Mid-week roundup: another hurdle for Oracle Cerner VA delay, Walmart builds out clinic infrastructure, Cerebral round 3 layoff of 15%, Evolent Health’s 9% layoff, Quil Health age-in-place tech shuts

March 1, 2023 | by

Oracle Cerner EHR rollout faces yet another hurdle. The Department of  Veterans Affairs (VA) announced that the next go-live, Ann Arbor (Michigan) Healthcare System, originally scheduled for completion by July 2023, would be delayed until much later this year or even early 2024.  It turns out that a key reason for the delay is that Ann Arbor is a VA research center, and there are major concerns that the EHR changeover won’t blend well with their medical research. VA Under Secretary for Health Dr. Shereef Elnahal told FedScoop during a media roundtable that “…there are many VA medical centers that are heavy with clinical research because of their academic affiliations, and so those centers will need this research functionality. It’s not just an issue with the Ann Arbor Hospital.” In the article, Dr. Elnahal also lamented that the VA health system running on two separate EHRs, VistA and Oracle Cerner, presented additional risks to security. Also FedHealthIT   Hat tip to HISTalk 24 Feb

Walmart’s 32 clinics are building out their infrastructure. Working with their Epic EHR, all the clinics are now operating on the Horizon Cloud on Azure platform paired with VMware cloud infrastructure and digital workspace technology services. A blog published by VMware interviewing BreAnne Buehl, director of life sciences solutions for VMware, and David Rhew, MD, global chief medical officer at Microsoft, details the ambitions of Walmart to move beyond ‘minute clinic’ to broader primary care and chronic disease management, into proactive predictive analytics. Becker’s Hospital Review, VMWare

And on the less cheerful side:

  • Beleaguered telemental health/ADHD provider/prescriber Cerebral announced another 15% layoff, cutting 285 people. It is its third layoff in one year, following a 20% cut last October.  Cerebral is also closing its medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program for opioid use disorder (OUD). A Cerebral spokesperson said the decisions were made to reorganize the company to “refocus on the most important service offerings for our patients.” Another reason for the MAT program closing is the pending renewal of requiring in-person visits for certain mental health medications. For instance, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is proposing that buprenorphine can be prescribed via telehealth for treating OUD for 30 days but then an in-person exam would be required.  Last year, Cerebral faced still-unresolved DOJ and FTC actions on their telehealth prescribing of ADHD and other controlled Schedule 2 medications, from deceptive advertising (FTC) to overprescribing (DOJ) [TTA 18 Nov 22]. Topping this off are dueling lawsuits with former CEO Kyle Robertson [TTA 30 Nov 22]. Cerebral at the end of 2021 was valued at $4.8 billion by Softbank and other investors, but no one wants to talk about its worth today.  Reuters, Layoffs Tracker, Behavioral Health Business
  • Payer/provider management services organization Evolent Health quietly laid off 460 positions in its Chicago operations, about 9% of their 5,100 person staff, starting in December 2022 into last month.  Their Q4 net loss doubled to $11.25 million on $382 million in revenue, doubling 2021’s $5.65 million loss, though full year 2022 closed with a final loss of $19 million, about half of 2021. The company projects Q1 revenue of $420 million to $440 million, with 2023 revenue of $1.92 billion to $1.96 billion with a shift of emphasis to specialty care, bolstered by its closed acquisition in January of Magellan Specialty Health from Centene. Layoffs Tracker, Washington Business Journal
  • Quil Health shut down operations, with employees departing 10 February and executives 24 February. The Philadelphia-based Comcast-Independence Blue Cross joint venture was founded in 2018 to support older adults and caregivers in ‘aging-in-place’ alert and monitoring technology. The sole report in HISTalk states that the website is offline plus their CEO Carina Edwards updated her LinkedIn profile for Quil with a February 2023 end date and changed the company description to past tense, pushing up her board positions. Their Facebook page is still live but no posts after 16 January after announcing their joining the AARP AgeTechCollaborative. In 2019, this Editor wrote that they were developing pre- and post-care support through TV (!) with Comcast working on an ambient sensor-based device to monitor basic vital signs and fall detection, which launched in 2020 as Quil Assure. To this Editor, it sounded like a home version of QuietCare circa 2009 with multiple sensors and diagnostics. 

Should your healthcare organization become a public benefit corporation (PBC)?

February 24, 2023 | by

Is it this year’s ‘IT’ social trend–or a way to return companies to their purpose? Public benefit corporations (PBCs) are finding a foothold within healthcare and digital health organizations. Developed in 2010, the PBC form is a for-profit corporation that is structured to pursue a social mission and recognized in that structure to create a long-term public good or benefit by providing services and generating revenue. It can be publicly traded (though relatively rare). 36 states, including the ever-popular Delaware, and the District of Columbia permit PBCs to be formed. In terms of corporate accountability, achieving their stated social mission or purpose must work alongside maximizing value for shareholders. Otherwise, they are structured like standard for-profit corporations. 

Examples of healthcare PBCs are Aledade (practice management services in value-based care models which just acquired Curia in VBC analytics), Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drugs, Osmind (behavioral EHR), and startup Crescendo Health (health data). Other well-known PBCs are Lemonade (insurance), Veeva (cloud software for life sciences), Patagonia (clothing), Ben & Jerry’s (unusually within Unilever), and Coursera (online learning). Companies like Veeva have converted from traditional publicly traded corporations to PBC.

Would this form be right for your company? From what this Editor has read (see below) if the company is truly purpose-driven from the top and the bottom. A PBC company’s board of directors is required to balance its mission/purpose with the financial interests of shareholders and investors. A mission focus can be attractive to both. It also orients management on the long term versus living and dying by quarter-to-quarter performance. Part of this can be environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. For many companies in healthcare that are oriented to service and to benefit health (beyond the loose ‘transformation’) but must generate profitable revenue, a PBC can differentiate your company from competitors that are standard corporations that answer to VCs and PEs. 

Intertwined with this is the B Corporation (B Corp) certification, granted by a third-party organization called B Lab. It is not necessary to be a PBC to have it but it helps the ‘look’. Like most third-party certifications, it’s a high and distracting bar, requiring assessments and changes in corporate governance, and has to be renewed every three years. (This Editor worked for an internationally known travel organization starting with an ‘A’ before healthcare that attempted to achieve the Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award after high scores with J.D. Power. That effort served to distract everyone for an entire year from real business. And then we missed! And then we got bought–and moved!)   FierceHealthcare, Kiplinger’s, US News, 

News roundup: UHG closes $5.4B LHC deal, Teladoc’s record $13.7B ’22 loss, Olive AI divesting UM, Cigna exec can’t join CVS, VA anti-suicide program awards, Equiva-Infiniti ACP initiative, Newel Health’s Parkinson’s device

February 23, 2023 | by

UnitedHealth Group added more home care to its Optum unit with the close of the LHC Group deal on 22 February. Final cost was $5.4 billion or $170 per share of the now-delisted Nasdaq company. The acquisition was announced in March and survived two reviews: a request from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for additional information which held up the close past the original December date and a shareholder suit on ‘material nondisclosure’ in the SEC filing. FTC requested information on worker pay and ‘vertical harm’ on market competition, but did not proceed with further action prior to the closing. LHC Group serves 960 locations in 37 states, with 30,000 employees and revenue of $2.2 billion last year. The original announcement indicated that the Louisiana-based management team will be coming over to Optum Health and co-founders Keith and Ginger Myers will personally invest $10 million in UHG following the acquisition close. Interestingly, as of today (Thursday noon ET), neither company has announced the closing on their websites. Home Health News, FierceHealthcare  For those into value-based care, as previously noted, Optum is acquiring via LHC Imperium Health, a good-sized ACO, population health, and management services company. It’s another fit as Optum is a major physician group owner, many of whom are also in ACOs, and made LHC even more attractive. According to their website, Imperium now manages 16 ACOs and is in partnership with a large ACO group. 

Unsurprisingly, Teladoc notched a record loss for 2022– $13.7 billion on revenue of $2.4 billion. This included the Q1 2022 $6.6 billion write-off of the Livongo acquisition. On the investor call, company executives scaled down 2023 revenue forecasts to $2.55-$2.68 billion, which is about 9% growth. Teladoc remains at about 80 million members. The company’s ‘balanced growth’ plan to move toward profitability has already resulted in January’s announcement of 6% of staff being laid off and a reduced geographic footprint, presumably including real estate and leases. Healthcare Dive, HISTalk 2/24/23 which also cross-references the MedCityNews Livongo ‘lemon’ interview

Olive AI continues to shrink and juggle, with today’s announcement of their putting their utilization management service line up for sale. Earlier, they announced divesting their population health and 340B service lines to a sister company. The UM line buyer would take on the accounts and the 100-person staff. Olive AI is an automator of routine health system administration tasks such as these. Their pivot will be in automating revenue cycle management for health systems. Last week, Olive announced the release of 215 employees, about 35% of its remaining staff, in addition to its July layoff of 450 employees, then about 33% of staff. If this Editor’s calculations are correct, Olive is down to about 900 or less. Becker’s  Original report in Axios is paywalled, but indicates problems with the software’s efficacy, multiple executive departures, and a previous asset sale.

Yes, Virginia–non-competes ARE enforceable. So Amy Bricker, Cigna’s former head of pharmacy benefits unit Express Scripts, found out when she tried to join CVS as a senior executive as chief product officer for its consumer area, not Caremark which is a direct competitor. She had signed a two-year non-compete/non-disclosure barring her from any employment with any direct competitor. Cigna apparently imposes non-competes on only their most senior executives, a total of 16. This is a temporary restraining order from the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to bar her from joining the company, duration unknown. Cigna had to post a $250,000 bond for possible future damages. FTC (again) is attempting to ban non-compete use both in future and retroactively. Restraining order, Healthcare Finance News, Healthcare Dive

Some blue side up news: 

  • Mission Daybreak Grand Challenge awarded by the VA. 10 companies were awarded $20 million to pursue digital health approaches to prevent veteran suicide as part of a 10-year VA initiative. The first-place winners were Stop Soldier Suicide and Televeda, awarded $3 million each. Healthcare IT News has additional details on all the finalists.
  • Digital health is leveraging an existing $14.2 billion FCC initiative called the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP). Two companies, Equiva Health, a digital patient engagement and health relationship management solution provider, is partnering with internet provider Infiniti Mobile to create Equiva ACP Connect. The product configures tablets and mobile devices for care management and patient education distributed by hospitals, nursing homes, insurers, and other healthcare organizations. Release
  • Newel Health has received a grant from the Michael J. Fox Foundation to further development for Soturi, a digital therapeutic solution for Parkinson’s disease management. Soturi utilizes data collected from a wearable sensor, using an algorithm-based decision-making method, for personalized treatment. The project will be presented at the SINdem conference in Bressanone, Italy on 24th February. Release (PharmaPhorum)

Breaking: Amazon closes One Medical $3.9B buy, despite loose ends–and is the Antitrust Bear being poked?

February 23, 2023 | by

The Big Deal closes, but loose ends and larger issues remain. Today’s news of Amazon closing its purchase of the One Medical primary care group is being received in the press, especially the healthcare press, enthusiastically. This Editor cannot blame her counterparts, as since last year there’s not been much in the way of good news, compared to 2020-21’s bubble bath. Her bet as of a couple of weeks ago was that the deal would not go through due to Amazon’s financial losses in 2022 and/or that the FTC would further hold it up, both of which I was wrong, wrong, wrong on. (Cue the fresh egg on the face.)

Wiping off said egg, here is what Amazon is buying and their first marketing move. (Information on size and more from the 1 Life 2022 year end 10-K):

  • Amazon acquired 1Life Healthcare Inc. for $3.9 billion, or $18 per share in cash.
  • The practices are primarily branded as One Medical, closing out 2022 with 836,000 members and 220 medical offices in 27 markets
  • It is a value-based primary care model with direct consumer enrollment and third-party sponsorship across commercially insured and Medicare populations. Their Net Promoter Score (NPS) is an extremely high 90. (NPS is a proprietary research metric that indicates customer loyalty and satisfaction.)
  • They also have at-risk members from the $2.1 billion Iora Medical acquisition in seven states, in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare shared savings value-based care (VBC) arrangements [TTA 27 July 22].
  • One Medical has contracts with over 9,000 companies, establishing Amazon at long last in the desirable corporate market.
  • One Medical also provides a 24/7 telehealth service exclusively to employees of enterprise customers where there are no clinics.
  • Amazon will be offering a discounted individual membership of $144 versus $199 for the first year, without an Amazon Prime subscription.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which had additional questions about the buy as part of a Second Request in the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act reporting process, did not act in time to prevent the closing. Nor did the SEC or DOJ. This is CEO Andy Jassy’s first Big Deal at Amazon and certainly, the champagne and kvelling are flowing at HQ plus One Medical’s investors and shareholders for a successful exit. But should Amazon be looking over their shoulder? 

What are the open issues? Is a large, hungry Bear called Antitrust being poked, or lying in wait for its prey?

  • The FTC has the right to probe into the transaction despite the closing and a deadline passing for antitrust review. In FierceHealthcare and STAT, FTC spokesman Douglas Farrar is quoted as telling the WSJ (paywalled) in a statement that “The FTC’s investigation of Amazon’s acquisition of One Medical continues. The commission will continue to look at possible harms to competition created by this merger as well as possible harms to consumers that may result from Amazon’s control and use of sensitive consumer health information held by One Medical.”
  • As previously reported here, only in December did the FTC send out subpoenas to current and former One Medical current and former customers as part of its investigation. That’s late to stop a buy–unless FTC had something else larger in mind.
  • Early February reports in Bloomberg and the WSJ indicated that this may be part of a larger FTC action in developing a wide-ranging antitrust lawsuit against Amazon on multiple anticompetitive business practices. Their chair, Lina Khan, is highly critical of Amazon’s business practices. Amazon’s buy of iRobot, maker of Roomba, which at $1.7 billion was a comparative snack, is still not closed and has received a lot of negative attention for possible misuse of consumer information. 
  • Sidebar: This FTC is ‘feeling its oats’ on antitrust. GoodRx found itself making history as FTC’s first culprit of the 2009 Health Breach Notification Rule, used to prosecute companies for misuse of consumer health information. This was for their past use of Meta Pixel, discontinued 2019, to send information to third-party advertisers. One Medical is a HIPAA-covered entity which puts it at a far higher risk level. 
  • The Department of Justice (DOJ) has not publicly moved to approve or disapprove–yet. 
  • The change of ownership has not been reported as passing muster by regulators in multiple states. Example: Oregon approved it, but with multiple stipulations [TTA 6 Jan]–and there are only five One Medical clinics in Oregon. States like New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and California are not exactly pushovers for approval, with California alone having two approval entities.
  • Congress is increasingly feisty on data privacy–consumer health information and its misuse in telehealth [TTA 9 Feb]. 

Will this be ‘buy now, regret later’, a lá Teladoc’s expensive acquisition of Livongo, or Babylon Health going public with a SPAC? Is this a clever trap laid for Amazon?

  • Amazon is already under a Federal and state microscope on data privacy. Information crossing over from One Medical to their ecommerce operations such as Pharmacy and Prime will just add to the picture. 
  • Accepting Medicare/Medicare Advantage increases scrutiny on quality metrics and billing, to name only two areas. At-risk patients in Medicare and other VBC models, especially Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) fall under CMS scrutiny. Amazon may take a look at that and spin-off/sell off the former Iora Health practices/patients.
  • Amazon has failed in healthcare previously, as a partner in the misbegotten Haven and in its own Amazon Care ‘home delivery’/telehealth model selling to companies, now closed. Its asynchronous virtual care service, Amazon Clinic, is too new to judge its success. 
  • Office-based, brick-and-mortar healthcare provided by doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals is an entirely new area for Amazon. Will they be satisfied with their new masters–and new metrics? It is also expensive. One Medical has never been profitable and did not project breakeven for years. (If one asks how this is different than CVS acquiring Oak Street Health, or Walgreens acquiring VillageMD and Summit Health, CVS and Walgreens have experience for decades in multiple aspects of providing healthcare–profitably and in compliance.)
  • One wonders how heavy of a hand Amazon will place on One Medical’s operations. How their management, doctors, and other professionals will feel after a year or two of Amazon ownership is anyone’s guess. This Editor doubts they will remain in place or silent if unhappy.
  • Selling to enterprises–and account retention–is a vastly different relationship-building process and buyer journey than 1:many consumer transactions. One Medical made a go of it with 9,000 companies and enrolling employees at about a 40% rate, so they did something right. By contrast, Amazon failed to sell Amazon Care well to companies. Humility and service, for starters, are required.
  • Last but certainly not least, is how Amazon will deal with regulation and compliance at multiple levels.

Expect that the FTC and DOJ will not be done with Amazon any time soon in what looks like a wider antitrust pursuit that may take some time, which they have. Amazon has tens of millions in government business (AWS) at stake and shareholders expecting a reversal of losses. Pro tip to Amazon: run One Medical as a separate operation with minimal integration and no information sharing until past this. And then some.  Healthcare Dive, Becker’s

Breaking: AliveCor wins presidential review on ITC Final Determination on Apple patent infringement

February 22, 2023 | by

Enforcement held for PTAB appeal decision. As anticipated after the International Trade Commission (ITC) decision, finding that Apple Watches infringed three AliveCor patents on ECG readings [TTA 3 Jan], the Final Determination issued 22 December 2022 has passed the 60-day mandatory presidential review and is now in effect.

The penalty in the bond assessed against Apple–$2 per watch–applies to Apple Watches with the ECG feature imported or sold during the presidential review period. It is the first Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) with a cease and desist order against Apple. However, the penalty cannot be enforced until AliveCor’s appeal of the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) ruling is decided. PTAB’s ruling in early December not only ruled that Apple did not infringe on AliveCor’s patents, but also threw out the AliveCor patents that were the basis for the infringement as unpatentable: No. 10,595,731 (“the ’731 patent”); No. 10,638,941 (“the ’941 patent”); and No. 9,572,499 (“the ’499 patent”) in their Apple Watches 4, 5, and 6.

The PTAB appeal is in progress. AliveCor also has a separate action against Apple through its Federal antitrust case in the Northern District of California. That will not go to trial until early 2024. AliveCor has about 170 patents, but the loss of any patents is important to a company’s IP and ultimately, funding. It’s also a clear signal to innovative companies that a David can win against a Goliath. AliveCor release

Digital technology falling (even) short(er) in NHS nursing: QNI report (UK)

February 9, 2023 | by | 2 Comments

When health tech ‘magic’–isn’t. Roy Lilley and his several times per week newsletter (NHSManagers.net, subscribe here) are really must reads for our UK readers dealing with the foibles of the NHS and NHS Digital. Billions have been poured into digitization of records and equipping district (community) nurses with laptops and access to apps that connect them to patient information. All of which is apparently, a flop for the money spent. 

The Queen’s Nursing Institute (QNI) has published a study, Nursing in the Digital Age 2023, via its data gathering and analytics area, the International Community Nursing Observatory (ICNO). It obviously should be microscope-read by NHS Digital, but also by US developers (and in other countries) with clinical users. (Oracle Cerner, Epic, and 00’s of EHRs and workflow apps–take notice).

Mr. Lilley outlines the level of failure here–from his article: 

  • 5 yrs ago; 32.7% reported problems with lack of compatibility between different computer systems… in 2022 the figure had risen to 43.1%.
  • 5 yrs ago; around 85% of respondents reported issues with mobile connectivity… in 2022 this figure was around 87%.
  • 5 yrs ago; 29.5% reported problems with device battery life… in 2022 the figure was almost 53%.

The overall take of the QNI study is that nurses are highly digitally literate and embrace technology at scale, but in practice, the apps and the hardware have become impediments as the workload increases. For non-UK readers, district nurses travel a lot, often working from home–akin to home care or rural nurses in the US. Points from their executive summary:

  • Hardware–battery life, weight of laptop, old laptops, ergonomics not only from weight but also when working in cars. Safety and confidentiality issues lead many nurses to take the work home, leading to delays.
  • Software–connectivity, authentication, multiple platforms, little integration, repetition of data entry, and poor connectivity and software design leading to interrupted workflows.
  • Some scheduling tools cause workload issues, such as over-allocation of work, unmanageable workloads and loss of personal autonomy.
  • Systems design–impersonal, designed to act as a barrier to interacting with patients.
  • Duplicative workload–repetition with dual entry on paper and into platforms because of poor connectivity and software design
  • The use of electronic health records (EHR) and similar platforms was mixed in terms of productivity gains and work capture. 

Another issue: “Moving technology-enabled care (remote monitoring) to the community appears to have shifted work from the hospital to the community”, meaning an increased workload on nurses where specialists or non-nursing staff could do this. 

Mr. Lilley summarizes as a service what both the hardware and software should be accomplishing:

Just ten simple things:

  1. Who is the patient,
  2. where have they come from.
  3. See their record, have they been sick before and…
  4. What we did we do?
  5. Anything in their history that’s a red flag?
  6. What do we do to fix them up this time and…
  7. Record how we did it.
  8. Figure out what worked,
  9. What did it cost and…
  10. Do we want to do it again.

Both Mr. Lilley’s newsletter and the study (PDF) are must reads wherever you live. Especially if you are a software designer.

No wonder nurses are single-day rolling striking!

(He also has an interesting take on ChatGPT, AI for copywriting and reporting, which we will take on next week….) Hat tip to Editor Emeritus Steve.

Ad tracker action heats up: Congress questions DTC telehealth companies on sensitive patient health data sent to advertisers

February 9, 2023 | by

It looks like telemental and addiction counseling telehealth sites are routinely sending patient information to media ad platforms–Google, Facebook (Meta), TikTok, Microsoft, Snapchat, Bing, Pinterest, and Twitter–to serve ads back to patients. Four Senators sent letters this week to three telehealth companies treating patients: Monument (alcohol addiction), Workit Health (opioid and alcohol), and Cerebral (ADHD and other mental health). The letters questioned the use of ad trackers (pixels) such as Meta Pixel that collect information from telehealth sites and then use the information to send users targeted ads based on that information. Except that this is not about curtains or shoes, but medical treatment. 

Kicking this off was The Markup/STAT study in December, examining 50 telehealth websites.

  • 49 of 50 websites shared user/patient tracking data to advertising platforms. This captured data as routine as URLs and IPs, and as extensive as name, email, phone, questionnaire answers, when users created accounts, and cart behavior, such as a prescription medication or treatment plan.
  • 35 were found by the study to have trackers sending individually identifying information to at least one media platform that included names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • 25 had at least one tracker that indicated when users added prescription drugs and other items to their cart or when they checked out with a subscription for a treatment plan
  • 13 had at least one tracker that collected patients’ answers to medical questions

Ad trackers then send that information to platforms, which then serve targeted ads back to the telehealth companies’ users and patients. For the telehealth companies, the data is monetized. Because ads are served, there is a revenue stream back to the telehealth companies. 

From the senators’ letter: “This data is extremely personal, and it can be used to target advertisements for services that may be unnecessary or potentially harmful physically, psychologically, or emotionally.” Markup/STAT

Users may well assume that because the telehealth companies eventually connect them to a provider covered by HIPAA, or sends them a prescription from a provider, such as migraine treatment, that their data is protected along the entire journey. That assumption has now been demonstrated to be incorrect. This included major, heavily advertised DTC providers such as Lemonaid, Keeps, Hims & Hers, Talkspace, and Roman (Ro). Many of them are now examining their pixel policies.

The December article linked above has all 50 companies and what information they found was sent to ad platforms. The only website that did not was Amazon Clinic–brand new and of course not wanting to share their information outside of Amazon.

This follows on the FTC’s still to be approved by a Federal court, but apparently successful $1.5 million action against med discounter GoodRx using the never-used-before Health Breach Notification Rule, enacted in 2009 [TTA 3 Feb]. 

Why this is significant: first, the FTC action using an old rule, followed by the senators targeting three prominent (and in Cerebral’s case, beleaguered) telehealth companies, and the red meat documentation provided by The Markup/STAT study provide grounds for endless follow-up by not only Congress, but also private and public (DOJ) litigation. Stay tuned.

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) found in over 90% of deceased NFL player brains: BU study

February 9, 2023 | by

A topic TTA extensively covered from 2012 up to end of 2017 was long term brain damage created by repeated concussive, and likely sub-concussive, head impacts, culminating in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) which can only be diagnosed after death. Your Editor was privileged to attend presentations by researchers from Boston University (BU) and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) in 2013 at NYC’s German Center for Research and Innovation and by BU’s Robert Stern, MD, at NYC’s MedTech in 2014 (indexed here).

In time for the Big Game known as the Super Bowl is the timely release by the Boston University CTE Center of their latest findings, and it will give anyone who plays contact sports caution. 

Out of 376 former National Football League (NFL) players studied, 345 were confirmed to have died with CTE–91.7%. The norm is around 0.6%, and the lone person with it was a former college football player (2018 study by BU of 164 brains of men and women donated to the Framingham Heart Study). CTE is characterized by misfolded tau protein that is unique and unlike changes observed from aging, Alzheimer’s disease, or any other brain disease.

Ironically, former players of teams in this Sunday’s Super Bowl LVII between the Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City Chiefs were included in this study–former Eagles quarterback Rick Arrington, who played three seasons for the Eagles from 1970-73, and former Chiefs defensive tackle Ed Lothamer, who played for them in the very first Super Bowl and was a member of their winning team in Super Bowl IV.

The CTE Center cautions that the 91% quoted in the study should not be interpreted as a current/past player number, as the brain bank samples are subject to selection bias. The families donate the brains because their loved ones had the personality changes and debility in their final years, often in middle age and younger, that characterize CTE. 

In the past five years, CTE has been increasingly recognized as a risk in contact sports and in repeated concussion. According to the release, “In October 2022, the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), a branch of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), updated their position on what causes CTE: “CTE is a delayed neurodegenerative disorder that was initially identified in postmortem brains and, research-to-date suggests, is caused in part by repeated traumatic brain injuries.” Research is ongoing on whether sub-concussive head trauma, easy to overlook, may be a contributing or causative factor.

There are also five active CTE Center clinical studies designed to learn how to diagnose and treat CTE. Project S.A.V.E. (Study of Axonal and Vascular Effects) is actively recruiting 50+ adults who  played 5+ years of a contact sport, including American football, ice hockey, soccer, lacrosse, boxing, full contact martial arts, rugby and wrestling. BU CTE Center release.  The Daily Mail has a surprisingly  comprehensive article on the BU research, relatively young former players who killed themselves and others who turned out to have CTE, and (in this Editor’s opinion) the NFL’s limited efforts in providing for research funding, changing play/practice, and for league awareness. 

CVS opens the checkbook, does the Oak Street Health deal for a generous $10.6B

February 9, 2023 | by

Staying on strategy, CVS buys provider group Oak Street Health. First rumored in mid-January, CVS Health and Oak Street finalized their deal today. The $10.6 billion purchase price of the NYSE traded company rewards shareholders with a $39 per share purchase price. 45% of the shareholders are composed of Newlight Partners LP and General Atlantic LLC plus certain members of the Oak Street Health Board of Directors. They have agreed to vote the shares they own in favor of the transaction (with a whew! at exiting). It is expected to close this year subject to the usual Department of Justice antitrust, Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state-level review.

The $39 per share price was a tick lower than the January speculation that the price would be over $40 per share. $39 is not bad; at close of last week OSH was trading at $26.80, a far cry from its 2021 share prices in the $50-60 range. Today’s price closed at just above $35.  It has 169 offices and 600 providers across 21 states, making it a manageable size for CVS. OSH is headquartered in Chicago. Their CEO Mike Pykosz will continue to lead OSH, which will become part of CVS’ new Health Care Delivery organization and will be payer agnostic.  Oak Street is notable for serving underserved patient populations–50 percent of Oak Street Health’s patients have a housing, food or isolation risk factor.  

CVS Health’s long term plan, announced at recent earnings calls, is to add services in three categories: primary care, provider enablement, and home health. They are not hurting for profit or financing, closing out 2022 with $4.2 billion profit which certainly is a shining star in the depressed healthcare sky. CVS projects more than $500 million in synergy potential at the 2026 goal which is over 300 centers by 2026. But there will be losses first: 2023 loss about $200 million and not turning the profit corner till 2025 at earliest. An attractive point for CVS is  Canopy, their proprietary technology that determines the appropriate type and level of care for each OSH patient–and care integrates nicely into CVS Health’s community, home and digital offerings, as they say.

Will DOJ allow it without divestment? This administration has already taken a fairly hard tack on antitrust, trying (and failing, though appealing) to block UHG-Change Healthcare. Already the CVS-OSH tie-up has been opposed by an antitrust think tank, the American Economic Liberties Project. Oak Street adds primary care practices to those already under Aetna, many of which are in Federal ACO programs. Signify Health also has Medicare ACO practice groups, including the Caravan ACOs bought late last year. The Signify buy is already under a rolling DOJ and FTC review that has been moving slowly since last October. Signify’s other strength is diversification into home health, CVS’ third target area.

CVS’ investment in Carbon Health ($100 million Series D investment into primary and urgent care clinics in Western states) may be considered as Carbon will be piloting clinics in CVS retail locations. Release, Mobihealthnews, Healthcare Dive, Becker’s (including a breakdown of CVS’ 2022 financials), FierceHealthcare

Amazon gets all tangled up on their $3.9B One Medical buy as FTC widens antitrust scrutiny

February 7, 2023 | by

Amazon’s ride towards being the #1 threat to healthcare hits an oncoming train. A report in stock analysis newsletter Seeking Alpha, picked up from other sources (the subscription Dealreporter), states that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) hired outside economists to scrutinize Amazon’s $3.9 billion purchase of provider network One Medical (1 Life Healthcare). In a little-noticed action in early December, FTC also sent out subpoenas to current and former One Medical current and former customers as part of its investigation.

Both the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg (paywalled) are reporting that this appears to be part of a larger FTC action in developing a wide-ranging antitrust lawsuit against Amazon on multiple anticompetitive business practices. In a recent example, FTC held up Amazon’s acquisition of iRobot (Roomba) during the summer, and in September, requested information from 1 Life and Amazon above and beyond the usual required Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) reports reviewed by the FTC and DOJ [TTA 15 Sept 2022]. This examination has been going on for some years, across two administrations, but may come to fruition as early as this spring. The main investigation is around Amazon favoring its own products, how it treats outside sellers on its platform, and copycatting the products of outside sellers. It may also cover Amazon Prime bundling practices. Prime also plays into its healthcare strategy. FierceHealthcare

Another factor: the highly profitable growth of Amazon Web Services (AWS) has taken a nosedive along with the cloud market, killing Amazon’s growth and value, according to Seeking Alpha’s analysis (may be paywalled). Amazon is also closing or pausing already built-out food stores–Fresh supermarkets and Go convenience shops–ending a long-term commitment to developing them.

When all of these factors are combined with Amazon’s 18,000 layoffs and huge 2022 net loss of $2.7 billion, it’s hard to believe that Amazon now has enough blue sky fisc to make the huge investment and long-term commitment that a largely new and cash-intensive business, delivering healthcare through real live providers in offices, will require. Amazon’s current health business is either transactional virtual retail (Pharmacy and the new non-face-to-face Amazon Clinic for virtual medical referrals) or hardware+subscription (Halo)–areas that Amazon knows well. But managing an entirely new and complex area that provides expensive and regulated provider services?

This Editor will go out on a wintry limb and predict that Amazon, facing FTC and state anticompetitive actions plus plenty of shareholder profit pressure , will cancel the deal with One Medical–leaving One Medical on another limb.

Week-end roundup: more House actions on telehealth benefits, VA EHR; Oracle exec moves to FDA digital health; Angle Health raises $58M; layoffs at Akili, Innovaccer, Athenahealth, Mindstrong

February 4, 2023 | by

Has the House in this 118th Congress acquired a propensity for taking fast action? It seems that under the new Speaker, the House on both sides, though divided, is energized and responding to changes that would benefit worker health–and perhaps find a way out of the VA Tower of Trouble that would ultimately benefit veteran care.

The first is a short (four page) bipartisan bill still in draft, the Telehealth Benefit Expansion for Workers Act, that would amend current law in the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers to provide telehealth to employees as excepted benefits. This allows employers to finance an additional benefit not covered under their primary health plan. Examples of excepted benefits are vision and dental plans. Sponsors of the bill are Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) as lead and co-sponsors  Tim Walberg (D-MI), Angie Craig (D-MN), Ron Estes (R-KS), Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ), and Rick Allen (R-GA). This builds upon the Medicare and other plan reimbursement expansions contained in the omnibus budget plan passed in the 117th Congress that extended telehealth in high-deductible health plans with health savings accounts (HSAs). At this point, the bill is not numbered, submitted, or on Congress.gov. HealthcareITNews

Not addressed in this bill or any other is whether the extensions will cover hospital-at-home remote patient monitoring (RPM) that was permitted under waivers during the Public Health Emergency (PHE). With its scheduled 11 May end, the Connected Health Initiative (CHI) believes that CMS will not allow remote monitoring to continue in hospital-at-home programs, under current reimbursement and devices. CHI had sent Congress at the end of January a list of their priorities and they’ve received a hearing, but no action has been taken yet. Healthcare Finance

The second is a House bill that would support solving the issues around the VA implementation of the Oracle Cerner EHR without returning to VistA. This is being proposed by Democrats on the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee. According to FedScoop, which broke the story, this is being worked on as an alternative to Rep. Matt Rosendale’s H.R. 608 which would pull the plug on Oracle Cerner and revert back to VistA [TTA 1 Feb]. Exactly how this bill would solve Oracle Health’s issues with Cerner Millenium and support VA in continuing that EHR implementation after June is not specified. FedScoop’s source told them that “the proposal may have a wider scope than prior attempts at legislative oversight and could involve a complete rethink of how other IT projects are conducted within the agency. This proposal is focused at a higher level than just one program.” The lack of specificity in this broad brush is not precisely reassuring, but a bipartisan ‘game on’ by both parties on Veterans Affairs, perhaps a ‘good cop/bad cop’ treatment, could be an effective ‘nowhere to hide’ approach with Oracle. Becker’s

Oracle’s loss, FDA’s gain. Troy Tazbaz, formerly Oracle’s senior VP heading up their cloud transformation efforts, joined FDA as Director of their Center of Digital Health Excellence. In that capacity, he will be in charge of technology evaluation, policy development and strategic partnerships for safe healthcare use of digital technologies that advance public health. Certainly he is tanned, rested, and ready: Mr. Tazbaz  left Oracle last September and used part of that time to achieve a dream of bicycling from Chesapeake Bay in Maryland to San Francisco Bay over 58 days. FierceHealthcare

Employer insurer Angle Health raised a $58 million Series A. Lead was Portage Ventures, along with PruVen Capital, Wing Venture Capital, SixThirty Ventures, Mighty Capital, and several others. Angle’s angle is to act as a fully digital, full-stack insurance carrier that delivers comprehensive healthcare benefits tailored to startups and technology companies on one platform. Their baseline telehealth offering covers primary care, urgent care and behavioral health, outsourced to Included Health. They bundle this with administrative services and care navigation, and use the First Health and Cigna PPO networks according to their website. Angle recently expanded from Utah into Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri, and South Carolina. Release, FierceHealthcare

Unfortunately, layoffs continue in and out of healthcare as funding and usage go south:

  • Akili Interactive in January cut 30% of staff, or 46 people. Akili has developed cognitive therapies for ADHD and other mental illness, including EndeavorRx, a prescription treatment delivered through a video game. Non-ADHD therapies have been put on hold. They announced going public via a SPAC in January 2022 via a merger with Social Capital Suvretta Holdings Corp. I which closed last August at over $14, and are currently trading at $1.92. Mobihealthnews
  • Innovaccer, a health data analytics company, later in January laid off 15%, or 245 people, in the US and India, to concentrate on their ‘core portfolio’. This is their second layoff round;  90 people or 8% went in September. This was quite a turnaround to their sunny-side up 2021, where they raised Series D and E rounds totaling $255 million backed by Tiger Global, Whale Rock, Mubadala Group, and Microsoft M12, achieving a unicorn valuation over $3 billion.  Mobihealthnews, Inc42.com
  • Athenahealth yesterday released 178, or 3% of its staff, two months after going private. They pointed to overhiring, a sluggish recovery in doctor visits, and inflation. They plan to release or move to less expensive office space in their current cities of Watertown, MA and Austin, TX. Boston Globe
  • In yet another sign that virtual mental health’s boom is deflating sharply, Silicon Valley-based Mindstrong is essentially shutting down. Almost all of its C-suite including the CEO and CFO are gone plus an additional 128 jobs including therapists. It is closing its headquarters and is ceasing patient services as of 10 March, yet is still recruiting on its website. Employees are departing between 24 March and 15 April, when presumably the last one out the door will turn out the lights.  Mindstrong raised over $160 million since 2014 including a $100 million Series C in 2020. Behavioral Health Business

News roundup: GoodRx pays $1.5M to FTC on Meta Pixel use, ATA concerns on Covid PHE end, defending Livongo sale to Teladoc, Philips lays off 18K, Amazon health layoffs–and big ’22 loss, Ireland HSE digital head quits, Matt Hancock assaulted on Tube

February 3, 2023 | by

Rounding up the week–and it’s not over. 

Prescription discounter GoodRx settled with the FTC for $1.5 million for the unauthorized sharing of user health data with Facebook, Google, Criteo, and other advertising sites. GoodRx used the Meta Pixel and other Javascript trackers in software development kits (SDK) for sharing user data with third-party advertisers. They would then be capable of serving personalized health and medication-specific ads to GoodRx users. This differs from the earlier Meta Pixel incidents which involved hospitals using the tracker on their website appointment schedulers and patient portals which exposed personal health information (PHI) under HIPAA regulations. GoodRx is not a covered entity, thus does not fall under HIPAA violations of PHI.

For the first time, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) used the Health Breach Notification Rule, created in 2009, in charging GoodRx in a Federal court with misuse of consumer health information. The action was taken in US District Court for the Northern District of California, which has yet to approve the FTC order and the settlement.

GoodRx responded to the charges in their release that they stopped using pixel trackers in 2019 to protect user privacy. The trackers transmitted no PHI but primarily IP addresses and web page URL information. GoodRx maintains that this is a “novel application” of the Health Breach rule. But they settled with the FTC to avoid ‘the time and expense of protracted litigation’ on privacy issues they’ve already updated. HISTalk, The Markup, FierceHealthcare  TTA’s Meta Pixel articles

The good news for most of us is that the Public Health Emergency for Covid-19 will be ending 11 May. Not such good news, according to ATA and ATA Action, for mental health patients. While the omnibus budget passed at the end of the 117th Congress last year extended many telehealth provisions for two years [TTA 4 Jan], it did not extend the remote prescribing of controlled substances as part of the Ryan Haight Act. They are urging the Drug Enforcement Administration to release its rules for special registration for telemedicine as a first step. Release

With Teladoc’s $6.6 billion writeoff of the costs of acquiring Livongo in Q1 2022 [TTA 4 May 22], did Teladoc pick up an $18 Billion Bunch of Lemons in Livongo? Or did Teladoc mess up the expensive buy? You have to hand it to MedCityNews’ Arundhati Parmar for asking that burning question of Zane Burke, who was Livongo’s CEO at the time and the engineer of the sale, now CEO of Quantum Health. Not surprisingly, he said that “When we left the business, it was a freaking good business”, had just turned a big funding, was EBITDA positive, and wasn’t seeking a buyer. The massive difference was in the cultures, a ‘chasm’ that wasn’t bridged. One indicator: none of the top 16 Livongo executives stayed with Teladoc–and they were not required to as a condition of the sale. Teladoc considered it a ‘roll up’. 

This Editor was skeptical about it from the start–see TTA analyses 6 August and 11 August, as it happened in 2020. And while many smart observers were enthusiastic, others were not–the synergies (forgive me) they saw and the bottom line boosts were not there as predicted. In retrospect, which is always 20/20, it’s now proven to be a terrible buy. Teladoc has rebooted Livongo as of last month. More than the writeoff cost for Teladoc, it cost the industry, and affected lives.  It’s an important read in today’s situation.

Philips will be laying off 6,000 globally over the next two years, in addition to 4,000 booted this past October. Reasons why are the 2021 recall of Respironics ventilators, BiPAP machines, and CPAP machines because of the potential health risks of deteriorating polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam, supply-chain challenges, lower sales in China, and the fallout from the Russia-Ukraine war. Their new focus will be on R&D and fewer ‘more impactful’ projects. Dataquest India, Mobihealthnews

Amazon’s layoffs of 18,000–and huge 2022 loss–also affected their developing healthcare areas. The shutdown of Amazon Care affected 159 jobs. But surprisingly, growth areas that had just rolled out new programs also lost staff. Amazon Pharmacy, which just rolled out RxPass, a $5 per month medication prescription service, laid off some of its program managers, risk compliance managers, and billing managers. Employees working on Halo health and fitness trackers were also laid off.  Becker’s Hospital Review  Yet many health executives see Amazon as the #1 threat to health systems’ core business. In a survey by Health Tech Nerds (sic), these execs predicted that Amazon might buy Color, Walgreens, and Smile Digital Health–in addition to a health plan! At this point, their One Medical buy is under scrutiny by both the DOJ and FTC [TTA 15 Sept 22] and on 2 February they reported a $2.7 billion net loss for 2022, the first since 2014 (The Verge) so those predictions on aggressive healthcare moves might be very blue side up.  Becker’s Hospital Review

In Ireland, Prof. Martin Curley, who headed digital innovation for the Health Services Executive (HSE), resigned in an unusual fashion. On LinkedIn announcing his resignation effective immediately, he said he has “called off this particular ascent on Everest”. In the post, he expressed frustration with supply chain and funding blockages, but later interviewed by the Irish Times cited poor IT infrastructure creating patient adverse outcomes, even death–and that senior administrators blocked new technology solutions. He is now a visiting professor at the University of Bath and a professor of innovation at Maynooth University. Irish Times 16 Jan, 25 Jan

And former Health Secretary Matt Hancock cannot catch a break. First, he was suspended from the Conservative Party in November, having decided that traveling to Australia for several weeks to appear in a reality show was more important–while he was Conservative Whip and Commons was still sitting. Now as an independent representing West Suffolk, in December he announced he will not stand for re-election next year. The insult upon injury was being assaulted last month by a 61-year-old man on the London Underground, following Mr. Hancock through Westminster station and onto a train, and earlier by the same man on Parliament Street. The Lancashire man was arrested. Lately quite in the BBC News.

Pull the plug on Oracle Cerner in the VA! Two House Representatives urge return to VistA, send bill to Veterans’ Affairs committee

February 1, 2023 | by

Hold your hand up if this comes as a complete surprise. A Congressman who was the top Republican on a subcommittee overseeing technology at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has evidently had quite enough of the Oracle Cerner problems in implementing Cerner Millenium. Rep. Matt Rosendale of Montana has introduced H.R.608, titled “To terminate the Electronic Health Record Modernization Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs”. It would pull the plug on Oracle within 180 days, dissolve the VA Electronic Health Record Modernization Integration Office, and restore VistA/CPRS. In other words, back to the drawing board.

It was co-sponsored by Rep. Mike Bost of Illinois who is the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, where the bill was referred on 27 January. Rep. Rosendale is now the chair of the House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Technology Modernization. 

This follows on last week’s two-day slowdown of both the VA and MHS Genesis systems, last summer’s Congressional hearings with the roasting that Oracle Health’s head Mike Sicilia and VA heads received over the OIG report on the ‘unknown queue’ that created 149 adverse events, and October’s delay in further Oracle Cerner rollouts in the VA from January 2023 to June.

While the likelihood that the bill would pass both House and Senate, and be signed into law, is low, H.R. 608 is one very heavy and clever cudgel for getting Oracle–and the VA staff involved with the conversion–to Pay Attention! Fix The Problems! There’s also leverage far beyond the VA EHR. Oracle has multiple Federal contracts which could be jeopardized or defunded. Stay tuned to further developments in VA’s Tower of Trouble and Oracle’s Mound of (Acquired) Misery.  Hat tip to HISTalk for the heads up, actually obtaining a screenshot of part of the bill which has not yet been posted on Congress.gov.  FCW.

Using wearables to monitor biomarkers related to neuropsychiatric symptoms post-traumatic event

January 25, 2023 | by

Tracking biomarkers related to post-traumatic outcomes via a wrist-worn wearable. A January study published in JAMA Psychiatry (full text) monitored 2,021 participants who experienced traumatic stress exposure, mainly from car accidents but also physical assault, sexual assault, serious falls, and a mass casualty incident. 

The Advancing Understanding of Recovery After Trauma (AURORA) study examined adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric outcomes after traumatic stress exposure, especially among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. Qualifying patients used the (Alphabet) Verily Life Sciences’ Study Watch for a minimum of 21 hours a day over the eight-week tracking period, starting with screening and qualification in the emergency department (ED). 

  • Participants used smartphones to complete a rotating battery of questionnaires consisting of 10 common adverse post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae (APNS) symptom domains: pain, depressive symptoms, sleep discontinuity, nightmares, somatic symptoms, difficulty with concentration, thinking, or fatigue, avoidance of trauma reminders, trauma reexperiencing, anxiety, and hyperarousal.
  • Using the wearable’s accelerometer feature, it monitored eight significant biomarkers for pain, sleep, and anxiety. A reduction in 24-hour activity variance was associated with greater pain severity. Six others were associated with rest-activity measures indicative of changes in pain over time and one with repeated sleep-wake disruption indicative of changes in pain, sleep, and anxiety.

Depending on the data plus self-reporting on the questionnaires, the patient could be recovering or worsening post-event. The study concluded that “wrist-wearable device biomarkers may have utility as screening tools for pain, sleep, and anxiety symptom outcomes after trauma exposure in high-risk populations.” This Editor notes that over time, wearable monitoring was coupled with plentiful subjective information.

The group was selected from an initial 19,019 patient pool drawn from 27 emergency departments. 3,040 patients met the study criteria including being within 72 hours of the trauma, aged 18 to 65 years, and were able to speak and read English. They also provided informed consent and completed baseline assessments for a final completion group of 2,021. Most of the participants were female, half of the study were African American, 34% were white and 11% were Hispanic. Nearly 80% of the study did not have a college degree, while 64% earned $35,000 per year or less. The study was headed by a team at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  Also Mobihealthnews

CVS, Walgreens, Walmart….Dollar General health clinics?

January 24, 2023 | by

Can Dollar Tree and Family Dollar be far behind? A possible new entrant to the onsite clinic wars may be Dollar General in piloting DocGo clinic vans in three Tennessee stores. DG Wellbeing will be providing urgent, preventative, and chronic care at three locations, two days a week each, with two in Clarksville and one in Cumberland Furnace, from 10am to 8pm based on current FAQs. DocGo vans will be located adjacent to the stores, in the parking lot. Appointments and walk-ins, Medicaid, Medicare, TRICARE, some commercial insurances, and cash are accepted.

Certain lab tests plus blood work are done either onsite or sent out. Medical staff on the van can write prescriptions. Some referrals (e.g. imaging) are done while other referrals are not available.

As to their strategy, you have to hand it to Dollar General. They get some good press from this. They are starting small in working through the details, outsourcing the healthcare part, and seeing if there’s sufficient demand to 1) expand and if promising 2) model the customer demographics–what we marketers call customer personas. If it doesn’t work, no Theranos-sized holes in their budgets–it’ll be GoneGone to DocGo.

Dollar General started to make moves into health about two years ago by noting the scarcity of health products in rural and underserved areas. They started to add more healthcare products (what they know about) on their shelves as part of the initial phase of the DG Wellbeing initiative and appointed a chief medical officer, Dr. Albert Wu. Currently, Wellbeing is in 3,200 stores (of 18,000+) with up to of 400 items per store. This past July, DG created a healthcare advisory panel including Dr. Patrick Carroll, chief medical officer of Vida Health; Dr. Katy Lanz, chief strategy and product officer at Personal Care Medical Associates and former chief clinical officer at Aspire Health; Dr. Von Nguyen, clinical lead of public and population health at Google; and Dr. Yolanda Hill, a board-certified physician in pediatrics and adolescent medicine. On Dollar General’s third quarter earnings call last December, CEO Jeff Owen noted the expansion of stores and the test of the DocGo vans to expand their services into rural health. Watch out Walmart, CVS, and Walgreens! Healthcare Dive, Forbes, Mobihealthnews

Their healthcare provider, DocGo, last week announced a partnership with Redirect Health, a platform offering directed to enterprises that provides on-demand, urgent mobile care to businesses in New Jersey and New York. DocGo SPAC’d on Nasdaq in 2021 and, unlike other SPACs, hasn’t cracked. Other than one wobbly point last year, it’s generally held its share price within a dollar or two of its initial offering range, which in this past year has to be considered good news.

Interesting pickups from JPM on CVS, Talkspace, Veradigm backs Holmusk, ‘misunderstood’ Babylon Health; six takeaways

January 19, 2023 | by

Out of a decidedly soggy JPMorgan healthcare conference that concentrated mainly on pharma and biotech, there was some news in the downtrodden health tech and related areas. Selected from FierceHealthcare’s Heather Landi’s take:

CVS Health’s open checkbook for the right companies in primary care, provider enablement, and home health was a throwback to the palmy days of 2020-21. A big announcement at JPM was their investment in in-home kidney care and end-stage renal disease management provider Monogram Health. Their Series C raise of $375 million was lead-funded by CVS Health, Cigna Ventures, Humana, Memorial Hermann Health System, and SCAN.  Release, Mobihealthnews This added up to a busy January for CVS with leading Carbon Health‘s $100 million series D [TTA 11 Jan] and $25 million for Array Behavioral Care [TTA 12 Jan].

Talkspace, the cracked telemental health SPAC most recently rumored to be in buy talks with Amwell, touted their “defined, very significant path to profitability within a short period of time.” New CEO Jon Cohen, MD, a surgeon and veteran healthcare exec, touted the strength of the telemental health model, the effectiveness of their asynchronous messaging therapy for depression and anxiety,  and their market change from consumer to employers and health plans. Talkspace has some distance to go, quickly, with a loss through Q3 2022 of $61 million on revenues of $89 million and a share price today of $0.74, which means eventual delisting from Nasdaq. Is a quick buy in their future?

Veradigm, still settling in on their new corporate name, has its own bet on behavioral health data on the analytics side, with a lead investment in Holmusk‘s $45 million Series B. Holmusk will pull in de-identified patient data from Veradigm to their NeuroBlu Database.  Release

And on to Babylon Health, where Ali Parsa must feel like Eric Burdon of the 1960s blues group The Animals in the depth of being ‘misunderstood’. Dr. Parsa promises a path to breakeven by end of 2024.  Babylon’s revenue is on target to hit over $1 billion. They operate in over 15 countries with well over 5 million transactions. But their SPAC cracked too from a high of $272 per share after listing in October 2021 to today’s price just above $11, leaving a lot of investors in the lurch. Even though Q3 revenue increased by $288.9 million versus $74.5 million in 2021, an increase of $214.4 million or 3.9x, and the Q3 loss correspondingly widened to $89.9 million, the loss was significantly lower as a percentage of revenue. They are also converting from a foreign private issuer to a domestic, planning a reverse share split, and selling non-core businesses like the Meritage IPA [TTA 22 Nov 22] It’ll either be more correctly understood by Mr. Market or…be bought?

Arundhati Parmar in MedCityNews had a tart take on the proceedings, leading with the convergence of therapeutics with devices and data, Primary Care-Primary Care-Primary Care, billion-dollar bolt-on acquisitions that may be good for biopharma (but not necessarily so in health tech where integration is leading), and innovative therapies that don’t save but actually cost mo’ money. All of which is no surprise to our Readers. And why is there a JPM every year? Healthcare insanity may be catching.