Aging and Health Technology Watch’s latest: The Future of Wearables and Older Adults 2021

June 24, 2021 | by

Laurie Orlov’s latest report takes a look at the state of wearables in the older adult market. She posits that it’s comparable to where voice tech (Alexa et al) stood in 2018–at the early stage, with the present state of minimal adoption ramping up in about a three to five-year time frame. 

From the report, she identifies these tipping points:

  • Self-service hearables have made hearing improvements cool – and cheap. In the US, hearing assistance has become mass marketed and, as a result, has become less of a stigma. While not for all, it’s reduced prices overall.
  • Fitness wearables already appeal to the younger, better educated, and more affluent cohort of older adults. They will carry this trend forward as they age.
  • Designs are improving, from the Apple Watch to mobile PERS. The pendant is the past.
  • Pricing is improving
  • Technology means that one wearable can be multi functional–and research is pouring into new uses, creating new companies and tech
  • Investment is pouring into digital health, accentuating all the above
  • Doctors may be more accomodating of the ‘data overload’–but consumers may drive this with recording their own data

The future for wearables? Personalized, predictive, proactive, smart, integrated, affordable, privacy-protective–and prescribed.

The report is free and downloadable from AgeInPlaceTech.com.

GPDPR update: GPs must set own patient opt-out date prior to 1 September extraction (updated for ‘Data Saves Lives’)

June 24, 2021 | by

(Editor’s Note: Read till the end for Roy Lilley’s take on data and the NHS Bureaucracy. “Bureaucracy… creates delays, duplication, interfaces and costs lives.)

Is it 25 August–or earlier? Well, it depends… NHS Digital has informed GPs that, contrary to a prior announcement, the deadline for submitting those who wish to opt out of the General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR) database must be set by the GP practice, and is not 25 August. The deadline for the mass extraction remains 1 September. This puts practices into a dilemma–informing patients of their right to opt-out. setting a date for staff to process the forms, and processing the hard copy forms in time for the 1 September extraction. (And right during summer holiday time with the bank holiday on 30 August)

For patients wishing to opt-out, they must submit a type-1 opt-out form (a Word document) and send it to their GP practice via mail or email by the deadline which then submits with the data collection. If a patient wishes to opt-out after, it’s permitted but any data before the opt-out date will be collected. The National Data Opt-Out does not apply to the GPDPR. 

According to the 22 June update in Pulse,

The BMA GP Committee’s latest newsletter quoted IT lead Dr Farah Jameel as saying: ‘The public needs a clear deadline by which they can opt out, alongside clear instructions on how to do this if they so wish.

‘We have been urging the government and NHS Digital to consider making the process of opting out simpler, and in effect remove any additional burden [that] large volumes of Type 1 opt-outs could place on already under-pressure general practice.

‘We urge NHS Digital to clarify this with both the public and practices.’

Another GP from Bristol is quoted as pointing out that most opt-outs will be received last minute, jamming the practices.

In addition, each GP practice has more work to do before the extraction–a data protection impact assessment (DPIA).

The problems of patient awareness, particularly during the summer, obtaining the form, and submitting it in time remain. So, what’s the rush? This Editor closes once again with the thought that the fourth quarter would be far better timing both for the surgeries and NHS Digital.

Our prior coverage 11 June and 2 June.

Addendum: Roy Lilley’s eLetter on ‘Data Saves Lives’ (draft publication here) is a Must Read. It is a most interesting take on how the NHS is botching the opportunities around health data by drowning it in bureaucracy. The latest example is a draft document titled ‘Data Saves Lives’. A course in obfuscation where even a casual look will reveal its true awfulness. Mr. Lilley has counted 96 commitments, 10 new organizations, and six major pieces of legislation. “It is bad, bad, bad and a perfect example of why the NHS’ relationship with the IT sector is so bad.” The GPDPR gets one–one–mention in this document. Sounds like some imports from the US Congress wrote it! In any case, if you’re in UK healthcare, you should be subscribing to this free eLetter. ‘Data Saves Lives’ NHS news release may go down easier

Breaking: 1B CVS Health records exposed in unsecured database now secured

June 18, 2021 | by

A potential hacker’s holiday–damage unknown, but now secured. Back in March, cybersecurity researcher Jonathan Fowler, working with the WebsitePlanet research team, discovered an unsecured database, hosted by an undisclosed third-party vendor, with information clearly linked in their view to CVS Health. Mr. Fowler and WebsitePlanet immediately notified CVS Health through a responsible disclosure notice. 

The files were production files with 1,148,327,940 records in a file of 204 GB. CVS worked quickly to secure the data that same day by shutting down public access. CVS confirmed to WebsitePlanet that it was indeed their data. No directly personally identifiable information (PII) was included of customers, members, or patients. Instead, the histories are largely log files from searching and shopping on the site. However, Mr. Fowler maintains that there was enough information in the files to derive customers’ PII, including their email addresses.

The story is breaking now on media, notably ABC-TV cited in Becker’s. While apparently not a true breach or malicious–just another one of those darn errors–it presented a real danger to CVS Health customers. Whether the publicity will force CVS Health to take remedial action is to be determined. Not ‘Hackermania Running Wild’ but could have been in this overheated world of ransomware and Healthcare Hacking. CVS needs to keep far tighter oversight on their vendors. They should post what’s left and above in the IT Department. Also Threatpoint and Becker’s Health IT

US FCC releases Round 2 of the Connected Care Pilot Program with 36 projects

June 18, 2021 | by

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has awarded another round of the Connected Care Pilot Program. Funds are awarded to 36 projects in underserved geographies, such as rural and Indian Tribal areas, plus to groups such as veterans, the disabled, children, and older adults. A brief sample of the awardees includes Yale New Haven Health System (four projects), Catholic Health Initiative (36 sites in the Midwest), Heritage Clinic (CA), Hudson Headwaters Health Network (upstate NY), Johns Hopkins (Baltimore), and the Universities of Kentucky, Florida, and Hawaii. 

The original Connected Care Pilot Program started in 2019 [TTA 20 June 2019]. It was established to provide up to $100 million in Universal Service Funds (USF) to help eligible health care providers defray the costs of providing connected care services to their patients. On an ongoing basis, the USF can be used to provide continuing support for connected care services. FCC Public Release, WTVQ (Lexington KY)

News and deal roundup: Zus Health’s $34M ‘back-end in a box’, Bright Health’s IPO, Lyra Health’s $200M done, Valo Health’s $2.8B SPAC; UK’s Alcuris, Clarity Informatics, GTX test; Google’s health blues, Facebook’s smartwatch

June 18, 2021 | by

Athenahealth founder’s latest health tech venture lays track. Jonathan Bush’s new venture, Zus Health, is being pitched to tech founders as providing a ‘Lego’ like back-end for startup digital health companies. Variously compared to ‘Build-A-Bear’ or track laying, it’s an ‘in a box’ setup that provides a data record back end, a software development kit (SDK) with tools and services, and a patient interface. Presumably, this will also assist interoperability. Mr. Bush has enlisted an all-star team and is basing outside of Boston in the familiar area of Watertown, Massachusetts. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) led the $34 million Series A, joined by F-Prime Capital, Maverick Ventures, Rock Health, Martin Ventures, and Oxeon Investments. The financing will be used for engineering the tech stack. Current clients developed in stealth include Cityblock Health, Dorsata, Firefly Health, and Oak Street Health. Not a breath about the revenue model other than ‘partnership’. Make sure you pronounce Zus as ‘Zeus’ (Athena’s father for those who aren’t up on their Greek myths). Zus release, FierceHealthcare

This week’s IPO filing by insurtech/clinic operator Bright Health with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) confirmed earlier reports that the offering will crest over $1 billion [TTA 28 May]: 60 million shares with an initial valuation of $20 to $23 is at a minimum of $1.2 billion. Company valuation is estimated at $14 billion which is about midpoint of earlier estimates. It will trade on the NYSE under BHG. The cherry on the cake is a 7.2 million 30-day share purchase option to their underwriters at the initial IPO price. Timing is not addressed in the release but expect it soon. BHG release, Mobihealthnews

Lyra Health banks an additional $200 million. This week the corporate mental health therapy provider completed their Series F $200M financing backed by Coatue, new investor Sands Capital, plus existing investors, for a total of $675 million to date (Crunchbase). Valuation is now estimated at $4.6 billion. Mental and behavioral health tech remains warm, with the thundercloud on the horizon Teladoc’s myStrength app [TTA 14 May]. Lyra’s strong corporate footprint puts them, along with Ginger, in a desirable place for acquisition by a telehealth provider or payer. Lyra release, FierceHealthcare

Drug discovery and development company Valo Health is going the SPAC route with Khosla Ventures. The special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Khosla Ventures Acquisition Co. will form with Valo Health a new company (KVAC) with a pro for­ma mar­ket val­ue of approx­i­mate­ly $2.8 bil­lion with an initial cash balance of $750 million including a $168 million PIPE led by Khosla Ventures. Valo’s flagship is the Opal Computational Platform that creates an AI-based platform for drug discovery. The current pipeline has two clin­i­cal-stage assets and 15 pri­or­i­tized pre-clin­i­cal assets across car­dio­vas­cu­lar meta­bol­ic renal, neu­rode­gen­er­a­tion, and oncol­o­gy fields. Khosla has been largely absent from digital health investments. The SPAC route to IPOs has also cooled. Valo release, Mobihealthnews  

And short takes on other news… (more…)

Robotic exoskeletons successfully used in exercise rehabilitation for MS patients: study

June 18, 2021 | by

In the first pilot randomized controlled trial of robotic exoskeleton-assisted exercise rehabilitation (REAER), researchers from the Kessler Foundation found that REAER had positive effects on improving mobility and cognitive function in subjects who had significant MS-related neurological disability that limited their ability to walk. 

Four weeks of REAER were compared to four weeks of conventional gait training. The training with the FDA-cleared Ekso Bionics’s Ekso-GT exoskeleton device produced large improvements in functional mobility, cognitive processing speed, and brain connectivity outcomes, most significantly between the thalamus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. The REAER group patients took about 59 percent more steps during the last session compared with the first, among multiple assessments. By contrast, patients in the control group using gait training had stable or declining outcomes.

Impairments in mobility and cognition are common in multiple sclerosis patients, and exercise such as walking is one of the more effective therapies in the limited group available. While this was a small group trial (10 patients), the results shown within a relatively short period of time are promising for larger group studies and wider application.

The research was performed by the New Jersey-based Kessler Foundation with funding from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, USA (Collaborative Network of New Jersey), Award Number: CA1069-A-7; and Joy and Avi Avidan, New Jersey, USA. Kessler release, Multiple Sclerosis News Today  Hat tip to Editor Emeritus Steve 

 

The Theranos Story, ch. 74: defense questionnaire trimmed; Holmes loses attorney-client privileges on 13 emails, doctor/patient testimony allowed

June 18, 2021 | by

This week’s update as Elizabeth Holmes’ Federal trial nears its 31 August start. 

The defense’s 112-page whopper of a jury selection questionnaire was, as most expected, nixed by Judge Edward Davila. He provided the defense with a slimmed-down version that apparently, from press reports, edited the media coverage issues. The prosecution had previously objected to the length, intrusiveness, and over-specificity around juror media usage. Judge Davila remarked in Tuesday’s hearing that jurors could be asked about their sources of news in an open-ended response. According to the Fox Business report, “He said both sides might be surprised to see how many potential jurors don’t know anything about the case.” Impartiality is also an issue in high-profile cases, but “impartiality does not require ignorance,” in the words of a previous Federal decision in the Enron CEO’s criminal case.

The jury will also hear testimony from patients and doctors who used Theranos tests and said they got inaccurate results. The testimony will be limited to facts about the inaccurate test and the money they lost by paying for it. Emotional and physical harm will be off-limits. Fox Business  What won’t be admissible, at least for now, is how Theranos “destroyed” its Laboratory Information System, or LIS, database. The defense argued that the prosecution took years to acquire it and then sat on the evidence. Judge Davila reserved the right to revisit that issue if appropriate. Fox Business

Elizabeth Holmes cannot keep her 13 emails with law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP out of the trial on attorney-client privilege grounds. US magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins ruled that it did not apply to these emails since Boies Schiller was the corporation’s legal counsel and not hired by her personally. According to the Wall Street Journal (partial article as paywalled), the receiver who wound down Theranos after it closed in 2018 waived the company’s privilege to the documents, yet another factor. Boies Schiller represented Theranos up to 2016. Managing partner David Boies was a Theranos board director and a bulldog of an advocate from the company until then. Mr. Boies is now aged 80 and remains chairman of the law firm. (One wonders if the well-seasoned litigator, or his deposition, will be part of the trial.)

Judge Davila has also set the trial schedule–three days per week from late August into December, earlier disclosed as Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays, with relatively short days to fight ‘juror fatigue’. Since Elizabeth Holmes will also have delivered her child by the time the trial starts, there will be a “quiet room” in the courthouse provided for her special needs during the trial.

TTA’s previous coverage of Theranos

Disruption or giveaway: Amazon Care signs on employers, but who? Amazon Pharmacy’s 6 months of meds for $6. (updated)

June 16, 2021 | by

Is this disruption, a giveaway, or blue smoke requiring IFR? An Amazon Care VP, Babak Parviz, said at the Wall Street Journal’s Tech Health virtual event that all is well with their rollout of virtual primary care (VPC). Washington state is first, with VPC now available nationally to all Amazon employees as well as companies. However, Mr. Parviz did not disclose the signed-up companies, nor a timetable for when in-person Amazon Care practices will be expanding to Washington, DC, Baltimore, and other cities in the coming months.

Mr. Parviz also provided some details of what Amazon Care would ultimately look like:

  • Clinician chat/video connected within 60 seconds
  • If an in-person visit is required, a mobile clinician arrives within 60 minutes, who can perform some diagnostic tests, such as for strep throat, provide vaccinations and draw blood for lab work. For other diagnoses, that clinician is equipped with a kit with devices to monitor vital signs which are live-streamed to remote clinicians.
  • Medication delivery within 120 minutes

FierceHealthcare

The timing of the Amazon Care rollout has not changed since our coverage of their announcement in March. This Editor noted in that article that Credit Suisse in their overview was underwhelmed by Amazon Care as well as other efforts in the complex and crowded healthcare space. Amazon Care also doesn’t integrate with payers. It’s payment upfront, then the patient files a claim with their insurer.

Existing players are already established in large chunks of what Amazon wants to own.

  • Both Amwell’s Ido Schoenberg [TTA 2 April] and Teladoc’s Jason Gorevic (FierceHealthcare 12 May) have opined that they are way ahead of Amazon both in corporate affiliations and comprehensive solutions. Examples: Amwell’s recently announced upgrade of their clinician platform and adding platforms for in-home hospital-grade care [TTA 29 Apr], Teladoc’s moves into mental health with myStrength [TTA 14 May].
  • Even Walmart is getting into telehealth with their purchase of a small player, MeMD [TTA 8 May].
  • CVS has their MinuteClinics affiliated with leading local health systems, and Walgreens is building out 500 free-standing VillageMD locations [TTA 4 Dec 20]. CVS and Walgreens are also fully integrated with payers and pharmacy benefit management plans (PBM).

Another loss leader is pharmacy. Amazon is also offering to Prime members a pharmacy prescription savings benefit: six-month supplies of select medications for $6. The conditions are that members must pay out-of-pocket (no insurance), they must have the six-month prescription from their provider, and the medication must be both available and eligible on Amazon Pharmacy. Medications included are for high blood pressure, diabetes, and more. The timing is interesting as Walmart also announced a few days earlier a similar program for Walmart+ members. Mobihealthnews.

crystal-ballThis Editor’s opinion is that Amazon’s business plans for both entities and in healthcare are really about accumulating data, not user revenue, and are certainly not altruistic no matter what they say. Amazon will accumulate and own national healthcare data on Amazon Care and Pharmacy users far more valuable than whatever is spent on providing care and services. Amazon will not only use it internally for cross-selling, but can monetize the data to pharmaceutical companies, payers, developers, and other commercial third parties in and ex-US. Shouldn’t privacy advocates be concerned, as this isn’t being disclosed? 

Telemental Health Care Access Act introduced in US Senate to repeal in-person requirements for mental telehealth care

June 16, 2021 | by

Eliminating the Medicare requirement for an in-person visit prior to telehealth used for mental health services. Yesterday, the Telemental Health Care Access Act of 2021 (PDF link) was introduced in the US Senate. It is a bipartisan bill sponsored by four senators, Bill Cassidy, MD (R-LA), Tina Smith (D-MN), Ben Cardin (D-MD), and John Thune (R-SD). It specifically amends Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure coverage of mental health services furnished through telehealth without a prior in-person visit.

The 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act on one hand removed the geographic restrictions for Medicare, but on the other imposed a restriction that requires physicians to see their mental health patients in-person at least six months prior to a Medicare-reimbursed telehealth visit. It’s significant as Medicare and the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) [TTA 3 Dec 20] set the standards for commercial payers on coverage and reimbursement. The bill, so new it does not have a number yet, is designed to eliminate that requirement.

In the US, there is an acute shortage (at least 6,000) of mental health providers, particularly psychiatrists. Back in 2013, 70 percent of psychiatrists were over the age of 50 and due to retire. As to the top of the funnel, few medical graduates choose psychiatry due to compensation issues (paying for expensive medical education). Those who do are trained in residencies and tend to stay near large cities, further exacerbating the existing geographic imbalance. It’s a situation that hits this Editor close to home as her own brother is one of those semi-retired psychiatrists. He apparently has not been replaced in the clinic practice in which he worked for over 20 years and his private practice is self-limited. Most of the psychiatrists in his suburban area are retiring as well. Psychiatric mental health advanced practice registered nurses (PMH-APRN) fill only part of this gap. (For a further discussion of APRNs and their role in mental health practice, see this issue of Psychiatric Times)

Telemental health can fill some of the gap in rural areas, for continued support in mental health counseling and medical management, and for those who would benefit from cognitive therapies, a burgeoning area for telehealth companies.

The bill is supported by the American Telemedicine Association (ATA), the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and at least 30 companies (including the leading telehealth providers such as Teladoc and Doctor on Demand) and non-profit organizations such as the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. ATA release and overview of present in-person requirements;  Senator Bill Cassidy release.

Samsung stretches into electronic skin sensors with OLED display for heart rate

June 11, 2021 | by

Stretchable skin sensors were the rage a few years ago, yet disappeared off the radar well before the pandemic. A good part of it was that the sensor tech was confined to university labs and small companies attempting to commercialize it into ‘smart clothing’ paired with a smartphone, a form factor that never found a market. Since those early days, what has entered the mainstream are sensors/smartphone combinations for blood glucose reporting. So it’s positive that Samsung, expert at commercialization and the technology around displays, has set its R&D unit, the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT), to developing a prototype stretchy skin patch for vital signs monitoring that combines both a sensor and display.

SAIT developed a sensor (left) that combined a stretchable LED (OLED) display and a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor. The tests applied it to the inner wrist near the radial artery to measure and display heart rate in real time.

The device uses a combination of elastomer, a polymer compound with excellent elasticity and resilience, with existing semiconductor manufacturing processes to apply it to the substrates of stretchable OLED displays and optical blood flow sensors.

The study found that the sensor achieved:

  • Stable performance in a stretchable device with high elongation. The display can be stretched up to 30 percent.
  • The movement of the arm did not affect the OLED display 
  • The adhesion and location of the display and sensor made, in their findings, continuous heartbeat measurements possible with a high degree of sensitivity compared to existing fixed wearable sensors

The researchers claim this is for the first time in the industry and proves the commercialization potential of stretchable sensors. While the OLED display leaves a lot to be desired in readability and it seems chunky, it’s another step in creating more easily worn ‘all in one’ monitoring devices that stretch to fit, don’t require a wristband, or constant checking on one’s phone. The SAIT research was just published in Science Advances, 4 June.  Samsung release, The Verge, Mobihealthnews

NHS Digital GPDPR medical database data extraction start postponed from 1 July to 1 September

June 11, 2021 | by

Facing a GP revolt and legal action, NHS Digital has postponed the extraction of patient data records from surgeries until 1 September for the General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR). Before the House of Commons on 8 June, health minister Jo Churchill announced the extension. “We will use this time to talk to patients, doctors, health charities and others to strengthen the plan, build a trusted research environment and ensure data is accessed securely.” Health secretary Matt Hancock also announced that the patient opt-out deadline, originally 23 June, will be extended (date TBD). Pulse (may require registration), NHS revised release

On 4 June, before the extension announcement, the Doctors Association UK (DAUK), the Citizens, openDemocracy, the National Pensioners Convention, and Conservative MP David Davis were among the signatories to a legal letter sent to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) threatening action to halt the data collection from GPs. Pulse (may require registration)   

While Ms. Churchill, Mr. Hancock, and Simon Bolton collectively insist that the additional time will be used for consultations with patients, doctors, health charities, and others, the proof will be in both the data collection and how informed patients will be of their options. Both the opt-out date and September, given the summer holidays, aren’t much time. In this Editor’s estimation, for a major effort, the end of this year would be far better. Perhaps we should send them this poster? Additional TTA coverage 2 June.

News and deal roundup: OneMedical’s $2.1 bn for Iora, CareDx buys Transplant Hero, Mount Sinai’s Elementa Labs; UK news–NHSX/Babylon, Doro-Everon, Tunstall

June 11, 2021 | by

West Coast-based concierge medical provider One Medical goes ‘mass’ with Iora. One Medical, best known for serving the affluent well through a membership fee, direct pay, commercial insurance, and sponsored contracts with large employers like Google for primary care, announced plans to acquire Boston-based Iora Health. Iora’s primary care providers serve a different market, with primarily Medicare patients moved into full-risk value-based models such as Medicare Advantage plans and practices in shared savings arrangements such as Direct Contracting. The investor presentation here discloses the all-stock purchase with 26 percent of ownership going to current Iora shareholders. Iora for now will be run separately, which makes sense given the disparity in patient base. The major element in common? Primary care practices and ‘white-glove’ services. Healthcare Dive, FierceHealthcare

Consolidation in digital transplant care assistance. CareDx, which provides a wide variety of management services for organ transplant providers and recipients, is acquiring New York-based Transplant Hero. Transplant Hero is an app that reminds recipients to take their vital medications, and was founded by a transplant physician. Financial terms and integration going forward were not disclosed. Release, Mobihealthnews.

Mount Sinai Innovation Partners (MSIP) creates a new health tech incubator. Elementa Labs launched this week, specifically seeking pre-seed or seed-stage healthcare and biotech startups. Companies must also have a clear objective for working with Mount Sinai to develop a comprehensive development plan.The first startup on board is avoMD, a mobile-friendly point of care clinical decision support platform. Applications for the 12-week program close 30 September. FierceHealthcare

UK activity heats up with the late spring…

NHSX and NHS England are assessing Babylon Health’s triage app. According to an exclusive in Pulse (may require registration), a senior delegation from both visited University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB) last month to look at its use of the Babylon technology. However, NHSX has disclaimed any work towards a national program with Babylon as practices reopen throughout the UK.

DoroCare UK and Everon announced a partnership on products and services for social care, such as Everon’s Lyra, a cloud-based emergency call system, and Doro’s Eliza, a smartcare hub. Release

Tunstall announced the release of the Tunstall Service Platform (TSP) in the UK. It’s described as a connected care software platform supporting the Tunstall Alarm Receiving Centres coordinated by local authorities and social housing providers. It has four unique functions: PNC (call handling), service manager, fieldforce manager, and proactive services. It also will transition these systems from analogue to digital and will be operable in both. Release

The Theranos Story, ch. 73: the defense tries to stack the jury deck in Holmes’ favor, prosecutors say. And Theranos swag and memes are hot!

June 10, 2021 | by

Law and Order Proceeds. For those of us who follow US trials, or have served on a local or county jury, smart attorneys do a fair amount of ruling jurors in–and out. The voir dire process in high-profile trials is critical. Jury consultants make comfortable livings creating profiles of their ‘ideal juror’.

Thus it should not be a surprise that Elizabeth Holmes’ spare-no-expense-or-strategem defense would file in May with the court an over-the-top 41-page, 112 question jury document. Their rationale is to screen jurors for issues related to the extensive news coverage around la scandale Theranos, Holmes herself, and even the pandemic (!).

In the prosecution’s view, questions such as “Do you have investments?”, “Do you have health insurance?”, and inquiries about social media use, were “untethered” from pretrial publicity and the coronavirus pandemic.

By comparison, the prosecution presented to Judge Edward Davila a modestly sized nine-page questionnaire with a scant 51 questions. Typically, many of these questions are routine, such as reading about the case and if they had any pre-existing opinions which would prevent that person from a fair judgment of the facts presented in the case. On pandemic issues, the prosecution drew from previously used questionnaires that addressed them, though this Editor cannot see how the pandemic is pertinent to this case.

Holmes is facing 12 felony fraud charges. The trial will start 31 August and will be held on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays through 17 December, according to a filing last week by Holmes’ legal team. She faces maximum penalties of 20 years in prison and a $2.75 million fine, plus possible restitution. East Bay Times

Attention eBay Shoppers!  According to CNBC, original Theranos-labeled items are fetching real coin on auction sites like eBay and Poshmark. An original Theranos lab coat is supposedly listed for $17,000. Over at Etsy and Redbubble, which sell artist-created items, logo-printed t-shirts and masks, including those with Holmes’ face and the Silicon Valley meme, ‘Fake It Till You Make It’, “Girl Boss” signs, throws, posters (left), and greeting cards. (Good things? Yeesh!) are all over. The funniest is a sweatshirt with ‘Theranos Testing–A Guaranteed Result’. Over on Etsy, a merchant’s most popular Theranos item is a mug emblazoned ‘Theranos Early Investor’. (Is it cracked?) Perhaps Holmes could put her Theranos trinkets and trash online to defray a few costs. Or copyright her image like Bogart?

OnePerspective: How the shift from analogue to digital telephone services affects telecare provisioning

June 10, 2021 | by

TTA has an open invitation to industry leaders to provide a personal perspective on issues of importance to readers. This week, Charlotte Rathbone, Product Account Manager for CareUnity Digital, Chubb, examines the ongoing transformation of the UK telecommunications industry and how the shift to digital technology will affect telecare provision.

Interested contributors should contact Editor Donna. (Pictures and graphs/infographics are welcome)

According to the Technology Services Association (TSA), the representative body for technology-enabled care, more than 1.8 million vulnerable people* rely on telecare in the UK. In most cases, telecare consists of a care alarm in a person’s home, which when triggered by pressing a button or an automated sensor, sends data via the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) to a monitoring centre, where an operator will give advice or seek help.

The UK telecommunications industry however is undergoing rapid change. By 2025* all analogue telephone services across the UK will be switched off as infrastructure is upgraded to digital connectivity. This approaching switch highlights the need for dedicated digital telecare solutions. 

So how will this affect telecare services in the UK?
As early as 2023*, British Telecom (BT) customers may not be able to buy an analogue phone line. Instead, BT will move its customers to a digital Internet Protocol network in readiness for the shutdown of traditional telephone lines in 2025. It’s then that we’ll see the PSTN and all Integrated Services Digital Network lines switched off. These lines are currently used by many telecare services to feed alarm data into their monitoring centres.

While the digital migration is underway, analogue telecare alarm services are reporting a rise in the number of failed alarm call attempts – with one service provider reporting a failure rate of 11.5% for the first alarm attempt*. This is concerning.

Another concern is failed care alarms through loss of power. When analogue alarms run on a digital network, they require a router to be plugged in at home. In the event of a power failure, this router will stop working, so if a vulnerable person triggered their alarm, it would duly fail.

It’s little surprise that telecommunication providers and Ofcom are all recommending a shift away from traditional analogue devices to digital devices to ensure consistency of access to care*. Some countries including Sweden are ahead of the curve when it comes to switching to digital. More than 95% of Swedish digital alarm installations now use mobile network connections*. There is some way to go in the UK.

Currently, there are approximately 1.6 million analogue telecare devices** across the UK that need to be changed to digital-dispersed alarm units so it’s going to be a gradual process. There are, however, benefits for telecare service providers that make the change sooner rather than later. 

Why switch now?
As we approach the switchover date, the time to replace analogue units in the field reduces. This will likely result in significant resource pressures for customers to complete the transition; by switching early, this can be completely avoided.

References
*TSA, 10 Facts about Analogue to Digital: How it will affect telecare.   ** TSA survey of service provider members, May 2021.

Hat tip to Kathryn Ranger of PRG Marketing Communications

Tunstall Group acquires Secuvita (NL)

June 2, 2021 | by

Breaking news. Tunstall Healthcare announced today (2 June) the acquisition of Dutch alarm/home automation company Secuvita, Financial terms, integration, timing, and management going forward were not disclosed. In the announcement, Tunstall Group CEO Gordon Sutherland referred to Secuvita’s technology  integration with Tunstall Cognitive Care’s proactive care model. Benelux is one of Tunstall’s six key regions. The acquisition adds to Tunstall’s customer base 70,000 Secuvita users.

Secuvita’s director and owner is Patrick Gaasbeek. It was founded in 2006 as a brand independent service provider for social alarm systems. Today, their significant sectors are care alarms (standard and mobile), healthcare home automation (smart home), and remote care for home care, housing, and emergency centers. Featured clients on their website are Florence, Aafie, and Vérian. The company is based in Apeldoorn, Netherlands. 

NHS Digital GPDPR medical database plans criticized by Royal College of GPs, privacy advocates (updated 8 June)

June 2, 2021 | by | 2 Comments

What our UK Readers may have missed on the long bank holiday weekend. And why this matters outside the UK.  NHS Digital is being roundly criticized by privacy advocates, the Royal College of GPs (RCGP), the Doctors’ Association UK (DAUK), and individual GP surgeries on plans for creation of the General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR).

The GPDPR will compile information on 55 million patients–every patient in England registered with a GP surgery–into a database available to academic and commercial third parties for research and planning purposes. NHS has been collecting patient data on patients in a database, the General Practice Extraction Service (GPES), for the past decade. The GPDPR will replace it. Data collection on patients in England starts 1 July. What will be collected is at the end of this article as background.

The objections center on the sensitivity of the data, the short window of notification to patients, the lack of a clearly notified opt-out with sufficient time, and how it will be used.

  • The data apparently can include mental and sexual health data, criminal records (!), and other sensitive information. 
  • The short time–six weeks–between the announcement in late April (a low key affair with Matt Hancock-signed blog posts on the NHS Digital website, YouTube videos, and flyers at GP surgeries), and the start of data collection from the surgeries
  • How many patients are actually aware that this is happening and of their options is debatable. (See next two bullets)
    • If a patient didn’t pick up on it in the six-week window ending on 23 June (and go to the page with the Type 1 Opt-Out), a patient can opt out for data going forward, but cannot withdraw any data collected into the database prior to that date.
    • If a patient is in the National Data Opt-out program, their medical data will be collected anyway, since it applies to only identifiable and confidential patient information.
  • Many GPs are concerned about further erosion of the physician-patient relationship and the lack of communication to patients on how the data will be used, the ethical questions around the organizations to which it will be sold, and how patient privacy will be preserved.

The blackest mark here on NHS Digital is that the groups ostensibly involved in the development of the database–the RCGP and the British Medical Association (BMA)–are the ones sounding the alarm, along with the aforementioned DAUK and privacy groups such as MedConfidential and Foxglove. There is also a rebellion starting among London GPs. Reportedly, 36 doctors’ surgeries in Tower Hamlets, east London, will withhold data. An email is circulating to about 100 surgeries in north London questioning the legitimacy of the NHS data collection. This is despite penalties if they don’t submit.

Why does this matter if you’re not in England? Medical data–collecting, manipulating it, connecting it, finding insights, and selling it–is the Gold Rush of the 2020s. Pharma and payers as markets are just the start. Nearly every Roundup or deal this Editor covers has companies with a chunk of this gold rush. Why are telehealth companies worth their IPO/SPAC/funding prices? Why is McKesson ‘big banging’ four separate businesses into one division? Why do we follow ‘data warehouses’ like Sensyne [TTA 26 May],  Mayo Clinic’s big bet on a multi-line Remote Diagnostics and Management Platform [TTA 23 Apr], and virtual pharmacies like Capsule?  Why are insurtechs like Oscar and Bright Health hot? Why is it the #1 target of hackers?

It’s not altruistic. Services can be duplicated. Companies can be a hair away from failure. But ah, their data…the data has huge market value, even if its potential is not fully understood yet. Ask any data analytics person. Ask China, probably the most aggressive nation in collecting the health and personal data of its citizens, with Chinese capital for years now leading investment in global health tech companies.

In an article back in October 2015, this Editor described the many ways that deidentified patient data, in this case genomic data, can be identified by researchers through cross-checking via research database “beacons”, a network of servers. Referring to the 23andme and Ancestry.com collection of innocently given genomic data from consumers, this Editor proposed a Genomic Bill of Rights in 2018 and again in 2020. If this Editor, no data geek, can deduce it (hat tip to Toni Bunting back in 2015), this information has to be well known to researchers and to privacy advocates.

The controversy is just starting to ramp up. And it should. It’s about time there was a reckoning. The Guardian 30 May, 1 June

More background. According to the NHS Digital page on the GPDPR, patients will be anonymized by a process where de-identification software will replace their NHS Number, date of birth, and full postcode with unique codes produced by de-identification software. The data collected from GPs in England starting 1 July will be on: (more…)