in September.” In a statement from Charterhouse that cleverly tap-danced past the reason for the meeting, “Tunstall continues to be a successful, profitable, cash-generating business and comparable to many other organizations, experiences short-term fluctuations in performance.” and “The group has been impacted by a number of factors including specific market factors and the continued strength of sterling against the major-trading currencies.” The business has also been hurt by delays in awarding major contracts, according to the statement.

From the Bloomberg article:

As Tunstall’s profits have declined, its ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization increased to 5.6 times as of March, from 4.7 times in September, the people said. The loan terms in the March test dictated that the leverage ratio shouldn’t exceed 6.3 times, they said.

Lenders are expecting the company to give a new profit forecast today for the 12 months to September 2014, according to the people. The company didn’t comment on earnings targets or leverage in its statement.

AND: Its 350 million pounds ($590 million) of loans dropped to as little as 77 pence on the pound, according to broker quotes, from 99 pence in September. (Ed. note: these loans are publicly traded and a lowered value is highly significant as to the debt quality.)

The outcome of the meeting is not yet known.

As our readers know, private equity firm Charterhouse Capital Partners LLP acquired Tunstall Group in 2008 from Bridgepoint Capital  for £514 million (US$ 1 billion), funded in part with over £242 million in debt and with Bridgepoint and management retaining small shares (FT.com). The September 2013 refinancing was for £350 million ($590 million). This paints a picture of a highly leveraged company beholden to many beyond its owners and its contractors in local authorities and housing associations. Tunstall and Charterhouse also received negative publicity when the Guardian did an exposé on their use of the (wholly legal) ‘Quoted Eurobond Exemption’, where they pay loan interest at high rates to their parent companies through a mechanism via the Channel Islands Stock Exchange.

Management changes over the past six months have also rocked the top layers of the company. (more…)