More VA-Oracle Cerner fallout? Deputy secretary, EHR executive director depart agency

March 3, 2023 | by

EHR Trouble falls with a thud on two senior VA leaders. The Department of Veterans Affairs announced yesterday (1 March) that Deputy Secretary Donald Remy will be stepping down from his post. He will be replaced on an interim basis by VA Assistant Secretary for Enterprise Integration Guy Kiyokawa. This follows the resignation effective 25 February of Terry Adirim, MD, EHR modernization (EHRM) program executive director. Her duties will be taken over, also on an interim basis, by Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Information and Technology (OIT), Dr. Neil Evans. The Deputy Secretary position requires nomination by the President and Senate confirmation. The EHRM position is an internal fill.

Both Deputy Secretary Remy and director Adirim were named to their posts in mid-to-late 2021, Dr. Adirim from Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs. Remy specifically oversaw the EHRM among other duties while Dr. Adirim led the implementation of the Oracle Cerner Millenium EHR that started with an analysis of the failures of the initial tests and the formation of an EHR Integration Council [TTA 3 Dec 21]. But from this ‘go forth and fail no more’, the rethought rollout was fraught with failures, including the 2022  ‘unknown queue’ that created 149 adverse events, a two-day slowdown in both the VA and MHS EHRs in late January 2023, and delayed rollouts to June this year. Perhaps the topper was the chair of the House Veterans Affairs Committee and the chair of the House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Technology Modernization co-sponsoring a bill to cancel the Oracle Cerner EHR and return to VistA [TTA 1 Feb]. At the end of February, Ann Arbor Healthcare Center pointed out that VA’s research centers were having specific problems with the EHR cutover that had not been addressed and were cause for further delay, possibly to end of year. Will this change lead to progress with Oracle–or more delay? FedScoop 1 March, 10 Feb. Hat tip to HISTalk 3 March

More gimlety views on CVS-Oak Street Health, Amazon-One Medical acquisitions

March 2, 2023 | by

Perhaps this Editor is not that much of an Outlier in thinking that these deals don’t beat, say, sliced bread. Oak Street Health (OSH) disclosed its financials in an SEC 10-K filed on Tuesday. One must wonder what CVS is seeing in the company other than bulking up its primary care profile. Their loss grew to $510 million from 2021’s $415 million. While OSH grew impressively in 2022 with a 51% increase in revenue to $2.2 billion, driven by 40 new centers ending with a total of 169 facilities in 21 states, expenses grew exponentially for the new patients: medical claims expenses grew 48%, cost of care went up 49%, and sales and marketing up 38%. Scalable, so they claim; profitable, not till 2025 at earliest.

Other problems were revealed in the 10-K. OSH has substantial business from other payers, which may not be pleased that CVS owns a small payer called Aetna, though has pledged to keep OSH payer-neutral. OSH leases or licenses most of its care centers from Humana. That payer also accounted for 32% of its 2022 capitated revenue. Centene’s plans and HealthSpring made up an additional 23%. Other, more routine concerns are regulatory review, attrition of physicians and clinician staff, and last but not least, breakup fees ($500 million if CVS walks away, $300 million if it’s OSH). When you add these to other factors as outlined in our earlier article, such as the Medicare Advantage and high-need populations, CVS is cutting off a hefty slice of loaf, especially considering that the more complex Signify Health buy is due to close this quarter. Earlier opinions on the buy [TTA 16 Feb], Healthcare Dive

Now to Amazon and One Medical. This Editor received her invitation to buy a One Medical membership earlier this week (left). Countering this Editor’s analysis from last week, which maintains that Amazon is already under a broad antitrust microscope viewed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), Healthcare Dive counters, quite logically and in the view of their experts, that if either agency was going to object, they would have done so before the closing, and the grounds were likely too novel. The article concedes that the FTC could take action further down the road, for instance if Amazon violates HIPAA or consumer privacy with ad trackers. Instead, the focus is on objections by consumer groups, Amazon leveraging health data, privacy violations, and a general consumer unease around Amazon dealing with their health issues.

  • Consumer protection group Public Citizen urged regulators to block the deal in a letter to regulatory groups after it was announced last summer. For instance, it could bundle One Medical and Prime membership (a no-brainer). By tying the two together, Amazon could gain consent for using patient data from health records. Amazon could also serve ads for products related to medical conditions without that access (that old Pixel/ad tracker business again). These concerns are publicly shared by two FTC commissioners.
  • “Analysts said that data acquisition was likely a big driving factor for the deal. After linking One Medical’s data with that from its other products and services, Amazon can analyze petabytes of healthcare data in the cloud and use the findings to better manage the health of One Medical’s Medicare population, build new products and pinpoint people with rare diseases to solicit participation in clinical trials, according to (market research firm) Forrester’s (Natalie) Schibell.” [Editor] That would, of course, require patient consent. 
  • Forrester noted that the consumer unease around Amazon in healthcare is substantial. 34% of surveyed adults weren’t at all comfortable with Amazon for healthcare needs with an additional 17% only somewhat more comfortable (tier 2). Trust levels are low, and it would take only one or two incidents, such as a security breach or HIPAA violations, to destroy it. This Editor would add that if One Medical practices were not managed impeccably, that would go viral among individual and corporate members, in a way that Amazon Care did not.

Mid-week roundup: another hurdle for Oracle Cerner VA delay, Walmart builds out clinic infrastructure, Cerebral round 3 layoff of 15%, Evolent Health’s 9% layoff, Quil Health age-in-place tech shuts

March 1, 2023 | by

Oracle Cerner EHR rollout faces yet another hurdle. The Department of  Veterans Affairs (VA) announced that the next go-live, Ann Arbor (Michigan) Healthcare System, originally scheduled for completion by July 2023, would be delayed until much later this year or even early 2024.  It turns out that a key reason for the delay is that Ann Arbor is a VA research center, and there are major concerns that the EHR changeover won’t blend well with their medical research. VA Under Secretary for Health Dr. Shereef Elnahal told FedScoop during a media roundtable that “…there are many VA medical centers that are heavy with clinical research because of their academic affiliations, and so those centers will need this research functionality. It’s not just an issue with the Ann Arbor Hospital.” In the article, Dr. Elnahal also lamented that the VA health system running on two separate EHRs, VistA and Oracle Cerner, presented additional risks to security. Also FedHealthIT   Hat tip to HISTalk 24 Feb

Walmart’s 32 clinics are building out their infrastructure. Working with their Epic EHR, all the clinics are now operating on the Horizon Cloud on Azure platform paired with VMware cloud infrastructure and digital workspace technology services. A blog published by VMware interviewing BreAnne Buehl, director of life sciences solutions for VMware, and David Rhew, MD, global chief medical officer at Microsoft, details the ambitions of Walmart to move beyond ‘minute clinic’ to broader primary care and chronic disease management, into proactive predictive analytics. Becker’s Hospital Review, VMWare

And on the less cheerful side:

  • Beleaguered telemental health/ADHD provider/prescriber Cerebral announced another 15% layoff, cutting 285 people. It is its third layoff in one year, following a 20% cut last October.  Cerebral is also closing its medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program for opioid use disorder (OUD). A Cerebral spokesperson said the decisions were made to reorganize the company to “refocus on the most important service offerings for our patients.” Another reason for the MAT program closing is the pending renewal of requiring in-person visits for certain mental health medications. For instance, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is proposing that buprenorphine can be prescribed via telehealth for treating OUD for 30 days but then an in-person exam would be required.  Last year, Cerebral faced still-unresolved DOJ and FTC actions on their telehealth prescribing of ADHD and other controlled Schedule 2 medications, from deceptive advertising (FTC) to overprescribing (DOJ) [TTA 18 Nov 22]. Topping this off are dueling lawsuits with former CEO Kyle Robertson [TTA 30 Nov 22]. Cerebral at the end of 2021 was valued at $4.8 billion by Softbank and other investors, but no one wants to talk about its worth today.  Reuters, Layoffs Tracker, Behavioral Health Business
  • Payer/provider management services organization Evolent Health quietly laid off 460 positions in its Chicago operations, about 9% of their 5,100 person staff, starting in December 2022 into last month.  Their Q4 net loss doubled to $11.25 million on $382 million in revenue, doubling 2021’s $5.65 million loss, though full year 2022 closed with a final loss of $19 million, about half of 2021. The company projects Q1 revenue of $420 million to $440 million, with 2023 revenue of $1.92 billion to $1.96 billion with a shift of emphasis to specialty care, bolstered by its closed acquisition in January of Magellan Specialty Health from Centene. Layoffs Tracker, Washington Business Journal
  • Quil Health shut down operations, with employees departing 10 February and executives 24 February. The Philadelphia-based Comcast-Independence Blue Cross joint venture was founded in 2018 to support older adults and caregivers in ‘aging-in-place’ alert and monitoring technology. The sole report in HISTalk states that the website is offline plus their CEO Carina Edwards updated her LinkedIn profile for Quil with a February 2023 end date and changed the company description to past tense, pushing up her board positions. Their Facebook page is still live but no posts after 16 January after announcing their joining the AARP AgeTechCollaborative. In 2019, this Editor wrote that they were developing pre- and post-care support through TV (!) with Comcast working on an ambient sensor-based device to monitor basic vital signs and fall detection, which launched in 2020 as Quil Assure. To this Editor, it sounded like a home version of QuietCare circa 2009 with multiple sensors and diagnostics.