Short takes: CVS’ $1.12M Q2 net income loss, forecast spurs 5,000 layoffs; Signify’s in-home kidney exams; Indonesia’s Halodoc $100M D; FeelBetter raises $5.9M; Medicare breach hits 612,000 beneficiaries

A mixed picture for CVS Health. Their Q2 reporting was almost schizophrenic, depending on whose reporting you read. Healthcare Finance highlighted their $1.12M net income loss–tiny when compared to the size of the company– but apparently one of the factors driving a layoff of 5,000 corporate, non-customer facing staff. From FierceHealthcare, CVS is still quite profitable at $1.9 billion, but that is down 36%. Revenue of $88.9 billion was up 10% from prior year. The results beat Wall Street analyst estimates of $2.12/share with adjusted earnings of $2.21/share. 

Despite the overall good picture of Q2, financial projections trended down for the full year. CVS in Q2 started a restructuring plan which cost $496 million in pre-tax income, expected to be completed by year’s end. 2023 is projected to have increased Medicare Advantage costs, higher drug utilization, and lower consumer spending expectations affecting retail operations. Added to their acquisition binge of Signify Health and Oak Street Health, which together totaled $18.6 billion, their 2024 earnings per share projections for 2024 fell from $9 to a range of $8.50 to $8.70. Timing was not disclosed for the 5,000-person reduction among corporate staff. It is not known whether this will affect Aetna and CVS Caremark (pharmacy benefit). CVS has 300,000 employees (75% full time) including part and full-time retail workers. They are also reducing corporate travel, plus the use of consultants and vendors. (CVS is known to have extremely low contractor rates already.) The restructuring is projected to save $700 to $800 million next year, but cold comfort to the 5,000 who won’t be there.  FierceHealthcare. We’ll see.

One of those CVS purchases, Signify Health, is moving forward with an in-home option for evaluating kidney function as part of in-home exams of Medicare Advantage members. This evaluation will include urinalysis and estimated glomerular filtration rate testing which are relatively simple and cost-effective to administer in-home. It fits within their in-home exam protocols and will support early detection and diagnosis of kidney disease plus management of those with chronic kidney disease for earlier and better treatment. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) costs $37.3 billion to Medicare. FierceHealthcare

Going far, far East to Indonesia, virtual health provider Halodoc scored $100 million in a Series D funding round. Lead investor was Astra International with Openspace and Novo Holdings. This brings their total funding to $245 million. Halodoc provides online and app-based health services for 20 million active platform users claimed. Services include telehealth, medicine ordering, lab test, and doctor appointment booking. They also manage third-party health insurance purchase and at-home health testing. Their network includes more than 20,000 medical practitioners, 3,300 hospitals, and 4,900 pharmacies. On the website, there are a wide variety of services, including wellness. Unfortunately, to read it, you’ll have to know Indonesian (Malay)–and there are some pictures of intriguing recipes there! Mobihealthnews

Contrasting this to an exceedingly modest raise by a new Boston/Tel Aviv medication management company, FeelBetter. Their $5.9 million unlettered raise was led by Firstime Ventures and Shoni Health Ventures, with participation from Random Forest VC, The Group Ventures, and previous investor Triventures for a total of $8 million. FeelBetter uses AI tools to create what they call Pharmaco-Clinical Intelligence to identify patients at risk and deliver insights on gaps in care to personalize medication management to change the risks of polypharmacy. Release, Mobihealthnews  They also issued a study on how FeelBetter could be used to effectively risk stratify emergency department use and hospitalizations among patients 65+ with multiple chronic conditions and complex medication regimens to avoid the 10-30% of hospitalizations that include medication issues. Release

No week seems to pass by without a data breach of some sort, but it’s unusual when Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are attached to it. A contractor to the Medicare program, Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Maximus), used a vendor, Progress Software, and their MOVEit Transfer software, which is a popular file transfer software for transmitting sensitive data. There was a vulnerability in this software that has previously been exploited by Russian ransomwareistes CLOP with Johns Hopkins currently being sued for their breach [TTA 19 July]. Maximus detected the unusual activity, an outside entity copying files, from 27 to 31 May. CMS is reporting that about 612,000 Medicare beneficiaries may have been affected by the breach which may have exposed personally identifiable information (PII) and/or protected health information (PHI). CMS and Maximus are notifying the beneficiaries this week and offering 24 months of free credit monitoring service. CMS release, Federal News Network, Progress page,  Deep Instinct backgrounder on MOVEit’s zero-day vulnerability

House appropriates $1.9B for Oracle Cerner VA EHR modernization, $5.2B for telehealth, plus other technologies; Oracle lays off more Cerner staff

House appropriations for the VA in FY 2024 were passed last week, including requirements for the VA/Oracle Cerner EHR Modernization program. The House allocated $1.9 billion in total for VA’s Oracle Cerner EHRM program. According to the report in FedScoop, the topline amount is broken down as follows: $1.2 billion for the Oracle Cerner-operated contract, $424 million for infrastructure readiness, and $253 million for program management. 

The budget is part of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill 2024 (full bill). The bill goes to the Senate after the summer recess. See pages 53 and 54 for the EHRM.

Key points:

  • This appropriation is the sole source of funding for the EHR modernization program. “No authority is provided for funds from other VA accounts to be transferred into this account nor for funds from this account to be transferred out to other accounts.”
  • Reaffirms “quarterly reporting of obligations, expenditures, and deployment schedule by facility and the Office of Deputy Secretary to administer the initiative”
  • There is also a 25% contingency upon the VA Secretary to report any outstanding issues impacting the stability and usability of the system, certifying and detailing any changes to the deployment timeline, certifying the status of outstanding issues, and whether
    the system is ready and optimized for further deployment at VA sites. 
  • ” The Government Accountability Office is directed to continue quarterly performance reviews of EHRM deployment and to report to the Committees each quarter.”

Reports will start within 30 days of the enactment of the appropriations bill looking back on “each new requirement and customized interface added in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, including the cost of each, reasons for inclusion, and whether they were outside of the scope of the contract within 30 days of enactment of this Act.” At 45 days, the bill requires a briefing on how the Department plans to set enterprise standards. The bill also confirms that no new deployments are scheduled for FY2024 and the 25% of funds set aside for FY2023 in deployment will not be released. Also EHR Intelligence

The bill also allocates $5.2 billion for telehealth and connected care (page 42). This covers services in home telehealth, home telehealth prosthetics, and clinic-based telehealth. The bill encourages expanding telehealth capacity to address backlogs for disability exams and healthcare appointments when appropriate. Our top story on 9 June was the award of Home Telehealth monitoring contracts to incumbent Medtronic and newcomers Cognosante, Valor Healthcare, and DrKumo.

Included in other budget lines are healthcare technologies (pages 33-34) such as bioelectronic medicine/AI, early detection diagostics, focused ultrasound therapy, medical image exchange, migraine prevention and treatment, and respiratory illness diagnostics using 4-dimensional images of lung function. 

Meanwhile, Oracle is laying off more Cerner employees. Your Editor is basing this on a Reddit 1 August thread that has no totals but indicates that employees were told yesterday (1 August), given two weeks notice to 15 August, and that the layoffs hit areas such as revenue cycle, 10% of CernerWorks, and properties. CernerWorks hosts, manages, and monitors client systems by providing data center hosting services for Cerner EHRs and other SaaS. Whether any of this affects the VA is to be determined, but their Federal service area had 500 to a rumored 1,200 layoffs in June. This was not much of a surprise with the near-completion of the DOD Military Health System EHR implementation and the holdup save one of the VA’s implementations (except the joint VA-MHS Lovell facility in Chicago). Our Readers have heard this here first.

Done (and split) deal! Informa to “manage” HIMSS Global Health Conference & Exhibition (updated)

Gimlet EyeIt’s now a “landmark partnership”. From a non-announcement announcement by Informa in its H1 financials to today (seven days), we have gone from Informa’s “exclusivity to acquire the HIMSS Global Health Exhibition/Conference” to a “partnership” as follows:  Informa will manage the HIMSS Exhibition, while HIMSS will oversee the content and programming. This will expand the combined conference and exhibition. (Informa taking over conference logistics aren’t specified, but assumed from later on in the release.)

No transaction costs are disclosed. The word ‘acquire’ is not used once.

It may be the best possible deal for both. The press release (on Yahoo Finance) and identically in the news section on HIMSS.org content is masterful in saying very little in a lot of words. Here’s this Editor’s view of the deal:

  • It avoids the biggest problem–without HIMSS content, the conference would lack a strong reason why to go and spend money on participation and exhibiting. (This Editor guessed right on that.) Minus HIMSS, it would be easy for exhibitors and participants to walk away from it or say ‘maybe next year’. A lot of what has driven HIMSS is FOMO.
  • It would lose 50+ years of Society legitimacy, continuity, and goodwill as an unaffiliated conference
  • This gives HIMSS, as a society, an annual conference as part of member value (Guessed right on this too)
  • Informa would be hard-pressed to organize the conference content by year’s end, as there’s basically less than eight months to March
  • It absolves the HIMSS organization of being responsible for venue negotiations, expo design, logistics, travel arrangements, and all the messy expenses such as Freeman. Their vulnerability showed in the last-minute cancellation in 2020. It’s now in professional hands. 
  • It may generate some needed cash for HIMSS in this FY (not disclosed) 

HIMSS24 will be taking place in March in Orlando as originally planned, managed by Informa’s South Florida Ventures unit. Informa promises “improved digital features, enhanced registration processes, marketing tools, and cutting-edge product discover applications”. One would also hope improved travel arrangements.

There is no information in the release about Informa involvement in the 18-21 September APAC conference (too soon?) nor mention of any future international conferences, though Informa is certainly capable of staging and managing them.

Open issue–HIMSS Media is not mentioned in the release. Media tie-ins and merchandising are a substantial source of revenue for that division. But the lack of mention is not a ‘no’ and if HIMSS is generating the conference content, it’s likely that HIMSS Media will do the merchandising.

Surprisingly, the press ‘break’ is not yet up on HIMSS Media (Healthcare IT News, Mobihealthnews, Healthcare Finance News). Update–an 18 minute video hosted by editor Mike Miliard is up on Healthcare IT News 3 August.

  • The name will not be changed.
  • HIMSS has been considering bringing in an outside organization to manage the conference for some time and had been speaking with Informa over the past year.
  • Mr. Wolf of HIMSS stated that their conference organizing people will be moving over to Informa.
  • Mr. McAvoy of Informa touted the tools that HIMSS will now be able to access–enhanced tools that Informa has developed and amortized over multiple conferences.
  • More to come

A new day for HIMSS in a competitive conference market. Except the link to the conference page at the end of the release, https://www.himss.org/global-conference.–does not open the conference page but goes to a ‘page not found’. Oops! Hint: it’s misconfigured to include the period in the URL.

Previous coverage: More thoughts 2 August, Informa to acquire 27 June    Follow up 8 Aug, answers to questions:

 

More thoughts on the pending sale of the HIMSS Global Conference

In the absence of a real announcement, speculation has been everywhere on the not-yet-done deal between HIMSS and Informa. As reported last week [TTA 27 July], HIMSS will be selling the annual Global Conference to Informa PLC, the largest B2B trade show operator on the Planet Earth. There has been no communication as of this writing from HIMSS to members or chapters, nor any announcements in HIMSS Media. The only corporate confirmation came through Informa PLC’s H1 financial report.

From LinkedIn, Tom Foley, who is the head of GenieMD telehealth and also hosts a podcast called The Virtual Shift via HealthcareNOWRadio and Answers Media Network (headed by Roberta Mullin and Carol Flagg, with whom this Editor worked some years back) had two posts on the pending ‘exclusivity to acquire’. In the later post, he addresses the fact that HIMSS has already been booked by most exhibitors as HIMSS, not as a ‘third-party conference’, and asks for market responses. The earlier post is about the ‘announcement’ and is largely the same as his comment on TTA’s original article. Other than these and spinoff posts from other commenters, Other than we Happy Few, LinkedIn posts have been on the QT and very hush-hush on the subject. Interesting as so many on LinkedIn are HIMSS, HLTH, ViVE and other health conference exhibitors and attendees.

Which leads this Editor to turn to the pointed, yeasty HIStalk where their Editors have dug around HIMSS and turned up some interesting things. This Editor encourages Readers to go to the source articles linked below for their analysis. I will add some points and commentary to each, especially on the Form 990s:

  • Monday Morning Update 7/31/23 speculates on HIMSS’ financials reported in their Form 990 as a 501 (c)(6) non-profit. Their last FY filing is for fiscal 2020. Since HIStalk does not, here is the link to that Form 990 2020 in Candid, a public database on non-profits (the former Guidestar and Foundation Center). On the organization page, click on the Form 990 tab for the first 2020 dropdown, which is for their FY starting 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020. In 2020, HIMSS had total revenue of $28.7 million, a severe drop from 2019 where revenue was over $111.9 million (line 12). Their expenses were over $82.6 million for an operating loss of over $53.9 million. This represents the effects of the cancellation of the 2020 conference, which in 2019 ‘conferences and meetings’ reported $42.8 million in revenue and in 2020 only $1.9 million. Using this information and from Informa’s track record, HIStalk does some calculations on projected sales prices.
  • This Editor also examined the second 2020 dropdown, which is a six-month first-half report from 1 July to 31 December 2020. Revenues rose to $65.1 million with expenses of $42.6 million for an operating profit of $17.9 million. Conference revenue was a tiny $8.7 million but higher than the full year. HIMSS under a joint Health 2.0 banner had a Middle East-based virtual conference in November and HIMSS Media promoted some ‘HIMSS20’ content as digital sessions.
  • News 8/2/23 has reader comments on a HIMSS initiative for vendors called Accelerate, which has apparently been inactive for some time, executive salaries, and speculation on why the delay on the Form 990s.

What remains problematic is HIMSS’ future involvement, if any, in a conference that has been branded as HIMSS for over 50 years and has already been sold into as HIMSS’. How will Informa handle that? Invite HIMSS to sponsor it? Then again, what will be HIMSS’ future as a member-based society without a conference and with a subsidiary, HIMSS Media, that makes money off sponsorships both pre and post and content during the conference? It seems that both buyer and seller would benefit from a shared relationship.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Amazon Clinic announces 50-state rollout 1 August. Were the privacy issues fixed?

At least the disclaimers are new and improved. Amazon today, on its news page, announced that Amazon Clinic was being rolled out to all 50 US states from the previous 33. You will be paying in cash (no insurance accepted) for services, which now include live 24/7 telehealth (via two ‘white-labels’, Wheel and SteadyMD) in addition to asynchronous (messaging) telehealth, for treatment of about 30 common mild and chronic conditions such as rosacea, gout, eczema, UTIs, and the ever-popular erectile dysfunction and hair loss. Access is provided through the Clinic website or the Amazon app. Providers set fees on a one-time and ongoing basis. Prescriptions can be filled individually or through Amazon Pharmacy. The service is not available to those below 18 or above 64, which is a mystery as those 65+ are perfectly capable of paying in cash and suffer from the same maladies. (Age discrimination, anyone?)

As to the reported delay from 27 June on the service expansion [TTA 27 June], an Amazon spokesperson denied that privacy concerns expressed by two US senators (Warren and Welch) and in the Washington Post had any effect and in fact, denied that there was any delay.  FierceHealthcare.

It is unknown whether Amazon replied to the senators’ letter that cited where consumer information went, that it may be redisclosed, and denial of service (inability to complete registration) if a user during registration did not agree to waive HIPAA and give Amazon access to the patient’s personal information file.

Looking at the news, website and privacy disclosures, there are multiple disclaimers wherever one looks that seem to address these concerns.  On the news release, there is a link labeled Read more about how privacy is built into Amazon Clinic’s core. Excerpts below (main points in red):

We do not sell customer information.

Amazon doesn’t sell customers’ personal information. Amazon Clinic also doesn’t use a customer’s personal health information to market or advertise other products in the Amazon.com store.

We ask for HIPAA authorization to make things easier for customers.
One of the complaints we hear a lot about traditional health care is how many times customers are asked to fill out forms over and over again. To solve this problem, Amazon Clinic asks customers for permission (through the HIPAA authorization) to allow us to save their information and patient records if their health care provider leaves Amazon Clinic. This supports continuity of care and makes it easier for customers to work with different provider groups, because they won’t have to fill out the same form multiple times or lose access to their visit history. Customers have the option to accept or decline the HIPAA authorization before getting treatment—customers who decline can still receive care from Amazon Clinic.

Privacy disclosure on the Amazon Clinic site is the same in consumer-oriented language and with a revocation notice:

What we do (and don’t do) with your information
We use your information to make your healthcare experience easier. We send it to your healthcare providers and pharmacies when you’re being treated, and we save it so you won’t have to fill out the same forms over and over again—even if your healthcare provider were to leave Amazon Clinic. We’ll never sell your information to anyone and we don’t use your personal health information to market or advertise other products available on Amazon.com.
We respect your preferences
If you don’t want us to save your health information, you can still get care through Amazon Clinic. However, you should know that if the healthcare provider(s) you’ve used leave Amazon, we’ll be required by law to delete your health information and you’ll have to re-enter it if you visit us again.
You can change your mind
If you give us permission to save your health information, then change your mind, that’s OK. To revoke your HIPAA Authorization, just email your request to clinic.privacy@amazon.clinic. Make sure to include your name, date of birth, address, and phone number, or download the HIPAA revocation form, fill it out, and send it as an attachment to your email.

Unless this is not operating reality, Amazon may have come to its senses and installed proper guardrails on this service. Amazon is making a massive bet on healthcare by building Clinic, Amazon Pharmacy, and paying $3.9 billion for One Medical which is currently unprofitable. They are betting that to their captive audience, basic healthcare can be delivered like merchandise and that more complex primary care can be folded into the Amazon continuum. In Amazon Clinic, it’s betting that it can one-up established players like Ro and Hims as well as Teladoc and Amwell.

A hard look at Amazon reveals that the strategy compensates for losses in other areas, such as their basic businesses with layoffs of 27,000, including Amazon Pharmacy and the Washington Post, and shuttering Amazon Care last year. Technology hasn’t been much of a winner, with Halo terminated yesterday and with privacy concerns (again) around Alexa, Kindle, and Ring security cameras. AWS is no longer the cash cow mooing in the meadow that subsidizes various ventures, with growth down by half and plenty of competition [TTA 16 June]. Amazon has few friends in DC, not even at the Washington Post. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have held up their $1.7 billion buy of iRobot for one year as of this month, and are still scrutinizing One Medical.

If the guardrails are made of Silly Putty and there are consumer complaints, Senator Warren, who has a long history of sparring with Amazon, will be issuing more letters. She will huddle with FTC and DOJ, where there’s a dartboard with Amazon’s name on it. Note to Amazon: Senator Warren is up for reelection in 2024, and she needs a high-profile issue.