Breaking: Teladoc’s Q2 sinks on $790M BetterHelp impairment; Wojcicki files to take 23andMe private

Teladoc posts Q2 loss of $838 million, takes $790 million impairment on BetterHelp’s sinking performance. New CEO Chuck Divita had nothing but bad news to deliver to Mr. Market (right below). It was so bad that they withdrew their FY2024 outlook for both consolidated operations and BetterHelp stated in April and all three-year outlooks. TTA Q1 Teladoc results and outlook  

• Q2 revenue declined 2% versus prior year to $642.4 million. Integrated Care (main business) segment revenue increased 5% to $377.4 million while BetterHelp declined 9% to $265 million. Readers will recall that previous CEO Jason Gorevic assured investors that BetterHelp would carry Teladoc to profitability. Au contraire, along with his job.
• The bright spot was that adjusted EBITDA increased to $89.5 million, up 24% versus prior year, but adjustments reflect all sorts of financial legerdemain, including impairments.
• First half results were essentially flat versus prior year, with revenue up 1% to $1,288 million with Integrated Care up 7% to $754.5 million–but BetterHelp again sinking results with a decrease of 7% to $534.0 million.

BetterHelp’s rolling failure is almost inexplicable, with telemental health being the ‘IT’ clinical category in digital health funding. Spring Health just scored a $100 million Series E [TTA 31 July]. Younger companies such as Talkiatry and Brightside Health seem to have no problem raising funds or gaining partners/customers. One would think that with established customers in the enterprise space, Teladoc would have no problem adding on telemental services. This Editor has previously analyzed the problems that have led to the decline of both Teladoc and Amwell, but Teladoc stands apart in one factor. It is still recovering in its huge failure in buying and failing to integrate Livongo. But in the telemental health space, the profitable companies are largely in the enterprise and payer space. Even DTC, they have slicker solutions and extensive networks. It’s a cost-sensitive market, both to benefit admins and to prospective members. 

Here’s the pivot. On the earnings call, CEO Divita and CFO (former acting CEO) Mala Murthy announced a pivot for BetterHelp to international, non-English-speaking markets, where customer acquisition costs are lower. (This Editor would add that competition is also less.) They also blamed advertising cost inflation and jacked-up acquisition costs during a US election year–something that is completely predictable and should be baked in the 2024 marketing expenses. Unbelievably, if advertising costs remain high, Murthy stated that they expect a low double-digit revenue decline, whatever that means.

The shocker here is that it finally dawned on them that the big problem with BetterHelp is that it does not accept insurance and has a high DTC cost. Their leavers in research cite both as reasons why. Hellooooo? What took so long?  So their fix is to negotiate insurance coverage–but that won’t take effect till 2025. 

From FierceHealthcare in an on-point close of their article: “Divita was adamant that Teladoc runs BetterHelp well and that it’s an important part of the company.”  Morningstar (Teladoc release)  How much more can Mr. Market stomach? This story is developing.

As we predicted, CEO/founder Anne Wojcicki has made an offer to take 23andMe private. She has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) amendments to their Schedule 13D form that confirm that on 29 July, she sent a non-binding proposal to the Special Committee that has been looking at alternatives since late March [TTA 20 April]. The Exploding Plastic Inevitable offer of $0.40 per share is to shareholders of Class A and B common stock. It became public yesterday (31 July). The current price is around $0.40, so there is no premium. 23andMe is also on a six-month delisting deadline with Nasdaq from November, which they have since passed but may have been extended due to the Special Committee formation.

Wojcicki holds supervoting privileges that have always given her effective control of the company. According to analyst TD Cowen, she currently holds 22.5% of the company’s outstanding Class A common stock and 59.2% of outstanding Class B common stock. In going private, she would be right in line to be paid out by outside funders (Other People’s Money). Other alternatives to her buyout, such as Chapter 11 or 7 bankruptcies, are even more bleak and would leave shareholders with effectively 0.

As TTA noted in our April coverage, the company is yet another cracked SPAC (2021) hitting a $4.8 billion valuation, acquiring companies, and falling precipitously. It never found a recurring revenue model, being largely ‘one and done’ on ancestry and genetic reports. Recently, it lost a lucrative contract with GSK for research data. It stumbled badly after a major data breach in Fall 2023 that exposed 6.9 million records. Then, they blamed members for their poor cyberhygiene and lack of security. This once bright light has burnt out; is it even relevant anymore other than giving the CEO a job? Yahoo Finance, CNBC, MedCityNews  Developing. Our recent 23andMe coverage: 29 May (FY24 earnings and the committee’s poor choices), 2 Feb (data breach timeline, financials)