VA pulls out the stick in contract renegotiation with Oracle Cerner, slams brakes on further EHRM rollouts–and is this trouble? (updated)

April 19, 2023 | by

VA puts away the carrot, pulls out the stick with Oracle Cerner on the VA EHR modernization. Last Friday’s report in the Wall Street Journal (paywalled) confirms that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is actively renegotiating its contract with Oracle at what is now the five-year mark. Until an agreement is reached, VA is pausing the rollout, which according to previous reports has been largely paused anyway due to multiple critical problems in the slow rollout to date. The WSJ report is cited in Becker’s.

Reports in March during Senate VA committee hearings indicated that the $16 billion contract was due for renegotiation anyway by 17 May. Typically, VA vendor contracts are for five years and the original contract was signed in 2017 with Cerner. VA’s contracting officer, Michael Parrish, testified in those Senate hearings that he will push for a more favorable contract [TTA 18 March].

The Oracle Cerner Millenium EHR was to replace the crusty, still working but not interoperable VistA EHR. The Department of Defense had already contracted with Cerner and Leidos to develop an EHR for the Military Health System (MHS), Genesis, replacing AHLTA. That has largely been completed in a smaller system, though not without its glitches. Billions had been spent in multiple multi-year efforts to make the two existing systems interoperable, for instance to cover records of service members transitioning from active service to reserve or veteran status and for military retirees.

Oracle closed its $28.4 billion acquisition of Cerner last June to much fanfare, but has not had a pleasant moment with the VA or Congress since. During 2021-22, failures of the Oracle Cerner system included hundreds of outages, the ‘unknown queue’ creating at least 150 instances of harm (including one averted suicide) at one VA health system (Mann-Grandstaff), four veteran deaths, training program troubles, more in a GAO Inspector General audit, and the VA’s EHRM Sprint Team itself identifying 14 main and multiple sub-issues in safety and medical research integration in the EHR Modernization Sprint Report (PDF) released on 10 March delving deeply into the initial implementations. 

In 2023, there have been three Senate and three House bills proposed with mandates ranging from ‘hold rollout till issues fixed’ to ‘pull the plug and start over’. The VA had two resignations tied to the EHRM failures, VA deputy secretary Donald Remy and EHRM director Terry Adirim, MD. Implementations were delayed at Michigan’s Ann Arbor (including medical research, TTA 1 Mar) and Saginaw (this month) systems to later this year or even 2024. None of this has been cheap. The Senate VA Committee hearings in March revealed that the VA has paid Oracle Cerner $4.4 billion on the contract so far, with a refund of $325,000 paid as compensation for ‘incomplete technology and poor training’. Obligations through the contract are at least $9.4 billion. The new system has been implemented to date in five VA medical centers out of 171. [TTA 18 Mar]

Updated. Another five-hour outage of both VA and DOD-MHS systems occurred on Monday 17 April. Affected systems included PowerChart, RevCycle, and other applications with latency issues and freezing. This may have been a result of transitioning to a larger database over the weekend. Today (Wednesday 19 April), the House Veterans’ Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold hearings on the proposals contained in the two House bills.  FedScoop

If Oracle really wants to transform healthcare, it can start with the VA as Job #1. Or give the keys to Epic. The VA is between the proverbial rock and a hard place. VA has to end VistA even though the old system is still being upgraded during the transition. Terminating the deal with Oracle and reverting five health systems would be perilous, if even possible. But the stakes for Oracle are even higher. Let’s start with billions in Federal contracts in other parts of government systems outside of healthcare. To get into healthcare EHRs, Oracle bought a Pandora’s Box with Cerner. The stakes are not only for our veterans but also to salvage its credibility in healthcare versus Epic–and with its lenders who financed the heavily leveraged Cerner acquisition plus $90 billion in debt load [TTA 10 Nov 22]. 

Congress calls to extend PHE telehealth flexibilities; FCC’s $48M telehealth funding boost, telehealth’s shortcomings in pediatric asthma treatment

February 2, 2022 | by

Permanent telehealth flexibility and expanded use still being debated, and still stuck in Congress. The expansion of telehealth that came with the US public health emergency (PHE) isn’t permanent, despite some expansion plugged into the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. That can only come with legislation passed by Congress and signed into law–and it is still being debated. A fresh group of 45 Congresscritters (this Editor can’t restrain a certain sarcasm) is now plumping for a more permanent extension for a set–but undefined– time, as part of February funding legislation. This effort is being led in the Senate by Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, and Roger Wicker, R-Mississippi. Oh yes, the power of a letter to the House and Senate majority and minority leaders (sigh!) Meanwhile, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act have languished for months in the Senate Finance committee and in House Ways and Means. Healthcare IT News

Over at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), they’re doling out the sixth and final tranche of $47.89 million to 100 provider and community health organizations that applied to the COVID-19 Telehealth Program. The total FCC funding in this round 2 was $249.95 million that built on funding that was part of the CARES Act. The full list is in the FCC release (PDF). MHealthIntelligence

A combination of in-person care with telehealth as an adjunct may be the best protocol for treating pediatric asthma, a UC Davis Health study found. The first part of the study analyzed EHR records for asthma patients aged 2-24 treated at UC Davis Health in 2020. Of 502 patients, telemedicine usage was significantly lower among:

  • Patients with a primary language other than English (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.025–0.54, p = 0.006)
  • School-aged children (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.005),
  • Those who received asthma care from a primary care provider instead of a specialist (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34–0.91, p = 0.020).

Focus groups are qualitative and should be used for direction and to surface issues, and they did with telehealth. The 12 parents and five young adult patients who were randomly selected and participated stated that:

  • The parents felt that in-person care built better rapport, was more effective in counseling the child and young adult patients on their medication and condition, and more actively engaged their children
  • Parents did not feel confident in correctly using diagnostic tools like peak flow meters and home spirometers on a telehealth visit
  • Scheduling follow-up telehealth appointments was more difficult than in-person 
  • Where telehealth stepped up was convenience–to see their specialist without travel time. The visit also ‘cut to the chase’ by seeing one physician only, not an entire care team. And it was protective of their children during the pandemic. 

Most of the focus group participants agreed that a combination of telemedicine and in-person visits would be preferred when asthma is well-controlled. Published in the Journal of Asthma. Also MHealthIntelligence, which read the study conclusions a bit different than this Editor.

21st Century Cures and Telehealth (US)

December 19, 2016 | by

Just before the signing ceremony of the 21st Century Cures Act in [grow_thumb image=”https://telecareaware.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Barack_Obama_signs_2013_inauguration_proclamation-cropped.jpg” thumb_width=”150″ /]the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building President Obama made special mention of his Vice President Joe Biden and his wife Jill who had spoken of the death of their son due to cancer. Obama also mentioned his own mother who had also died of cancer when she was two and a half years younger than he was himself now. The Act provides $1.8 billion for cancer research according to the Washington Post although the allocation is for biomedical research and is not specifically for cancer research.

What was unsaid at the ceremony was that the Act also has a section on telehealth. The telehealth section of the act requires the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to report within one year to Congress on populations of Medicare beneficiaries whose care may be improved by expansion of telehealth services. CMS is also asked to report on the telehealth related work already funded by CMS Innovation, make suggestions on the type of services which might be suitable for telehealth and indicate barriers to expansion. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is asked to identify, by March next year, services for which payment is available through private health insurance plans but not under Medicare. MedPAC is then asked to recommend how to incorporate these into Medicare.

These measures look to expanding the role of and accessibility to telehealth for Medicare beneficiaries. Further, a note entitled “Sense of Congress” states that “It is the sense of Congress that eligible originating sites should be expanded …”. However, unlike the key elements of the 21st Century Cures Act, such as biomedical research, no specific funding has been allocated for the implementation of any telehealth related recommendations. Although some optimism has been expressed about the expansion of telehealth as a result of this Act (see, for example, comments from URAC in HIT Consultant and Healthcare IT News.), with the lower priority on health that is possible from the incoming Trump administration, only time will tell if such optimism is justified.