Short takes: both Clover and Oscar in the black; Aetna prez booted after 11 months; Ava-VSee bedside robot; updates on Change, OneBlood ransomware, Masimo proxy fight

August 8, 2024 | by

Clover Health’s milestone–a first-ever profitable operating quarter. Not only that, but it was an impressive turnaround from the prior year. With results in their Q2 operating net income of $7.2 million, versus a $28.9 million loss in 2023, these results were far more favorable directionally than the adjusted EBITDA which was $36.2 million versus $9.9 million for the prior year. Insurance revenue was also up 11% to $349.9 million, attributed to member retention and an improved medical cost ratio (MCR) of 71.3%, down from 77.9% in the prior year. Additional revenue from other operations, such as the recently introduced Assistant AI, is minimal. The 2024 forecast stays ‘in the clover’ with raised forecast revenue of $1.35 to $1.375 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $50 million to $65 million. Also helpful is their lifted Star rating from 3 to 3.5 for 2025. FierceHealthcare, Clover earnings release

Rival Oscar Health also stayed Back in Black for the second quarter running–CEO Bertolini wouldn’t have it any other way (or else–see below right). Q2 net income rose to $56.2 million which was a a $71.7 million improvement versus prior year. Adjusted EBITDA also nicely improved to $104.1 million, a $68.6 million improvement. Revenue increased to $2.2 billion, a 46% increase over the prior year. Their MCR went down .9 points. The overall forecast for the year wasn’t provided. Membership was up over 600,000 in their main business of individual and small group insurance, with Bertolini pointing out that this was powered by plan growth in 80% of the states where they operate. Oscar exited Medicare Advantage at the end of 2023, and is shifting to marketing ICHRA, or individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements that permit small businesses to offer employees individual health plans subsidized by employer contributions. After this year, the 58,000 members left in the unprofitable Cigna co-branded small group program will exit [TTA 10 May]. Oscar release, FierceHealthcare

Back in Mr. Bertolini’s old stand, Aetna, results weren’t so cheerful–and their president walked the plank after less than one year. The reorganization announcement was made on the earnings call yesterday, effective immediately. CVS Health CEO Karen Lynch will oversee the daily operations of the health benefits segment along with Aetna’s CFO. CVS VP/chief strategy officer Katerina Guerraz will move over to become Aetna’s chief operating officer.

What initiated it: while health benefits’ revenue stayed in the black, going the wrong way were operating income decreasing 39.1%, the medical benefits ratio (MBR) soaring to 90% from 86% in prior year and the medical loss ratio (MLR) going up to 89.6% from 86.2%. These were attributed to increased utilization, the decline in Medicare Advantage Star ratings, Medicaid acuity, and a revised risk adjustment in the individual exchange business. Something in this immediately doomed now former president Brian Kane, who joined only last September. His last post was at Humana as chief financial officer and leader of their primary care business. CVS Health release, FierceHealthcare, Healthcare Finance

Marrying robots with telemedicine, VSee is partnering with Ava Robotics to create an autonomous robot for telepresence use in hospital intensive care units. This would enable remote emergency physicians to be present at the point of patient care, interact with patients, consult with onsite staff and make treatment decisions. The projected market is smaller regional hospitals and ICUs.  VSee already markets telemedicine carts and portable diagnostic and home care kits. Availability is not disclosed. VSee release, Mobihealthnews

VSee also announced a partnership with Wichita, Kansas community health provider Stand Together for its Aimee telehealth services. Telehealth at their centers will be available to participants for a monthly charge of $4.99 or a single virtual urgent care appointment for $9.99. VSee release

Ransomware strikes again. Non-profit blood donation organization OneBlood was hit on 29 July by a despicable ransomware attack that disabled much of its blood collection services for over 250 hospitals in the southeastern US. They continued to operate at reduced capacity and called for donors of O positive blood, O negative blood and platelet donations. The perpetrator, ransom demands, and breached information were not disclosed. On Monday 5 August, systems were partially restored in time for Tropical Storm Debby’s assault on many southeastern states. From a OneBlood spokesperson: “Our critical software systems have cleared reverification and are operating in a reduced capacity. As we begin to transition back to an automated production environment, manual labeling of blood products will continue. Additionally, we are beginning to return to using our electronic registration process for donors.” DataBreaches.net, FierceHealthcare, HealthcareITNews

Hard-hit Change Healthcare is still playing games with reporting to HHS’ Office of Civil Rights (OCR). Parent UnitedHealth Group reported the ransomware shutdown and data breach to OCR, a full five months after its occurrence. The number reported is the OCR minimum of 500, when it is well known that it affected millions of patients. UHG started direct patient notification on 31 July after weeks of delay, but stated to OCR that they are still determining the number of individuals affected. Provider notifications started in late June [TTA 21 June]. This followed after a hostile dispute earlier that month where UHG tried to push patient notifications onto providers, which HHS decided was 100% UHG’s responsibility. [TTA 5 June]. OCR FAQ update, HealthcareITNews

Masimo and activist shareholder Politan Capital continue to slug it out down to the 19 September shareholders meeting. Back in mid-July, Masimo postponed the meeting, originally scheduled for 25 July. At that time, Masimo filed a complaint in the US District Court for the Central District of California against the two Politan representatives on their board of directors plus Politan’s two nominees that proxy materials contained false statements and violations of the Exchange Act. The suit added that board member Quentin Koffey, also Politan’s chief investment officer, was secretly conspiring with a plaintiffs’ bar law firm currently in litigation with Masimo.

The latest revelation per Strata-gee 7 August: Politan’s countersuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery states that the charges filed by Masimo in the District Court are based on ‘unnamed sources received from a third-party opposition research firm…’ and Masimo’s outside counsel does not know the identity nor ever spoke to the sources. This was filed against CEO Joe Kiani, independent director Craig Reynolds, and director Bob Chapek as a breach of Delaware law.

To date, Masimo has not confirmed their sources to the Delaware court. 

As previously reported [TTA 17 July], the proxy fight was triggered by the value of the company, reduced substantially after Masimo’s snakebit 2022 acquisition of Sound United’s consumer audio brands, Politan’s move to control the company, and kick out the CEO Joe Kiani.  The fight on the Masimo board of directors for two open seats pits the Masimo slate of CEO Joe Kiani and outside candidate Christopher Chavez, against Politan’s Darlene Solomon and William Jellison. Politan already holds two seats and with a win of two additional seats will control the company. Masimo plans to sell the consumer audio and healthcare (baby monitoring) businesses to another unnamed investor, retaining their professional healthcare and pulse oximetry products.

Stay tuned to the next episode of this soap opera.

The clunk continues: Q2 2022 digital health funding fades to $4.1B in Q2, down 50% from 2021

July 13, 2022 | by

Digital health funding continues to take a plunge. Knocked about by the hangover from the pandemic, a grinding war between Russia and Ukraine, gasoline prices jacked up worldwide, and knock-on inflation and looming stagflation, funding continues to slide. The decline in Q2 digital health deals and funding to $4.1 billion more truly reflects the downturn than Q1’s relatively buoyant $6.1 billion, which benefited from the carryover of deals negotiated during 2021’s boom and closing then [TTA 6 April]. Year over year, it was half of 2021’s high of $8.3 billion.

  • 2022’s first half (H1) total of $10.3 billion was down 31% from 2021’s $15 billion. Despite this, it is 63% above the pandemic-stricken 2020’s H1 $6.3 billion. 
  • Average deal size has dropped to $31.2 million from 2021’s full-year $39.5 million and even 2020’s $30.6 million, accounting for inflation in the past two years. Looking at funding size by series year over year, Series A funding is flat but funding for Series B, C, and D+ have dropped substantially.
  • No startups went public but four digital health companies announced plans to go public or were reported to be planning public exits. One SPAC was announced in June to close in Q3, that of VSee and iDoc Telehealth with Digital Health Acquisition Corporation. SPACs, as this Editor has noted, have gone from Funding Hero to Zero under 2022’s economics, causing many SPACs to crack (Owlet, Talkspace) and increased scrutiny by the Feds [TTA 9 June]. SOC Telehealth, an early SPAC, went private after a 90% share price drop [TTA 8 Feb].
  • Average monthly M&A has dropped substantially. 2021’s monthly average of 23 has dropped to 20 in Q1 and 13 in Q2, for a H1 average of 16.
  • Most popular funding areas are mental health (a far ahead #1 at $1.3 billion), oncology, and cardiovascular. Diabetes dropped from #2 to #4, skewed last year by Teladoc’s acquisition of Livongo. Oncology rose to #2 from #6 in 2021. For mental health, given increased Federal scrutiny and legal problems of companies like Cerebral plus the expansion of Teladoc and Amwell into the area, this Editor does not expect telemental health companies to continue to attract this level of funding but may be attractive for M&A.
  • Disease monitoring (a/k/a RPM) as a value proposition moved from #8 to #3 in investment at $1.4 billion. R&D and on-demand healthcare remained in their #1 and #2 positions.

As TTA has noted previously, this was all to be expected. Will 2022 funding perk up like 2020’s did through Q3 and Q4, or fall off like in 2019 as money sits on the sidelines? Rock Health does try to put a rosier shine on the retrenchment in its roundup, as has venture capital–reality can be good for you. Another depressive factor is regulatory uncertainty in multiple areas and Federal involvement, which some companies can work to their advantage. The Rock Health summary discusses this at length. Also Mobihealthnews. 

Humana-Omada Health diabetes prevention program could cut $3 bn in Medicare expense: study

February 8, 2017 | by

A study performed by insurer Humana using the Omada Health program for diabetes prevention effectively lowered weight, improved cholesterol, blood glucose and mood. 500 volunteer subjects from Humana’s Medicare Advantage program, enrolled during 2015, lost an average of 13 to 14 pounds over a year (7.5 to 8 percent). They also saw improvements in cholesterol levels, blood glucose levels and subjective measures of moods and self-care. Individuals were chosen from administrative medical claims based on metabolic syndrome diagnosis or a combination of three of four of the following diagnoses: prediabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Based on the researchers’ calculations, this type of prevention program among this group if widely implemented among overweight adults could reduce Medicare costs by $3 bn over 10 years, not only for diabetes but also heart disease and high blood pressure.

Omada Health’s program included an online small group support, personalized health coaching, digital tracking tools, and a weekly behavior change curriculum. These one-hour lessons focused on a single topic were delivered via laptop, tablet, or smartphone, and included interactive games or exercises, written reflections, and goal-setting activities. The content was approved by the CDC Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program. Data was gathered via wireless scale, pedometer for physical activity, online food intake logging and standard lab results. “In conclusion, this study demonstrated that older adults who agreed to participate in this program were able to engage meaningfully and gain important health and wellness benefits during a relatively short time frame.”

While the cost reduction estimate is exactly that, other studies directionally confirm health improvement and savings: the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) which is the model for the Omada program, the BMJ/Noom Health study, and the Fruit Street/VSee telehealth program being used by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, University of South Florida and University of Michigan. mHealth Intelligence, study (full text in Journal of Aging and Health/Sage Journals)

ATA’s hottest trend: advancing to Healthcare 2.0 via personalized healthcare

May 12, 2015 | by

Guest columnist Dr Vikrum (Sunny) Malhotra attended ATA 2015 earlier this month. This is the third of three articles on his observations on trends and companies to watch.

For those who attended the American Telemedicine Association‘s meeting in Los Angeles, the overarching trend was how a personal healthcare system is taking shape. The three pillars include: care anywhere, care networking and care customization.

The ATA stage opened with a keynote speech by Dr Sanjay Gupta about celebrating new innovation and technology advancements. This is the year where healthcare models are being built around patients in the home to support patient autonomy.These three pillars of personalized healthcare are being made possible by disruptive technologies, wearables/implantables, social networks and analytic technologies to automate remote care. Wearables and biosensors allow patients to move anywhere without interfering with day to day schedules while allowing for optimized data collection.

Access to care anywhere has been a challenge and is becoming realized through providing cheaper wireless tools that takes it to far corners. Dr Gupta focused on the use of telemedicine for delivery of care and its utility for improving access. He endorsed it as a tool for providing care for those with limited healthcare accessibility and locally for more a mainstream solution to a larger healthcare problem. We have seen telemedicine become mainstream (more…)