Short takes 2: Humana’s CEO changeover; Owlet Dream Sock CE Mark, UK approval; TytoCare goes to school; LG enters home health with Primefocus; Samsung $92M buys Sonio (FR); raises by Blackwell in health cybersec, Watershed Health

Keeping it short and sweet for the end of the week.

Payer Humana changing out CEOs. The wrap for current CEO Bruce Broussard is coming a little earlier than anticipated, with the planned changeover to Jim Rechtin on 1 July. Mr. Broussard will depart the board of directors but stay on as a ‘strategic advisor’ until 2026, which is a typical arrangement for CEOs usually tied to compensation. Mr. Rechtin’s experience prior to joining Humana as president/COO in January was as Envision Healthcare’s CEO and with OptumCare and DaVita. Last year, Humana and Cigna failed to merge after shareholders disapproved and the evident conflict in PBMs [TTA 13 Dec 23]. 2024 earnings were revised downwards in April due to ongoing losses in Medicare Advantage plans. Release, FierceHealthcare

Owlet’s Dream Sock now has EU CE Mark, UK medical device approvals. The European medical device clearance by the EU notified body was announced on 2 May, with the UK certification following on 14 May. As certified for the EU and UK, the Dream Sock is intended for use with healthy infants between 0-18 months and 2.5-13.6 kg. The Dream Sock measures oxygen saturation and pulse rate which are reported on a smartphone app and on a base station to provide baby sleep insights. In the US, it was FDA cleared under de novo last November. It is sold without prescription through retailers and directly through Owlet. Owlet plans to debut it in Germany, France, and the UK later this year. CE Mark, UK releases. Mobihealthnews

TytoCare expands a logical market–school RPM. Their school health initiative that started before the pandemic has added or expanded in five healthcare systems. This brings primary and urgent care services to over 2,500 schools in 31 states. Three of the five systems are Cone Health (North Carolina), Sentara Health (Virginia), and A Plus Family HealthCare (Kentucky). TytoCare works with school nurses and adminstrators for remote diagnostics, not only for children presenting with illness but also for monitoring children with chronic conditions. Blog, Mobihealthnews

LG NOVA launches Primefocus Health in North America. LG, well known for monitors and TVs in healthcare settings, is introducing a “provider-focused, patient-centric healthcare platform” to connect patients in home care with their providers. It will use “innovative non-invasive technology for tracking patient progress for multiple medical conditions, which can be integrated with the provider’s electronic health record system, artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities for ease of use.” No demos or further specifics are provided.  LG NOVA is LG Electronics North America Innovation Center and demonstrates an interest in additional healthcare expansion. Release, Mobihealthnews

LG’s rival Samsung buying France’s Sonio for $92 million. The fetal AI ultrasound company originally partnered with Samsung Healthcare France in 2021 in order to confirm the efficacy of its AI for pregnancy/prenatal monitoring. It raised a $14 million Series A last year for a US commercial launch of their AI FDA 510(k) cleared Sonio Detect, a machine-agnostic AI assistant software for reporting and imaging. Samsung Medison, the ultrasound division of Samsung, must await French regulatory approvals, including the French Ministry of the Economy and Finance. Release, MedTech Dive

And in latest fundings:

Healthcare focused Blackwell Security now has a $13 million Series A, led by co-creators General Catalyst and Rally Ventures. The funding will expand their Managed Healthcare Extended Detection and Response (MHXDR) offering. They are also acquiring their first CEO, Geyer Jones, from cybersecurity/IoT companies Cylera and RSA.  Release, Mobihealthnews

New Orleans-headquartered Watershed Health completed a $13.6 million venture round funding. This was led by First Trust Capital Partners with participation from FCA Venture Partners, Create Health Ventures, Impact Engine, 450 Ventures, LDH Ventures II/Launchpad Digital Health, and others that adds to a 2022 $9.8 million venture round. The new funding will be to expand their SaaS platform plus grow the engineering, development, customer success and sales teams. Watershed is a care coordination platform with a community focus that connects clinical and non-clinical providers such as SDOH resources. Release

Short takes: Legrand acquires Enovation, FDA nixes Cue Health’s Covid tests, Ascension confirms ransomware attack–who did it? (updated), beware of ‘vishing’ courtesy of ChatGPT

Legrand Care acquires Enovation. Enovation is a Netherlands-based digital health company with a connected care platform for care monitoring across prevention, early detection, medication checks, and remote healthcare. Its customer base includes ambulances, pharmacies, clinics, hospitals, and home care. With distribution in healthcare organizations across 18 countries, including Scottish Digital Telecare [TTA 11 Aug 2021], it will join the equally international Legrand’s Assisted Living and Healthcare (AL&HC) business unit with Intervox, Neat, Tynetec, Jontek, and Aid Call. Acquisition cost was not disclosed. Release   Legrand and Tynetec are long-time supporters of TTA.

The hammer drops on embattled Cue Health. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has invalidated Cue Health’s Covid-19 Tests for Home and OTC Use and for the authorized lab test version. Home users were advised to discard unused kits in household trash. Both consumers and providers were advised to retest if symptoms persisted after a negative test result. This followed an FDA inspection of their operations that determined that unauthorized changes to the test kit design were made along with failures in performance testing. A Warning Letter was issued to Cue on 9 May. The company has not yet responded. FDA Safety Communication

Cue was one of many biotech manufacturers that marketed Covid-19 point of care/lab, and home testing kits after obtaining Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) in 2020 and 2021. It exploded in size and went public in September 2021 at $200 million and $16/share with a valuation of $3 billion. Today HLTH shares trade on NasdaqCM at a little bit over $0.13. Their headquarters facilities in San Diego that once had 1,500 employees must be a lonely place, as the company reported another layoff of 230 employees, about half of remaining staff, after earlier layoff rounds of 245 in February and 880 in 2023. Their remaining test is one for Mpox on a EUA. Two other tests developed for flu and RSV are still under FDA review.  Cue Health’s financial reports for 2023 were dismal with revenue down to $71 million, an 85% reduction versus 2022, and a net loss of $373.5 million. Recent reports indicate that the company will refocus on marketing its Cue Health Monitoring System. Management and board changes have also been drastic, with a CEO change in March (Yahoo Finance) and the CFO departing this past Monday. MedTech Dive

Ascension Health finally acknowledged that its cyberattack was ransomware-based. On Saturday 11 May, their website event update confirmed that the cyberattack was ransomware. The Saturday and Monday 13 May updates also confirm that system operations will continue to be disrupted with no timetable set for restoration to normal status. Impacted systems include their EHR, MyChart, and some hospitals are diverting emergency care. The update page now has 12 regional updates and a general + patient FAQ. Update: in these states, Ascension’s retail pharmacies cannot fill prescriptions: Florida, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia. Their website recommends that patients bring paperwork and prescription containers. Lab and imaging results are delayed. Since the hospitals are on manual systems, overall there are delays in admissions–bring documentation. And the class-action suits have started, with reports that three have been filed already. Healthcare IT News

Who dunnit? DataBreaches.net reported over the weekend that Ascension’s hack has been attributed to interestingly named ransomwareistes Black Basta. Late last week, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an alert on Black Basta. It’s another charming ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) with bad news affiliates like BlackCat/ALPHV wreaking havoc on over 500 organizations globally. No word on whether Ascension has paid ransom. 

Speaking of cybersecurity, now something else to worry about–‘vishing’. This is ‘voice phishing’, another generative AI-facilitated hack that uses snippets of a human voice to pose as people or representing organizations via phone call or voicemail. Not enough? There’s ‘smishing’–SMS or text phishing which can invade your phone with all sorts of nasty messages. These attacks, according to cybersec firm Enea, are up twelve-fold since the launch of ChatGPT. Vishing, smishing, and phishing (email) attacks have increased by a staggering 1,265%. 76% of enterprises lack sufficient voice and messaging fraud protection. Can we go back to the 1990s? 2000s? When we worried about “Nigerian princes” email scams? Becker’s, Enea survey report

Is Oracle Health’s Big Vision smacking into the wall of Healthcare Reality? Their business says so.

Once again, ‘healthcare transformation’ may be A Bridge Too Far but definitely a Long Slog for Oracle. A highly critical Bloomberg report details the flat and deteriorating business of Oracle Health, the division that includes the former Cerner. Since their much-touted acquisition of Cerner two years ago [TTA 14 June 2022], Oracle has not righted the basic health system EHR business. Revenue and clients have stagnated with high-profile losses, versus the massive gains predicted only two years ago, and Cerner falling further behind the hospital/practice EHR leader, Epic, with a 26% hospital bed share compared to Epic’s 48%. 

  • Bloomberg’s internal sources indicated that sales reached $5.9 billion in 2023, but are projected to slip to $5.6 billion both in 2024 and 2025.
  • In 2023, 12 accounts did not renew and announced they would replace Cerner with Epic. These are major names such as Northwell Health and Boston Children’s Hospital. In 2022, clients with a combined capacity of 4,658 patients were lost, according to KLAS Research. This is despite the fact that EHRs are not moved lightly. The average commitment is 15 years or more since the ramp-up is taxing and costs are astronomical.
  • Common complaints cited by KLAS center around Cerner’s legacy software and the Cerner transition: tracking clinical revenue, tool integration, technical glitches, and uncertainty or worsened service associated with the Oracle takeover.Boston moved to improve data exchange with surrounding hospitals and Northwell for Epic’s set of better integrated tools.

Oracle laid off many involved with customer accounts. The consulting and sales area laid off 3,000 in one year from March 2023 to February 2024, according to Bloomberg. These may have been as early as May 2023. In June 2023, there were reports that the VA’s pause of Cerner Millenium for at least a year coupled with the completion of MHS Genesis triggered 500 to 1,200 additional Federal service area layoffs plus rescinded job offers. The layoff total may be as high as 4,200 on a pre-acquisition employee base of 28,000, with salaries and promotions frozen. On the executive level, Don Johnson, who once was a successor to CEO Larry Ellison, departed from leading Oracle Health and AI. Reportedly, Dr. David Feinberg, who briefly headed Cerner prior to the sale, is now a ‘ceremonial’ chairman of Oracle Health. [TTA 18 May 2023] Dr. Feinberg also joined Aegis Ventures as a senior advisor and is on Humana’s board, which sounds like a winddown of Oracle responsibilities [TTA 11 Jan]. The layoffs and freezes have improved the former Cerner’s operating margin from 22% to 33%, but not as high as Oracle’s 46% margin.

Since the acquisition and chairman Larry Ellison’s Big Vision promises of creating ‘healthcare transformation’ and ‘better information’, Oracle’s challenge with Cerner has been not only to move their legacy systems onto the cloud but also to integrate Cerner systems with Oracle–and Oracle may have underestimated that complexity as well.

  • Oracle has stated that most customers have been moved to Oracle’s cloud, but inside sources have qualified them as Oracle Health’s smallest and least technically complicated. The big systems with their own domains have yet to be touched.
  • Cerner applications had about 8,000 bugs to be fixed.
  • On the people management/integration side, there are substantial differences between ‘legacy’ Cerner and Oracle people, often centering around not understanding the nuances and complexities inherent in healthcare–as well as compensation and working conditions. This Editor, who as a marketer has had to deal peripherally with ‘legacy systems’ (to the point of tears) through acquisitions on the payer side, knows this is common.

Where Oracle has had success with Cerner’s EHR is in international markets less saturated with EHRs or with home-grown systems, winning contracts in Sweden, the UK and Saudi Arabia. As previously noted, they are a supplier for the NHS. Oracle has moved forward on population health software,  modernizing Cerner’s revenue-tracking tool, and planning for an AI-assisted ambient listening voice note system. 

What remains up in the air is if the VA will restart Millenium transitioning from VistA this year. Oracle is pushing to restart it and its revenue stream this summer as projected last year [TTA 18 May 2023]. This counters VA Secretary Denis McDonough’s testimony last month to the House Veterans Affairs Committee that the VA does not intend to resume deploying it until FY 2025, which does not start until October 2024, and use carryover funding. This FY, there are no funds or plans allocated except for Lovell FHCC, which seems to be going well. The contract, already tightened last April with multiple metrics, demanded improvements, oversight, and annual renewals, is running into more Congressional headwinds this year. Three senators on the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee called for the VA “to use the opportunity the new contract structure provides to re-review terms and add additional accountability and oversight provisions to protect veterans and taxpayers.” pointing to the OIG report issued in March. The contract is up for renewal this coming Thursday 16 May. NextGov, Becker’s

The final burden on Oracle–only alluded to in the article–is the debt load undertaken to finance the $28 billion Cerner acquisition. A complex set of bridge and term loans were used to finance the buy [TTA 27 Oct 2022]. At the time, Oracle’s $90 billion debt load was one of the largest in tech. While Oracle’s stock value has been buoyed by its investments in AI, in the current environment, this debt load becomes suspect. Yahoo Finance, Quartz

News roundup: Transcarent raises $126M; 98point6 lays off; Oscar notches first profit; Steward Health’s Ch. 11; Amazon Clinic GM leaves; Amwell’s down but hopeful Q1; Hims founder gets political

A study in contrasts

Already well-funded Transcarent gains another $126 million in a Series D round. Total outside funding is $424 million that boosts its valuation to $2.2 billion. This round will fund expansion and development efforts plus enhancing the platform’s AI capabilities. The Series D round was led by General Catalyst and Glen Tullman’s 7wireVentures, with participation from new investors Memorial Hermann Health System and Geodesic Capital, along with existing investors. As noted in our Rock Health analysis (but not in the company’s release), this raise had a ‘sweetener’ of a 2.5x return should the company IPO or M&A.  Transcarent is an enterprise health navigator that enables employees to use a single platform to navigate their needs for medical, surgery, pharmacy, and mental health care. Transcarent’s differentiator in this space for large self-insured employers is that Transcarent steers employees to higher quality, lower cost care settings. Their pricing is also based on actual users only in risk-based agreements, versus the more common per member per month (PMPM) care management model. Transcarent also pays health systems up front for surgical procedures.

Tullman, who is also Transcarent’s CEO, is well known for creating high profile companies that eventually are sold or IPO’d for high valuations. These deals make his followers money, but often not the buyers (ask Teladoc) or the employees left in the lurch. This Editor does wonder, given the state of US business right now, how this competitive enterprise care management niche earns this kind of investment and valuation. Release, Mobihealthnews 

One of Transcarent’s buys last year was 98point6’s virtual care and related assets that included 98point6’s physician group, self-insured employer business, and an irrevocable software license in a deal worth potentially $100 million according to publicity. 98point6 then had a well publicized and $32 million-financed pivot to being a software company and licensor, acquiring remaining assets from asynchronous telehealth provider Bright.md this past January for 55% in equity and 45% in cash. Despite all this, little noted was that at the end of April was that 98point6 laid off an undisclosed number of its estimated 100 US-based staff. One wonders if this affects service to Bright.md’s provider customers. GeekWire

On the health plan side, rebooted insurtech Oscar Health finally got into the black with $177.4 million in net income for Q1 and beat earnings per share estimates. It’s no surprise to those of us who’ve followed the modus operandi of Mark Bertolini, who took the reins a year ago March [TTA 30 Mar 2023] and stated at the time that his focus was moving Oscar to profitability. Total revenue was $2.1 billion, a 46% increase versus Q1 2023, driven primarily by higher membership, rate increases, and lower risk adjustment as a percentage of premiums. Release. Becker’s, FierceHealthcare Their full 2024 is projected at $8.3 to $8.4 billion in revenue, $125 to $175 million in adjusted EBIDTA. Oscar solely offers ACA exchange plans for individuals and small groups, having exited Medicare Advantage after 2022. Release

Steward Health Care filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on 6 May. As forecast when the company moved to sell its provider group Stewardship Health to Optum [TTA 18 Apr], Steward’s debt load in its 31 hospitals and operations forced the restructuring on Monday. What’s owed: $1.2 billion in total loan debts, about $6.6 billion in long-term lease payments, north of $600 million to 30 of its largest lenders (Change Healthcare, Philips North America LLC, Medline Industries, AYA Healthcare and Cerner). There’s $289.8 million in unpaid compensation obligations: $68 million to its own workers in unpaid employee salaries, $105.6 million in payments for physician services and $47.7 million owed to staffing agencies. Topping it off–$979.4 million outstanding in trade obligations, of which approximately 70% are over 120 days past due.

Debtor-in-possession is now Medical Properties Trust (MPT) which will finance $75 million up front extending to $225 million more if Steward’s asset selloff milestones are completed on time. MPT will need to be far more forthcoming about Steward’s finances than Steward has been. The Stewardship Health sale to Optum now has to pass through the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas as well as Massachusetts regulators. Becker’s, Healthcare Dive 6 May, 7 May

Amazon Clinic loses its general manager, Nworah Ayogu, MD. He departed for Thrive Capital, a secretive VC (based on its website) that invests in technology, internet, and software companies. Dr. Ayogu, who doubled as chief medical officer of Amazon Pharmacy, stated the move will enable him to focus “exclusively on healthcare” after nearly four years with Amazon. He launched Clinic in November 2022 to a full 50-state rollout of the asynchronous and synchronous telehealth service last August, after a privacy challenge that escalated to the Senatorial level and forced a rollout delay [TTA 1 Aug 2023]. It sounds more like the doctor needs to go on a break. Amazon has not announced a replacement nor has Thrive issued any information. Becker’s, Modern Healthcare

Amwell’s soft Q1 reflective of telehealth as a whole. Its Q1 revenue of $59.5 million was 7% below Q1 2023’s $64 million, and missed Mr. Market’s forecasts. Where there was improvement was that net loss narrowed considerably to $73.4 million from prior year’s $398.5 million, when it took a hefty non-cash goodwill impairment charge. The bright spot Amwell is forecasting is that their Federal contract with Defense Health Agency, jointly with Leidos, will impact by Q4. Their part of the Digital First initiative for the Military Health System (MHS) will replace the current system, MHS Video Connect, with Amwell Converge [TTA 15 May]. Their pending NYSE stock delisting they plan to remedy with a reverse stock split to be announced.  Healthcare Dive, Amwell’s SEC Form 10-Q

Hims CEO and founder Andrew Dudum Does a Dumb. Mr. Dudum made a statement that on X that was interpreted by most to be encouraging the disruptive anti-Israel university and elsewhere protests which have roiled cities like New York and Los Angeles for weeks and are canceling graduations at Columbia University and University of Southern California. A statement like “If you’re currently protesting against the genocide of the Palestinian people & for your university’s divestment from Israel, keep going. It’s working.” and went on to say that companies would be eager to hire them is plain and clear. It immediately garnered criticism from investment group, industry, and software heads, as well as conservative and moderate media. This Editor will put on her marketing cap and remind Mr. Dudum of Marketing 101–be memorable, but do not offend the customer or investors who give you money. You have, after all, a company that depends upon appealing to a wide spectrum of people with easy and recurring telehealth prescriptions for hair loss, weight loss, skin problems, women’s health concerns, and erectile dysfunction. Your statement was not only completely unnecessary but also inflammatory at a bad time–it offended many customers no matter what religion or beliefs. Stock dropped. Customers canceled. Note to Mr. Dudum: if you want a thriving business, don’t live up to your name. FoxBusiness

News roundup: UHG CEO’s Bad Day at Capitol Hill; Kaiser’s 13.4M data breach; Walgreens’ stock beatup; Cigna writes off VillageMD; Oracle Cerner shrinks 50%; Owlet BabySat gets Wheel; fundings for Midi, Trovo, Alaffia, Klineo

It was a Bad Day at Boot (Capitol) Hill for UnitedHealth Group’s CEO Andrew Witty. On May Day, he was the Man In The Arena facing two Congressional grillings–the first from the Senate Finance Committee in the morning, and the second in the afternoon from the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. The precipitating event was the Optum/Change Healthcare data breach and system hacking by ALPHV/BlackCat, a disruption which is as of today not fully resolved.  Millions of patients may have had data stolen and exposed–a number that has yet to be determined, but an outcome for which UHG, while paying the ransomwaristes, has prepared. Already, the VA has notified 15 million veterans and families of that possibility.

This Editor will be linking below to multiple articles and Mr. Witty’s prepared testimony. Interested Readers can also refer to YouTube for extensive links to video testimony. Highlights:

  • Both houses criticized the slow response and amount of financial assistance given to providers after the shutdown of Change’s systems prevented (and still is preventing) timely claims processing and payment. While ‘near normal’ volumes of medical claims and 86% restoration of payment processing sounds good, that leaves a lot of wiggle room on over two months of totally disrupted processing and payment. The billion or so cited sounds impressive but much of this is in loans. Most practices and groups simply do not have the financial cushion or billing skillset to bridge this disruption, to pay back loans, or to bookkeep this.
  • Also criticized at this late date was UHG being unable to determine how many individuals had PHI exposed in the breach.
  • As to cause, the description of UHG finding that surprise, surprise, Change’s systems were way out of date, stored on physical servers versus the cloud, and used Citrix remote access without multi-factor authentication (MFA) was utterly savaged. According to Mr. Witty, ALPHV after days of knocking around got in on the one server that did not have MFA authentication.

The blunt fact is that UHG had close to two years (January 2021-Oct 2022) before the buy closed. Due diligence consisting of a full audit had to have been done on Change’s IT systems. They processed what UHG wanted to buy. In this Editor’s estimation, Job #1! for UHG should have been ensuring that Change’s systems were hardened, then upgrading to what Mr. Witty called UnitedHealth’s standards. This Editor will go further. A minimum requirement for the sale should have been security hardening. There was time before the closing.

Senator Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, had the best riposte. He brought a copy of “Hacking for Dummies” to the hearing, highlighting MFA. I doubt he was much moved by UHG now bringing in cybersecurity company Mandiant to both investigate and harden their systems, nor by UHG having to pay ransom, without knowing whose data was compromised.

  • Beyond the breach, UHG was called ‘monopolistic’ by both Republican and Democrat Members. There were calls to break up UHG as not ‘too big to fail’. UHG has grown by acquisition and consolidation of services. As this Editor has speculated, this is likely coming to an end with the new, much more stringent Merger Guidelines. This sentiment paints a large, unmissable target on UHG’s back for aiming FTC’s and DOJ’s missiles. (DOJ also has a huge score to settle with UHG dating back to the failure to block the Change sale.)

By the end of the day, Mr. Witty looked quite the worse for wear–tie and collar askew, slightly sweaty, versus the perfect poses of the various Members. Becker’s, FierceHealthcare, Axios, HealthcareDive    Mr. Witty’s Senate testimony statement, House testimony statement

Speaking of data breaches, Kaiser Permanente reported a big one to Health and Human Services (HHS). This relates to ad tracker information shared with third-party advertisers such as Google, Microsoft, and X. Kaiser used it in secured areas of their website and mobile apps. Information disclosed could be name and IP. Kaiser reported it on 12 April but only disclosed on 25 April that 13.4 million records may have been affected. The ad trackers have since been removed. TechCrunch, FierceHealthcare 

Walgreens stock not recovering. April was WBA’s worst month in five years and May is no better, with the stock muddling around $17.50. The month slid around 18%. Their 52-week high was $33. As of now, CEO Tim Wentworth’s actions such as closing locations and writing down VillageMD haven’t convinced Mr. Market of WBA’s worth, but in fairness it’s early in his tenure. In the Insult to Injury Department, it was revealed that the IRS is seeking to claw back $2.7 billion in unpaid 2014-2017 taxes. Crain’s Chicago Business

Cigna is also writing down its interest in VillageMD. Almost forgotten is that in late 2022, Cigna invested $2.5 billion into VillageMD. They have now written down $1.8 billion of that ‘low teens’ ownership. The planned tie was connecting Village Medical into Evernorth, Cigna’s medical services area. It was also supposed to provide Cigna with an annual return on investment, but one assumes it did not. The writeoff threw Cigna’s Q1 into the red with a net loss of almost $300 million versus a prior year profit of $1.3 billion, despite a strong quarter that grew revenue 23% versus prior year to $57.3 billion. Healthcare Dive

Oracle Health has been successful–in shrinking Cerner by close to half. Records of employment at Cerner’s Kansas City-based operation have declined from 11,900 people in 2022 (Kansas City Area Development Council) to a current 6,400 (internal documents). Cerner itself reported 12,778 local full-time-equivalent employees in 2022. Oracle had multiple layoffs of Cerner affecting Kansas City workers and has consolidated multiple office buildings and campuses. Becker’s

In more cheerful news:

Baby monitor Owlet announced a strategic partnership with Wheel for Owlet’s BabySat. BabySat is Owlet’s FDA-cleared prescription vital signs monitor for infants 1-18 months. Wheel clinicians can now prescribe BabySat which enables parents to order BabySat from Owlet and other suppliers. With Wheel, BabySat also integrates with durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers who accept and can bill for the product through many insurance providers for partial or full reimbursement. Wheel is a virtual care platform and physician/nurse-practitioner online network available direct to consumer and to enterprises. Owlet release

And rounding up funding:

MidiHealth closed a $60M Series B funding. This was led by Emerson Collective with participation from Memorial Hermann, SemperVirens, Felicis, Icon Ventures, Black Angel Group, Gingerbread Capital, Able Partners, G9, and Operator Collective for a total of $99 million in funding. Midi provides virtual support for women going through peri- and full menopause. The fresh funding will help them expand national insurance coverage, hire and upskill an additional 150 clinicians by end of year, diversify service lines, and scale to care for 1 million+ women per year by 2029. Release

Trovo Health launched with $15 million in seed funding, led by Oak HC/FT. The NYC-based AI-powered provider task assistance platform will use the funding to build its technology platform, clinical operations, and leadership team. Mobihealthnews 

In the same roundup, NYC-based Alaffia Health scored a $10 million Series A round. This was led by FirstMark Capital with participation from Aperture Venture Capital. Alaffia creates generative AI solutions for payment integrity in health insurance claims operations, with the aim of eliminating insurance fraud, waste, and abuse for health plans, third-party administrators, self-insured employers, stop-loss carriers, and government agencies. Their total raise to date is $17.6 million. Paris-based Klineo also raised €2 million for its oncology clinical trials search platforms, assisted by AI, for the use of doctors and patients. BPIFrance and business angels participated in the round.

Teladoc’s Q1: increased revenue, increased net loss, dealing with slowing growth–as is CVS Health

Teladoc had a passable Q1, given the sudden departure of their CEO, a lackluster 2023, and a downbeat (realistic?) 2024 forecast. The highlights were versus Q1 prior year:

  • Revenue increased 3% to $646.1 million. This exceeded their 2024 projection of $630 to $645 million but the percentage increase is below the 5.2% Teladoc is forecasting for the full year. Their US revenue grew 1% to $547.6 million while international revenue grew 13% to $98.5 million.
  • But net loss also increased far more on a percentage basis–18% to $81.9 million, or $0.49 per share. Some of the loss was due to stock-based compensation expense, severance expenses, and amortization of acquired intangibles. Due to these, the increased revenue did not offset or narrow losses.
  • Adjusted EBIDTA increased 20% to $63.1 million, which is positive.

Looking at their main market segments, their Integrated Care segment revenue grew 8% to $377.1 million, Once again, BetterHelp, their behavioral telehealth unit and one-time hope for growth, continued to disappoint with a 4% decrease in revenue to $269.0 million.

The forecast for Q2 is: 

  • Revenue $635 – $660 million
  • Net loss per share ($0.45) – ($0.35), slightly lower than Q1
  • Adjusted EBITDA $70 – $80 million

Integrated Care’s forecast is an increase of 2 to 5% in revenue, while BetterHelp’s remains weak with a decrease of 4 to 8% in revenue.

So far, cutting costs, higher margins, cutting jobs in data science and engineering, third-party (supplier?) costs, and getting on that ‘path to profitability’ has had limited results, at least to Mr. Market which continues to drop the stock–40% to date and deteriorating. On the earnings call, interim CEO and CFO Mala Murthy, in referring to this, said “We are not waiting. We have a plan to deliver, we have investments to execute, and that is absolutely our focus.” Will Mr. Market believe this in a shrinking market? The search for a permanent CEO is underway, and the replacement is expected to be named later this year. Teladoc release, Mobihealthnews, FierceHealthcare

The broader meaning? This Editor explored what happened at Teladoc and the aftermath after some of the dust settled [TTA 9 April]. The Teladoc foundational model as a stand-alone, mostly urgent care service is not growing but shrinking. It doesn’t coordinate care nor does it integrate well into providers. While the pandemic gave that model a lift, it also boosted integrated services as modules into patient portals, EHRs, population health, and other provider-based platforms. Among higher care need Medicare beneficiaries, usage was there but minimal detailed in two recent studies. Even asynchronous and telephonic telehealth gained since they were reimbursed or low cost. Before, during, and after the pandemic, there were too many telehealth companies for the limited demand. Add in the continuing proliferation of telementalhealth providers, still popping up like tulips in spring–another reason why BetterHelp, one of the earlier entrants, isn’t getting traction. FierceHealthcare adds more points such as over-supply cratering price (and the revenue model) and hybridization: white-labeling with providers, virtual specialty clinics such as those under Included Health’s, and partnerships with health plans and employers. 

CVS Health’s Q1 also wasn’t swell for reasons that are impacting their full year. High medical costs affected their Aetna plans, with high utilization in Medicare Advantage, inpatient admissions, and outpatient services were all high in Q1–$900 million higher than CVS expected. Lower MA STAR ratings will affect their forward Federal reimbursements, with one of their largest MA plans falling from 4.5 to 3.5 rating in 2024. According to CEO Karen Lynch, most of this utilization was from a patient usage reversion to pre-pandemic patterns. Their Q1 revenue of $88.4 billion was up 4% versus prior year with net income falling by almost half to $1.1 billion, both significantly below analysts’ expectations. CVS adjusted their full year downward, which led to their stock falling another 19%. Change Healthcare’s data breach is also affecting their forecasts with delayed claims, leading CVS to set a reserve of $500 million. HealthcareDive

Midweek news roundup: Optum exiting telehealth, laying off; Advocate Health selling MobileHelp; VA notifying 15M veterans re Change PHI breach, Oracle moving to Nashville–maybe? (updated)

Optum Virtual Care closing, staff layoffs in progress. Optum Everycare CEO Jennifer Phalen on an 18 April internal conference call announced that the unit would close. According to sources, some employees would have layoff dates in July. No further details were available on other layoffs or plans for integrating Virtual Care’s capabilities into other Optum units, except for generalities. “We are com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing pa­tients with a ro­bust net­work of providers for vir­tu­al ur­gent, pri­ma­ry and spe­cial­ty care op­tions,” and “We con­tin­u­al­ly re­view the ca­pa­bil­i­ties and ser­vices we of­fer to meet the grow­ing and evolv­ing needs of our busi­ness­es and the peo­ple we serve.” a spokesper­son for Unit­ed­Health said to End­points, a biopharma publication from the University of Kansas which broke the story.

For Optum, this is the second shoe drop about layoffs and closures in less than two weeks. Reports from social media and layoff-specific boards indicated that thousands were being laid off, from their plans to urgent care and providers [TTA 23 Apr]. These were not confirmed by Optum nor by UnitedHealth Group. It’s not known if this unit’s closure was included in the total. 

The larger picture is that it is symptomatic of the sudden growth, then equally sudden consolidation, of general telehealth. Optum opened the unit in April 2021 as the pandemic entered year 2. Utilizing existing capabilities, UHG claimed it facilitated more than 33 million telehealth visits in 2020, up from 1.2 million in 2019. The number looks sky high but in that time of practices closing it was a free-for-all in telehealth–and ‘facilitating’ is a nebulous catchword that could mean a practice using Facetime, telephones, or an EHR/population health platform module. Commercial claims for telehealth have remained at 4 to 5% since (FAIR Health, Jan 2024). Even during the pandemic’s first year, telehealth claims hit a peak of 13 percent in April 2020 that dropped fast to 6% by August 2020. Well over 60% are for behavioral telehealth claims.

A leading indicator: Last June, Optum Everycare’s CEO from their 2021 start, Kristi Henderson, a former Optum SVP for digital transformation, departed to become CEO of Confluent Health, a national network of occupational and physical therapy clinics. It was about as far away as one could get from telehealth, digital transformation, and Amazon Care, her former employer that expired in 2022.

Apparently, UHG and Optum see no further need for a virtual care specialty unit, instead integrating it into plans and other Optum services. According to MedCityNews, industry analysts aren’t surprised. Both Amwell and Teladoc have had well-known struggles. The latest: Walmart, after investing millions into their unit that included full clinics and a virtual care service, also made news on 30 April that it is closing both. Also greatly on UHG’s mind: cleanup after the Change debacle, making Mr. Market happy, and the looming antitrust action by DOJBecker’s, Healthcare IT News, 

In another sign that healthcare investors are selling off ancillary businesses, Advocate Health is selling PERS provider MobileHelp. It “no longer fit the strategic priorities of Advocate Health” according to their 22 April audit report (see document pages 10 and 13) and was authorized last December.

Advocate, through its investment arm Advocate Aurora Enterprises, acquired both MobileHelp, one of the earliest mobile PERS, and sister company Clear Arch Health, a remote patient monitoring provider, in April 2022. Cost was not disclosed at that time but later was reported to be $290.7 million. The plan at the time was to combine both MobileHelp and Clear Arch with a senior care/home health provider earlier acquired by Advocate for $187 million, Senior Helpers. That company was sold in March to Chicago-based private equity firm Waud Capital Partners for an undisclosed amount. The MobileHelp sale is expected to close later this year. Buyer and price are not disclosed. The expected loss on the MobileHelp sale was figured into FY 2023 as part of an asset impairment write-down of $150 million, which Advocate said was “related to the expected loss on the sale of MobileHelp.” The PERS and RPM business is a largely consolidated ‘cash cow’ type of business that (Editor’s prediction) will be snapped up by another player like Connect America, Alert One, or a smaller player like ModivCare. Milwaukee Business Journal, Becker’s, Crain’s Chicago Business (requires subscription)

VA admits that some veterans may be affected by Change Healthcare data breach, PII/PHI disclosure. While Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough at this time believes that “there’s no confirmation yet” that veteran data was exposed, the scope of the Change Healthcare breach has led VA to formally alert via email 15 million veterans and their families of the possibility. The email also included information “about the two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection” that Change Healthcare is offering to those affected by the attack. The VA maintains that the attack resulted in only a temporary delay in filling 40,000 prescriptions but did not cause “any adverse impact on patient care or outcomes,” according to a department spokesman. NextGov/FCW 26 April, 23 April 

In related news, HHS as of 19 April had not received any notification from Change Healthcare nor UHG. They are required to file a breach report as providers and also as covered entities. They have 60 days from the breach occurrence on 21 February to report, which is coming right up. Becker’s

If Larry said it, it must be true…assemble the moving boxes. At an Oracle conference in Nashville last week, Oracle chairman Larry Ellison said to Bill Frist of investment firm Frist Cressey Ventures that he planned to move the company to that city as “It’s the center of the industry we’re most concerned about, which is the healthcare industry.” It’s their second public Larry and Billy meetup in the last few months, the last in November at the Frist Cressey Ventures Forum where Ellison had previously touted Nashville. Ellison is investing in and building a 70-acre, $1.35 billion campus on Nashville’s riverfront. Oracle is currently HQ’d in Austin, Texas having moved in 2020 from Redwood City, California but with extensive facilities remaining in the state. Texas and Tennessee have one thing in common–a superior business climate. Both are long on lifestyle, though Austin is not as temperate (read, hot) as Nashville. What Nashville has that Austin doesn’t is being a healthcare hub. At least in Ellison’s view, healthcare is where it’s at and so is Nashville. So as long as he’s running Oracle from his manse on Lanai, Oracle does what Larry says. Healthcare Dive, Healthcare IT News, The Tennessean

More fun facts about Larry Ellison and Nashville: David Ellison, his son, is founder of Skydance Media, a major Hollywood production company (Mission: Impossible and others) and negotiating a zillion-dollar merger with Paramount Pictures. David’s wife is a singer trying to make it in Music City and they have a home there. Kind of like the age-old trend of moving the HQ near where the CEO’s living. On moving the HQ to Nashville from Austin, this would affect perhaps 2,500 workers based there currently. Most of Oracle’s workers are dispersed and work remotely. 6,400 of former Cerner-ites are still in Missouri and 7,000 remain in California. Big hat tip to HIStalk—scroll down and see more about Larry and Billy’s talk, which also covered cybersecurity, the NHS (which uses Cerner), and automating hospitals and the hospital-payer interface.

Two studies: Telehealth underutilized, underbilled, even during pandemic–and accounted for only modest increases in costs, quality

A newly published study in April’s Health Affairs Scholar points to telehealth’s surprisingly low reimbursable takeup among tradtional Medicare beneficiaries–even during the pandemic. This study evaluates E&M (evaluation and management) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing against codes that were established during the pandemic to pay providers for telehealth (e-visits in the study), 99421-99423. It also broke down e-visits by different clinician types: primary care, medical specialties, surgical specialties, behavioral health, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, and counted the most frequent diagnoses. E-visits constituted less than 0.1% of E&M services in the monitored period, 2020-22.

Key findings:

  • E-visit billing hit an absolute peak in April 2020 of 728 monthly encounters per 100,000 beneficiaries. It dropped off dramatically by summer 2020 and later stabilized to approximately 90 monthly encounters per 100,000 beneficiaries.
  • Only 0.8% of Medicare beneficiaries who received an E&M service were billed for at least one e-visit.
  • E-visits constituted 0.09%, 0.05%, and 0.05% of all E&M services in 2020, 2021, and 2022.
  • Primary care providers accounted for over 50% of the billing.
  • Approximately 30% were billed at the highest level of clinician time, requiring at least 21 minutes.
  • Hypertension was the most common diagnosis addressed in e-visits (21%), followed by diabetes (2.3%) and COVID-19 (2%).
  • Surprisingly, fewer beneficiaries receiving e-visits lived in rural areas.

HealthExec

Note to Readers: for those puzzled by the absence of mental health diagnoses, FAIR Health’s monthly telehealth tracker which during the pandemic showed Covid/respiratory diagnoses first, then mental health–and mental health as #1 in about 5% of claims since then –FAIR uses a different methodology. It tracks medical claims for private health plans only, not traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, or Medicaid. It also does a comparison on CPT 99213, comparing a specific procedure provided via telehealth to the same procedure provided in an office. 15 April methodology release

Editor’s Note, strictly anecdotal: As someone who worked as the sole marketer for a management services company with primary care ACOs during the period in early 2020 when HHS was turning out new codes nearly hourly to create telehealth flexibilities in Medicare, there was considerable confusion around codes and what they covered. Our teams, sourcing from HHS and the AMA, had our hands full to correctly specify and document the CPT codes established at that time. I know because I worked on said documentation that we condensed into a two-page fast guide and then into presentations. Many of the codes were telephonic. My conclusion about this study is that it was very narrow and tracked too few codes. Other factors: practices had difficulty using audio/video telehealth with their patient populations–if the practices had it, patients weren’t ready (tech barriers) or willing to use. Some of the practices reported that they didn’t bill for telehealth encounters during this confused time, trading off reimbursement for overall patient care and marking up quality metrics such as Annual Wellness Visits.

A second telehealth study, published this month in Health Affairs, looked at health systems to assess whether telehealth increased or decreased healthcare spending and usage by Medicare beneficiaries. The study defined by quartile health systems that had high telemedicine usage versus those with higher in-person usage, based on 2020 visits. Their conclusions tracked the changes between the 2019 baseline, 2020, and 2021-22. This study found only a modest increase after 2020 in visits and spend in the highest quartile of telemedicine usage for patient care.

  • In 2020, patients in the highest quartile of telemedicine use had 2.5 telemedicine visits per person (26.8 percent of visits) compared with 0.7 telemedicine visits per person (9.5 percent of visits) in the lowest quartile of telemedicine use.
  • Patients in the highest quartile had modest increases in office visits, care continuity, and medication adherence, as well as decreases in ED visits, relative to patients of health systems in the lowest quartile.
  • During 2021–22, relative to the lowest quartile, patients in the highest quartile had an increase of 0.21 total outpatient visits (telemedicine and in-person) per patient per year (2.2 percent relative increase)
  • That group also had a decrease of 14.4 annual non-COVID-19 emergency department visits per 1,000 patients per year (2.7 percent relative decrease)
  • Per patient per year spending increased by $248 (1.6 percent relative increase)
  • They also had increased adherence for metformin and statins.
  • There were no clear differential changes in hospitalizations or receipt of preventive care.

The researchers contend their findings confirm that the flexibilities around telehealth instituted during the pandemic for Medicare beneficiaries should continue past their scheduled expiration at the end of 2024. The moderate spending increase is also confirmed by another study through 2021 by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission found that geographic areas with higher telemedicine uptake had a spending increase of $165 per patient and a 3 percent relative increase in total clinical encounters. Healthcare Dive

Breaking: UnitedHealth admits to paying ransomwareistes on Change stolen patient data (updated)

Admitted, finally, to CNBC on Monday. UnitedHealth told CNBC in a statement. “A ransom was paid as part of the company’s commitment to do all it could to protect patient data from disclosure.” UHG’s release alludes to this but without specifics as to what entity was paid (ALPHV? RansomHub?) nor the amount. It vaguely states that it reviewed 22 screenshots “some containing PHI and PII, posted for about a week on the dark web by a malicious threat actor” and that “it is likely to take several months of continued analysis before enough information will be available to identify and notify impacted customers and individuals”. This seems to point to the most recent RansomHub offer of 4TB of Change Healthcare PHI/PII for sale, not the original breach, but UHG’s information is inconclusive for the reader. Also Becker’s.

However, the admission that Change files were breached and a ransom was paid is substantial and points to multiple leaks of the PHI and PII on multiple sites. Despite no identification and notification of customers yet, UHG is offering a support hotline to individuals concerned about the cyberattack, offering free credit monitoring and identity theft protections for two years plus “emotional support.”

Another fun fact that DataBreaches.net points to in its short article is that the Wall Street Journal (also cited by TechCrunch) said that its research indicated that the original breach came from stolen remote access credentials. It took only a week for ALPHV’s hackers to explore the system before deploying the cyberransom and hacking software through Change’s systems. Updated: the WSJ pins the original breach to 12 February but the hackers didn’t ‘detonate’ the ransomware till 21 February. Also multi-factor authentication is standard operating procedure for remote access, but MFA wasn’t enabled on this.  Developing and will be updated. Our article posted on Monday here with links to our prior articles.

Who really has the 4TB of Change Healthcare data 4 sale? And in great timing, Optum lays off a rumored 20K–say wot?

The data is for sale! And the top does not go down, but the price definitely goes up! That old antique auto auction cry is paraphrased here because the 4TB of patient data hacked from Change’s systems is up for sale, since Change/Optum didn’t buy it. Interested parties should stroll over to the dark web and see RansomHub’s listing for details.

Unlike some news sources that got confused, this apparently is the same 4TB that BlackCat/ALPHV affiliate ‘notchy’ stole (technically, exfiltrated) posted about on a dark web site shortly after the attack [TTA 7 Mar]. According to those early reports, ‘notchy’ was dissatisfied that he didn’t get a cut of the $22 million ransom that Optum supposedly paid the BlackCat/ALPHV group.

For their $22 million ransom, which Change has not, repeat NOT, confirmed, ALPHV gave Change a decryptor key. But, they didn’t have the good manners to 1) return the stolen data to Change or delete it, which included highly sensitive data from multiple Change customers including active military PII (from Tricare), patient PII, payment and claims data, and much more, and 2) pay a cut to the affiliate. And then ALPHV shut down and ran out of town.

Here’s the latest updates from DataBreaches. net

Over a month later, an outfit called RansomHub posted, again on the dark web, that it has the 4TB of data. 

As reported here on 10 April, there was an announcement on the RansomHub website, not signed by ‘notchy’, that if Change wasn’t interested in paying for the data, it would be up for sale. There was some confusion, based on a WIRED report, that this was a second breach. The RansomHub information seemed to point to only ‘notchy’s’ data.

DataBreaches followed up with RansomHub to 1) verify they had the data, asking if 2) was it ‘notchy’s data’, and 3) how did RansomHub obtain it if not ‘notchy’? RansomHub also leaked some screenshots of  2011-2013 Medicare claims data. This old data raises even more questions on why this data was even available online and not stored offline…unless…. RansomHub’s 15 April posting included this statement, “The more we go through the data the more we are shocked of the amount of financial, medical, and personal information we find and it will be more devastating than the first attack itself.” 

By 16 April, DataBreaches reported that the listing read:

Change HealthCare – OPTUM Group – United HealthCare Group – FOR SALE

The data in now for sale. Anyone interested in the purchase should contact RansomHub. 

But does RansomHub actually have it? Are they ‘notchy’, in it with ‘notchy’, brokering ‘notchy’, or is it a second 4TB breach? Stay tuned.

Thousands at Optum won’t care one way or another. Reports since last Thursday have been that first hundreds, then thousands, then up to 20,000, have been laid off. These are based on social media postings on LinkedIn and boards like The Layoff where anyone can post. Optum has not confirmed any layoffs to industry media such as FierceHealthcare and Becker’s Hospital Review / Becker’s ASC Review which published reports starting last Friday. Federal and state WARN notices, which usually confirm mass layoffs by state, have been oddly empty. 

Across the reports, Optum has laid off staff from their California care division (400), home health provider Landmark Health (500), urgent care MedExpress (all as of 18 July), Genoa (OptumRx-unknown). Notices range from immediate, to two weeks into May, and forward. Types of jobs eliminated have been at all levels of regional and corporate, affecting engineers, care management, clinical, case directors, data operations, and integration managers. This LinkedIn post claims up to 20,000. Optum’s silence has let the rumor mill run overtime.

CMS has lowered Medicare Advantage reimbursement, but other insurers factored this in earlier this year. The major whack was the Change Healthcare cyberattack. Though the public posture of UnitedHealth Group is that most of the systems are back or being worked around, the financial truth is that the Change disaster will cost them $1.6 billion in 2024 as announced last week. It does lead one to wonder about how mighty UHG, on an acquisition tear for years through today, always doing well and pleasing Mr. Market, got quite so overstaffed. How would it be overstaffed by thousands or the rumored 20,000 who are suddenly, dramatically unnecessary? That may boost the stock, but it gives the Feds yet another ax to grind, what with the House savaging an absent UHG on the cyberattack handling and their payments to providers [TTA 18 April], DOJ taking a hard cold look into UHG’s business practices, specifically around antitrust between the payer group and Optum [TTA 6 Mar], and approvals for the Amedisys buy stalling.

Here’s a view at variance, not about the layoffs but about how UHG is really doing. STAT’s analysis of UHG’s financial report is that the Change losses barely dent the overall picture and won’t affect 2024 earnings. Q1’s loss was mostly the Brazil writedown. It also confirmed that CEO Andrew Witty had a certain gall to say in prepared remarks that the Change situation would have been so much worse had they not been owned by UHG. Mr. Witty will have some ‘splainin’ to do before the House and the Senate, 30 April and 1 May, respectively.

Weekend reading: 23andMe’s exploding plastic inevitable fate–and what might have been

23andMe may go private, break up, or go bankrupt. Not many other options. A major end-of-week news item in healthcare was that 23andMe, the beleaguered genetic testing company, may be taken private by its CEO and founder Anne Wojcicki per an SEC 8-K filing on 18 April and a press release issued the same day. Currently, she is a major shareholder controlling more than 20% of the total outstanding shares with ‘supervoting’ rights that entitle her to approximately 49% voting power. She filed a Schedule 13D the prior day indicating her intent to buy all outstanding shares. No offer value nor timing was specified. Bloomberg, LinkedIn

23andMe shares closed Friday at $0.48 on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. On Wednesday, they closed at an all-time low of $0.36. It has not had a close above $1.00 since 29 September 2023. In November, Nasdaq notified them that the company had 180 days to bring the share price above $1.00 or face delisting–and there is little time remaining on the clock. CNBC

In February, after a disastrous fiscal Q3 with net loss tripling and revenue down 32%, Wojcicki floated the idea of separating the consumer genomics/virtual care and the commercial genomic database/drug discovery businesses but has turned now to taking the company private and fully under her control. Its market cap is now about $200 million with $200 million cash on hand, creating a zero-sum situation. The release states that on 28 March, the board of directors formed a special committee to evaluate alternatives to maximizing shareholder value. But when ‘shareholder value’ has to be approved by one shareholder with 49% of the votes, the BOD’s options may be constrained.  

What a difference in three years. In February 2021 after much anticipation, 23andMe went public in a SPAC founded by Richard Branson and soared to a $3.5 billion valuation. It achieved a $4.8 billion market capitalization after buying in October 2021 Lemonaid, a quick-diagnosis/quick-prescription telehealth company for minor but troublesome conditions that was touted, but never became, a nexus of, to quote the announcement, “healthcare that is based on the combination of your genes, your environment, and your lifestyle.”  At the time, its future seemed unlimited between consumer genetic testing (genotyping, not diagnostic) for health and ancestry, building up Lemonaid into a full-featured virtual diagnostics and health service, while taking the deidentified data and marketing it for commercial research to Big Pharma, initially via a five-year exclusive deal with GSK.

That commercial use proved to be a sticky wicket with consumers concerned about how their data was being protected, with opting out made (deliberately?) opaque and difficult. Other than Lemonaid, 23andMe failed to successfully diversify beyond the core ‘one and done’ genotype testing until very late last year. Last February, after their disastrous 6.9 million record data breach turned the spotlights on, the Wall Street Journal revealed that a pricey subscription program for lifestyle counseling that included clinical exome sequencing plus Lemonaid called Total Health failed to gain traction after its late 2023 debut and their in-house drug discovery moved only two out of 50 into early-stage human trials. The GSK deal expired and was not renewed. 23andMe was also torching through cash. [TTA 2 Feb]. The thick and sticky icing on the cake was 23andMe’s antagonistic response to the breached customers, blaming them for recycling passwords and using multiple features they offered [TTA 19 Jan]. This was rightfully blasted in the industry and the subject of multiple consumer class-action lawsuits.

In this Editor’s opinion, 23andMe’s ship must pass between the Scylla and Charybdis of financial choices. Splitting up a near-worthless company into three money-losing parts, like Gaul, is rearranging deck chairs on the sinking ship (to really scramble our metaphors). In either a Chapter 7 (closure) or Chapter 11 (reorganization) option, Wojcicki would lose control and her spot as CEO, wiping out the shareholders, but she might retain some value in Chapter 11 in the IP, depending on how it is structured. Then finally, there is Wojcicki’s buying out the other shareholders. That is dependent on her having or being able to access the cash from investors. None of this solves the failure of the business model, which was for most customers ‘one and done’ testing, not subscribing to additional services, and unsubscribing from any further data use. They saw nothing attractive or useful in the other services. Then as a member to be hacked and blamed for it? That is a run, do not walk, to the exit.

Chapter 7s are usually forced situations where there is little value left in the company other than intellectual property (as in Pear) and equipment (if applicable), zero confidence in management and product delivery (Olive AI), withdrawal of key client business, collapsing in a heap of litigation (Theranos), and any of the above coupled with overwhelming debt that lenders will no longer carry (Babylon Health).

A Must Read for your weekend is Arundhati Parmar’s gem of an essay on 23andMe in MedCityNews–the company’s current dilemma contrasted with what if co-founder Linda Avey had not been ousted in 2009. She expertly sets off interviews with Avey and Wojcicki into an illuminating virtual debate that should be part of an MBA candidate’s case study. Parmar sets them off with analyst views, the experience of a referred 23andMe customer who illuminates the life-changing nature of genetic testing as well as 23andMe’s service drawbacks, and a sparkling view from an empty 23andMe cocktail reception at this past January’s JPM.

TandemStride launches platform to assist survivors of traumatic injury; a personal look

A peer-support platform for those with life-altering injuries. TandemStride is an app for the use and support of those with traumatic injury. It is structured as a peer-to-peer platform to connect those who are injured–from amputations to head and spinal injuries–to mentors and others to share their experiences and connect to resources. The app, available for free on Google Play and the Apple App Store, matches patients with peers who have progressed well in their recovery, with guidance from the TandemStride Assistant. It also connects them with resources such as the Trauma Survivors Network, United Spinal Association, Amputee Coalition, and the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation. Local trauma centers can then connect to this national network.

Last week, this Editor had the opportunity to speak with their founder, Matt Kalina. How he came to develop TandemStride threads through health tech’s latest boom and bust cycle–and loops back to the motivation of most industry founders.  He is a veteran of the late Olive AI (post-mortem here) in the GTM (go-to-market) team, was one of their first employees, and one of the last to turn out the lights. After that too-much-too-soon roller coaster, he focused on something personal, beyond another job.

Matt’s brother had a bi-lateral amputation as a college student due to a train accident in 2012. His brother’s injury and recovery had its ups and downs, but he had the important and focused help of his mother, a nurse. This led to Matt looking at others with similar injuries, which are all too common. Psychiatrists, like your Editor’s brother, see many of them in everyday practice. Beyond the physical injuries, there is PTSD coupled with loss of employment and ordinary socialization due to lack of physical ability. One in four have PTSD. But with help, they can overcome. Today, Mark Kalina is married with children, a senior analyst for the MetroHealth System in Cleveland, and works with other traumatic injury survivors. ‘A Leg To Stand On’ on LinkedIn

We discussed the extent and the effect of traumatic injury. Globally, there are 140 million who experience one or more traumatic injuries. These disproportionately affect lower to middle-income and minority people. Based on claims analysis, an Ohio study found that 13% of Medicaid beneficiaries have had physical trauma in the prior year. Timing and quality of rehabilitation are vital to better outcomes, to recovering ability and gaining employment. But there are a lot of gaps not only in treatment but also in the total picture–moving the injured back to their ‘stride’ in life. One in five ‘recidivize’, according to Matt, which means they lose ground after recovery and can wind up back in acute care. Reducing that number is key not only to better individual outcomes, but also to reducing long-term costs to insurers and Medicaid.

As part of the launch, TandemStride, based in Cleveland, is partnered with Molina Healthcare to support members in Ohio recovering from traumatic injury. Collaborating with trauma-focused associations also provides them with technology they did not have before, according to Sue Prentiss, executive director of the American Trauma Society, home to the Trauma Survivors Network. 

What is disturbing is how on a national level, support and resources for traumatic injury haven’t been available or organized for the civilian population. Veterans have the VA and deep resources there, with delivery the problem. Yet we have maybe a dozen or more telemental health services jockeying for business, with a new entrant promising something unique every few months, an overpopulation of competitors similar to what happened more slowly in telehealth. In this Editor’s view, Matt’s technology and building a network of traumatic injury survivors right now is filling a wide gap in care and recovery, connecting fragmented resources, and through community, can boost their long-term outcomes. TandemStride launch release, Matt’s launch posting on LinkedIn

News roundup: Congress hammers absent UHG on Change cyberattack–and more; 10% unhinged at Hinge Health; Steward Health nears insolvency; Two Chairs $72M Series C

UnitedHealth Group facing direct Congressional criticism–and didn’t show up to answer it. The House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing yesterday on the BlackCat/ALPHV cyberattack on UHG/Optum’s Change Healthcare systems. Representatives of the American Hospital Association, which we noted led the earliest efforts to assess the situation, help health systems, and then lobby Health and Human Services to assist providers, the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives, and the Healthcare Sector Coordinating Council testified to a restive group of House representatives. Though reports have said that UHG had previously briefed the committee and CEO Andrew Witty will appear before the Senate Finance Committee on 30 April, both Republicans and Democrats didn’t spare the criticism. Other issues, such as healthcare provider consolidation, cybersecurity coordination, and vertical integration through acquisitions as represented by UHG and Change, entered into the hearing. And it went pretty far. Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA): “The FTC has failed the American people by allowing vertical integration to happen, and it needs to be busted up.” Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA): “The attack shows how UnitedHealth’s anti-competitive practices present a national security risk because its operations now extend through every point of our healthcare system,” and called it “outrageous”. 

The current administration’s proposed $800 million investment in hospital cybersecurity protections was typed as “woefully insufficient.” 

Returning to the main issues, Larry Bucshon, MD (R-IN) stated that both the government and private companies were slow in assisting providers. John Riggi, AHA’s national adviser for cybersecurity and risk testified that “The federal government did not step in for weeks. Needed flexibilities under Medicare were not immediately available. It took 18 days for CMS to begin allowing providers to apply for advancing accelerated payments.” On how it affected providers, 94% of respondents in an AHA provider survey felt a financial impact from the attack, over half reported a “significant or serious” impact, and 74% of hospitals reported a direct effect on patient care. Payers are resisting advanced payments. UHG was even accused of exploiting the cyberattack to purchase additional practices by Rep. John Joyce, MD (R-PA). Becker’s, Chief Healthcare Executive, STAT

This Editor has previously noted that UHG is taking a $1.6 billion charge for the cyberattack and is separately facing a DOJ investigation on multiple antitrust issues between the payer group and Optum, including their Amedisys buy [TTA 6 Mar]. UHG is also facing multiple class-action lawsuits from practices currently and expected from patients affected by the theft of PHI and PII [TTA 28 Mar]. It’ll be a busy spring and summer for UHG’s legal department.

Hinge Health cuts 10% of staff. Reasons given were the standard tropes of ‘long-term sustainable business’, ‘accelerate our path to profitability, speed up decision making, and better focus our investments’ plus ‘realign our organization’. Their employee group is estimated at 1,700 on LinkedIn, making this about 170 staff released in various functions including engineers. The company is preparing for an IPO, which may not be this year, since they claim to have $400 million in cash on the books. Hinge’s last raise was an October 2021 $400 million Series E led by Tiger Global and Coatue Management for a total funding of $826.1 million over 10 raises (Crunchbase). At that time, their valuation was a bubbly $6.2 billion. Their virtual musculoskeletal rehabilitative therapy for back and joint pain care has since then expanded to rehab for pelvic pain, bowel, and bladder control. TechCrunch  As predicted in our Rock Health Q1 review, Hinge is a perfect example of companies “pursuing IPO and M&A exit pathways concurrently to keep options open” by presenting their financials as if they were already public companies. 

Steward Health Care nears bankruptcy court. And the Optum buy of Stewardship Health practices won’t save it in time. Steward’s lenders are giving the health network until the end of April–two weeks away–to prove it can repay its considerable debts. Its recovery plan which included the Stewardship sale has been criticized as unworkable given the volume of debt and the regulatory implications of selling their hospital assets. The Optum acquisition is required to undergo a 30-day review by Massachusetts’ Health Policy Commission (HPC)–and while it was announced at the end of March, it had not started by mid-April. Given UHG’s other problems and scrutiny of practice purchases by the DOJ and FTC, Optum may walk away or wait. No purchase price had been announced but it would be a drop in a bottomless well anyway. The mounting problems of Steward Health Care are detailed in Healthcare Dive’s analysis.

And to end on a more optimistic note, Two Chairs, a telemental health provider out of San Francisco, scored a $72 million Series C. Lead investors are Amplo and Fifth Down Capital with debt financing from Bridge Bank. The new raise, majority equity, brings Two Chairs’ total funding to $103 million. Their hybrid virtual and in-person therapy model is available at present in California, Florida, and Washington and markets to consumers, payers (Aetna nationally, Kaiser Permanente in Washington and Northern California), providers, and employers. The company states it will use the fresh funding to expand its markets and improve its technology platform. Currently, they have more than 500 clinicians on staff, most of whom are full-time. Their differentiator in the crowded telemental health category is their emphasis on measurement-based care, aided by a “matching consult,” facilitated by a proprietary 300-variable algorithm that creates the right therapist-client match (the ‘two chairs’ of the company’s name), which studies indicate is the most important factor in determining a good outcome.  Release, FierceHealthcare, MedCityNews

Mid-week short takes: UnitedHealth’s $1.2B Q1 loss from Change attack, another Walgreens layoff, Dexcom-MD Revolution partner, Kontakt.io $47.5 raise, GeBBS Healthcare may sell for $1B

UnitedHealth Group rang up Q1 revenue of $99.8 billion, with adjusted earnings from operations $8.5 billion, but had a net loss of $1.22 billion (WSJ). (Ed. note–Becker’s has $1.4 million) The loss was created not only from the cyberattack on Change Healthcare’s systems ($0.74/share) but also a $7 billion charge due to the sale of UHG’s Brazil operations.

  • Q1 revenue was up $7.9 billion versus same quarter 2023.
  • Their year 2024 forecast of the damage done by the ALPHV cyberattack on Change is $1.6 billion ($1.15 to $1.35 per share).
  • Optum’s Q1 revenues of $61 billion grew by $7 billion over prior year, led by Optum Health and Optum Rx due to continued strong expansion in the number of people served

Someone at HIStalk did some counting and noted that the Optum Solution Status dashboard for Change Healthcare shows 109 of 137 applications remain down, not much different than when we eyeballed it on 3 April. CNBC, UHG release, HIStalk, Becker’s, MSN/WSJ

Walgreens continues to cut staff–this go-around, it’s corporate support center employees both in Chicago and working remotely. No total was provided by the Walgreens spokesperson contacted by Crain’s Chicago Business. This adds to 900 corporate staff laid off in several waves earlier this year and last fall, VillageMD staff due to 140 closures, and 646 distribution center staff laid off last month. Walgreens stock is down 33% this year. 

In cheerier news, Dexcom is partnering with remote patient monitoring (RPM) provider MD Revolution to add its continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to MD Revolution’s RPM platform. MDR is a startup company marketing its RPM platform to large practices, health systems, and healthcare organizations. Current raises date back to 2015 totaling under $60 million mostly from venture round funding (Crunchbase). Release

Inpatient data analytics company Kontakt.io raised a Series C investment of $47.5 million, led by Growth Equity at Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Goldman Sachs). This adds to a modest $21.5 million from various investors from 2013 to 2022 (Crunchbase). Kontakt provides patient flow analytics to health systems to optimize patient, staff, and resource flows, improving safety, coordination, and service delivery. It uses a combination of RTLS property tracking, cloud, and AI to provide real-time location data and orchestrate staff, equipment, and clinical spaces around a patient’s care journey. The additional funds will be used for sales expansion and AI development. HIStalk, Release 

GeBBS Healthcare Solutions on the block, may fetch $1 billion. The LA-based business process outsourcing (BPO)/revenue cycle management (RCM) company, currently owned by ChrysCapital of New Delhi, is on the market for a reported $800 million to $1 billion. This would be a tidy payday for ChrysCapital which back in 2018 acquired an 80% stake in GeBBS for $140 million with a valuation then of $175 million. ChrysCapital is India’s largest home-grown PE investor. Economic Times-India Times, HIStalk

News roundup: VillageMD sued on Meta Pixel trackers; Cerebral pays $7.1M FTC fine on data sharing, cancellation policy; VA may resume Oracle Cerner implementation during FY2025; Epic-Particle Health dispute on PHI sharing

It’s all about personal health data–sharing, bad sharing, and bad transfers in this roundup.

VillageMD takes another hit, this time on Meta Pixel ad tracker issues. A class-action lawsuit filed on 10 April charges VillageMD (formally Village Practice Management Company), via its Village Medical website, of using the Meta Pixel ad tracker for disclosing user-protected health information (PHI) and other identifiable information generally classified as PII. This included visitors to their website villagemedical.com seeking information and patient users of Village Medical’s web-based tools for scheduling and the patient portal. The lawsuit by a “John Doe”, a patient since January 2023 resident in Quincy, Massachusetts but brought by three Midwest law firms in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, states that VillageMD used trackers that transferred this personal information to Meta Networks’ Facebook and Instagram, as well as other third parties like Google, for use in targeted advertising, in violation of HIPAA and other regulations. The lawsuit seeks 1) an injunction stopping Village Medical from using ad trackers and 2) monetary redress via damages–actual, compensatory, statutory, and punitive for the entire affected class. The suit also alleges that VillageMD violated its own internal procedures. Crain’s Health Pulse, Healthcare Dive

Readers will recall that in June 2022, STAT and The Markup published a study and follow-ups on Meta Pixel and ad tracker use by healthcare organizations. Ostensibly, the ad trackers were there to better track website performance and to tailor information for the patient [TTA 17 June, 21 June 2022], but they sent information to third parties that violated HIPAA and privacy guidelines. Ad trackers were also monetized. Meta blamed the health systems [TTA 16 May 2023] for misuse though they used the data for ad serving.  Congressional hearings, FTC, and DOJ followed later in 2022 and 2023. Multiple class action lawsuits against providers large and small have ensued. Providers have pushed back on FTC and HHS rules on ad trackers, stating the restrictions hamper their ability to build better websites based on customer usage and to serve individuals with useful information. 

Another ‘oversharing’ company, troubled telemental Cerebral, whacked with $7.1 million FTC fine on disclosing consumer information via ad trackers plus ‘negative option’ cancellation policy. The proposed order for a permanent injunction filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and docketed on 15 April has to be approved by the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The fine for the company only penalized the following:

  • Cerebral released 3.2 million consumers’ information to third parties such as practices, LinkedIn, and TikTok. This included PHI and PII such as names, medical histories, addresses, IP addresses, payment methods including insurance, sexual orientation, and more. Even more outrageously, they also used the mail for postcards that had sensitive information such as diagnosis printed on them. The insult on injury was that Cerebral failed to disclose or buried information on data sharing to consumers signing up for their ‘safe, secure, and discreet’ services. Cerebral now has to restrict nearly all information to third parties.
  • Cerebral also set up their service cancellation as a ‘negative option’ cancellation policy, which in reality meant that it was renewed indefinitely unless the customer took action to cancel. It was not adequately disclosed in violation of the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). Then Cerebral made it extremely difficult to cancel by instituting a complex procedure that required multiple steps and often took several days to execute. They even eliminated a one-step cancel button at their then-CEO Kyle Robertson’s direction. The order requires this to be corrected including deleting the negative option.
  • Former employees were not blocked from accessing patient medical records from May to December 2021. It also failed to ensure that providers were only able to access their patients’ records.

Cerebral’s settlement with the FTC and DOJ breaks down to $5.1 million to provide partial refunds to consumers impacted by their deceptive cancellation practices. They also levied a civil penalty of $10 million, reduced to $2 million as Cerebral was unable to pay the full amount. The decision and fine do not cover charges to be decided by the court against the former Cerebral CEO Robertson due to his extensive personal involvement in these practices. Those have not been settled and apparently were severed from the company as a separate action (FTC case information). Since 2022, Mr. Robertson has consistently blamed company management and investors for pushing for bad practices such as prescribing restricted stimulant drugs. Cerebral countersued him for defaulting on a $49.8 million loan taken in January 2022 to buy 1.06 million shares of Cerebral common stock. More to come, as the order also does not address other Federal violations under investigation, such as those under the Controlled Substances Act.  FTC release, FierceHealthcare  

VA to possibly resume Oracle Cerner EHR implementation at VA sites before the end of FY 2025, even if not in budget. During House Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearings on FY 2025 and 2026 budgets, VA Secretary Denis McDonough last Thursday (11 April) said that the VA intends to resume deploying the Oracle Cerner EHR as part of VA’s Electronic Health Records Modernization (EHRM) before the end of FY 2025. As Federal years go from October to September, FY 2025 starts October 2024 and ends September 2025. When asked if VA plans to maintain the “program reset” as they termed it in April 2023 for all of FY25, Secy. McDonough said that “we do not.”However, there is no budget allocated for additional implementations in either FY. The plan is to use carryover funding.

Oracle Cerner’s Millenium EHR was implemented at five VA locations before suspending in April 2023 for a massive re-evaluation which involved reworking systems such as the Health Data Repository which created critical scheduling and pharmacy problems detailed by the Office of Inspector General (OIG)  [TTA 28 Mar]. The joint VA and MHS/Genesis Lovell FHCC implementation, which went live in March, is not included.  NextGov/FCW, Healthcare Dive

And in another dispute about data sharing, leading EHR Epic cut off requests made by some Particle Health customers, expressing concern about privacy risks. Particle Health is a health data exchange API platform for developers. Both Epic and Particle are part of Carequality, a large scale data exchange group that connects 600,000 care providers, 50,000 clinics, and 4,200 hospitals to facilitate the exchange of patient medical records On 21 March, Epic filed a dispute with Carequality that some of Particle’s users “might be inaccurately representing the purpose associated with their record retrievals.” and stopped responding to some Particle Health customer queries. This has now degenerated into a ‘who said what‘ dispute, with Particle and their CEO alleging that Epic implied that it completely disconnected Particle Health and its customers from Epic’s data, while Epic has said that after a review by its 15-member Care Everywhere Governing Council, they flagged three companies who were using Particle’s Carequality connection to access data not related to patient care or treatment. There’s also a larger concern being brought up by providers on the use of these mass data exchanges for fraudulent extraction of data or use that would violate HIPAA guidelines. FierceHealthcare, CNBC, Becker’s, Morningstar

The New Reality, Bizarro World version: NeueHealth gets $30M loan increase from NEA, now majority owner

Because NeueHealth needs money now after a 2023 cratering–then paying 2023 performance bonuses to its top execs. New Enterprise Associates (NEA), one of NeueHealth’s remaining key funders, has decided to double down on its bet and extended $30 million to NeueHealth. It’s structured as a credit facility agreement effective 8 April, with NeueHealth able to access $20 million immediately and the remaining $10 million after 180 days. It’s secured by penny warrants ($0.01) of 1,113,563 shares of the company’s common stock to the lenders. According to FierceHealthcare’s Noah Tong, this brings NEA’s shares to more than 2.76 million shares since it first entered the credit agreement. These warrants which allow the purchase of shares at a nominal price are divided among various NEA entities. Investing.com, NeueHealth release, SEC Form 8-K

NEA is now majority owner at 60%, up 10 percentage points. It can also appoint one of its members to NeueHealth’s board, which will expand to 11 members.

Despite the disclosure in its March 10-K that additional funding was needed this year to continue as a going concern, the need for fast cash was urgent enough that the board of directors’ audit committee approved a waiver of shareholder approval on the warrant issuance, as waiting would jeopardize the financial viability of the company. NeueHealth stated the additional cash would be used for general business purposes.

The additional cash infusion is after shocking many observers in healthcare with CEO Mike Mikan’s $1.9 million bonus for performance, along with cash bonuses of $875,000 to CFO Jay Matushak and Executive Vice President of Consumer Care Tomas Orozco. NeueHealth’s 2023 was marked by exiting all their healthcare plans, owing tens to hundreds of millions to states on losing plans and CMS on repayment agreements, a name change from Bright Health, an HQ move, and finally a net loss of $627.7 million with an adjusted EBITDA loss of $8.5 million for 2023. TTA 5 April

Industry observer Ari Gottlieb to both Mr. Tong and in his own LinkedIn post noted that NeueHealth reported that they had, at the end of 2023, $90 million in unrestricted cash. He also noted that CalSTRS, the California State Teachers Retirement System, NeueHealth’s other major investor, did not participate. Mr. Gottlieb also speculated that Molina Healthcare, to which Bright Health sold their Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, may ask for further adjustments to the payment price as the MA plans’ performance was poor.

Has NEA lost its investors’ minds and cash–or are they seeing something we don’t see in NeueHealth?

Editor’s note: The reference to Bizarro World, for those unfamiliar with the Superman oeuvre, is explained here.