This editor was involved in the development of two events at the Academy of Medical Sciences that took place at the end of 2014, the reports of which have just been publicised.
The first, on medical apps, brought together a wide range of stakeholders to:
- Explore the current and proposed regulatory frameworks for health apps;
- Hear case studies of the development of health apps and of the regulation and oversight of software development in other medical, nuclear and automotive sectors;
- Discuss the current and future challenges faced in the oversight of health apps and devise solutions to these issues.
Particular issues raised during the day included: (more…)
As a distraction from the things that, before the advent of handheld technology, little boys used to do in the school playground when this editor was young, once in a while we would engage in the pointless debate of what would happen if an irresistible force met an immovable object.
Those debates came to mind when Graham De’Ath kindly drew this editor’s attention to the recently published Labour Ten Year Plan for Health & Care. Now Telehealth & TelecareAware knows better than to indulge in politics, however the document was notable in that it did not make any significant reference either to the demographic reality of the next ten years, or the likely role of ‘technology’ in assisting with the resultant increase in care required (the word is mentioned just once, in the commitment to: “Set up a wide–ranging review of NICE which will look at reforming the NICE technology appraisal process…” [actually already underway by the NIB]). The Labour Party is far from being alone in this – readers with long memories will recall our amusement as the RCGP’s ten year forecast of the changes in GP practice where the biggest role technology was expected to play in 2022 was in remote delivery of test results.
The reality, TTA believes, will be very different: (more…)