Perspectives: Virtual Nursing Optimism Grows, But Providers Remain in Early Stages

TTA has an open invitation to industry leaders to contribute to our Perspectives non-promotional opinion and thought leadership area. Today’s contribution is from Lisbeth Votruba, MSN, RN, CAVRN, the Chief Clinical Officer for AvaSure. She is a pioneering nurse executive committed to continuous improvement of healthcare and the diffusion of new technologies to drive patient and staff safety. Her Master of Science in Nursing is from Columbia University School of Nursing. In this article, Ms. Votruba reviews the state of virtual nursing in US health systems and how they can progress into a system-wide strategy for integrating virtual care into widespread clinical use. AvaSure is an intelligent virtual care platform that deploys AI-powered virtual sitting and virtual nursing solutions and is a trusted partner of 1,100+ hospitals with experience in over 5,000 deployments.

Looking at healthcare news headlines, one might think inpatient virtual care is ubiquitous and everyone else is saving millions of dollars through virtual nursing. Or one might get the impression the nursing shortage is over because AI is easing administrative strain. It turns out the truth lies somewhere in the middle. 

A new survey reveals that most health systems remain in the early stages of virtual nursing adoption in acute care settings. In 2024, just 10% of hospital leaders and 14% of IT leaders have reached the phase where virtual care is a standard part of care delivery. In both groups, 30% reported no virtual care.

Those were among the major takeaways from two recent surveys of 369 hospital clinical and information technology leaders on the topic of inpatient virtual care.

Over the last year and a half, hospital leaders grew more firmly committed to the concept of virtual nursing with those believing it will be an integral part of care delivery, growing from 66% to 74%. However, as of October 2024, one out of three respondents had yet to implement virtual care in any inpatient department.

Progressing through the early stages of virtual care
Based on survey results and firsthand observation, most providers are still in the early exploration phase, which is stage 2 of the 5-stage Inpatient Virtual Care Maturity Model (see graphic). The 5-stage process represents a blueprint for care model redesign led by change-management-oriented, outcome-focused leaders.

Few survey respondents have progressed to stage 3, strategic advancement, in which providers establish infrastructure and advance virtual care use for admission, discharge, education, mentoring, and rounding. None has advanced to stage 5, mature virtual care, which is characterized by full integration of virtual care with an emphasis on optimizing workflows, operational efficiency, and outcomes.

Key survey findings

Despite these slow steps toward inpatient virtual care maturity, the annual survey revealed that:

  • 74% of hospital leaders believe virtual care is or will become integral to care delivery models in acute inpatient care, up from 66% in last year’s survey.
  • Hospital leaders continue to prioritize virtual nursing, with an average ranking of 6.2 on a prioritization scale of 1 to 10. Among health IT leaders, the average ranking was 6.
  • 46% of hospital leaders are piloting or have implemented virtual care for inpatient acute care, up from 38% a year ago.

Virtual care use cases and metrics
Hospital leaders consider the top use cases for virtual care to be virtual sitting (39%), patient discharge (33%), admission documentation support (32%), high-acuity monitoring (18%), patient education (18%), and virtual consults (18%).

Survey respondents’ most frequently cited metrics to measure the success of virtual care programs include patient safety, patient experience, workload burden for staff, patient outcomes, patient flow, nurse retention, workforce costs, and nurse safety, satisfaction and retention.

The use of virtual care solutions to reduce burnout among nurses and other clinicians is consistent with the US Surgeon General’s advisory on building a thriving health workforce. Researchers estimate that annual burnout-related turnover costs are $9 billion for nurses.

The path to virtual care maturity requires not just investing in new technology; it also requires organizational alignment, solid change management processes, and buy-in at all levels of the organization. Adopting an intelligent platform that seamlessly blends remote and in-person care with AI-powered virtual sitting and virtual nursing could be a critical step towards accelerating virtual care maturity. However, making a significant difference requires more than just adopting technology; it also calls for establishing specific objectives and taking deliberate steps to build these initiatives.

About the survey:

The Virtual Care Insight Survey was conducted online within the U.S. by Joslin Insight on behalf of AvaSure between September 19 and October 7, 2024. The survey received responses from 340 healthcare professionals primarily working in acute care settings. At least 30% were nurse leaders or key decision-makers (collectively referred to as hospital leaders). This study’s sample data is accurate to within +5.3 percentage points using a 95% confidence level.

To complement the survey of hospital leaders, AvaSure gathered insights from 29 hospital IT leaders (mostly CIOs) regarding Inpatient Virtual Care Adoption.

The full survey report is available for download here: https://avasure.com/resource/2024-virtual-care-insight-survey-report/

News roundup: 4.3M HealthEquity member data breach, CrowdStrike health fallout, more Congress pounding of VA/Oracle; Flo app now unicorn (UK), fundings for Clarapath, CoachCare; AvaSure buying Ouva

Health savings account (HSA/FSA) provider HealthEquity had a three-month breach that compromised 4.3 million member accounts. The breach originated with an undisclosed third-party vendor, in a pattern that has become familiar. According to HealthEquity’s filing with the Maine attorney general (though HQ’d in Utah), the breach occurred in that vendor’s “unstructured data repository” at HealthEquity, outside of their core systems, after the hacker stole the password out of a vendor user account. Unfortunately for HealthEquity, the hack that started in March wasn’t discovered until 26 June, giving the hacker free rein in that database for three months. What’s surprising is that the breach wasn’t worse.

HealthEquity is a third-party administrator for companies of FSA/HRA, Commuter, COBRA, and Lifestyle plans.

The Maine AG filing states that information stolen may include customer names, addresses, phone numbers, their Social Security number, information about the person’s employer, benefit type, diagnoses, prescription details, the person’s dependent (if any), and some payment card information. With HealthEquity claiming 15 million+ members, the breach affects a substantial 29% of its membership. Actions they are taking are to notify members and provide them with credit monitoring services through Equifax with a reference guide. HealthEquity notification page, TechCrunch, HealthcareITNews

CrowdStrike’s antivirus software update that went waaaay sideways continues its fallout. As most know, it happened when they pushed an update and patch to Falcon, a cloud-based anti-cyber attack product that uses AI to detect intrusions. Well, Falcon’s AI wings were fractured on that 19 July push where testing was apparently lacking. BSOD became their new thing. What made the news was the devastating effect on 8.5 million Windows devices, only about 1%–on Delta Air Lines’ aircraft scheduling and the shutdown of many systems such as 911 and police within cities and states, but apparently a curtain was drawn around the healthcare bed. EHRs were affected at major systems such as Kaiser Permanente, Providence, Henry Ford Health, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Mass General Brigham, RWJBarnabas Health, Penn Medicine, and Seattle Children’s Hospital, causing postponements of medical procedures. At Providence, it totaled 15,000 of the organization’s servers, as well as about 40,000 of its 150,000 computers. It was the equivalent of a cyberattack without being a cyberattack. According to industry analyst Parametrix, US Fortune 500 companies (excluding Microsoft) lost a total of $5.4 billion. MedCityNews

With this kind of devastation, it’s no surprise that these companies and the government are rethinking their approach to cloud computing. They’re very concerned about the oligopoly of three providers: Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. Microsoft has 40% of the cybersecurity market with CrowdStrike 15% concentrated in larger organizations.“We’re reaching the point where over-centralization makes us less ‘healable,’ and less resilient,” Robert Thomas, owner of cybersecurity company 180A Consulting said. “We’re losing our resiliency as a nation.”  Systems are still not back up and neither is the CrowdStrike stock. Rumors do persist that they were hacked. Epoch Times   Microsoft also published a recovery tool for IT administrators to expedite the repair process. FierceHealthcare

The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Subcommittee on Technology Modernization hearing on 22 July had some further flak-gathering from committee members. Most of the criticism concentrated on the joint MHS/VA rollout at Lovell Federal Health Care Center and the amount of work it required to get the Oracle Cerner EHR to work mostly right. While VA and Oracle leaders insist that Lovell went better than anyone expected, the resources used at Lovell cannot be duplicated at the remaining VA facilities. VA is already facing a $15 billion shortfall for FY 2024 and 2025. The Lovell center had a persistent problem in processing prescriptions, with 60% going unfilled. In member Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Fla.) words, “I think we are far from ready to endorse further go-live activities. The two departments threw more resources at this go-live than will ever be available at any future VA facility.” Healthcare Dive  Earlier coverage TTA 24 July

The UK women’s health app Flo is now a unicorn. Their Series C of $200m (£156m), funded solely (and unusually) by General Atlantic, put them at a valuation of over $1 billion. Their total funding is $275 million. Two General Atlantic executives will be joining Flo’s board, Tanzeen Syed, managing director, and Jessie Cai, principal. Flo helps users track ovulation and menstrual periods, enabling calendaring of fertility, and monitoring of over 70 symptoms. It also assists with pregnancy health guidance. The raise will be used to expand into new user segments including perimenopause and menopause. Its current base is 70 million monthly active users (MAUs) and close to 5 million paid subscribers. Flo is marketed in 66 countries, including the US, India, Indonesia, and Nigeria, with centers in Lithuania and the Netherlands.  Release, UK Tech News

Funding/M&A wrap:

Clarapath, a medical robotics developer based in White Plains, NY, scored $36 million in a Series B-1 funding round from Northwell Ventures with participation from new investors Ochsner Ventures, CU Healthcare Innovation Fund, and Mayo Clinic. Clarapath automates pathology lab work. Its SectionStar platform sections biopsy tissue with improved accuracy. It is pre-revenue with a total of $75 million in funding. Axios, Mobihealthnews

CoachCare, a remote patient monitoring/virtual health monitoring developer for practices and health systems, added $48 million in an unlettered venture round funding led by Integrity Growth Partners with participation from Topmark Funding. The platform combines software and connected devices with outreach for RPM, chronic care management, and other virtual care for about 150,000 patients. Funding to date is $49 million. It has acquired four companies in the past year: NVOLVE, CareSpan Health, Alertive (formerly part of Carbon Health), and WebCareHealth. Release, Mobihealthnews

Another virtual care company, AvaSure, is acquiring Ouva’s smart hospital room solutions. Ouva has been partnering with AvaSure to supply AI-enhanced care automation technology. The acquisition will expand the ambient AI capabilities of AvaSure’s Intelligent Virtual Care Platform and double in-house AI engineering resources. AvaSure’s primary market is hospitals. Ouva will continue as a separate company with its pediatric and wayfinding business. Cost is not disclosed. Release, HIStalk 7/31