And why is it even necessary? If you are a wide consumer of online media, including LinkedIn (oy!), all too many articles and videos are either AI-generated or heavily edited by AI. It’s not just grammar and spelling cleanup anymore (tools which this Editor happily uses, along with her own rolling edits). It has little to do with em versus en dashes or the stringing together of clichés in a Perfectly Processed Article.
TTA, whether written by your Editor Donna, Editor Emeritus Steve, or a guest post, is not written by AI. And we won’t be. (My 6 month layoff should be proof therein!). No AI slop here whether generative or agentic, except as In The News.
Steve Hards put it very well some years back. From the sidebar:
Telecare Aware’s editors concentrate on what we perceive to be significant events and technological and other developments in telecare and telehealth. We make no apology for being independent and opinionated or for trying to be interesting rather than comprehensive.
We don’t cover everything and don’t plan to. This perhaps makes us far less marketable than some of our sources, which don’t deviate much from the press releases or the packaged interviews because it pumps up the volume with only a few people writing. Yes, just like Joe Friday on Dragnet (=UK, Jack Regan on The Sweeney who was about 50x rougher than Joe at his worst), we start with just the facts, a/k/a the 5 Ws: who, what, when, where, and why. Sometimes that’s all that’s needed or wanted. But usually, there’s more to the story. I then fill out the background and then opine on What This All Means and why it’s interesting. And yes, we are opinionated, especially when there are broken promises, fraud, or lies, which I no lika.
In increasingly processed and reprocessed media, this Editor (Donna) wants to acknowledge the exceptions. They dive deep and make some major machers (Yiddish for ‘big shot’ or ‘movers and shakers’) uncomfortable. #1 in afflicting the comfortable–Sergei Polevikov. His Substack ‘AI Health Uncut’ goes where no one else does and is so jammed with facts/original research it is often a hard read. It’s linked on the sidebar and yes, requires a moderate subscription fee. #2 to me is MedCityNews‘ EIC Arundhati Parmar, with an honorable mention to Katie Adams. (See this Must Read from last February)
AI content has its place, but not here. For better or worse, irredeemably, Written 100% by a Human. For our Readers, thanks for staying with us especially after last year’s long hiatus. And thank you, Legrand, for continuing to advertise. (Your company can too.)
Do you want to try out writing for something like this? Contact Editor Donna.
(Editor’s Final Thoughts: Two handy guides to spotting (or fixing when you must) AI-generated content: Optimizely and in plain sales-oriented language, Troy Harrison’s blog.)
Most Recent Comments