Is the future of home-based telecare robotic? It’s a question we keep asking as more and more ingenious approaches to robots appear. Here is a ‘telepresence’ robot that is low-cost owing to using a notebook computer for its ‘brain’. Oculus telepresence robot incorporates user’s existing netbook. GizMag.
Des robots multiservices pour les seniors (France)
Video: French TV report on an exhibition featuring a number of robots with a focus on older people at home, with a cameo appearance from Kompaï. Des robots multiservices pour les seniors. After the adverts.
Telecare Soapbox: TSA2011 losing touch and losing relevance?
This Soapbox is published anonymously for someone who wished to express some observations and feedback for the conference organisers and the TSA membership without compromising his company. Please note Telecare Aware’s Anonymity Policy (Soapbox Section right sidebar).
Given the economic climate, TSA will undoubtedly report excellent results for its 2011 conference. And with so many corporate sponsors, it will certainly have been a great financial success. But careful analysis of the attendees listed reveals a concerning trend (more…)
United Tele Health
http://www.unitedtelehealth.com/ United Tele Health
Pousaché
http://www.pousache.com/ Pousaché are UK-based consultants supporting the electronic health and medical device technology sector.
Telecare Soapbox: Complicity between UK telehealth commissioners and providers
If ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’ telehealth commissioners and providers have a responsibility to make sure that in matters of medical devices all regulations – many of them legal requirements – are being adhered to. Failure to do so on one side or the other implies a willingness to be complicit in their breaking and it unfairly tilts the market against those companies that abide by the rules.
This Soapbox item is timely given that there is due to be a big push for telehealth in the UK on the back of the WSD programme results. It is written by an experienced professional in the telehealth field who, because of his or her position cannot reveal his or her identity. It will also become obvious to readers why he or she cannot name the ‘guilty parties’. However, there are questions at the end which service commissioners should now use to identify whether they are dealing with a company that is breaking the regulations.
There is now no excuse for either the companies involved not to correct the situation or for commissioners to continue to put their investment of public money at risk.
Steve Hards, Editor
Readers who prefer to read this long item as a PDF can download it here.
While the world holds its breath waiting for the imminent final revelation of the Department of Health’s Whole System Demonstrators (WSD) results, the global mass of telecare and telehealth manufacturers, distributors, resellers and newcomers are revving up their trucks full of boxes and briefing their marketing departments – all believing that a ‘tsunami of sales’ are just around the corner!
Storm brewing… (more…)
Most Recent Comments